Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37356474

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Prior studies have examined the association between timing of cardiac surgery after coronary angiography with risk of acute kidney injury, but this remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between interval from coronary angiography to urgent coronary artery bypass grafting with acute kidney injury, and to examine this possible effect in patients with preexisting kidney disease. METHODS: Patients from a single institution undergoing urgent, isolated coronary artery bypass grafting within 7 days of coronary angiography were included. Patients were subdivided by chronic kidney disease stage and angiography-to-surgery interval. Locally estimated scatterplot smoothing was used to evaluate the functional relationship of the probability of acute kidney injury and time interval. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated for each time interval group compared against the Day 0 to 1 interval group, controlling for multiple covariates. Analyses were repeated for each chronic kidney disease subgroup. RESULTS: A total of 2249 patients were included in this study. There were 271 (12.0%) patients with postoperative acute kidney injury. Plots demonstrated a decreasing risk of kidney injury from Day 0 to 1 to Day 3 following coronary angiography. Adjusted odds ratios also showed a significant decrease in risk of kidney injury on Day 3 compared with Day 0 to 1. Analyses repeated for each chronic kidney disease stage showed similar trends. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing urgent coronary artery bypass grafting, there is a decreased risk of kidney injury in those having surgery on day 3 after coronary angiography compared with those having surgery on Day 0 to 1, regardless of preexisting kidney disease.

2.
Am Surg ; 89(9): 3702-3709, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37133202

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: There is a perception, with mixed literary support, that patients are transferred from community hospitals to tertiary medical centers for non-clinical reasons (ie, payor, race, and admission time). Over-triage risks unequally burdening the tertiary medical centers within a trauma system. This study aims to identify potential non-clinical factors associated with the transfer of injured patients. METHODS: Using the 2018 North Carolina State Inpatient Database, patients with a primary diagnosis of spine, rib or extremity fractures, or TBI were identified using ICD-10-CM code and admission type of "Urgent," "Emergency," or "Trauma." Patients were divided into cohorts of "retained" (at community hospital) or "transferred" (Level-1 or 2 trauma centers). RESULTS: 11,095 patients met inclusion criteria; 2432 (21.9%) patients made up the transfer cohort. The mean ISS for all retained patients was 2.2 (±.9) and 2.9 (±1.4) for all transferred patients. The transfer cohort was younger (mean age 66 v 75.8), underinsured, and more likely to be admitted after 1700 (P < .001). Similar differences were seen regardless of injury pattern. CONCLUSIONS: Patients transferred to trauma centers were more likely to be underinsured and be admitted outside of normal business hours. These transferred patients had longer lengths of stay and higher mortality rates. Across all cohorts, similar ISS suggests that a portion of the transfers could be managed at a community hospital. After hours transfers suggest a need for more robust community hospital coverage. Intentional triage of the injured patient encourages appropriate utilization of resources and is crucial to maintaining high-functioning trauma centers and systems.


Assuntos
Centros de Traumatologia , Ferimentos e Lesões , Humanos , Idoso , Transferência de Pacientes , Triagem , Bases de Dados Factuais , Hospitalização , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento
3.
Am Surg ; 89(8): 3372-3374, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36867429

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Platelet mapping thromboelastography (TEG-PM) to evaluate trauma induced coagulopathy has become more prevalent. The objective of this study was to evaluate associations between TEG-PM and outcomes in trauma patients, including patients with TBI. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Database. Chart review was conducted to obtain specific TEG-PM parameters. Patients were excluded if they were on anti-platelets, anticoagulation, or received blood products prior to arrival. TEG-PM values and their associations with outcomes were evaluated using generalized linear model and Cox cause-specific hazards model. Outcomes included in-hospital death, hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS). Relative risk (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are provided. RESULTS: A total of 1066 patients were included, with 151 (14%) diagnosed with isolated TBI. ADP inhibition was associated with significant increase rate of hospital LOS and ICU LOS (RR per % increase = 1.002 and RR = 1.006 per % increase, respectively) while increased MA(AA) and MA(ADP) were significantly associated with decrease rate of hospital LOS and ICU LOS (RR = .993 per mm increase and RR = .989 per mm increase, respectively, and RR = .986 per mm increase and RR = .989 per mm increase). R (per minute increase) and LY30 (per % increase) were associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality (HR = 1.567 and HR = 1.057, respectively). No TEG-PM values significantly correlated with ISS. CONCLUSION: Specific TEG-PM abnormalities are associated with worse outcomes in trauma patients, including TBI patients. These results require further investigation to understand associations between traumatic injury and coagulopathy.


