Vaccination timeliness of preterm infants hospitalised in a neonatal intensive care unit in Denmark.

AIM: In Denmark, preterm infants are recommended to receive childhood vaccinations without correction for gestational age. This study aimed to describe the timeliness of the Danish Childhood Vaccination Program in preterm infants during the first 13 months of life and to evaluate possible determinants of delay. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included preterm infants admitted to a level III neonatal intensive care unit between October 2019 and October 2020. Clinical data were retrieved from medical records and the Danish Vaccination Register. Timely vaccination was defined corresponding to chronological age of 3-, 5- and 12 months, within a time interval of 30 days before to 29 days after the expected date. RESULTS: Analyses included 365 infants. Timely vaccination occurred in 91%, 83% and 67% of preterm infants for the first, second and third vaccination, respectively, and timeliness was highest if born before gestational age 28 weeks. Gestational age 28-31 + 6 weeks and delayed former vaccinations negatively influenced the timeliness of the following vaccinations. CONCLUSION: Most preterm infants received the first vaccination timely; however, timeliness decreased with each subsequent vaccination. Efforts to improve timeliness should focus on counselling healthcare personnel and parents to follow the recommendations for the first and the following vaccinations.

Assessment of Orofacial Symptoms in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Validation of a Consensus-Based Short Patient Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: To develop, validate, and test the performance of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a short patient questionnaire (< 5 minutes in length) in order to assess the multidimensional aspects of orofacial symptoms related to juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) among patients aged ≥ 10 years. METHODS: The study was conducted by an interdisciplinary task force from the Temporomandibular Joint Juvenile Arthritis Working Group. The project consisted of a multiphased approach including the following: (1) conceptual phase with online international survey of 167 healthcare workers, (2) item generation and drafting of preliminary questionnaire(s) (ie, face validity), (3) cognitive script interview and probing (ie, content validity; 16 patients with JIA), (4) assessment of construct validity (ie, convergence and divergence; 53 patients with JIA), (5) test of reliability, and (6) test of clinical performance and psychometric characteristics (95 patients with JIA). RESULTS: In total, 7 PROs were included in the final patient questionnaire: (1) pain frequency, (2) pain intensity, (3) pain location, (4) jaw function, (5) specific questions related to symptoms and dysfunction, (6) changes in face and jaw pain since last visit, and (7) changes in jaw function since last visit. In total, 80% of the patients were able to complete the questionnaire in less than 5 minutes. CONCLUSION: We have developed and validated a short patient questionnaire to assess the multidimensional aspects of JIA-related orofacial symptoms. The PROs included in our questionnaire show acceptable validity and reliability. The questionnaire is applicable to routine monitoring of subjects with JIA, as well as future research studies.

[Acute neonatal myocarditis with cardiogenic shock caused by enterovirus infection].

In this case report, a 16-days-old boy presented with reduced feeding, vomiting, respiratory distress and pallor. He developed cardiogenic shock with cardiac arrest and was resuscitated. Echocardiography showed reduced left ventricular systolic function and he was diagnosed with enterovirus myocarditis since enterovirus RNA was found in the blood by polymerase chain reaction. After one month of hospitalization, the patient was discharged without any apparent sequelae. The condition is rare but associated with a high mortality. Early diagnosis and initiation of treatment is essential for survival.

Standardizing the Clinical Orofacial Examination in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: An Interdisciplinary, Consensus-based, Short Screening Protocol.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a consensus-based, standardized, short (< 3 min) clinical examination protocol to assess the multidimensional, orofacial manifestations of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: The study was conducted by a multidisciplinary task force from the Temporomandibular Joint Juvenile Arthritis Working Group (TMJaw). The study used an acknowledged sequential approach involving (1) a global multidisciplinary online questionnaire study, (2) a systematic literature review and consensus meetings to identify items for inclusion, (3) pilot testing of included items, (4) test of reliability in 22 subjects with JIA by 4 examiners, (5) test of construct validity in a case-control study involving 167 subjects, and (6) establishment of final recommendations. RESULTS: Six items were recommended for the final examination protocol: (1) clinician-assessed pain location, (2) temporomandibular (TMJ) joint pain on palpation (open and closed mouth), (3) mandibular deviation at maximal mouth opening (≥ 3 mm), (4) maximal unassisted mouth opening capacity, (5) frontal facial symmetry, and (6) facial profile. All recommended items showed acceptable reliability and construct validity. The average mean examination time was 2 min and 42 s (SD ± 38.5 s). CONCLUSION: A consensus-based, short clinical examination protocol was developed. The protocol takes less than 3 min to complete and provides information about orofacial symptoms, TMJ dysfunction, and dentofacial deformity. The standardized examination protocol is applicable to routine clinical care, as well as future research studies.

Orofacial symptoms and oral health-related quality of life in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a two-year prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the chronicity of orofacial symptoms and how this influences the oral health-related quality of life in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Therefore, our objectives were to study the long-term changes in self-reported orofacial symptoms, and to define the impact of orofacial symptoms on oral health-related quality of life in JIA. METHODS: At baseline (T0), 157 consecutive JIA patients ≤20 years completed a patient pain questionnaire that incorporates domains related to the orofacial area. At the 2 year follow-up (T1), 113 patients completed the same questionnaire (response rate 72%) in addition to the Child Perception's Questionnaire; a validated 31-item questionnaire addressing oral health-related quality of life. RESULTS: At T0, 53% (60/113) of patients reported the presence of orofacial pain, and 36% (41/113) of patients reported compromised orofacial function. At T1, 77% (46/60) of patients with pain at T0 reported persistent pain, and 66% (27/41) of patients with functional disability at T0 reported persistent disability. Patients with orofacial symptoms reported a significantly greater prevalence of negative impact of orofacial conditions on general quality of life and within the domains of emotional and social well-being compared to asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSION: Self-reported orofacial pain and functional disability were common findings in a cohort of JIA patients followed over 2 years. These symptoms seem to persist over time in most patients, and have a significant negative impact on oral health-related quality of life.