RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to analyze the impact of time interval from referral to surgery and from surgery to adjuvant treatment on survival of adult isocitrate dehydrogenase-wild-type (IDH-wt) glioblastomas. METHODS: Data on 392 IDH-wt glioblastomas diagnosed at the Tampere University Hospital in 2004-2016 were obtained from the electronic patient record system. Piecewise Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios for different time intervals between referral and surgery, as well as between surgery and adjuvant treatments. RESULTS: The median survival time from primary surgery was 9.5 months (interquartile range: 3.8-16.0). Survival among patients with an interval exceeding 4 weeks from referral to surgery was no worse compared to <2 weeks (hazard ratio: 0.78, 95% confidence interval: 0.54-1.14). We found indications of poorer outcome when the interval from surgery to radiotherapy exceeded 30 days (hazard ratio: 1.42, 95% confidence interval: 0.91-2.21 for 31-44 days; and 1.59, 0.94-2.67 for over 45 days). CONCLUSIONS: Interval from referral to surgery in the range of 4-10 weeks was not associated with decreased survivals in IDH-wt glioblastomas. In contrast, delay exceeding 30 days from surgery to adjuvant treatment may decrease long-term survival.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Systemic levels of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) are increased in various inflammatory and infectious diseases. We investigated the activation and prognostic value of plasma suPAR (P-suPAR) in patients experiencing their first acute alcohol pancreatitis (AAP). METHODS: From prospectively collected data, we measured P-suPAR concentrations in 104 patients with AAP during hospitalization and again after discharge. RESULTS: According to the revised Atlanta classification, pancreatitis was moderately severe in 29 (28%) and severe in 6 (6%) patients and these severities were combined for further analysis (non-mild AAP, n = 35; 34%). Median P-suPAR levels were significantly higher in patients with AAP during hospitalization than after discharge (4.8 vs 3.1 ng/mL; P < 0.001) and in non-mild compared to mild AAP (6.2 vs 4.2 ng/mL; P < 0.001). When the analysis was made 1 to 4 days after admission (n = 68), the area under the curve was 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.92). P-suPAR was found to be a better prognostic marker in AAP than C-reactive protein, hematocrit, or creatinine. CONCLUSIONS: P-suPAR concentrations are elevated in AAP and correlate with the severity of the disease. These results suggest that P-suPAR may have potential to serve as a novel prognostic marker for AAP severity on admission.