Surgical Rib Fixation is Associated With Lower Mortality in Patients With Traumatic Rib Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Nonoperative management (NOM) along with supportive care has been the adopted approach for traumatic rib fractures; however, surgical approaches have emerged recently to treat this common pathology. Despite this, there are no guidelines for surgical rib fixation in patients with traumatic rib fractures. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective cohort study was performed at the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital aiming to compare the outcomes and complications between patients with traumatic rib fractures who undergo surgical fixation and their counterparts with NOM. The study period comprised from January 2016 through July 2020. Outcomes were evaluated with negative binomial and logistic regressions. RESULTS: Fifty patients were identified for the surgical rib fixation group, who were matched to 150 patients who received NOM. The majority of patients were male (91.5%), with a median (interquartile range) age of 53 (29) years. Concomitant chest injuries were significantly more prevalent in the operative group, such as flail segment (P < 0.001), number of fractures (P < 0.001), and displaced rib fractures (P < 0.001). Although hospital length of stay was 25% (95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.54) longer in the surgical group, this intervention was associated with an 85% (95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.70) lower mortality rate when compared to conservative management. CONCLUSIONS: Rib fixation may offer some benefits in selected patients with traumatic rib fractures, such as those with bilateral rib fractures, multiple displaced rib fractures, flail segment, and concomitant thoracic injuries. This study may serve as a guide for treatment strategy and patient selection regarding the surgical management of traumatic rib fractures.

Trends and outcomes of trauma patients positive to marijuana and cocaine.

PURPOSE: Substance misuse has long been recognized as a major predisposing risk factor for traumatic injury. However, there still exists no clear scientific consensus regarding the impact of drug use on patient outcomes. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the demographic profile, hospital-course factors, and outcomes of trauma patients based on their toxicology. METHODS: This is a non-concurrent cohort study of 3709 patients treated at the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital during 2002-2018. The sample was divided into four groups according to their toxicology status. Statistical techniques used included Pearson's chi-square test, Spearman correlation, and negative binomial and logistic regressions. RESULTS: Admission rates for marijuana (rho = 0.87) and marijuana and cocaine positive (rho = 0.68) patients increased. Positive toxicology patients underwent surgery more often than negative testing patients (marijuana: 68.7%, cocaine: 65.6%, marijuana & cocaine: 69.8%, negative: 57.0%). Among patients with non-penetrating injuries, a positive toxicology for cocaine or marijuana was linked to a 48% and 42% increased adjusted risk of complications, 37% and 27% longer TICU LOS, and 32% and 18% longer hospital LOS, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results show an association between positive toxicology for either marijuana, cocaine, or both with higher need for surgery. Additionally, our results show an increase in complications, TICU LOS, and hospital LOS among non-penetrating trauma patients testing positive for marijuana or cocaine. Therefore, this study provides valuable information on the clinical profile of patients with positive toxicology, suggesting they might benefit from more aggressive management.

Epidemiology of trauma in patients with mental disorders.

Objectives: We aimed to explore the influence of mental disorders on the risk of developing complications and in-hospital mortality after trauma. Methods: We conducted an institutional review board-approved cohort study of 23 500 adult patients admitted to the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital from 2002 to 2019. Participants were divided into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of psychiatric illnesses. Logistic regressions were employed to investigate the effect of mental illness on study outcomes. Results: Psychiatric illness was associated with higher risk of complications; this risk increased with age. The pattern was accentuated for those with substance use disorders (SUD) and attenuated for those with non-substance-related diagnoses (NSRD). Psychiatric patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 15 had a 42% (95% CI 1.17 to 1.73) higher risk of dying, while the opposite was seen for those with scores <15 (adjusted OR=0.79; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.99). SUD was associated with a 51% (95% CI 1.21 to 1.88) higher risk of death in patients with GCS scores of 15, while NSRD was linked to a 49% (95% CI 0.33 to 0.79) lower odds of death among subjects with scores <15. Conclusions: Our results suggest that trauma patients with SUD are at increased risk of developing complications and those with SUD and GCS scores of 15 are at increased risk of death. Mental health screening is an essential component of the management of trauma patients. Stratifying based on mental health disorders may be helpful during the clinical management of trauma patients, as those with SUD may benefit from more aggressive management. Level of evidence: Level 4, prognostic and epidemiological study. Study type: Original retrospective cohort study.