Assuntos
Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea , Tromboelastografia , Humanos , Tromboelastografia/métodos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/etiologia , Coagulação Sanguínea , Plaquetas , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Cancer Causes Control ; 33(9): 1125-1133, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35864368

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Although significant racial and ethnic disparities exist in colorectal and lung cancer treatment and survival, racial differences in patient-reported experience of care are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in patient-reported ratings of colorectal and non-small-cell lung cancer care by race/ethnicity. METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries with AJCC stage I-IV colorectal and non-small-cell lung cancer (2003-2013) who completed a Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers (CAHPS) survey within 5 years of cancer diagnosis were identified in the linked SEER-CAHPS dataset. Scores were compared by race/ethnicity, defined as White, Black, or any other race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Of the 2,621 identified patients, 161 (6.1%) were Black, 2,279 (87.0%) White, and 181 (6.9%) any other race/ethnicity. Compared to White patients, Black patients were younger, had lower educational level, and had higher census tract poverty indicator (p < 0.001). Black patients rated their ability to get care quickly significantly lower than White patients (63.5 (SE 3.38) vs. 71.4 (SE 2.12), p < 0.01), as did patients of any other race/ethnicity (LS mean 66.2 (SE 2.89), p = 0.02). Patients of any other race/ethnicity reported their ability to get needed care significantly lower than White patients (LS mean 81.9 (SE 2.46) vs. 86.7 (SE 1.75), p = 0.02); however, there was no difference in ability to get needed care between Black and White patients. CONCLUSION: Patient ratings for getting care quickly were lower in non-White patients, indicating racial disparities in perceived timeliness of care.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Colorretais , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Idoso , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Etnicidade , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Medicare , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
Am Surg ; 88(7): 1471-1474, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35324338

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Delay to definitive treatment is a significant and persistent challenge to trauma systems across the United States, especially in rural communities with limited resources. We hypothesized that elderly trauma patients with delay in transfer would have increased morbidity and mortality. This study evaluates the relationship between inter-facility transfer time and outcomes in elderly trauma patients, and the validity of the 4-hour dwell time as a performance improvement benchmark. METHODS: The National Trauma Registry and Emergency Medical Services Database were queried from January 2010 to January 2018. Inclusion criteria included age ≥65, blunt mechanism, and transfer from another facility. Correlation analysis was used to evaluate the association between clinical and demographic variables and transfer time. Multicollinearity was evaluated using the variance inflation factor. RESULTS: 1535 patients were identified. This cohort was further subdivided into 4 cohorts based on dwell time: 0-1.5 hours (n = 384), ≥1.5-1.9 hours (n = 379), 1.9-<2.5 hours (n = 383), and ≥2.5 hours (n = 388). Analysis revealed that shorter dwell time was associated with male gender (P = .0039), higher ISS (injury severity score) (P < .0001), lower RTS (revised trauma score) (P < .0001), higher pre-hospital arrest (P = .0066), lower initial GCS (Glasgow Coma Scale) (P = .0012), higher mortality, longer ICU, and ventilator length of stay (P < .0001). Longer dwell times were associated with discharge from the hospital to home or skilled nursing facility as well as lower mortality (P < .0001). DISCUSSION: Longer dwell time was inversely related to outcome. More severely injured patients were rapidly transferred. This represents a mature rural trauma system. In addition, dwell time should be scrutinized as a meaningful indicator within a performance improvement program.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Ferimentos e Lesões , Idoso , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Traumatologia , Estados Unidos , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia
6.
Am Surg ; 88(7): 1442-1445, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35272534

