RESUMO
Background: Previous studies have shown a potential beneficial effect of endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO). It was unclear that whether atrial fibrillation (AF) can affect the clinical outcomes for BAO patients treated with EVT. Objectives: To investigate the association between AF and clinical outcomes, and whether AF can modify the efficacy and safety of EVT in patients with BAO. Design: We conducted a multicenter, nationwide, retrospective analysis to investigate how the presence of AF affects treatment allocation for BAO patients. Methods: The endovascular treatment for acute basilar artery occlusion (ATTENTION) registry was a multicenter, prospective study in China that included acute BAO patients who underwent EVT or received best medical management (BMM) between 2017 and 2021. The outcomes include the distribution of 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS) score, functional independence (defined as mRS 0-3), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and mortality. Results: 2134 patients were included in the study, of which 619 had AF and 1515 did not have AF. The median age was 65 (interquartile range [IQR]: 56-73) years, and 689 (32.3%) patients were female. Multivariate regression analysis indicated no significant association existed between AF and the distribution of mRS (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.05 [95% CI: 0.88, 1.25]; p = 0.564) at 90 days. Similarly, AF was not found to have a significant association with and other measured outcomes, or with the effects of EVT in AF subgroups for at 90 days as measured by ordinal mRS (p for heterogeneity = 0.247). Finally, no significant differences were found for symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and mortality within 90 days between the EVT and BMM groups across AF subgroups. Conclusions: Our results illustrated that the effect of EVT did not differ statistically in acute ischemic stroke patients with and without AF. Moreover, no significant association between AF and functional or safety outcomes could be detected at 90 days.
RESUMO
Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the major causes of mortality and disability worldwide, and ischemic stroke (IS) is a serious complication after AMI. In particular, patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are more susceptible to IS. However, the interrelationship between the two disease mechanisms is not clear. Using bioinformatics tools, we investigated genes commonly expressed in patients with STEMI and IS to explore the relationship between these diseases, with the aim of uncovering the underlying biomarkers and therapeutic targets for STEMI-associated IS. Methods: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to STEMI and IS were identified through bioinformatics analysis of the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets GSE60993 and GSE16561, respectively. Thereafter, we assessed protein-protein interaction networks, gene ontology term annotations, and pathway enrichment for DEGs using various prediction and network analysis methods. The predicted miRNAs targeting the co-expressed STEMI- and IS-related DEGs were also evaluated. Results: We identified 210 and 29 DEGs in GSE60993 and GSE16561, respectively. CD8A, TLR2, TLR4, S100A12, and TREM1 were associated with STEMI, while the hubgenes, IL7R, CCR7, FCGR3B, CD79A, and ITK were implicated in IS. In addition, binding of the transcripts of the co-expressed DEGs MMP9, ARG1, CA4, CRISPLD2, S100A12, and GZMK to their corresponding predicted miRNAs, especially miR-654-5p, may be associated with STEMI-related IS. Conclusions: STEMI and IS are related and MMP9, ARG1, CA4, CRISPLD2, S100A12, and GZMK genes may be underlying biomarkers involved in STEMI-related IS.
RESUMO
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is more advantageous than conventional ultrasound in the diagnosis of carotid web (CaW) and to compare the clinical characteristics of patients in different age groups. Methods: Seventeen patients admitted to the hospital from October 2019 to December 2021 were included in our study. Patients were initially diagnosed with CaW using digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and conventional ultrasound and CEUS were completed. Baseline patient data were analyzed and compared between the <60 years old CaW group and the ≥60 years old CaW group to explore the differences between the two groups. Then, comparing the accuracy of conventional ultrasound and CEUS. Results: A total of 17 CaW patients participated in this study, including 4 female patients (23.5%) and 13 male patients (76.5%), with an average age of 59.41 (±10.86) years. There were 9 patients (52.9%) with left CaW and 8 patients (47.1%) with right CaW. Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) occurred in 14 patients (82.4%). Thrombosis occurred in five of 17 patients (29.4%). There was a significant statistical difference about the thrombosis between the <60 years old CaW group and the ≥60 years old CaW group [<60 years group: 0 (0%), ≥60 years group: 5 (62.5%), P = 0.005]. Seven patients (41.2%) received medical management, nine patients (52.9%) had carotid artery stenting (CAS), and one patient (5.9%) had carotid endarterectomy (CEA). None of the patients had recurrent stroke during the follow-up period. The diagnostic rate of CaW and thrombus by CEUS was higher than that by conventional ultrasound, and there was a significant statistical difference in the diagnosis of thrombus between CEUS and conventional ultrasound (χ2 = 4.286, P = 0.038). Conclusions: CEUS may have a higher diagnostic accuracy for CaW with thrombosis, and it has a higher clinical application prospect.