Elderly Admission Trends at the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital: A Time-Series Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The aging process places the elderly, a worldwide increasing age group, at an increased risk for trauma. This study aims to explore changes over time in admission rates, sociodemographical, clinical, and injury-related data in elderly patients (aged ≥65 y) admitted to the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital (PRTH) during 2000-2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A time-series analysis was conducted. Admission rates were analyzed by fitting an exponential growth curve model. Trends were assessed using the Cochrane-Armitage and Cuzick tests for categorical and continuous data, respectively. RESULTS: Elderly admission rates to the PRTH have shown growth over the past 2 decades, from 6.2 cases per 100 overall admissions in 2000 to 18.2 in 2019. This trend is projected to continue with estimated 24.8 (95% CI: 21.7-27.8) cases per 100 overall admissions in 2023. Trends for mechanisms of injury such as motor vehicle accidents and pedestrians showed a significant decrease, whereas falls presented a clear positive trend, showing an increase from 25.6% in 2000-2004 to 46.2% in 2015-2019. Both Injury Severity Score ≥25 and Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8 declined significantly through time. Finally, in-hospital mortality presented a decreasing trend from 31.7% in 2000-2004 to 21.5% in 2015-2019. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis demonstrates an increase over time in elderly admissions, especially fall-related trauma. Also, it projects this upward trend will continue. This imposes new challenges for PRTH and other healthcare services and is a gateway for the implementation of adapted clinical management.

Recidivism at the puerto rico trauma hospital.

PURPOSE: Although trauma represents a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, there is limited and heterogeneous evidence regarding trauma recidivism and its outcomes. This analysis determined the rate and independent risk factors of trauma recidivism and compared the first and second injury episode among recidivists. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective cohort study was performed with data from the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital Registry. Bivariate analyses were done using Pearson's Chi squared, Wilcoxon rank-sum, McNemar, Stuart-Maxwell or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, as appropriate. Independent predictors for recidivism were determined through a logistic regression model. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: 24,650 patients were admitted to the hospital during 2000-2017. Recidivism rate was 14 per 1,000 patients discharged alive. Males and individuals aged 15-24 years old were 3.88 (95% CI: 2.21-6.80) and 3.80 (95% CI: 2.24-6.46) times more likely to be recidivists, respectively. Contrariwise, an ISS [Formula: see text] 25 [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.28-0.68] and a GCS [Formula: see text] 8 (AOR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.34-0.92) were protective factors. Furthermore, recidivists exhibited less in-hospital mortality than their non-recidivist counterparts (7.2% vs. 10.7%; p = 0.045). For recidivists, the median (interquartile range) time to reinjury was 42 (59) months; and the second injury episode was more severe than the first one, as the proportion of patients with ISS [Formula: see text] 25 increased (7.9% vs. 14.1%; p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: The independent predictors of trauma recidivism and the median time to reinjury identified in this study provide valuable information to the development of prevention strategies aimed at reducing the burden of injury.

A Retrospective Cohort Study on Health Insurance: Related Disparities in Trauma Patients After Penetrating Injuries: 2000-2014.

