Recurrent rejections after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma with stem cell features in an adult patient.

Patients with hepatoblastoma featuring carcinoma characteristics have better outcomes after liver transplantation, than after chemotherapy and resection. Possibly this should be extrapolated to aggressive subtypes of hepatocellular carcinomas in non-cirrhotic livers, where early liver transplantation might also be indicated. However, the risks associated with liver transplantation and immunosuppressive treatment after liver transplantation are once again demonstrated by this case of a 32-year-old women with a negative personal and familial history of liver diseases. She underwent transplantation (DBD) for a hepatocellular carcinoma with stem cell features (HCC-HS; an aggressive 'hepatoblast subtype' of hepatocellular carcinoma) after chemotherapeutical downstaging techniques failed to sufficiently downstage the tumor. Despite being on conventional immunosuppressive regimens (tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil with initial corticosteroids tapered), this patient still developed two severe rejection episodes, one of which necessitated retransplantation (DCD). Both episodes were preceded by alterations in tacrolimus trough levels, either intentionally, when tacrolimus was reduced within a nephroprotective regimen, or unintentionally, when rifampicin, a CYP3A4 inducer, significantly lowered the trough levels. Together, these episodes stress the importance of therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus. Furthermore, the patient experienced an everolimus-linked drug-induced thrombotic microangiopathy, underwent multiple ERCPs for an anastomotic stricture and only one and a half year after the first liver transplantation she already suffers from long-term immunosuppressive-related side effects such as impaired glucose tolerance, hypertension and a potential cardiomyopathy. At present, she is still alive and experienced no recurrence of her primary tumor. Her case underscores the significant challenges in post-liver transplantation care.

Recent advances in the approach to hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension.

Liver disease, cirrhosis and portal hypertension can be complicated by pulmonary vascular disease, which may affect prognosis and influence liver transplantation (LT) candidacy. Pulmonary vascular complications comprise hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) and portopulmonary hypertension (POPH). Although these two conditions develop on a same background and share a common trigger, pulmonary responses are distinct and occur at different anatomical sites of the pulmonary circulation. HPS affects 10-30% of patients referred for LT, and is characterized by gas exchange abnormalities due to pulmonary vasodilation and right-to-left shunting. POPH occurs in 5%, and is defined by pulmonary arterial hypertension due to increased pulmonary vascular resistance, which leads to hemodynamic failure. Even though HPS and POPH may have a substantial negative impact on survival, both entities are clinically underrecognized and frequently misdiagnosed. Without intervention, the 5-year survival rate is 23% in HPS and 14% in POPH. Their presence should be actively sought by organized screening in patients presenting with dyspnea and in all patients on the waitlist for LT, also because clinical symptoms are commonly non-specific or even absent. LT may lead to resolution, however, advanced stages of either HPS or POPH may jeopardize safe and successful LT. This implicates the need of proper identification of HPS and POPH cases, as well as the need to be able to successfully 'bridge' patients to LT by medical intervention. A review article on this topic has been published in this journal in 2007 (1). This updated review focuses on recent advances in the diagnosis and management of these 2 liver-induced pulmonary vascular disorders and incorporates results from our recent work.

Serum vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 predicts significant liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide and is strongly associated with obesity, dyslipidemia and insulin resistance. NAFLD often presents as simple steatosis (NAFL) but can progress to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis. Current non-invasive biomarkers are not tailored to identify significant (⩾F2) fibrosis, although recent guidelines recommend a stringent follow-up of this patient population. We and others have reported on the role of pathological angiogenesis in the pathogenesis of NAFLD, highlighting pro-angiogenic factors as potential diagnostic markers. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the applicability of angiogenic and endothelial dysfunction markers as non-invasive diagnostic tools for NASH or NASH-associated fibrosis in obese patients. METHODS: In a prospective cross-sectional study, male patients undergoing bariatric surgery (n=61) and control patients (n=35) were recruited. Serum protein levels and visceral adipose tissue gene expression of endothelial dysfunction and angiogenic markers were analyzed by multiplex bead-based assay and quantitative RT-PCR, respectively. For validation, we recruited a second cohort of patients undergoing bariatric surgery (n=40) and a cohort of NAFLD patients from our outpatient clinic (n=30). RESULTS: We identified serum vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) as an independent predictor for ⩾F2 fibrosis (median 14.0 vs 8.7 ng ml-1 in patients with and without significant fibrosis; P<0.0001) with an area under the receiver-operating characteristics (AUROC) curve of 0.80. The cutoff point of 13.2 ng ml-1 showed a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 83%. In line with these results, VCAM-1 visceral adipose tissue gene expression was also elevated in patients with fibrosis (P=0.030). In the bariatric surgery and clinical validation cohorts, VCAM-1 displayed similar AUROCs of 0.89 and 0.85, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: VCAM-1 levels are able to accurately predict significant (⩾F2) fibrosis in NAFLD patients.