Burr hole washout versus craniotomy for chronic subdural hematoma: patient outcome and cost analysis.

Chronic subdural hematomas (CSDH), which are frequently encountered in neurosurgical practice, are, in the majority of cases, ideally treated with surgical drainage. Despite this common practice, there is still controversy surrounding the best surgical procedure. With lack of clear evidence of a superior technique, surgeons are free to base the decision on other factors that are not related to patient care. A retrospective chart review of 119 patients requiring surgical drainage of CSDH was conducted at a large tertiary care center over a three-year period. Of the cases reviewed, 58 patients underwent craniotomy, while 61 patients underwent burr hole washout. The study focused on re-operation rates, mortality, and morbidity, as measured by Glasgow coma scores (GCS), discharge Rankin disability scores, and discharge disposition. Secondary endpoints included length of stay and cost of procedure. Burr hole washout was superior to craniotomy with respect to patient outcome, length of stay and recurrence rates. In both study groups, patients required additional surgical procedures (6.6% of burr hole patients and 24.1% of craniotomy patients) (P = 0.0156). Of the patients treated with craniotomy, 51.7% were discharged home, whereas 65.6% of the burr hole patients were discharged home. Patients who underwent burr hole washout spent a mean of 78.8 minutes in the operating suite while the patients undergoing craniotomy spent 129.4 minutes (P < 0.001). The difference in mean cost per patient, based solely on operating time, was $2,828 (P < 0.001). This does not include the further cost due to additional procedures and hospital stay. The mean length of stay after surgical intervention was 3 days longer for the craniotomy group (P = 0.0465). Based on this retrospective study, burr hole washout is superior for both patients' clinical and financial outcome; however, prospective long-term multicenter clinical studies are required to verify these findings.

Experience with 161 cases of anterior exposure of the thoracic and lumbar spine in an acute care surgery model: impact of exposure level and underlying pathology on morbidity.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of anterior exposure of the thoracic and lumbar spine by an acute care surgery service. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spine surgeons typically require an "approach surgeon" to provide anterior exposure of the thoracic and lumbar spine. We hypothesized that a dedicated acute care surgery service can perform those operations with acceptable morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A retrospective review of 161 trauma and nontrauma patients was performed. All cases were performed at a level I trauma center with a dedicated acute care surgery service. In-hospital morbidity and mortality were evaluated. A brief description of the operative techniques used by our group is also provided. RESULTS: Of the 161 patients, 59 (37%) were trauma patients. Ninety-three patients (58%) had anterolateral retroperitoneal exposure of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Sixty-eight patients (42%) had anterior retroperitoneal midline exposure of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. Total morbidity was 9.3% (7.4% for trauma patients and 1.8% for non trauma patients). Morbidity was highest in patients who had anterolateral exposure of the thoracic and lumbar spine (6.8%). Morbidity in patients who had midline exposure of L4 to S1 was 0%. Total mortality was 1.2% (3.3% for trauma patients and 0% for nontrauma patients). The acute care surgery service gained 3141 physician work relative value units (RVU) by performing those operations. CONCLUSION: Anterior exposure of the thoracic and lumbar spine both for trauma and nontrauma related indications can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality by a dedicated acute care surgery service. Morbidity and mortality were higher in trauma patients and in those who underwent thoracolumbar procedures. Patients who had midline exposure of L4 to S1 for degenerative disc disease had the lowest morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Single-drug sedation with fentanyl for prehospital postintubation sedation in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: A fentanyl-only (FO) regimen for prehospital postintubation sedation in trauma patients was compared with the standard protocol (SP) of fentanyl + benzodiazepine. METHODS: Intubated patients transported to a Level I trauma center from December 1, 2005, to April 30, 2009, were retrospectively reviewed. Before 2007, only SP was used; afterward both regimens were used. Groups were compared for hemodynamic and neurologic parameters in the prehospital setting and trauma bay, fluid volumes, time until general or neurosurgical intervention (NSI), and other outcomes. RESULTS: Groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, mechanism, alcohol level, intensive care unit length of stay, and hospital length of stay. Comorbidities were similar except hypertension (p = 0.019), and stroke (p = 0.029) were more frequent in FO patients. Prehospital heart rate and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) were similar. Trauma bay hemodynamic parameters and fluid resuscitation volumes were comparable, but pupil nonreactivity was more frequent in the FO group both overall (p = 0.032) and when comparing only patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI; p = 0.014). The incidence of TBI was comparable. Although the frequency of craniotomy (13% FO vs. 7% SP) and mortality (17% FO vs. 11% SP) were not statistically different overall, in patients with TBI, there was a higher incidence of NSI (28% vs. 14%, p = 0.015), craniotomy (14% vs. 3%, p = 0.02), and time to initial NSI (446 minutes vs. 193 minutes, p = 0.042) in the FO patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, an FO regimen was associated with similar hemodynamic but worse neurologic variables compared with the SP regimen. Prospective evaluation is warranted before adoption of this regimen, especially in TBI patients.

Age: is it all in the head? Factors influencing mortality in elderly patients with head injuries.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients, an increasing segment of the population, who sustain traumatic brain injury (TBI) are known to have worse outcomes, including higher mortality. This objective of this study was to examine the Crash Injury Research Engineering Network and to determine at what age motor vehicle crash fatalities from head injuries increased. METHODS: The Crash Injury Research Engineering Network database was queried from 1996 to 2009. Study inclusion criteria were adult vehicle occupants with TBI, with an Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥2. The age at which mortality increased was calculated. Patients younger and older than this cutoff age were compared to determine differences in crash characteristics. The determined cutoff age was compared with one found in a larger, population-based database. RESULTS: There were 915 patients who met the study criteria. An increase in mortality was seen at age 60 years despite no difference in Injury Severity Score and a decrease in crash severity. Patients ≤60 years were more likely to have alcohol involved, to be in a rollover crash, and had higher crash speeds. Comparing the element of the crash attributed to the head injury, the patients >60 years were more likely to have struck the airbag, door, and seat. An analysis of the larger database revealed an increase in mortality at age 70 years. CONCLUSIONS: There was a higher mortality secondary to head injuries in those older than 60 years involved in motor vehicle crashes. Improved safety measures in vehicle design may decrease the number of head injuries seen in the older population.