Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0263677, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35143580

RESUMO

Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) is a highly invasive noctuid pest first reported in northern Australia during early 2020. To document current status of resistance in S. frugiperda in Australia, insecticide toxicity was tested in field populations collected during the first year of establishment, between March 2020 and March 2021. Dose-response was measured by larval bioassay in 11 populations of S. frugiperda and a susceptible laboratory strain of Helicoverpa armigera. Emamectin benzoate was the most efficacious insecticide (LC50 0.023µg/ml) followed by chlorantraniliprole (LC50 0.055µg/ml), spinetoram (LC50 0.098µg/ml), spinosad (LC50 0.526µg/ml), and methoxyfenozide (1.413µg/ml). Indoxacarb was the least toxic selective insecticide on S. frugiperda (LC50 3.789µg/ml). Emamectin benzoate, chlorantraniliprole and methoxyfenozide were 2- to 7-fold less toxic on S. frugiperda compared with H. armigera while spinosyns were equally toxic on both species. Indoxacarb was 28-fold less toxic on S. frugiperda compared with H. armigera. There was decreased sensitivity to Group 1 insecticides and synthetic pyrethroids in S. frugiperda compared with H. armigera: toxicity was reduced up to 11-fold for methomyl, 56 to 199-fold for cyhalothrin, and 44 to 132-fold for alpha cypermethrin. Synergism bioassays with metabolic inhibitors suggest involvement of mixed function oxidase in pyrethroid resistance. Recommended diagnostic doses for emamectin benzoate, chlorantraniliprole, spinetoram, spinosad, methoxyfenozide and indoxacarb are 0.19, 1.0, 0.75, 6, 12 and 48µg/µl, respectively.


Assuntos
Resistência a Inseticidas , Inseticidas/toxicidade , Oxigenases de Função Mista/metabolismo , Spodoptera/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Animais , Austrália , Combinação de Medicamentos , Regulação Enzimológica da Expressão Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Hidrazinas/toxicidade , Proteínas de Insetos/metabolismo , Ivermectina/análogos & derivados , Ivermectina/toxicidade , Hormônios Juvenis/toxicidade , Larva/efeitos dos fármacos , Larva/enzimologia , Larva/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Dose Letal Mediana , Macrolídeos/toxicidade , Oxazinas/toxicidade , Vigilância da População , Spodoptera/efeitos dos fármacos , Spodoptera/enzimologia , ortoaminobenzoatos/toxicidade
2.
J Insect Physiol ; 98: 199-204, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28109904

RESUMO

Immune function is often involved in physiological trade-offs because of the energetic costs of maintaining constitutive immunity and mounting responses to infection. However, immune function is a collection of discrete immunity factors and animals should allocate towards factors that combat the parasite threat with the highest fitness cost. For example, animals on dispersal fronts of expanding population may be released from density-dependent diseases. The costs of immunity, however, and life history trade-offs in general, are often context dependent. Trade-offs are often most apparent under conditions of unusually limited resources or when animals are particularly stressed, because the stress response can shift priorities. In this study we tested how humoral and cellular immune factors vary between phenotypes of a wing dimorphic cricket and how physiological stress influences these immune factors. We measured constitutive lysozyme activity, a humoral immune factor, and encapsulation response, a cellular immune factor. We also stressed the crickets with a sham predator in a full factorial design. We found that immune strategy could be explained by the selective pressures encountered by each morph and that stress decreased encapsulation, but not lysozyme activity. These results suggest a possible trade-off between humoral and cellular immunity. Given limited resources and the expense of immune factors, parasite pressures could play a key factor in maintaining insect polyphenism via disruptive selection.


Assuntos
Gryllidae/imunologia , Imunidade Celular , Imunidade Humoral , Micrococcus/fisiologia , Asas de Animais/anatomia & histologia , Animais , Feminino , Gryllidae/anatomia & histologia , Gryllidae/enzimologia , Gryllidae/microbiologia , Muramidase/metabolismo , Fenótipo , Estresse Fisiológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA