Comparison of subretinal aflibercept vs ranibizumab vs bevacizumab in the context of PPV, pneumatic displacement with subretinal air and subretinal tPA in naïve submacular haemorrhage secondary to nAMD. "The Submarine Study".

OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy and safety profile of subretinal aflibercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab in the context of pars plana vitrectomy, pneumatic displacement with subretinal air and subretinal tPA for subretinal macular haemorrhage (SMH) due to naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). DESIGN: Retrospective interventional cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: 123 eyes of 123 patients treated with subretinal aflibercept (n = 41, 33%), ranibizumab (n = 41,33%), and bevacizumab (n = 41, 33%). METHODS: Review of electronic medical records for best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfoveal thickness (CST), and intraocular pressure (IOP) at baseline and 24 months after treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BCVA, CST, and number of intravitreal anti VEGF over 24 months. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 80.5 ± 5.5 years, 43.9% were female. Mean time from symptom onset until surgery was 1.1 days (range 0-3 days). In all cases, the SMH did not reach the arcades. CST at baseline was 627 ± 140 µ, 739 ± 54 µ, and 793 ± 93 µ (p = 0.0001) for aflibercept, ranibizumab, or bevacizumab, respectively. Baseline BCVA (logMAR) was 0.65 ± 0.13, 0.69 ± 0.96, and 0.74 ± 0.81 (p = 0.0041) for aflibercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab, respectively. All three groups showed statistically significant improvement in BCVA and CST (for all groups: p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference at the final BCVA (p = 0.789). The mean number of anti VEGF given during follow-up period was 5.2 ± 0.81, 4.4 ± 0.63, and 5.5 ± 0.95 (p = 0.0001) for aflibercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study shows that aflibercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab in a subretinal manner in the context of PPV, pneumatic displacement with subretinal air and subretinal tPA for subretinal macular haemorrhage secondary to naïve nAMD work with the same efficacy and safety profile.

Naïve subretinal haemorrhage due to neovascular age-related macular degeneration. pneumatic displacement, subretinal air, and tissue plasminogen activator: subretinal vs intravitreal aflibercept-the native study.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare visual and anatomical outcome in subretinal aflibercept vs. intravitreal aflibercept in the context of Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV), pneumatic displacement with subretinal air and subretinal tPA in patients with naïve submacular haemorrhage (SMH) secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). DESIGN: Retrospective interventional cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: 80 patients treated with subretinal aflibercept vs. intravitreal aflibercept in the context of PPV, subretinal air and subretinal tPA in patients with SMH secondary to naïve nAMD. METHODS: Records were reviewed. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfoveal thickness (CST), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were recorded at baseline and 24 months after treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BCVA, CST, and number of anti VEGF treatment over follow-up period. RESULTS: The average duration from onset of symptoms to surgery was 1.26 days (range 0-3 days). Based on review of OCT images, SMH was subretinal in all 80 patients (100%), and sub-RPE in 29 patients (36.3%). Forty-one patients (51.25%) were treated with subretinal aflibercept ("subretinal group"), and 39 patients (48.75%) were treated with intravitreal aflibercept injections ("intravitreal group"). The groups were well balanced for age and gender p = 0.6588, and p = 0.263, respectively). Both groups showed statistically significant improvement in BCVA and CST (for all groups: p < 0.001). The mean number of anti VEGF given during follow-up period was statistically significantly lower in the "subretinal group" (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study shows better management of the CNV, with a statistically significant lower need for anti-VEGF injections when treated with subretinal aflibercept compared to intravitreal application.