Participation rate in cervical cancer screening in general practice related to the proximity of gynecology care facilities: A 3 year follow-up cohort study.

Cervical cancer screening (CCS) by Pap tests is mainly performed by gynecologists in France, but also by general practitioners (GPs) and midwives. The screening uptake is insufficient to reduce the incidence of cervical neoplasms. Our aim was to investigate the association between screening rates in patients listed with GPs and the distance between GPs' offices and gynecology facilities. The population of 345 GPs, and their 93,918 female patients eligible for screening over 3 years (2013-2015), were derived from the Health Insurance claim database. We estimated the socioeconomic level of the geographical area of GPs' offices using the European Deprivation Index (EDI). The proximity of gynecology facilities was calculated by computing their distance from GPs' offices (in order to adjust the proximity of gynecology facilities with EDI and performance of smears by the GP). The number of gynecologists within 5 km of a GP's office was associated with the CCS rate increasing by 0.31% for every unit increase in the density of gynecologists within 5 km (p < 0.0001). The close proximity of gynecology facilities was not significantly associated with screening uptake among female patients when the office of the GP where they were registered was settled in a deprived area.

National organization of uterine cervical cancer screening and social inequality in France.

Some of the inequality in uterine cervical cancer (UCC) screening uptake are due to the socioeconomic deprivation of women. A national organized screening programme has proven to be effective in increasing the uptake, but may increase socioeconomic inequality. Therefore, we compared inequality in uptake of UCC screening between two French departments, one of which is experimenting an organized screening programme. We used reimbursement data from the main French health insurance scheme to compare screening rates in the municipalities of the two departments over a three-year period. The experimental department had higher screening rates, but the increase in deprivation in municipalities had a greater effect on the decrease in participation in this department. Moreover, while screening rates were higher in urban areas, the negative effect of deprivation on participation was greater in rural areas. Although these departments were compared at the same time under different conditions, socioeconomic inequality between them may have been greater before the experimentation started. However, screening may have led to an increase in socioeconomic inequality between women screened. Special attention must be paid to changes in socioeconomic and geographic inequality in the uptake of UCC screening when the programme is rolled out nationally.

Social inequalities in cervical cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment among French general practitioners and gynaecologists.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening is effective in reducing mortality due to uterine cervical cancer (UCC). However, inequalities in participation in UCC screening exist, especially according to age and social status. Considering the current situation in France regarding the ongoing organized UCC screening campaign, we aimed to assess general practitioners' (GPs) and gynaecologists' preferences for actions designed to reduce screening inequalities. METHODS: French physicians' preferences to UCC screening modalities was assessed using a discrete choice experiment. A national cross-sectional questionnaire was sent between September and October 2014 to 500 randomly selected physicians, and numerically to all targeted physicians working in the French region Midi-Pyrénées. Practitioners were offered 11 binary choices of organized screening scenarios in order to reduce inequalities in UCC screening participation. Each scenario was based on five attributes corresponding to five ways to enhance participation in UCC screening while reducing screening inequalities. RESULTS: Among the 123 respondents included, practitioners voted for additional interventions targeting non-screened women overall (p <  0.05), including centralized invitations sent from a central authority and involving the mentioned attending physician, or providing attending physicians with the lists of unscreened women among their patients. However, they rejected the specific targeting of women over 50 years old (p <  0.01) or living in deprived areas (p <  0.05). Only GPs were in favour of allowing nurses to perform Pap smears, but both GPs and gynaecologists rejected self-collected oncogenic papillomavirus testing. CONCLUSIONS: French practitioners tended to value the traditional principle of universalism. As well as rejecting self-collected oncogenic papillomavirus testing, their reluctance to support the principle of proportionate universalism relying on additional interventions addressing differences in socioeconomic status needs further evaluation. As these two concepts have already been recommended as secondary development leads for the French national organized screening campaign currently being implemented, the adherence of practitioners and the adaptation of these concepts are necessary conditions for reducing inequalities in health care.

