Cancer Burden Among Arab-World Females in 2020: Working Toward Improving Outcomes.

PURPOSE: Cancer is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. This work presents the Arab-world females' cancers (AFCs) statistics in 2020, compared with the 2018 AFCs statistics, the Arab-world male cancers statistics, and the world females' cancers (WFCs) statistics in 2020. This can help set the stage for a better policy for cancer control programs and improve outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive review of the 2020 Global Cancer Observatory concerning AFCs was performed. Data on various cancers were compiled and compared among the countries in the region and WFCs. RESULTS: A total estimate of 244,317 new cases and 132,249 deaths is reported in AFCs; representing 2.65% and 2.99% of WFCs, respectively, with an average crude incidence/mortality ratio of 116.2 (/100,000 population)/62.9 (/100,000 population) and an age-standardized incidence/mortality ratio of 137.7(/100,000 population)/77.2(/100,000 population) compared with 238.8(/100,000 population)/114.6(/100,000 population) and 186(/100,000 population)/84.2(/100,000 population) of WFCs, respectively. Five-year prevalent cases were 585,295; 2.28% of WFCs. In comparison to males, females accounted for 47.8% of the whole population, 52.9% in incidence, 46.9% in mortality, and 56.9% in the prevalence of patients with cancer. Mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) was 0.54 (range 0.39-0.62 in Arab countries, compared with 0.48 globally), and it ranged from 0.14 to 0.97 in the 30 AFC types. Breast cancer was the most common cancer in incidence and mortality, with an MIR of 0.39. CONCLUSION: The 2020 descriptive analysis of the females' cancers in the Arab world revealed a relatively high MIR compared with females' cancers worldwide; a lower MIR compared with the males; and comparable MIR to 2018 one. We call for more in-depth studies to determine the causes of these differences that might translate into actionable interventions and better outcomes.

A multicentre point prevalence survey of hospital antibiotic prescribing and quality indices in the Kurdistan regional government of Northern Iraq: the need for urgent action.

BACKGROUND: Rationale antibiotic use is crucial to address antimicrobial resistance (AMR) threats. No study has been undertaken in the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) to document current antibiotic use/areas for improvement given the high AMR rates. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Point prevalence survey (PPS), using the Global PPS methodology, was conducted among the three major public hospitals in KRG/northern Iraq from September-December 2019. Prevalence and quality of antibiotic use were assessed using agreed indicators. RESULTS: Prevalence of antibiotic use was high (93.7%; n = 192/205); third-generation cephalosporins were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics (52.6%; n = 140/266). Reasons for treatment were recorded for only 61.7% (n = 164/266) of antibiotics and high use (89.9%) of parenteral therapy was observed. All therapy was empirical, no stop/review dates were recorded, and no treatment guidelines were available. The majority of the prescribed antibiotics (62%; n = 165/266) were from the WHO Watch list. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of antibiotic use was high not only versus other hospitals in the region but globally, coupled with significant evidence of sub-optimal prescribing. Swift action is needed to improve future prescribing to reduce AMR. One or two areas should initially be targeted for quality improvement including development of local guidelines, documentation of antibiotic indications, and/or stop/review dates.

Geriatric radiotherapy in a war-torn country: Experience from Iraq.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer prevalence and geriatric patients (GP) are increasing and about half of the patients with cancer will be offered radiotherapy (RT). Addressing GP and their RT needs is an important issue in order to understand this heterogeneous group of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study, using a convenience sample from Sulaimani city's inhabitants, aged 70-year and more, who were treated with RT at the only city's RT center, Zhianawa Cancer Center (ZCC), in 2015. RESULTS: 153 patients' charts were reviewed. GP represented 20% of the patients referred to ZCC. Male: Female ratio was 3:1. One third presented with distant metastases, and 46% were treated with curative intent versus 54% with palliative intent. 94% completed the planned sessions of the curative RT vs 90% of the palliative RT. 23% of GP who were referred for RT didn't receive it. 9% got interruptions during RT course. 10% of GP living >40 km away from the treatment center refused treatment. Mean time interval between the date of referral and the date of starting treatment in the palliative setting was 19 days. Only 41% of patients with curative setting had regular follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Being the 1st study in this regard in a war-torn nation, Iraq, our results demonstrated that GP is a sizable group of ZCC patients and that RT is a valuable modality in GP cancer treatment. "Age per se" is not a factor to avoid this modality when there is an indication to use it. Longer distance to reach the center was a challenge in some of our GP. Due to inadequate number of RT machines, GP have to wait long time before getting their RT, even for palliative purposes. Further studies in this field are warranted.