Improvement in quality of life after robotic surgery results in patient satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: There are well-described benefits to minimally invasive surgery including decreased blood loss, shorter hospital-stay, and faster recovery. The role of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology has become increasingly prominent; however limited data are available on quality of life (QOL) after robotic surgery. METHODS: In this prospective, IRB-approved study, women scheduled for robotic surgery for a gynecologic indication between May 2008 and February 2012 completed validated QOL measures at baseline, 6 weeks (6wk), and 4 months postoperative (4mo). Functional status (SF-12), symptom severity and interference (MDASI), sexual function (FSFI), and satisfaction with decision (SWD) were assessed at relevant time points. Differences between groups were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Among 408 women who underwent robotic surgery 278 (68%) completed the QOL measures. Median age was 55.6 years (range 25.7-85.1). Median BMI was 31.3kg/m(2). The majority of patients were white (75%). The most common indication for surgery was endometrial cancer/hyperplasia (59.7%). While physical functioning declined from baseline to 6wk (51.4 to 41.6, p<0.001), it improved by 4mo (53.5). Mental functioning improved over time (baseline 48.6, 6wk 52.8, and 4mo 55.6, p<0.001). Symptom severity decreased over time (p<0.001) as did symptom interference (p<0.001). Sexual function improved significantly from baseline (8.6) to 4mo (20.2, p<0.001). Patients were satisfied with their decision making (SWD=30). CONCLUSION: In this prospective study, general health, symptom burden and sexual function returned to or improved beyond baseline levels within 6 weeks of surgery. Overall, women were satisfied with their decision to undergo robotic surgery.

Overall survival after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancy.

BACKGROUND: Five-Year survival after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies has been reported as high as 60%. The objective of this study was to determine overall survival (OS) after pelvic exenteration and evaluate factors impacting outcome. METHODS: A retrospective review of all women who underwent pelvic exenteration at our institution between February 1993 and December 2010 was performed. OS was defined as time from exenteration to date of death or last contact. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan Meyer method. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the impact of clinical and pathologic factors on survival outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred sixty patients with gynecologic malignancy underwent pelvic exenteration. Five-year recurrence free survival (RFS) was 33% (95%CI 0.25-0.40). Factors which negatively impacted RFS included shorter treatment-free interval (p=.050), vulvar primary (p=.032), positive margins (p<.001), lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI, p<.001), positive lymph nodes (p<.001) and perineural invasion (p=0.030). In multivariate analysis, positive margins (p=.040), positive nodes (p<.001) and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI, p=.003) retained a significant impact on RFS. Five-year OS was 40% (95% CI 0.32-0.48). Factors which negatively impacted OS included vulvar primary (p=.04), positive margins (p<.001), LVSI (p<.001), positive lymph nodes (p<.001) and perineural invasion (p=.008). In multivariate analysis, positive nodes (p=.001) and LVSI (p=.001) retained a significant impact on OS. CONCLUSION: Five-year OS after pelvic exenteration was 40%. Survival outcomes have not significantly improved despite improvements in technique and patient selection. Multiple non-modifiable factors at the time of exenteration are associated with poor survival.

Conversion from robotic surgery to laparotomy: a case-control study evaluating risk factors for conversion.

OBJECTIVES: To determine risk factors associated with conversion to laparotomy for women undergoing robotic gynecologic surgery. METHODS: The medical records of 459 consecutive robotic surgery cases performed between December 2006 and October 2011 by 8 different surgeons at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Cases converted to laparotomy were compared to those completed robotically. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Forty of 459 (8.7%, 95% CI 6.3%-11.7%) patients had conversion to open surgery. Reason for conversion included poor visualization due to adhesions (13), inability to tolerate Trendelenburg (7), enlarged uterus (7), extensive peritoneal disease (5), bowel injury (2), ureteral injury (1), vascular injury (1), bladder injury (1), technical difficulty with the robot (2), and inability to access abdominal cavity (1). 5% of cases were converted prior to docking the robot. On univariate analysis, preoperative diagnosis (p=0.012), non-White race (p=0.004), history of asthma (p=0.027), ASA score (p=0.032), bowel injury (p=0.012), greater BMI (p<0.001), need for blood transfusion (p<0.001), and expected blood loss (p<0.001) were associated with conversion. On multivariate analysis, non-White race (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.39-5.96, p=0.004), bowel injury (OR 35.40, 95% CI 3.00-417.28, p=0.005), and increasing BMI (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.09, p<0.001) were significantly associated with increased risk for conversion. Prior surgery was not associated with conversion to open surgery (p=0.347). CONCLUSION: Conversion to laparotomy was required for 8.7% of patients undergoing robotic surgery for a gynecologic indication. Increasing BMI and non-white race were identified as the two preoperative risk factors associated with conversion.

