Early tracheostomy after initiation of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is associated with decreased duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support.

Timing of tracheostomy placement for patients with respiratory failure requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support is variable and continues to depend on surgeon preference. We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive adult patients supported with peripheral venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome at a single institution with the hypothesis that early tracheostomy (within 7 days of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation) decreases the duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. The primary endpoint was duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Secondary endpoints included mortality, overall and intensive care unit length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and time from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation to liberation from ventilator, intensive care unit discharge, and hospital discharge. Overall and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-associated hospital costs were compared. A total of 50 patients were identified for inclusion (early n = 21; late n = 29). Baseline characteristics including indices of disease severity were similar between groups. Duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was significantly shorter in the early tracheostomy group (12 vs. 21 days; p = 0.005). Median extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-related costs were significantly decreased in the early tracheostomy group ($3,624 vs. $5,603, p = 0.03). Early tracheostomy placement is associated with decreased time on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support and reduced extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-related costs in this cohort. Validation in a prospective cohort or a clinical trial is indicated.

Early Decompressive Laparotomy for Intra-Abdominal Hypertension Following Initiation of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Patients supported with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation are at risk for intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. Flow through the return cannula may be compromised in these patients, resulting in inadequate support and end-organ malperfusion. Early decompressive laparotomy can mitigate these complications and potentially improve outcomes. Here we review a series of nine patients undergoing early decompressive laparotomy for abdominal compartment syndrome at a single institution and propose an algorithmic approach to the management of these patients.

Comparison of individual and composite radiographic markers of frailty in trauma.

BACKGROUND: Clinical frailty scores usually involve questionnaires or physical testing. Many trauma patients are not able to participate in these. Radiographic measurement of frailty may be a viable alternative. Individual radiographic markers of frailty have been investigated, such as sarcopenia or osteopenia. The ideal radiographic variable (or variables) to measure frailty in trauma is unknown. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review was performed of restrained drivers ages 40 and greater at a single institution from 2010-2015. Multiple markers of radiographic frailty were measured including: sarcopenia, osteopenia, vascular calcifications, sarcopenic obesity, emphysema, renal volume, cervical spine degeneration, and cerebral atrophy. Frailty was defined as the worst quartile for each radiographic variable, and these values were summed to create a composite marker of frailty. The primary outcome was discharge disposition. We hypothesized that a composite frailty score would be associated with discharge disposition while individual markers would not be associated with discharge disposition. RESULTS: Overall 489 patients were included in this study. Cerebral atrophy (p = 0.05), renal volume (p = 0.004), sarcopenia (p = 0.05), vascular calcifications (p = 0.02) and sarcopenic obesity (p = 0.01) were associated with discharge disposition. Pearson's correlation coefficients between radiographic frailty markers were all less than 0.4. Youden's Index was 0.26 (p < 0.001) at a composite score of 3. In multivariable analysis, the composite score of 3 or greater was associated with poor discharge disposition (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.10-5.18, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Individual radiographic frailty markers are inadequate markers of frailty, as they may miss patients who are frail. This study also suggests that a composite radiographic frailty score may better predict patient outcome than individual radiographic markers of frailty.

Ambulation With Femoral Arterial Cannulation Can Be Safely Performed on Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support can be associated with significant deconditioning due to the requirement for strict bedrest as a result of femoral arterial cannulation. To address this issue, we evaluated our experience with ambulation in patients with peripheral femoral cannulation for VA-ECMO. METHODS: All patients that were peripherally cannulated for VA-ECMO over a 2-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Patients that ambulated at least once while supported with VA-ECMO were included in the analysis. The primary outcomes were safety and feasibility of ambulation, defined as the absence of major bleeding, vascular, or decannulation events. RESULTS: Of 104 patients placed on VA-ECMO, 15 ambulated with a femoral arterial cannula. Forty-six percent of patients were placed on VA-ECMO for decompensated heart failure, and 54% for massive pulmonary embolism. Twenty-seven percent of patients were cannulated during active cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The median length of time from cannulation to out of bed was 3 (range, 0 to 26) days. The median length of time from cannulation to initial ambulation was 4 (range, 1 to 42) days. The median distance of the first postcannulation walk was 300 feet. Neither flow nor speed decreased during or after ambulation. There were no major bleeding events, vascular complications, or decannulation events associated with ambulation. The median intensive care unit length of stay and hospital length of stay were 12 and 21 days, respectively. One-year survival was 100% for ambulating patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulating patients supported with VA-ECMO, despite femoral arterial cannulation, appears feasible and safe in carefully selected patients.