OBJECTIVE: Although the lack of health insurance has been linked to poor health outcomes in several diseases, this relationship is still understudied in trauma. There exist differences between the Puerto Rico health care system and that of the United States. We therefore aimed to assess mortality disparities related to insurance coverage at the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital (PRTH). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who sustained penetrating injuries (presenting at the PRTH from 2000 to 2014) was performed. Individuals were classified by their insurance status. Study variables comprised demographics, clinical characteristics and outcomes. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the association between health insurance status and risk of dying. RESULTS: Patients with public health insurance experienced more complications than did individuals who had private health insurance (PrHI) or who were uninsured. This group had longer durations of mechanical ventilation and spent more time in the hospital than did patients who had PrHI or who were uninsured. However, uninsured patients with gunshot wounds were 54% (adjusted odds ratio = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.36) more likely to die than were their counterparts who had PrHI. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that having health insurance could reduce a given patient mortality risk in trauma settings. More studies with larger samples are warranted to confirm these findings. If these findings hold true, then providing equitable access to health services for the entire population could prevent patients suffering trauma from having premature, preventable deaths.

The effect of the lockdown executive order during the COVID-19 pandemic in recent trauma admissions in Puerto Rico.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic led to world-wide restrictions on social activities to curb the spread of this disease. Very little is known about the impact of these restrictions on trauma centers. Our objective was to determine the effect of the pandemic-associated lockdown on trauma admissions, patient's demographics, mechanisms of injury, injury severity, and outcomes in the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital. METHODS: An IRB-approved quasi-experimental study was performed to assess the impact of the restrictions by comparing trauma admissions during the lockdown (March 15, 2020 - June 15, 2020) with a control period (same period in 2017-2019). Comparisons were done using the Pearson's chi-square test, Fisher exact test, or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. A negative binomial model was fitted to estimate the incidence rate ratio for overall admissions among pre-lockdown and during-lockdown periods. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 308 subjects were admitted during the quarter of study for 2017; 323, for 2018; 347, for 2019; and 150, for 2020. The median (interquartile range) age of patients rose significantly from 40 (33) years to 49 (30) years (p < 0.001) for the lockdown period compared to the historical period. Almost all mechanisms of injury (i.e., motor vehicle accident, assault, pedestrian, burn, suicide attempt, other) had a slight non-significant reduction in the percentage of patients presenting with an injury. Instead, falls experienced an increase during the lockdown period (18.9% vs. 26.7%; p = 0.026). Moreover, the proportion of severe cases decreased, as measured by an injury severity score (ISS) > 15 (37.3% vs. 26.8%; p = 0.014); while there were no differences in the median hospital length of stay and the mortality rate between the comparison groups. Finally, the decrease in overall admissions registered during the lockdown accounts for a 59% (IRR 0.41; 95% CI 0.31-0.54) change compared to the pre-lockdown period, when controlling for sex, age, mechanism of injury, and ISS. CONCLUSIONS: Following periods of social isolation and curfews, trauma centers can expect drastic reductions in their overall patient volume with associated changes in trauma patterns. Our findings will help inform new interventions and improve healthcare preparedness for future or similar circumstances.

Epidemiology of traumatic falls after Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico.

BACKGROUND: Hurricanes are among the most devastating natural disasters, playing a significant role in public health. Currently, the epidemiology of fall-related injuries after the occurrence of a tropical storm is not well described. This study aims to compare the demographical patterns, clinical profile, hospital course, and costs of patients admitted to the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital before and after Hurricane Maria. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed to compare fall-related injuries after the hurricane (September 20, 2017 - January 20, 2018) with a control period (same period in 2014-2016). Comparison between the groups was done using chi-square, Mann-Whitney test, and logistical regression. RESULTS: After the hurricane, there was an increase in the proportion of fall-related admissions in subjects aged 40-64 years (39.2% vs. 50.6%) and a decrease among those aged 18-39 years (16.0% vs. 5.9%), when compared with the previous years. A greater proportion of patients presented with work related injuries (3.9% vs. 9.4%). No significant differences were identified for sex, Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, and hospital outcomes (hospital and intensive care unit days, mechanical ventilation, and mortality). Intracranial injuries were marginally higher post-Maria (p = 0.06). In multivariate analysis, during the post-Maria period, an increased risk of fall-related injuries was observed among subjects ≥40 years (OR: 3.20) and injuries related to recovery work (OR: 2.64) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that there is an increased risk of fall-related injuries among middle-aged individuals after a hurricane, causing significant changes in epidemiology. This study helps to elucidate the health consequences of falls and, in doing so, improves healthcare preparedness, interventions, and planning for future natural disasters.

