RESUMO
BACKGROUND: During the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a protocol was adopted by our department on antibiotics treatment for Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis (AUA). Our study aimed to determine the feasibility and safety of non-operative treatment (NOT), compared to upfront laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), for AUA in children during the pandemic. METHOD: Our prospective comparative study was conducted from May 1, 2020 to January 31, 2021. Patient selection criteria included: age ≥5 years, abdominal pain duration ≤48 h, ultrasound (US)/Computered Tomography scan confirmation of AUA, US appendiceal diameter 6-11 mm with no features of perforation/abscess collection and no faecolith. For NOT patients, intravenous antibiotics were administered for 24-48 h followed by oral for 10-day course. Comparison was performed between patients whose parents preferred NOT to those who opted for up-front appendectomy. Primary outcomes were NOT success at index admission, early and late NOT failure rates till 27 months. Secondary outcomes were differences in complication rate, hospital length of stay (LOS) and cost between groups. RESULTS: 77 patients were recruited: 43 (55.8%) underwent NOT while 34 (44.2%) patients opted for LA. Success of NOT at index admission was 90.7% (39/43). Overall, NOT failure rate at 27 months' follow-up was 37.2% (16/43). Of the NOT failures, 1 appendix was normal on histology while only 1 was perforated. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between both groups except for LOS of late NOT failure. Cost for upfront LA was nearly thrice that of NOT. CONCLUSION: Our stringent COVID protocol together with shared decision-making with parents is a safe and feasible treatment option during a crisis situation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Treatment study, Level II.
Assuntos
Apendicite , COVID-19 , Laparoscopia , Criança , Humanos , Pré-Escolar , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Apendicite/tratamento farmacológico , Apendicite/cirurgia , Pandemias , Estudos Prospectivos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Apendicectomia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Doença AgudaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and cost-efficiency of antibiotic management versus laparoscopic appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis (AUA) in children during the COVID-19 pandemic when resources were limited and transmission risks uncertain. METHOD: In this prospective comparative cohort study, we analyzed the data of 139 children diagnosed with AUA meeting the following inclusion criteria: 5-18 years of age, symptoms duration of ≤ 48 h, appendix diameter ≤ 11 mm and no appendicolith. Treatment outcomes between non-operative management group (78/139) and upfront laparoscopic appendectomy group (61/139) were compared. Antibiotic regimes were intravenous ceftriaxone/metronidazole or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid for 48 h, followed by oral antibiotics to complete total 10-days course. RESULTS: 8/78 (10.3%) children had early failure (within 48 h) requiring appendectomy. 17/70 (24.3%) patients experienced late recurrence within mean follow-up time of 16.2 ± 4.7 months. There were no statistical differences in peri-operative complications, negative appendicectomy rate, and incidence of perforation and hospitalization duration between antibiotic and surgical treatment groups. Cost per patient in upfront surgical group was significantly higher ($6208.5 ± 5284.0) than antibiotic group ($3588.6 ± 3829.8; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite 24.3% risk of recurrence of appendicitis in 16.2 ± 4.7 months, antibiotic therapy for AUA appears to be a safe and cost-effective alternative to upfront appendectomy.
Assuntos
Apendicite , COVID-19 , Humanos , Criança , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Apendicite/tratamento farmacológico , Apendicite/cirurgia , Apendicite/diagnóstico , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Prospectivos , Pandemias , Resultado do Tratamento , Apendicectomia , Doença Aguda , Tratamento ConservadorRESUMO
We present a rare case of Klinefelter syndrome who presented with perinatal ascites, unilateral renal agenesis and a prostatic utricle cyst. The patient was born at term via emergency Caesarean section with gross abdominal distension. Antenatally, amniocentesis revealed a fetal karyotype of Klinefelter syndrome (47, XXY), and the 34-week ultrasound scan showed a cyst measuring 17×21×27 mm located inferior-posterior to the bladder. There was no ascites noted then, but a small left pelvic kidney was present. Ultrasound kidney, ureter and bladder as well as CT scan of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis done at birth showed a solitary right kidney with large-volume ascites and no evidence of a cyst adjacent to the bladder. These findings suggest urinary ascites from an involuting left renal system or a ruptured prostatic utricle cyst. We report the first case of Klinefelter syndrome associated with a prostatic utricle cyst and unilateral renal agenesis, presenting with neonatal ascites.