Triage and optimization: A new paradigm in the treatment of massive pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Massive pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a highly fatal condition. Although venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and surgical pulmonary embolectomy in the management of massive PE have been reported previously, the outcomes remain less than ideal. We hypothesized that the institution of a protocolized approach of triage and optimization using VA-ECMO would result in improved outcomes compared with historical surgical management. METHODS: All patients with a massive PE referred to the cardiac surgery service between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by treatment strategy: historical control versus the protocolized approach. In the historical control group, the primary intervention was surgical pulmonary embolectomy. In the protocol approach group, patients were treated based on an algorithmic approach using VA-ECMO. The primary outcome was 1-year survival. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients (control, n = 27; protocol, n = 29) were identified. All 27 patients in the historical control group underwent surgical pulmonary embolectomy, whereas 2 of 29 patients in the protocol approach group were deemed appropriate for direct surgical pulmonary embolectomy. The remaining 27 patients were placed on VA-ECMO. In the protocol approach group, 15 of 29 patients were treated with anticoagulation alone and 14 patients ultimately required surgical pulmonary embolectomy. One-year survival was significantly lower in the historical control group compared with the protocol approach group (73% vs 96%; P = .02), with no deaths occurring after surgical pulmonary embolectomy in the protocol approach group. CONCLUSIONS: A protocolized strategy involving the aggressive institution of VA-ECMO appears to be an effective method to triage and optimize patients with massive PE to recovery or intervention. Implementation of this strategy rather than an aggressive surgical approach may reduce the mortality associated with massive PE.

Outcomes after surgical pulmonary embolectomy for acute submassive and massive pulmonary embolism: A single-center experience.

OBJECTIVES: Ideal treatment strategies for submassive and massive pulmonary embolism remain unclear. Recent reports of surgical pulmonary embolectomy have demonstrated improved outcomes, but surgical technique and postoperative outcomes continue to be refined. The aim of this study is to describe in-hospital survival and right ventricular function after surgical pulmonary embolectomy for submassive and massive pulmonary embolism with excessive predicted mortality (≥5%). METHODS: All patients undergoing surgical pulmonary embolectomy (2011-2015) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with pulmonary embolism were stratified as submassive, massive without arrest, and massive with arrest. Submassive was defined as normotensive with right ventricular dysfunction. Massive was defined as prolonged hypotension due to the pulmonary embolism. Preoperative demographics, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients were identified: 28 as submassive, 18 as massive without arrest, and 9 as massive with arrest. All patients had a right ventricle/left ventricle ratio greater than 1.0. Right ventricular dysfunction decreased from moderate preoperatively to none before discharge (P < .001). In-hospital and 1-year survival were 93% and 91%, respectively, with 100% survival in the submassive group. No patients developed renal failure requiring hemodialysis at discharge or had a postoperative stroke. CONCLUSIONS: In this single institution experience, surgical pulmonary embolectomy is a safe and effective therapy to treat patients with a submassive or massive pulmonary embolism. Although survival in this study is higher than previously reported for patients treated with medical therapy alone, a prospective trial comparing surgical therapy with medical therapy is necessary to further elucidate the role of surgical pulmonary embolectomy in the treatment of pulmonary embolism.

Utilization of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Massive Pulmonary Embolism.

BACKGROUND: The management of massive pulmonary embolism remains challenging, with a considerable mortality rate. Although veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for massive pulmonary embolism has been reported, its use as salvage therapy has been associated with poor outcomes. We reviewed our experience utilizing an aggressive, protocolized approach of VA-ECMO to triage, optimize, and treat these patients. METHODS: All patients with a massive pulmonary embolism who were placed on VA-ECMO, as an initial intervention determined by protocol, were retrospectively reviewed. ECMO support was continued until organ optimization was achieved or neurologic status was determined. At that time, if the thrombus burden resolved, decannulation was performed. If substantial clot burden was still present with evidence of right ventricular (RV) strain, operative therapy was undertaken. RESULTS: Twenty patients were identified. Before cannulation, all patients had an RV-to-left ventricular ratio greater than 1.0 and severe RV dysfunction. The median duration of ECMO support was 5.1 days, with significant improvement in end-organ function. Ultimately, 40% received anticoagulation alone, 5% underwent catheter-directed therapy, and 55% underwent surgical pulmonary embolectomy. Care was withdrawn in 1 patient with a prolonged pre-cannulation cardiac arrest after confirmation of neurologic death. In-hospital and 90-day survival was 95%. At discharge, 18 of 19 patients had normal RV function, and 1 patient, who received catheter-directed therapy, had mild dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: VA-ECMO appears to be an effective tool to optimize end-organ function as a bridge to recovery or intervention, with excellent outcomes. This approach may allow clinicians to better triage patients with massive pulmonary embolism to the appropriate therapy on the basis of recovery of RV function, residual thrombus burden, operative risk, and neurologic status.