The association between cervical cancer screening participation and the deprivation index of the location of the family doctor's office.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening rates are known to be strongly associated with socioeconomic status. Our objective was to assess whether the rate is also associated with an aggregated deprivation marker, defined by the location of family doctors' offices. METHODS: To access this association, we 1) collected data from the claim database of the French Health Insurance Fund about the registered family doctors and their enlisted female patients eligible for cervical screening; 2) carried out a telephone survey with all registered doctors to establish if they were carrying out Pap-smears in their practices; 3) geotracked all the doctors' offices in the smallest existing blocks of socioeconomic homogenous populations (IRIS census units) that were assigned a census derived marker of deprivation, the European Deprivation Index (EDI), and a binary variable of urbanization; and 4) we used a multivariable linear mixed model with IRIS as a random effect. RESULTS: Of 348 eligible doctors, 343 responded to the telephone survey (98.6%) and were included in the analysis, encompassing 88,152 female enlisted patients aged 25-65 years old. In the multivariable analysis (adjusted by the gender of the family doctor, the practice of Pap-smears by the doctor and the urbanization of the office location), the EDI of the doctor's office was strongly associated with the cervical cancer screening participation rate of eligible patients (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The EDI linked to the location of the family doctor's office seems to be a robust marker to predict female patients' participation in cervical cancer screening.

[Human papillomaviruses vaccination: Vaccine intentions of parents of children aged 10 to 11s in Normandy schools after an information campaign during the 2015-2016 school year]. / Vaccination contre les papillomavirus humains : intentions vaccinales des parents d'élèves bas-normands après campagne d'information au cours de l'année scolaire 2015­2016.

BACKGROUND: In 2015, the vaccine against human Papillomavirus (hPV) was recommended in France for children from 11 to 14 years-old. This study assessed the knowledge of parents from Normandy about this vaccine and measured the impact of an information campaign on their intent to have their children vaccinated. METHODS: Parents from Normandy with children in sixth-grade class, aged 10 to 11, during the 2015-2016 school year were included. The secondary schools were selected in collaboration with academic institutions. The intent to have their child vaccinated was measured with a questionnaire distributed to children in April 2016 and collected from May to June 2016 by school nurses. RESULTS: Among the 16 selected secondary schools, 1428 questionnaires were distributed and 864 (60.5 %) were collected regardless of the gender of the child. Among the 439 girls, 85.9 % were not vaccinated against hPV. The intent to vaccinate was higher when the parent who responded was the mother (P<0.001). Among the parents who took note of the information booklet, 73.7 % found this information useful. There was a significant association between the knowledge about the vaccine against hPV and the intent to vaccinate (P<0.001). The percentage of vaccinated girls was significantly higher when their parents were informed (10.9 % versus 3.2 %). We noticed a significant rise of the intent to vaccinate children when information booklets were distributed (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The vaccination rate after specific information about vaccination against hPV was significantly higher. The information campaign has thus a significant positive impact.

The Effect of Cervical Smears Performed by General Practitioners on the Cervical Cancer Screening Rate of their Female Patients: A Claim Database Analysis and Cross-Sectional Survey.

PURPOSE: Cervical cancer screening reduces the incidence and specific mortality rate of cervical neoplasms. In most cases screening by means of Pap smears is performed in France by gynecologists. The primary objective of this study was to confirm whether the participation rate is increased when general practitioners (GPs) carry out the smears themselves. The secondary objective was to evaluate other independent characteristics of GPs predicting participation rates in women. METHODS: The population of 347 GPs, including their relevant characteristics and their 90,094 female patients eligible for screening over 2 years (2013-2014), was derived from the SIAM claim database of the Flanders Healthcare Insurance Fund (CPAM). A telephone survey among all GPs was carried out to know whether they were performing smears in their surgeries. RESULTS: A total of 343 GPs were included for analysis (98.8% participation rate). The mean cervical cancer screening participation rate over 2 years among all the women in the recommended age group (25-65 years) was 43.3% (±6.9). Bivariate analysis showed that participation rate was higher when the GP performed smears (adjusted difference of mean: 2.06 [95% CI: 0.67-3.45], p = 0.037) and whether the GP was female (2.08 [0.42-3.74], p = 0.0144). After multivariate analysis the only significant characteristic of the GP was the performance of smears (1.71 [0.27-3.16], p = 0.0204). CONCLUSIONS: Cervical smears performed by GPs led to increased screening participation rates within the recommended age group of women. However, the size of this increase is insufficient to reach the expected participation rates.

Factors associated with the achievement of cervical smears by general practitioners.