Assuntos
Cistos , Síndrome de Klinefelter , Rim Único , Ascite/diagnóstico por imagem , Ascite/etiologia , Cesárea , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Síndrome de Klinefelter/complicações , Síndrome de Klinefelter/diagnóstico , Masculino , Gravidez , Sáculo e UtrículoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To develop an international core outcome set (COS), a minimal collection of outcomes that should be measured and reported in all future clinical trials evaluating treatments of acute simple appendicitis in children. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A previous systematic review identified 115 outcomes in 60 trials and systematic reviews evaluating treatments for children with appendicitis, suggesting the need for a COS. METHODS: The development process consisted of 4 phases: (1) an updated systematic review identifying all previously reported outcomes, (2) a 2-stage international Delphi study in which parents with their children and surgeons rated these outcomes for inclusion in the COS, (3) focus groups with young people to identify missing outcomes, and (4) international expert meetings to ratify the final COS. RESULTS: The systematic review identified 129 outcomes which were mapped to 43 unique outcome terms for the Delphi survey. The first-round included 137 parents (8 countries) and 245 surgeons (10 countries), the second-round response rates were 61% and 85% respectively, with 10 outcomes emerging with consensus. After 2 young peoples' focus groups, 2 additional outcomes were added to the final COS (12): mortality, bowel obstruction, intraabdominal abscess, recurrent appendicitis, complicated appendicitis, return to baseline health, readmission, reoperation, unplanned appendectomy, adverse events related to treatment, major and minor complications. CONCLUSION: An evidence-informed COS based on international consensus, including patients and parents has been developed. This COS is recommended for all future studies evaluating treatment ofsimple appendicitis in children, to reduce heterogeneity between studies and facilitate data synthesis and evidence-based decision-making.
Assuntos
Apendicite , Criança , Humanos , Adolescente , Técnica Delphi , Apendicite/cirurgia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Consenso , Doença Aguda , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are one of the more common congenital anomalies encountered in pediatric surgery where the majority are diagnosed in the early neonatal period. The etiology of ARM remains uncertain and is likely to be multifactorial. A majority of ARMs result from abnormal development of the urorectal septum in early fetal life. There can be a broad range of presentation features varying from low anomalies with perineal fistula to high anomalies mandating intricate management. To develop a standardized system for comparison in follow-up studies, the Krickenbeck classification was introduced according to the type of fistula. According to the Krickenbeck classification of ARM, those with a rectoperineal fistula are classified as low-type ARM and are usually managed with a perineal anoplasty without colostomy. In this case series, we describe two rare cases of distinct high and intermediate ARM with rectoperineal fistulas, which were thought to be low-type ARM but were subsequently found to have urethral involvement. Our cases consisted of high and intermediate ARMs, which were successfully treated with posterior sagittal anorectoplasty as described. These cases exemplified rare variants of ARM where rectoperineal fistulas can be associated with high-type anomalies. Rare-variant ARM with rectopenile or rectoscrotal fistula can be associated with high-type anomalies in contrast to classical rectoperineal fistulas. A high index of suspicion should remain in cases with previous urinary tract infection despite normal imaging. Careful planning is also needed with consideration of possible need for urethral repair during anoplasty, which was needed in both our cases.
RESUMO
AIM: Perforated appendicitis has poorer clinical outcomes compared to non-perforated appendicitis. However, accurate outcome comparisons in research and clinical audits are challenged by its wide spectrum of manifestation. Previous attempts at the classification of severity have been complex and difficult to reproduce. In our study, we used another institution's (Jones et al., TX, USA) previously described simple classification system of peritoneal contamination and examined its usefulness in predicting outcomes. METHODS: With ethical approval, we retrospectively reviewed the records of all paediatric patients operated at our institution for perforated appendicitis from 2016 to 2017. Patient demographics, intra-operative and histological findings, post-operative outcomes and length of stay were collected. Patients were categorised into group 1 (purulence in right lower quadrant only) and group 2 (contamination in two or more quadrants). Post-operative complications were defined as procedure-related (e.g. post-operative ileus, intra-abdominal abscess, visceral injury) and non-procedure-related (e.g. bronchospasm). Statistical analysis using χ2 tests for categorical data and Mann-Whitney U-tests for non-parametric continuous variables was performed, with a significance of P < 0.05. RESULTS: There were 134 eligible patients. We excluded 19 with incomplete data, leaving 115 for analysis, of which 69 (60%) were in group 2. Those in group 2 had a longer stay (P = 0.005) and more post-operative complications (P = 0.001), particularly procedure-related events (P = 0.006). There were no differences in age (P = 0.182), gender (P = 0.876), readmission rate (P = 0.317) and non-procedure-related post-operative complications (0.152). CONCLUSION: This simple classification of perforated appendicitis appears to differentiate clinical outcomes well, particularly for iatrogenic morbidity, making it useful for operative preparation and outcomes research.
Assuntos
Abscesso Abdominal , Apendicite , Apendicectomia/efeitos adversos , Apendicite/cirurgia , Criança , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Vitellointestinal duct (VID) anomalies have been described extensively in the literature. However, an everted VID with prolapse of ileum arising from an omphalocele is rare, and its appearance at birth can be alarming and can present a diagnostic challenge. We describe a baby born to a teenage diabetic mother who was noted to have a strange exophytic mass arising from the abdominal wall. Antenatal scans had revealed multiple other malformations but not an omphalocele. He was operated on early, and the diagnosis of a patent VID with prolapse of the ileum arising from an omphalocele was only confirmed intraoperatively. The duct was resected, the ileum closed primarily and primary closure of the abdominal wall was performed without tension. He recovered well postoperatively. A brief review of similar cases is included.