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and treatment is a mainstay of severe TBI management but the relationship between intracranial opening pressure (OP) and outcomes has not been well established. The purpose of our study was to assess the relationship between OP and outcomes in severe TBI patients, with a focus on in-hospital mortality. METHODS: Adult blunt TBI patients with ICP monitoring between 2007 and 2017 were evaluated using sequential multivariable binary logistic modeling. Generalized additive model (GAM) was used to evaluate the relationship between OP and death. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for measures of strength of association and precision. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were identified, with 61 (33.5%) having OP >20 mmHG (overall mean ± OP = 19.4 ± 17.8 mmHG). Forty-eight percent, 9% and 8% of patients were discharged to rehabilitation, skilled nursing institution, and home, respectively. Thirty-five percent died in the hospital. A linear relationship was found between OP and log-odds of mortality. OP (OR = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.04-1.11), age (OR = 1.05;95%CI = 1.02-1.07), and injury severity score (ISS) (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.02-1.10) were independently associated with increased odds of death while adjusting for sex, race, and year. DISCUSSION: Elevated opening pressure is strongly predictive of death in severe TBI. Age and ISS are independent predictors of mortality regardless of OP. These results suggest that maintaining low levels of ICP should result in decreased mortality in severe TBI patients. The patient's age and ISS should be considered in the decision-making processes related to ICP utilization and management.


Assuntos
Hipertensão Intracraniana , Adulto , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Hipertensão Intracraniana/etiologia , Pressão Intracraniana , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodos
7.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 23(4): 616-622.e1, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35245484

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes in emergent surgical treatment of acute diverticulitis in the older population. DESIGN: Retrospective multi-institute database cohort analysis. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS NSQIP) and NSQIP Colectomy Targeted Database. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Colectomy Targeted Database was merged with the main participate use file to identify adult patients undergoing emergent Hartmann procedure or primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy for acute diverticulitis. Patients were subdivided into age cohorts (<65 years, 65-79 years, ≥80 years) and primary postoperative outcomes including mortality, morbidity, and readmission were compared using multivariate regression. RESULTS: A total of 6091 patients were identified. On multivariate analysis, 30-day mortality was higher in patients undergoing a Hartmann procedure aged 65-79 years [odds ratio (OR) 2.39, P < .001] and ≥80 years (OR 6.28, P < .001) compared to patients aged <65 years. In patients undergoing a primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy, 30-day morbidity was lower only in the cohort aged ≥80 years (OR 2.63, P = .04). Readmission rates were similar across age groups within each procedure cohort. Comparing the 2 procedures, readmission rates in patients aged 65-79 years who underwent a Hartmann procedure were lower than those that underwent a primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy (OR 2.43, P = .001). In patients aged ≥80 years, readmission rates were lower in patients who underwent a primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy (OR 0.12, P = .04). Thirty-day mortality was also lower in patients aged ≥80 years if they underwent a primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy (OR 0.15, P = .03) but similar for patients aged 65-79 years (OR 0.81, P = .70). CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: In patients undergoing a Hartmann procedure emergently for diverticulitis, mortality is higher in older patients. Patients aged ≥ 80 years had increased mortality if they underwent a Hartmann procedure compared to a primary anastomosis with diverting ileostomy; however, readmission rates vary with procedure performed. Careful consideration of age should be taken into account when operating emergently for diverticulitis.