Unveiling the Natural History of Category 4 Tropical Cyclones: The Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital Experience after Hurricane Maria.

OBJECTIVES: The hazardous environmental conditions hurricanes create might increase injury incidence almost 7 times. Therefore, a cohort study was performed at the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital to compare morbidity and mortality patterns of patients after Hurricane Maria with a control period. METHODS: Admissions from September 20, 2017, through January 20, 2018, constituted the post-Maria period (473 patients); the corresponding months of the previous year comprised the pre-Maria period (439 patients). Comparisons were done using Pearson's chi-square or Mann-Whitney U-tests, as appropriate. A logistic regression was performed to assess the association between mortality and the study period. RESULTS: Postlandfall admissions among patients aged 40-64 y increased by 6.6%, while among subjects between ages 18 and 39 y dropped by 7.0% (P = 0.03). Falls, gunshots, and burns were the injury mechanisms that varied the most across the exposure period. The median Injury Severity Score (13 vs 12; P = 0.05) and the frequency of Glasgow Coma Scale scores ≤8 (17.1% vs 10.9%; P = 0.03) were higher among poststorm patients. Moreover, a 2-fold (odds ratio = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.07-3.47) increase in mortality was observed after Maria, when adjusting for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Following a hurricane, trauma centers might expect an older population, with more severe injuries and a 2-fold increased mortality risk.

Morbidity and mortality of Hispanic trauma patients with diabetes mellitus.

PURPOSE: DM and trauma are leading causes of death in Hispanic patients, yet the interaction between them remains obscure. We aimed to assess the complications and in-hospital mortality rate of Hispanic diabetic trauma patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out using data from the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital databank. Patients were matched based on gender, age, mechanism of injury, Glasgow Coma Scale, and Injury Severity Score using propensity-score matching. From 2000 to 2014, a total of 1134 patients with DM were compared to 1134 patients who did not have DM. The outcomes measured were hospital and TICU lengths of stay, days on mechanical ventilation, complications, and in-hospital mortality rate. A logistic regression model was carried out to evaluate the relationship of DM with complications and mortality after trauma. RESULTS: Hispanic patients with DM had longer hospital and TICU stays and required mechanical ventilation for extended periods. Complications, predominantly of an infectious nature, were more common among DM patients than they were among non-DM patients: 31.3% in the DM group vs. 11.6% in the non-DM group (OR 3.46; 95% CI 2.77-4.31). Despite an increase in the number of complications, DM was not associated with higher in-hospital mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: DM is associated with a twofold increase in complications in Hispanic diabetic trauma patients, which may account for their longer hospital and TICU stays. This indicates that diabetic Hispanic trauma patients may need earlier and more aggressive intervention to reduce their risk of developing complications.

Patient Outcomes After Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of early tracheostomy (ET, ≤7 days) versus that of late tracheostomy (LT, >7 days) on outcomes such as hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) days, mechanical ventilation (MV) days, and mortality ratio. METHODS: A historical cohort study was undertaken using charts of patients admitted to the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital who required MV and underwent tracheostomies, from 2000 to 2013. A logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between timing of tracheostomy and complications and mortality. To estimate the relationship between ET and outcomes related to hospital stay, a binomial-negative regression was performed. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 1134 patients were evaluated, 313 of whom underwent ET and 821 underwent LT. Early tracheostomy patients had a lower Injury Severity Score compared with their counterparts (P = 0.004) and showed lower complications (respiratory failure: odds ratio [OR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.84; acute respiratory distress syndrome: OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30-0.64; pneumonia: OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.40-0.71; septicemia: OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.33-0.70; bacteremia: OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40-0.86) than LT patients. Those with ET had lower MV days (RRadj, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.68-0.82), ICU days (RRadj, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.59-0.73), and LOS (RRadj, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.69-0.80) compared with those with LT, after adjusting for age, Injury Severity Score, and complications. However, there were no differences in mortality ratio (ORadj, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-1.01) among ET and LT patients, after adjusting for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that ET reduced complications, MV days, ICU days, and LOS, having an indirect effect on mortality ratio. Standardized protocols for ET are recommended to enhance health outcomes in trauma patients.

