Is it the Surgeon? A Re-examination of Mid-urethral Sling Complications.

OBJECTIVE: To identify potential technical factors during initial mid-urethral sling (MUS) placement that contribute to subsequent sling revision procedures. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed examining synthetic MUS reoperations at a single institution from 2008-2020. The implanting surgeon's operative note, when available, was critically reviewed with respect to trocar placement, sling location, and tensioning technique. The reoperative report was reviewed for aberrant intraoperative findings relating to the index surgery. RESULTS: A total of 306 women underwent revision of their MUS. Operative reports from the implanting surgeon were available for 276 (90.2%) women. Review of index operative reports revealed 47 unambiguous descriptions of improper technique, including 19 cases of described excessive tensioning and 2 cases of MUS placement despite noted urethral injury during the index case. Indications for reoperation were clinical obstruction (63%), pain (40%), and mesh erosion/exposure (33%). In 186 (67.4%) women, there was an intraoperative finding during the revision that likely contributed to the need for reoperation. Among these 186 women, 110 (59.1%) slings were noted to have been placed too proximally, 78 (41.9%) were over-suspended, and 57 (30.6%) were placed too deep in the periurethral fascia. CONCLUSION: Review of the index operative note and findings at operative re-exploration of MUS surgeries, often reveals evidence that the initial MUS implantation was technically suboptimal. Such findings suggest that intraoperative surgical technique is a critically important factor contributing to postoperative complications in MUS surgery. This underscores the importance of surgical training and adherence to surgical principles during the placement of a synthetic MUS.

Urinary retention after AdVance™ Sling: A multi-institutional retrospective study.

AIMS: To identify risk factors for urinary retention following AdVance™ Sling placement using preoperative urodynamic studies to evaluate bladder contractility. METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective review of patients who underwent an AdVance Sling for post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence from 2007 to 2019 was performed. Acute urinary retention (AUR) was defined as the complete inability to void or elevated post-void residual (PVR) leading to catheter placement or the initiation of intermittent catheterization at the first void trial postoperatively. Bladder contractility was evaluated based on preoperative urodynamics. RESULTS: Of the 391 patients in this study, 55 (14.1%) experienced AUR, and 6 patients (1.5%) had chronic urinary retention with a median follow-up of 18.1 months. In total, 303 patients (77.5%) underwent preoperative urodynamics, and there was no significant difference between average PdetQmax (26.4 vs. 27.4 cmH2 O), Qmax (16.6 vs. 16.2 ml/s), PVR (19.9 vs. 28.1 ml), bladder contractility index (108 vs. 103) for patients with or without AUR following AdVance Sling. Impaired bladder contractility preoperatively was not predictive of AUR. Time to postoperative urethral catheter removal was predictive of AUR (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.94; p = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic urinary retention after AdVance Sling placement is uncommon and acute retention is generally self-limiting. No demographic or urodynamic factors were predictive of AUR. Patients who developed AUR were more likely to have their void trials within 2 days following AdVance Sling placement versus longer initial catheterization periods, suggesting that a longer duration of postoperative catheterization may reduce the occurrence of AUR.

Do urodynamics predict urinary retention after sling placement in the complex patient: the value of reproducing symptoms on urodynamics.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To examine urinary retention (UR) after female urethral sling placement in patients with or without detrusor underactivity (DU) or Valsalva voiding whose urodynamics (UDS) accurately reproduced voiding symptoms to determine whether the reproduction of voiding symptoms on UDS in those with DU is predictive of UR after sling placement. METHODS: We performed a review of patients undergoing urethral sling procedures for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) looking specifically at the occurrence of short- and long-term urinary retention. Preoperative UDS data were obtained from a prospectively acquired UDS database in which patients were directly queried at the time of the UDS study about whether the filling and/or storage phase of the study reproduced their usual symptoms. RESULTS: Of the 141 women who had a urethral sling procedure, 124 (87.9%) had preoperative UDS. Of those who had UDS, 41 (33%) had de novo UR at some point postoperatively. Compared to those without DU, patients with DU and/or Valsalva voiding were more likely to have UR (75.6% vs. 56.6%, p = 0.04). There was no difference in association of UR in patients with DU/Valsalva voiding whose UDS reproduced voiding symptoms compared to those with DU/Valsalva voiding whose UDS did not reproduce symptoms (OR 1.01, CI 0.32-3.19, p 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that patients with DU/Valsalva voiding had an increased association with UR but did not find reproduction of symptoms on UDS to correlate with UR in either those with DU/Valsalva voiding or with normal bladder contractility.

Outcomes of treatment of stress urinary incontinence associated with female urethral diverticula: A selective approach.

AIMS: To assess surgical outcomes of concomitant treatment of SUI at time of transvaginal urethral diverticulectomy (TVUD) based on a selective approach. METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, we identified patients with a UD and SUI who underwent TVUD between July 2004 and January 2016. SUI was documented before and after surgery using subjective and objective parameters. Autologous pubovaginal slings (APVS) were used selectively based on surgeon and patient preference. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients underwent surgical treatment of urethral diverticula; 39 patients with UD and concomitant SUI. Mean age was 53 years. Mean follow-up was 16.2 months. There were 24 patients (62%) with SUI that underwent concomitant APVS. There was resolution of SUI in 20 of 24 patients (83%) who underwent a simultaneous APVS compared to 8 of 15 patients (53%) who underwent TVUD without APVS. Surgery resulted in the improvement or resolution of the majority of preoperative symptoms including recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) (82% vs 15%), dyspareunia (64% vs 8%), and urgency (56% vs 13%) (preoperative vs postoperative). CONCLUSIONS: Female UD is often associated with SUI. Concomitant surgical treatment of UD and SUI often results in satisfactory control of bothersome SUI as well as other urinary symptoms such as UTI, dyspareunia and urgency. Treatment of SUI with APVS when undergoing TVUD is feasible with satisfactory outcomes.

Analysis of Complications of Pelvic Mesh Excision Surgery Using the Clavien-Dindo Classification System.

PURPOSE: We describe and categorize complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification system in patients who underwent vaginal mesh excision surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With institutional review board approval we retrospectively reviewed the records of 277 patients who underwent vaginal mesh extraction between 2007 and 2015 at a single institution. Surgical complications were stratified using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Complications were perioperative (prior to discharge) or postoperative (within 90 days). Indications for initial mesh placement, mesh revision procedure, time to resolution and medical comorbidities were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 277 patients 47.3% had at least 1 surgical complication, including multiple complications in 7.2%. A total of 155 complications were identified, which were grade II in 49.0% of cases, grade I in 25.8%, grade IIIb in 18.7%, grade IIIa in 5.2% and grade IVa in 1.3%. No grade IVb or V complications were identified. The indication for initial mesh placement did not significantly affect complication frequency. Patients who underwent combined stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse mesh revision surgeries had an increased frequency of complications compared to those treated with mesh revision surgery for pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence alone (p = 0.045). Most complications occurred postoperatively and resolved by 90 days. Age, body mass index, smoking status and diabetes were not associated with increased complications. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the complexity of mesh revision surgery most complications are minor. Serious complications may develop, emphasizing the need for proper patient counseling and surgical experience when performing these procedures.

Stress urinary incontinence surgery trends in academic female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery urology practice in the setting of the food and drug administration public health notifications.

AIMS: To investigate the possible effects of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Public Health Notifications in 2008 and 2011 regarding surgical trends in transvaginal mesh (TVM) placement for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and related mesh revision surgery in Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS) practice in tertiary care academic medical centers in the United States. METHODS: Surgical volume for procedures performed primarily by FPMRS surgeons at eight academic institutions across the US was collected using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for stress urinary incontinence repair and revision surgeries from 2007 to 2013. SAS statistical software was used to assess for trends in the data. RESULTS: There was a decrease in the use of synthetic mesh sling for the treatment of SUI at academic tertiary care centers over the past 7 years; however, this was not statistically significant. While the total number of surgical interventions for SUI remained stable, there was an increase in the utilization of autologous fascia pubovaginal slings (AFPVS). The number of mesh sling revision surgeries, including urethrolysis and removal or revision of slings, increased almost three-fold at these centers. CONCLUSIONS: These observed trends suggest a possible effect of the FDA Public Health Notifications regarding TVM on surgical practice for SUI in academic centers, even though they did not specifically warn against the use of synthetic mesh for this indication. Indications for surgery, complications, and outcomes were not evaluated during this retrospective study. However, such data may provide alternative insights into reasons for the observed trends. Neurourol. Urodynam. 36:1155-1160, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Female Urethral Diverticula in the Contemporary Era: Is the Classic Triad of the "3Ds" Still Relevant?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the correlation between signs and symptoms of urethral diverticulum (UD), especially the classic triad of 3Ds including dysuria, dyspareunia, and postvoid dribbling, before and after transvaginal urethral diverticulectomy, in relation to anatomic configuration on imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After IRB approval, records of 54 females who underwent transvaginal urethral diverticulectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Urinary symptoms before and after the procedure were correlated with the anatomical configuration of the UD on magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 52 years (range 29-77). Common presenting symptoms were stress urinary incontinence (60%), dyspareunia (60%), and recurrent urinary tract infections (70%). The classic 3Ds were present collectively in only 5% of patients. Dyspareunia was the most common of the 3 "Ds." Twenty-seven percent of patients had none of the classic 3Ds. On physical examination, the most common finding was a tender anterior vaginal wall mass (52%). Presenting signs and symptoms did not correlate with anatomic configuration in terms of radial urethral involvement, size, or length of urethral involvement on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. After median 14 months of follow-up, no patient reported the classic 3Ds after surgery. CONCLUSION: Recurrent urinary tract infections, stress urinary incontinence, dyspareunia, and vaginal mass are the most common presentations of UD. The classic triad "3Ds" is rarely seen in the individual patient. Preoperative anatomic configuration on imaging is not correlated with the severity or nature of presenting symptoms.

Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery in Academic Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Urology Practice in the Setting of the Food and Drug Administration Public Health Notifications.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the effect of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) public health notifications regarding transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapsed (POP) on surgeon practice patterns in tertiary care academic medical centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surgical volume for procedures performed primarily by fellowship trained Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery at a sampling of 8 academic institutions across the US were collected using current procedural technology codes for POP repair and revision surgeries from 2007 to 2013. SAS statistical software was used to analyze data for trends and to assess differences in number of procedures across years by performing Spearman correlation analysis and Pearson's chi-squared test. Significance of trend was defined as P <.05 for both analysis methods. RESULTS: There has been a substantial reduction in transvaginal mesh-augmented repair of POP since the FDA warning statements of 2008 and 2011. Mesh revision surgery has increased over this same period. However, the total number of interventions for POP has remained stable over the study period. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy has increased as a whole but represents only a small percentage of total cases. CONCLUSION: Surgical correction of POP comprises a large portion of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery practice that continues to evolve in the aftermath of the FDA public health notifications. The utilization of transvaginal placement of surgical mesh augmented POP repair has decreased among practicing urologists at a sampling of academic institutions across the United States. Indications for surgery, complications, and outcomes were not evaluated during this retrospective study; however, such data may provide alternative insights into the reasons for the observed trends.

Simple vs complex urethral diverticulum: presentation and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether complex anatomic configurations of urethral diverticula (UD), namely circumferential UD (cUD), present differently or confer a worse prognosis as compared with simple UD (sUD). METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of patients who underwent transvaginal urethral diverticulectomy at a single institution over an 8-year period was performed. A total of 43 patients were identified, of which 11 were found to have cUD. These lesions were repaired with complete division of the urethra to access the dorsally located portion of the UD, followed by end-to-end anastomosis for urethral reconstruction with a Martius flap and/or autologous fascial pubovaginal sling performed as needed. Presenting symptoms and surgical outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Mean age was 50.9 years in the cUD vs 52.7 years in the sUD. Patients with cUD were more likely to present with stress urinary incontinence than those with sUD (90.9% vs 56.3%; P = .04). There was no statistical difference in the rate of preoperative urgency, pelvic pain and/or dyspareunia, postvoid dribbling, and urinary tract infection. Postoperatively, patients with cUD were more likely to have a urinary tract infection (27% vs 3%; P = .2); otherwise, rates of postoperative results were similar. CONCLUSION: Urethral transection and end-to-end anastomosis for the repair of complex UD is a feasible approach and results in similar clinical outcomes compared with the repair of sUD.

Predicting for postoperative incontinence following sling incision.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Our objective was to assess preoperative risk factors for developing recurrent stress urinary incontinence (SUI) following transvaginal sling incision (TVSI) for bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). METHODS: We identified 101 women who underwent TVSI and/or removal of a midurethral sling. Thirty-nine underwent TVSI for clinical and videourodynamic demonstrable BOO. Eighteen of 39 women demonstrated preoperative clinical SUI and urodynamic BOO. A comparative analysis was performed specifically looking at several clinical factors and the risk of the occurrence of postoperative SUI. RESULTS: Mean age, number of prior surgeries, parity, and pre- and postoperative PVRs did not predict for postoperative SUI. Nine of 18 (50%) of women with SUI and BOO preoperatively vs. only 2/21 (10%) of women with BOO alone developed postoperative SUI. This difference in the incidence of postoperative SUI was statistically significant (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with BOO, the presence of preoperative clinical SUI is a predictor for postoperative SUI following TVSI.