OBJECTIVE: Reliable data about general practitioners performing pap-tests are insufficient. A claim code for the achievement of pap-smears exists in France, but its use by general practitioners is not known. The main purpose of this study was to highlight independent factors associated with the achievement of pap-smears by the general practitioner (GP). We carried out a descriptive and analytic epidemiologic study in 347 GPs and their 244,889 patients, registered at the Health Care Insurance Fund of Flanders. The European Deprivation Index (EDI) in the area of GP's surgeries was specified. All GPs were questioned by telephone about their performance of pap-tests. The claim database of the insurance fund was analyzed to describe characteristics of GPs. RESULTS: The answer rate among questioned GPs was 98.8%. Pap-smears were performed in their surgeries by 182 GPs (53.1%). Among males, 45.7% performed pap-smears versus 78.4% of the female (adjusted odds-ratio = 4.5, p < 0.001). The mean rate of screened women in the target population was 44% when GPs were performing smears versus 42% when they were not (adjusted odds-ratio = 1.04, p = 0.03). Only 19.5% of GPs used the claim code. The number of patients, and the EDI were not associated with pap-smears. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02749110 (April 22, 2016).

[Proposal of standardised and logical templates for discharge letters and discharge summaries sent to general practitioners]. / Proposition d'un contenu standardisé et raisonné pour les lettres de liaison et les comptes-rendus d'hospitalisation à destination du médecin traitant.

Background: Communication between general practitioners (GPs) and hospitals is a weak point of the French health system. Unfortunately, hospital discharge documents, a keypoint for healthcare safety and efficiency, tend to be poorly defined. This study aimed to propose standardised and logical templates for discharge letters (DL) and discharge summaries (DS) with particular attention to GPs' needs.Methods: A Delphi methodology was conducted on the findings of a systematic review of the international literature. We recruited 28 experts including producers (hospital physicians and interns), recipients (GPs, head of the medical information department, patient representatives), and other professionals using discharge documents (representative of regional health administration for inspection and control, jurist, pharmacists).Results: A consensus was reached after two rounds of consultation. According to the experts, DS should ideally be available on the last day of hospitalization, but this is rarely possible. DL have therefore become the most important document for GPs. Two standardised and logical templates were submitted to the experts for validation. The templates were considered to be pertinent by the experts and were perceived as improving several key points such as writing and reading speed, communication between hospitals and community practitioners or safety of healthcare after discharge from hospital.Conclusion: DL and DS templates will be tested in pilot hospitals by an impact study.

[Use of health professional cards by general practice locums: frequency and difficulties]. / Fréquence et difficultés d'utilisation des cartes de professionnel de santé par les médecins généralistes remplaçants.

BACKGROUND: Health professional cards are used for electronic production and transmission of medical reimbursement requests. These cards are personal and cannot be lent, including to locums. However, general practice locums often report using the cards of the practitioners they replace. The aim of this study was to assess the use of general practice locum's own professional cards for patient reimbursements in 2013. METHODS: A retrospective survey by computerized questionnaire was conducted in 2014 in Lower-Normandy among general practice locums. Data were collected on their possession, knowledge,frequency and difficulties using their own cards in 2013. RESULTS: All locums were familiar with health professional cards, but 71.9% did not know about health professional trainee cards. 71.9% of respondents had a card in 2013 and only 26.1% of them had already used the card. 78.1% of respondents thought they could use the card of the practitioner that they replaced' The main difficulties encountered when using health professional cards were the failure of general practitioners to ask locums to use their own cards, problems with software configuration and card installation, and a poor understanding of the purpose of the card. CONCLUSION: Locums in Lower Normandy in 2013 rarely used their own cards when they have one. Better information concerning use of the cars is required for locums.

Seasonal variations do not affect the superiority of fecal immunochemical tests over guaiac tests for colorectal cancer screening.