Traumatic esophageal perforation in Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital: A case-series.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal injuries are rare, life-threatening, events with an overall reported incidence of less than 3%. In rare cases, trauma due to blunt or penetrating injuries cause esophageal perforations, which account for less than 15% of all esophageal injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A case-series study was conducted to describe the outcomes and management of all the traumatic esophageal injuries at the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital (PRTH) from 2000 through 2017. These cases were evaluated in terms of etiology of perforation, mechanism of injury and esophageal level. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were treated for esophageal injuries at the PRTH between 2000 and 2017. Of these patients, 15 (93.7%) were males with a median age of 24.5 years (16, 49). Regarding the etiology of the esophageal perforation, 2 (12.5%) patients suffered blunt esophageal trauma, and 14 (87.5%) patients had penetrating trauma to the esophagus. The most common mechanism of perforation was gunshot wound 10 (62.4%), followed by stab wound 4 (25.0%), and the least common were motor vehicle collision 1 (6.3%) and pedestrian injured by traffic 1 (6.3%). Regarding esophageal location, 9 (56.3%) patients presented cervical, 6 (37.5%) thoracic, and 1 (6.3%) abdominal injuries. Most patients 13 (81.3%) had a prompt diagnosis of traumatic esophageal perforation, while 3 (18.7%) patients had a delayed diagnosis. Only 2 (12.5%) deaths occurred among our 16 patients, including 1 (6.3%) in delayed diagnosed subjects. CONCLUSION: Esophageal perforation is a life-threatening condition and should be treated urgently. An early diagnosis and prompt surgical treatment completed in the first 24-h is fundamental for a good outcome.

Traumatic Vascular Injury and its Management with Temporary Intravascular Shunts: A Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital's Experience.

OBJECTIVE: Temporary intravascular shunts (TIVSs) are commonly used as a damagecontrol procedure in trauma settings. Currently, there is scarce literature in the civilian field, and what there is is limited to large trauma centers with multiple resources. Therefore, we aimed to describe TIVS usage, and the outcomes of that usage, at Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a case series conducted from 2009 to 2013 with 32 patients who suffered vascular trauma, of which 13 needed TIVSs. Data related to age, trauma mechanism, injured vessel, type of shunt, Glasgow Coma Scale, vital signs, and mortality were collected. The analysis was carried out using descriptive statistics. This protocol was approved by the IRB of the Medical Sciences Campus. RESULTS: The most frequent mechanism of injury was a gunshot (11/13; 84.6%). The most commonly injured vessel was the superficial femoral artery. Indwelling time ranged from 6 to 96 hours. Only 2 of the 13 (15.4%) patients with shunts reported thrombosis. Furthermore, we performed 4 (30.7% of the patients) prophylactic fasciotomies and 4 (30.7% of the patients) amputations; 4 of the 13 (30.7%) patients died from unrelated causes. CONCLUSION: Our results are consistent with those in the literature, which supports our contention that a TIVS can be an effective component of damage-control vascular surgery and can, in both military and civilian settings, aid in extremity amputation prevention. Furthermore, it has been established that a TIVS can be fashioned from any available hollow tube. However, further research is needed to evaluate the safety of an improvised catheter of this nature.

A Comparative Analysis of the Injury Patterns and In-Hospital Mortality Rates of Belted and Unbelted Motor-Vehicle Occupants - Puerto Rico, January 2000 to December 2014.

