Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak ; 15(11): 693-6, 2005 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16300704

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) in predicting outcome in patients with secondary peritonitis and to assess each risk factor independently regarding its contribution towards final outcome. DESIGN: Prospective analytical study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Surgical Unit-II of Rawalpindi General Hospital, from December 1999 to January 2001. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty-six patients who presented to the department with secondary peritonitis were included in the study. MPI score was calculated for each patient on a pre-designed proforma and the patients were followed-up till death or discharged from the hospital. Death was the main outcome measure against which the MPI scores were analyzed under two categories; (i) score > or = 26 and < 26 (ii) scores < 21, 2-29, and > 29. Data was analyzed on software SPSS (version 11.0). Chi-square test was used to assess any significant association between scores and outcome. Odds ratios were calculated for individual risk factors. RESULTS: Mortality rate for MPI score > or = 26 was 28.1% while for scores less than 26 it was 4.3%. For MPI scores pound 20 mortality rate was 1.9%, for scores 21-29 it was 21.9% and for score 30 or more it was 28.1%. Chi-square showed significant association between mortality and increasing MPI score (p < 0.01). Odd ratios calculated were significant for age > 50 years, malignancy, organ failure, pre-operative duration of peritonitis > 24 hours and cloudy, purulent exudate. CONCLUSION: Increasing MPI score is strongly associated with outcome in secondary peritonitis.


Assuntos
Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Peritonite/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peritonite/etiologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco
2.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak ; 13(5): 277-9, 2003 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12757678

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness, safety and morbidity of strictureplasty with resection anastomosis in patients with tuberculous small gut strictures. DESIGN: Prospective comparison study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Surgical Unit-I of Rawalpindi General Hospital from March 2000 to February 2002. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients who presented with intestinal obstruction due to tuberculous strictures, and underwent either resection anastomosis or strictureplasty were included in the study. Data was collected on a proforma and analyzed using software SPSS (version 8.0). Chi-square and t-test were used to test the hypothesis. Main outcome measures included the presence or absence of postoperative leakage anastomosis, wound infection, recurrence of intestinal obstruction and postoperative stay. RESULTS: Chi-square test applied to see the effectiveness showed no significant difference (p>0.5) between the two procedures. t-Test on the score of morbidity also showed no significant difference (p>0.5) between the two procedures. CONCLUSION: Both procedures performed were equally effective and had equal morbidity in cases of intestinal tuberculous strictures. Strictureplasty is superior to resection anastomosis in cases of multiple strictures as it conserves gut length and can even be performed safely in cases with coexistent gut perforation.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Intestino Delgado/cirurgia , Tuberculose Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Intestino Delgado/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA