RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to compare the incidence of postoperative complications among minimally invasive surgery (MIS) tubular, endoscopic, and robot-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) techniques. METHODS: We studied consecutive patients who underwent single-level or multilevel TLIF between 2020 and 2022. Preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (Visual Analog Scale leg score and Oswestry Disability Index), demographic, and intraoperative variables were recorded. One-way analysis of variance with Bartlett's equal-variance and Pearson chi-squared tests were used. RESULTS: The study included 170 TLIF patients: 107 (63%) tubular, 42 (25%) endoscopic, and 21 (12%) robot assisted. All 3 TLIF techniques had similar complication rates: tubular 6 (5.6%), endoscopic 2 (4.8%), and robot assisted 1 (4.8%) all occurring within the first 2 weeks. Tubular TLIF reported the lowest incidence of new-onset neurologic symptoms, primarily radiculitis or numbness/tingling, at 2 weeks postoperatively (P < 0.05) with 21 (20%) tubular, 17 (41%) endoscopic, and 9 (43%) robot-assisted patients. There were 2 revisions in the robot-assisted group, while tubular and endoscopic each had one within 1 year. There was no statistical difference in preoperative or postoperative patient-reported outcomes between the TLIF groups. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated that tubular, endoscopic, and robot-assisted TLIF procedures had similar complication rates. The tubular MIS TLIF reported fewer new neurologic symptoms compared with endoscopic and robot-assisted TLIF procedures at 2 weeks postoperative, with all groups declining in symptom persistency at later time intervals. Average Visual Analog Scale scores continuously improved up to 1 year postoperatively among all groups.
RESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the utility of routine in-hospital postoperative radiographs for identifying hardware failure following surgical treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar (TL) injuries. BACKGROUND: Postoperative radiographs following spine surgery are considered standard of care despite a lack of evidence supporting their utility. Previous studies have concluded that postoperative radiographs following lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions have limited clinical value. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent surgical treatment of traumatic TL injuries between December 2006 and October 2015 at a level I trauma center. Before discharge, postoperative upright anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were obtained and reviewed by 1 surgeon and 1 radiologist as per protocol. Patients who subsequently underwent revision surgery during their initial hospital stay were identified. These patients were further analyzed to identify the indications for surgery and determine if the results of the radiographs obtained led to the subsequent revision surgery. RESULTS: A total of 463 patients were identified who underwent surgical treatment following TL trauma. The rate of revision surgery during the initial hospitalization was 1.3% (6/463). Three patients underwent revision surgery due to worsening neurological status. One patient underwent reoperation because of advance imaging obtained for abdominal trauma. Two patients underwent revision surgery due to abnormal findings on postoperative radiographs. The overall sensitivity and specificity of routine postoperative radiographs was 33.3% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of new clinical signs and symptoms, obtaining routine in-hospital postoperative radiographs following surgical treatment of TL injuries provides minimal value. Clinical assessment should help determine if additional imaging is indicated for the patient. Avoiding unnecessary inpatient tests such as routine postoperative radiograph may offer multitude of benefits including lowering patient radiation exposure, reducing health care costs and better allocation of hospital resources. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.