The effect of body mass index on surgical outcomes and survival following pelvic exenteration.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate whether preoperative body mass index (BMI) impacts surgical outcomes, complication rates, and/or recurrence rates in women undergoing pelvic exenteration. METHODS: All women who underwent pelvic exenteration for gynecologic indications at our institution from 1993 through 2010 were included. Women were stratified into 3 groups based on BMI. Baseline characteristics, surgical outcomes, early (<60 days) and late (≥ 60 days) postoperative complications, and recurrence/survival outcomes were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using log-rank test. RESULTS: 161 patients were included (59 normal weight, 44 overweight, 58 obese). Median follow-up times were 22, 29, and 25 months. Most patients underwent total pelvic exenteration (68%); 64.6% had a vaginal reconstruction. On multivariate analysis, both overweight and obese patients had a higher risk of early superficial wound separation compared to normal weight patients - OR 10.74 (3.33-34.62, p<0.001) and OR 4.35 (1.40-13.52, p=0.011), respectively. Length of surgery was significantly longer for overweight (9.6h, OR 1.26, 1.02-1.55, p=0.032) and obese (10.1h, OR 1.24, 1.04-1.47, p=0.014) patients than for normal weight patients (8.7h). Late postoperative complications for patients in the normal weight, overweight, and obese groups were 47.5%, 45.5%, and 43.1% (p=0.144). There were no differences in time to recurrence (p=0.752) or overall survival (p=0.103) between groups. CONCLUSION: Although operative times were longer and risk for superficial wound separation was significantly higher, pelvic exenteration appears to be feasible and safe in overweight and obese women with overall complication rates and survival outcomes comparable to normal weight women.

Characteristics of, and risk factors for, infections in patients with cancer treated with dasatinib and a brief review of other complications.

Dasatinib has transformed the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia, resulting in durable remissions and prolonged survival. The spectrum of infectious complications during and after dasatinib therapy is not known. Retrospective analysis of records among 69 patients treated with dasatinib showed that 35 (51%) developed 57 episodes of infection. Twenty-nine (51%) episodes occurred during neutropenia, and 25 (44%) were microbiologically confirmed. Compared with patients who did not develop infection with dasatinib therapy, patients with infection were significantly more likely to have acute lymphocytic leukemia (51% vs. 18%; p ≤ 0.005) and to have received high-dose corticosteroids (51% vs. 26%; p ≤ 0.05). Patients with infection were also more likely to have received dasatinib with another antineoplastic agent (57% vs. 35% without infection; p = 0.09). On multivariate analysis, treatment with three or more cycles of dasatinib increased the risk of infection (odds ratio 11.7; 95% confidence interval 2.5-54.3; p = 0.002). The presence of comorbidities tended to increase the risk of infection (odds ratio 3.9; 95% confidence interval 0.9-17.9; p = 0.07). Interestingly, viral infections, including a single case of cytomegalovirus colitis, were uncommon (7%). The rate of death in 57 patients during follow-up was non-significantly higher in patients with infection versus those without infection (35% vs. 18%; p = 0.18). Infection-associated deaths were noted in only two patients (10%) who had an infection and died. The results of our analysis suggest that antibacterial prophylaxis is important in patients who develop neutropenia during dasatinib therapy, although routine antifungal and anti-cytomegalovirus prophylaxis may not be necessary.