The aim of this study was to compare the seasonal variation in performance of a faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin (FIT) and a guaiac test (gFOBT) for colorectal cancer screening. From June 2009 to May 2011, 18,290 screening participants (50-74 years old) performed OC-SENSOR quantitative FIT (1 sample) and Hemoccult II gFOBT (3 stool samples with 2 spots/sample). Referral for colonoscopy required a minimum of one positive spot (gFOBT), or a positive FIT [cut-off 150 ng haemoglobin/mL buffer (i.e. 30 µg haemoglobin/g feces)]. The performance of tests for detection of advanced neoplasia was compared according to seasons using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves, at various FIT cut-off values. The positivity rate of FIT was significantly lower in the summer compared with other seasons (2.3% versus 3.0%, p = 0.03), whilst the positivity rate of gFOBT increased in the autumn (1.8% versus 1.5%, p = 0.11). FIT was clinically more effective than gFOBT over the four season-specific ROC curves. At the cut-off concentration used in the study, the season-specific FIT/gFOBT ratios for true positive rates were: 2.8 (Autumn), 2.5 (Winter), 3.0 (Spring), 3.7 (Summer), and for false positive rates: 1.2 (Autumn), 1.5 (Winter), 1.8 (Spring), 0.9 (Summer). Therefore, in this study with this cut-off concentration and in spite of lower positivity rate in summer, the seasonal variations of performance of OC-SENSOR FIT led to improved gain in specificity in the summer, without a decrease in gain in sensitivity compared with gFOBT.

[Systematic review of hospital discharge summaries and general practitioners' wishes]. / Revue systématique sur les documents de sortie d’hospitalisation et les attentes des médecins généralistes.

BACKGROUND: Communication between general practitioners (GPs) and hospitals is one of the weak points of our health system. Unfortunately, hospital discharge summaries, the cornerstone of this communication, tend to be poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to identify the key elements of hospital discharges ummaries, with particular attention to GP expectations. METHOD: A systematic review of the international literature was conducted by searching Cochrane, Medline, Systeme universitaire de documentation (SUDoc) and Banque de donnees en santé publique (BDSP) databases as well as the French journals La Revue du Praticien, Prescrire and Exercer. RESULTS: This database and journal review identified 10,551 publications, 38 of which were finally included in this analysis. The preferred maximum time to reception of the discharge summary was one week. This summary should not exceed four half pages. The desired content did not differ between GPs and hospital practitioners. GPs expressed the desire for a brief liaison letter given to the patient at the time of discharge. GPs expected the discharge summary to contain the reason for admission, treatment on discharge, the main diagnosis and subsequent management. A standardized and structured form was preferred, but a narrative form was not recommended. Special attention had to be paid to treatment on discharge and outstanding results at the time of discharge. CONCLUSION: The elements identified from the literature will be used as a basis for a subsequent study designed to formalize discharge summaries for GPs.

A population-based comparison of immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Quantitative fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) identify individuals with colorectal cancer with greater levels of accuracy than guaiac tests. We compared the performances of 2 FITs in a population undergoing screening for colorectal cancer. METHODS: We collected fecal samples from 19,797 individuals in France (age, 50-74 y) who participated in a colorectal cancer screening program, from June 2009 through May 2011. Samples were analyzed using the Magstream (Fujirebio Inc, Tokyo, Japan) and OC Sensor (Eiken Chemical Co, Tokyo, Japan) (2 samples each) FITs, as well as the Hemoccult II guaiac test (SKD, Villepinte, France) (3 samples each). Colonoscopies were performed for patients with positive results from all 3 tests. The cut-off values for levels of hemoglobin in buffer and stools were 55 ng/mL and 180 µg/g for the Magstream and 150 ng/mL and 30 µg/g for the OC Sensor, respectively. Results from the FITs were compared with those from the guaiac test for cut-off values for stool samples, positivity rates, and the receiver operating characteristic curve values. The numbers needed to screen and the numbers needed to scope to detect an advanced neoplasia (cancer, adenoma ≥10 mm, or high-grade dysplasia) were calculated. RESULTS: A positive test result was found in 1224 participants (6.2%); 1075 (87.8%) underwent a colonoscopy examination. Of these, 334 were found to have advanced neoplasia. Considering the cut-off values associated with the positivity rate of Hemoccult II (1.6%), the numbers needed to screen were 239 for Hemoccult II, 166 for a 1-sample Magstream FIT, and 129 for a 1-sample OC Sensor FIT; the numbers needed to scope were 3.3, 2.3, and 1.8, respectively. For the same false-positive rate as Hemoccult II (0.98%), the true-positive rates for Magstream and OC Sensor FITs were 0.65% and 0.90% respectively, compared with 0.42% for Hemoccult II. The OC Sensor FIT had a greater area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value than the Magstream FIT. CONCLUSIONS: Based on results from a large, population-based study, the OC Sensor FIT identifies patients with colorectal cancer with greater accuracy than the Magstream FIT. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01251666.