Body Mass Index Does Not Predict Injury Pattern or Outcome After Motorcycle Crash.

INTRODUCTION: The obesity epidemic plagues the United States, affecting approximately 42% of the population. The relationship of obesity with injury severity and outcomes has been poorly studied among motorcycle collisions (MCC). This study aimed to compare injury severity, mortality, injury regions, and hospital and intensive care unit length of stay (LOS) between obese and normal-weight MCC patients. METHODS: Trauma registries from three Pennsylvania Level 1 trauma centers were queried for adult MCC patients (January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020). Obesity was defined as adult patients with body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 and normal weight was defined as body mass index < 30 kg/m2 but > 18.5 kg/m2. Demographics and injury characteristics including injury severity score (ISS), abbreviated injury score, mortality, transfusions and LOS were compared. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred sixty-four patients met the inclusion criteria: 40% obese (n = 463) and 60% nonobese (n = 701). Comparison of ISS demonstrated no statistically significant difference between obese and normal-weight patients with median ISS (interquartile range) 9 (5-14) versus 9 (5-14), respectively (P = 0.29). Obese patients were older with median age 45 (32-55) y versus 38 (26-54) y, respectively (P < 0.01). Comorbidities were equally distributed among both groups except for the incidence of hypertension (30 versus 13.8%, P < 0.01) and diabetes (11 versus 4.4%, P < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in Trauma Injury Severity Score or abbreviated injury score. Hospital LOS, intensive care unit LOS, and 30-day mortality among both groups were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Obese patients experiencing MCC had no differences in distribution of injury, mortality, or injury severity, mortality, injury regions, and hospital compared to normal-weight adults. Our study differs from current data that obese motorcycle drivers may have different injury characteristics and increased LOS.

Geriatric Motorcycle-Related Outcomes: A Pennsylvania Multicenter Study.

INTRODUCTION: Geriatric patients (GeP) often experience increased morbidity and mortality following traumatic insult and as a result, require more specialized care due to lower physiologic reserve and underlying medical comorbidities. Motorcycle injuries (MCCI) occur across all age groups; however, no large-scale studies evaluating outcomes of GeP exist for this particular subset of patients. Data thus far are limited to elderly participation in recreational activities such as water and alpine skiing, snowboarding, equestrian, snowmobiles, bicycles, and all-terrain vehicles. We hypothesized that GeP with MCCI will have a higher rate of mortality when compared with their younger counterparts despite increased helmet usage. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective review of MCCI patients at three Pennsylvania level I trauma centers from January 2016 to December 2020. Data were extracted from each institution's electronic medical records and trauma registry. GeP were defined as patients aged more than or equal to 65 y. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included ventilator days; hospital, intensive care unit, and intermediate unit length of stays; complications; and helmet use. 3:1 nongeriatric patients (NGeP) to GeP propensity score matching (PSM) was based on sex, abbreviated injury scale (AIS), and injury severity score (ISS). P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: One thousand five hundred thirty eight patients were included (GeP: 7% [n = 113]; NGP: 93% [n = 1425]). Prior to PSM, GeP had higher median Charlson Comorbidity Index (GeP: 3.0 versus NGeP: 0.0; P ≤ 0.001) and greater helmet usage (GeP: 73.5% versus NGeP: 54.6%; P = 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between age cohorts in terms of ISS (GeP: 10.0 versus NGeP: 6.0, P = 0.43). There was no significant difference for any AIS body region. Mortality rates were similar between groups (GeP: 1.7% versus NGeP: 2.6%; P = 0.99). After PSM matching for sex, AIS, and ISS, GeP had significantly more comorbidities than NGeP (P ≤ 0.05). There was no difference in trauma bay interventions or complications between cohorts. Mortality rates were similar (GeP: 1.8% versus NGeP: 3.2%; P = 0.417). Differences in ventilator days as well as intensive care unit length of stay, intermediate unit length of stay, and hospital length of stay were negligible. Helmet usage between groups were similar (GeP: 64.5% versus NGeP: 66.8%; P = 0.649). CONCLUSIONS: After matching for sex, ISS, and AIS, age more than 65 y was not associated with increased mortality following MCCI. There was also no significant difference in helmet use between groups. Further studies are needed to investigate the effects of other potential risk factors in the aging patient, such as frailty and anticoagulation use, before any recommendations regarding management of motorcycle-related injuries in GeP can be made.

A Statewide Analysis of Pediatric Liver Injuries Treated at Adult Versus Pediatric Trauma Centers.

INTRODUCTION: Hemodynamically normal pediatric trauma patients with solid organ injury receive nonoperative management. Prior research supports that pediatric patients have higher rates of nonoperative management at pediatric trauma centers (PTCs). We sought to evaluate differences in outcomes of pediatric trauma patients with liver injuries. We hypothesized that the type of trauma center (PTC versus adult trauma center [ATC]) would not be associated with any difference in mortality. METHODS: The Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study database was retrospectively queried from 2003 to 2018 for all patients (<15 y) with liver injuries by International Classification of Disease 9 and 10 codes. Patients were categorized based on admission to the PTC or ATC. The primary endpoint was mortality with secondary endpoints being operative intervention and length of stay. Multivariate logistic regressions assessed the adjusted impact on mortality and surgical intervention. RESULTS: Of the 1600 patients with liver trauma, 607 met inclusion criteria. A total of 78.4% were treated at PTCs. Patients underwent hepatobiliary surgery more frequently at ATCs (11.5% [n = 15] versus 2.74% [n = 13], P < 0.001). Adjusted analysis showed lower odds of surgical intervention for hepatobiliary injuries at PTCs (adjusted odds ratio: 0.17, P = 0.001). There was a decrease in mortality at PTCs versus ATCs (adjusted odds ratio: 0.38, P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Our statewide analysis showed that pediatric trauma patients with liver injuries treated at ATCs were associated with having higher odds of mortality and higher incidence of operative management for hepatobiliary injuries than those treated at PTCs. In addition, between centers, patients had similar functional status at discharge.