Assuntos
Gastrosquise/diagnóstico , Doenças do Íleo/diagnóstico , Íleo/anormalidades , Ducto Vitelino/anormalidades , Gastrosquise/cirurgia , Hérnia Umbilical/diagnóstico , Hérnia Umbilical/cirurgia , Humanos , Doenças do Íleo/cirurgia , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Testicular atrophy (TA) is a significant complication in patients who undergo salvage procedures for testicular torsion. Studies on outcome focus on factors predicting testicular viability during scrotal exploration but few assess factors predicting TA in patients who undergo salvage procedures. We assess the incidence of TA after salvage and identify associated factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With ethical approval, we reviewed patients who underwent salvage for testicular torsion in our institution from 2001 to 2013. Data was collected on patient demographics, duration of pain, sonographic findings, postoperative complications, and follow-up assessment of TA (defined as difference in testicular volume > 50% compared with the contralateral testis, based on measurement by Prader orchidometer or by ultrasound). We excluded patients with torted undescended testis, those under 1 month, and those with follow-up < 6 months. Chi-square or Mann-Whitney U tests were used as appropriate with significance level < 0.05. RESULTS: Of 85 patients who had scrotal exploration for testicular torsion, 53 had testicular salvage. Overall, 16 patients defaulted or had < 6 months follow-up, leaving 37 patients who were studied, median age 12 years (range, 0.5-16.0 years) at presentation. Median follow-up was 12.5 months (range, 6-88 months). A total of 20 patients (54%) developed TA. Median duration to TA was 12.5 months (range, 2-88 months). All had clinical evidence of atrophy by 14 months, except two who initially defaulted follow-up, but were diagnosed with TA at 35 and 88 months postoperatively when presenting with unrelated complaints. Factors associated with TA were duration of pain > 1 day (p = 0.004) and heterogeneous echogenicity on ultrasound (p = 0.001). Sonographic evidence of reduced vascularity was not predictive. Of 11 that had pain > 1 day, 10 (91%) had TA. No testes survived when pain ≥ 3 days. CONCLUSION: Half of patients with testicular torsion undergoing salvage surgery will develop testicular atrophy, even when intraoperatively assessed as viable, and should be counseled accordingly. Duration of pain > 1 day and sonographic heterogeneous echogenicity are predictive. Salvage rates are dismal when duration of symptoms exceeds 1 day.
Assuntos
Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Torção do Cordão Espermático/cirurgia , Testículo/patologia , Adolescente , Atrofia/epidemiologia , Atrofia/etiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Torção do Cordão Espermático/diagnóstico por imagem , Torção do Cordão Espermático/patologia , Testículo/diagnóstico por imagem , Testículo/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyse the feasibility, safety and benefits of laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) in comparison with open appendicectomy (OA) for perforated appendicitis (PA) in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all consecutive cases of PA who underwent OA or LA between July 2001 and April 2004 was done. The patient demographics, duration of symptoms and operative findings were noted and the feasibility, safety and benefits of LA were analysed with respect to postoperative recovery and complications. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-seven consecutive patients with PA underwent either OA (n = 46) or LA (n = 91). Both groups were comparable with respect to patient demographics, duration of symptoms and operative findings. The mean operative time was 106.5 min (95% CI, 100.2 - 112.8) in the LA group and 92.8 min (95% CI, 82.9-102.7) in the OA group (P = 0.02). The return to afebrile status after surgery was significantly faster in the LA group [mean, 45.4 hours (95% CI, 36.8-54)] than the OA group [mean, 77 hours (95% CI 56.7-97.3)] (P = 0.007). The mean duration for postoperative opioid analgesia was 2.5 days (95% CI, 2.2-2.7) for LA and 3.2 days (95% CI, 2.9- 3.6) for OA (P = 0.001). The resumption of oral feeds after surgery was at 3.1 days (95% CI, 2.8-3.3) for LA and 3.7 days (3.4-4.1) for OA (P = 0.005). The length of the hospital stay was shorter in the LA group [mean, 6.5 days (95% CI, 6.1-6.8)] as compared to that of the OA group [mean, 8.2 days (95% CI, 7.1-9.3)] (P = 0.006). Postoperative complications included wound infection, adhesive intestinal obstruction and pelvic abscess formation. The incidence of these complications was 5.6% in the LA group and 19.6% in the OA group (P = 0.01). Nine patients (9.8%) needed conversion to open surgery in the LA group. None of the LA patients had wound infection. CONCLUSION: LA is feasible, safe and beneficial in children with PA.