OBJECTIVE: Motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) constitute a leading source of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Seatbelt use has been associated with reduced mortality in MVCs. In Puerto Rico, the impact of seatbelt use on MVC deaths has not been evaluated, although they represent a major public health threat. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the association between seatbelt use and in-hospital mortality at Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital (PRTH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 2,685 MVC patients aged 1 to 96 years was conducted using the Trauma Registry at PRTH, with data collected from 2000 through 2014. The patient data included sociodemographic and clinical variables and outcomes. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the mortality risk of patients of severe MVC-related trauma who had been wearing seatbelts and compare it to the risk sustained by their unbelted counterparts. RESULTS: Seatbelt use was more common in females than it was in males (71% vs.62%; p < 0.001) and more prevalent in older as opposed to younger patients (p < 0.001). Belted severe trauma victims suffered less frequently from head injuries than did their unbelted counterparts (p < 0.001). The proportions of patients with Glasgow coma scale (GCS) scores of 8 or lower (17% vs. 6%; p < 0.001) and Injury Severity Scores (ISSs) of 25 or higher (24% vs. 15%; p < 0.001) were greater for the unbelted group. Belted severe trauma victims had a 30% lower in-hospital mortality risk compared to their unbelted peers (ORunadj = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.52-0.92). After adjusting for confounders, this difference in risk was eliminated (ORadj = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.72-1.52). CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that seatbelt use is associated with fewer head injuries, lower ISSs, and higher GCS scores. This suggests that using seatbelts mitigates trauma severity, thereby reducing the likelihood of in-hospital mortality for those MVC victims who were wearing seatbelts at the time of their accident.

Trauma epidemiology in Puerto Rico: in-hospital morbidity and mortality from 2002 to 2011.

This study aimed to describe the distribution of injury mechanisms and to assess the impact of those mechanisms on the morbidity and mortality of trauma. All patients admitted to Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital (2002-2011) for road-traffic collisions (RTCs, 5,371), gunshot wounds (GSWs, 2,946), falls (2,319), pedestrian accidents (1,652), and stab wounds (SWs, 1,073) were selected. Gunshot victims were 1.19 (95%CI: 1.07-1.33) times as likely as road-traffic victims to have an ISS ≥25. Pedestrians were 1.76 (95%CI: 1.49-2.09) times more likely to have a GCS ≤8 than road-traffic victims were. The risk of dying was 2.64 (95%CI: 2.20-3.16) times higher for gunshot victims and 1.51 (95%CI: 1.23-1.86) times higher for pedestrians compared to patients who had had RTCs. Gunshot victims and pedestrians had the worst clinical outcomes. Accordingly, these patients should receive the most aggressive clinical management. Furthermore, it is imperative to develop public health campaigns on trauma prevention.

Trauma Epidemiology of Women in Puerto Rico, 2002-2011.

OBJECTIVE: Recent literature has suggested that trauma is heterogenic and that physiological response to it differs between sexes. The study represented in this manuscript aimed to describe gender differences in the mortality rates of trauma patients at the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital (PRTH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study performed at PRTH. A total of 14,874 injured patients admitted to the hospital from 2002 to 2011 were included in the sample and divided into 2 groups, based on sex. Pearson's chi-square test was employed for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous ones. A logistic regression model was undertaken to estimate the association between gender and study outcomes, after adjusting for confounders. A p-value lower than 0.05 was an indication of statistical significance. IRB approval was received. RESULTS: The most common injury areas for women were the chest (32.50%), followed by the extremities (25.83%) and the head/neck (21.51%). Road traffic collisions (RTCs) (45.08%), falls (19.62%), and pedestrian accidents (16.08%) were the most common injury mechanisms for women. The highest frequency of RTC injuries (57.52%) among females occurred in patients who were from 18 to 39 years old. Females 65 years old and older exhibited the highest frequency of falls (39.78%) and pedestrian injuries (25.14%). Males 17 years and under were more likely to have an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 15 or greater (AOR = 1.56; 95% CI: 1.19-2.03) than were their female counterparts; and, overall, males were more likely to have a Glasgow coma score (GCS) under 9 (AOR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.11-1.53) than females were. Despite these results, there were no differences between gender mortality rates (AOR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.86-1.25). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that there is no sex dimorphism conferring protection on females. Future studies should be conducted to assess this issue.