Home-Based Reiki by Informal Caregivers: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.

This pilot study explored whether Reiki delivered by family caregivers to cancer patients in a home setting was feasible in reducing cancer symptoms and enhancing health-related outcomes. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods study design was applied using pre-/post-Reiki questionnaires and post-Reiki interviews. Six patient-caregiver dyads from an outpatient clinic and cancer support facilities in northeast America performed daily Reiki at home for 3 weeks. Differences with symptoms, mental well-being, health-related quality of life, and satisfaction with at-home Reiki as well as qualitative content analyses were evaluated. Positive feedback was reported after at-home Reiki practice. Large statistical effects were identified for improving fatigue, memory, mood, nausea, and emotional well-being ( P < .10, r = 0.51-0.59). All participants were satisfied and 83.3% of them would recommend self-practice home Reiki. High involvement and adherence to the intervention protocol illustrated intervention fidelity. The qualitative data revealed 2 major categories, perceived benefits and barriers. Overall Reiki benefits outweighed barriers in relation to time commitment and place distractions/positioning. Our preliminary findings support that the at-home Reiki protocol had potential benefits and was feasible and acceptable by both community-dwelling patients and their family caregivers in promoting cancer-related outcomes. Further studies with larger samples are warranted to examine the effectiveness of home-based Reiki for a patient-centered cancer care modality.

Establishing treatment fidelity in a coping and communication support telephone intervention for aging patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers.

A randomized controlled trial of a nurse-delivered coping and communication support (CCS) intervention tailored to the preferences of middle-aged and older patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers is tested for its value in improving outcomes for quality cancer care. An intervention study must be reliably delivered to estimate the accuracy of findings or make valid conclusions about the outcomes of research. The purpose of this article was to describe methodology for ensuring treatment fidelity in this patient-centered CCS intervention. Fidelity is maximized by ensuring that the CCS intervention is congruent with relevant theory, standardizing training and interventionist competence, and monitoring intervention delivery and documentation. We address unique challenges arising from using individualized interventions that preserve autonomy of the individual and are responsive to shifts in patients' needs and preferences over time. The challenge of nursing research on patient preference and coping communication requires both rigorous measurement of interventionist adherence to the intervention protocol and flexibility to allow for changing needs of patients and family caregivers.

Family caregiver engagement in a coping and communication support intervention tailored to advanced cancer patients and families.

We describe family caregiver (FCG) participation in a tailored coping and communication support intervention for advanced cancer patients and families. Preliminary descriptive data on characteristics and patterns of early engagement in the intervention for 132 FCGs are presented. Engagement assessed at an initial in-person meeting and the following 6 weeks includes problems raised, strategies used, and initiation, frequency, and mode of contact. A sizable proportion of FCGs were male, African American, and nonspouse. The FCGs had modest scores on a standard survey measure of burden yet volunteered caregiving demands as their primary problem. Other problems raised initially by more than 40% of the sample included psychological, practical, and communication with healthcare providers. Few reported physical and psychosocial difficulties. Engagement preferences expressed at the initial meeting largely mapped with actual engagement during the 6 weeks of intervention. Most FCGs were actively engaged during follow-up. Some (14%) did not opt for coping and communication support during this early treatment phase. This intervention is expected to affect quality of care and quality-of-life outcomes for FCGs over time from patient diagnosis to end of life. Findings will guide modification and dissemination of this intervention primarily in cancer clinics for the underserved.

Predictors of engagement in a coping and communication support intervention for older patients with advanced cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To examine patterns and predictors of engagement in a coping and communication support (CCS) intervention tailored to the preferences of middle-aged and older patients in the early treatment phase for late-stage cancer. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial examining processes and outcomes of a CCS intervention for patients with late-stage cancer over time. SETTING: Two ambulatory cancer clinics providing care for underserved populations in Cleveland. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred nine middle-aged (MA: aged 40-60) and 101 young-old (YO: aged 61-80) patients randomized to the CCS intervention, surviving to 3 months after enrollment and averaging 2 months of 24/7 access to the intervention. MEASUREMENTS: Engagement was assessed in the average number of patient-CCS practitioner (CCSP) contacts per month during the initial 2 months of access to the intervention. Baseline data from patient interviews and chart reviews were used to test a model of prediction. RESULTS: MA patients averaged more patient-CCSP contacts per month than YO patients (mean 2.6 +/- 2.5 vs 2.0 +/- 1.2, P=.02), although both age groups were engaged. African-American patients (P=.007) and those with a higher blunting style (P<.01), reporting more family discord in cancer communication (P=.009), and receiving fewer active cancer treatments (P=.008) were more engaged in the CCS intervention in the initial months. CONCLUSIONS: Psychooncology interventions individualized to patient preferences can effectively reach older and underserved populations. Such interventions may be especially important to patients using more avoidant behaviors, experiencing more family discord communicating about cancer, or receiving fewer aggressive treatments in the early treatment phase for late-stage cancer.