Assuntos
Diverticulite , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Colectomia/métodos , Diverticulite/cirurgia , Humanos , Ileostomia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 23(2): 113-118, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34813370

RESUMO

Background: Trauma patients undergoing damage control surgery (DCS) have a propensity for complicated abdominal closures and intra-abdominal complications. Studies show that management of open abdomens with direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) reduces intra-abdominal complications and accelerates abdominal closure. This novel study compares intra-abdominal complication rates and the effect of DPR initiation in patients who received DPR and those who did not. Patients and Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on 120 patients who underwent DCS. Fifty patients were identified as DCS with DPR, and matched to 70 controls by gender, race, age, body mass index (BMI), past medical history, mechanism of trauma, and injury severity score. Results: The two groups of patients, those without DPR (-DPR) and those with DPR (+DPR), were similar in their characteristics. The +DPR group was more likely to have a mesh closure than the -DPR (14% and 3%; p = 0.022). The +DPR group took longer to have a final closure (3.5 ± 2.6 days vs. 2.5 ± 1.8; p = 0.020). Infection complications and mechanical failure of the closure technique were similar among the two groups. Timing of DPR initiation had no effect on closure type but did statistically increase the number of days to closure (initiation at first operation 2.8 ± 1.8 days vs. initiation at subsequent operations 6.0 ± 3.3 days; p ≤ 0.001). Conclusions: The use of DPR did not result in different outcomes in trauma patients. Therefore, traditional resuscitative measures for DCS may not be inferior to DCS with DPR. When choosing to use DPR, initiating it at the first operation could reduce the number of days to closure.


Assuntos
Cavidade Abdominal , Traumatismos Abdominais , Cavidade Abdominal/cirurgia , Traumatismos Abdominais/complicações , Traumatismos Abdominais/cirurgia , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Laparotomia/métodos , Ressuscitação/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Am J Surg ; 218(2): 311-314, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30795857

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current data suggests that decreasing VTE incidence may require focus on other factors. This study aimed to identify perioperative risk factors for VTE in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery for GI malignancy from 2013 to 2016 were grouped according to whether or not they developed a postoperative VTE, and groups were compared along demographic, perioperative, and outcome variables. RESULTS: Patients who developed VTE were more likely to be older (67 ±â€¯11 VTE vs. 61 ±â€¯10 no VTE, p = 0.04), male (92% vs. 59%, p = 0.02), and have a history of atrial fibrillation (39% vs. 11%, p = 0.01). They also experienced higher intraoperative blood loss (328 ±â€¯724 mL no VTE vs. 918 ±â€¯1885 mL VTE, p = 0.01). On multivariable analysis, history of atrial fibrillation was independently associated with development of postoperative VTE (odds ratio = 3.83, 95% confidence interval = 1.13-13.05, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: A prior history of atrial fibrillation independently predicts increased risk of developing VTE after surgery for GI malignancy. Improving understanding of the underlying VTE pathophysiology in these patients can help guide effective prevention strategies.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Perioperatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
10.
Surgery ; 164(4): 719-725, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30072252

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols have been increasingly adopted to standardize patient care and decrease overall costs. This study evaluated the impact of a prospectively implemented enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for patients undergoing surgery for gastroesophageal and hepatopancreatobiliary disease at an academic institution. METHODS: Patients undergoing either hepatopancreatobiliary or gastroesophageal procedures between January 2013 and May 2017 were classified according to whether or not they were placed on an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. Groups were compared along demographic, perioperative, outcomes, and financial variables. RESULTS: Of a total of 377 patients, 149 were placed on an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. There was a significant association between enhanced recovery after surgery protocol use and increased perioperative antibiotic use (98.0% enhanced recovery after surgery vs. 87.3% non-enhanced recovery after surgery, P < .001), decreased intraoperative crystalloid use (1,155 ± 705 mL enhanced recovery after surgery vs. 1,576 ± 826 non-enhanced recovery after surgery, P < .001), decreased requirement for intensive care unit stay (20.1% enhanced recovery after surgery vs. 36.4% non-enhanced recovery after surgery, P < .001), and decreased total hospital costs ($10,688.38 ± 10,518.22 vs. $15,439.22 ± 14,201.24, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, enhanced recovery after surgery protocol use was independently associated with decreased rate of intensive care unit admission (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.66, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways can be safely implemented in patients undergoing hepatopancreatobiliary and gastroesophageal procedures and can help standardize perioperative practices, decrease requirement for intensive care unit admission, and decrease total hospital costs.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Clínicos , Neoplasias do Sistema Digestório/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Idoso , Protocolos Clínicos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA