Determining the in vitro susceptibility of tebipenem, an oral carbapenem, against third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from bloodstream infections.

Background: Antimicrobials for bloodstream infections due to ESBL- and AmpC-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae are significantly limited due to widespread antimicrobial resistance. Tebipenem, an oral carbapenem, exhibits stability against these resistance mechanisms and may prove an attractive alternative. Methods: The in vitro susceptibility of tebipenem was assessed against previously whole-genome sequenced ESBL- and AmpC-producing E. coli (274 isolates) and K. pneumoniae (42 isolates) derived from bloodstream infections using broth microdilution testing. Resulting tebipenem MICs were compared with those of other carbapenems previously tested against the isolate collection. Tebipenem activity was also compared against those isolates expressing co-resistance to the common oral antibiotics ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Results: The tebipenem MIC90 value was found to be 0.03 mg/L for E. coli and 0.125 mg/L for K. pneumoniae. For E. coli, the tebipenem MIC90 value was equivalent to that of meropenem, 2-fold lower than that of doripenem, and 8-fold and 4-fold lower than that of imipenem and ertapenem, respectively. For K. pneumoniae, the tebipenem MIC90 value was 2-fold higher than that of meropenem, equivalent to that of doripenem, and 4-fold and 2-fold lower than that of imipenem and ertapenem, respectively. Tebipenem MICs were also unaffected by the expression of co-resistance to ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Conclusions: The in vitro activity of tebipenem was unaffected by the production of ESBL and AmpC enzymes. Tebipenem also retained its activity against those isolates expressing co-resistance to ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. These findings therefore highlight tebipenem as a potential option for the treatment of invasive MDR infections.

Comparative Genomics and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of Elizabethkingia Isolates Reveal Nosocomial Transmission and In Vitro Susceptibility to Fluoroquinolones, Tetracyclines, and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole.

The Elizabethkingia genus has gained global attention in recent years as containing sporadic, worldwide, nosocomial pathogens. Elizabethkingia spp. are intrinsically multidrug resistant, primarily infect immunocompromised individuals, and are associated with high mortality (∼20 to 40%). As yet, gaps remain in our understanding of transmission, global strain relatedness, antimicrobial resistance, and effective therapy. Over a 16-year period, 22 clinical and 6 hospital environmental isolates were collected from Queensland, Australia. Identification using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (Vitek MS) and whole-genome sequencing was compared with a global strain data set. Phylogenomic reconstruction robustly identified 22 Elizabethkingia anophelis, 3 Elizabethkingia miricola, 2 Elizabethkingia meningoseptica, and 1 Elizabethkingia bruuniana isolates, most of which branched as unique lineages. Global analysis revealed that some Australian E. anophelis isolates are genetically closely related to strains from the United States, England, and Asia. Comparative genomics of clinical and environmental strains identified evidence of nosocomial transmission in patients, indicating probable infection from a hospital reservoir. Furthermore, broth microdilution against 39 antimicrobials revealed almost ubiquitous resistance to aminoglycosides, carbapenems, cephalosporins, and penicillins. Like other international strains, our isolates expressed susceptibility to minocycline and levofloxacin and the less common trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Our study demonstrates important new insights into the genetic diversity, environmental persistence, and transmission of and potential effective therapy for Australian Elizabethkingia species.

Bacterial identification using a SCIEX 5800 TOF/TOF MALDI research instrument and an external database.

In our current study we were identifying 26 bacterial isolates using a SCIEX 5800 TOF/TOF MALDI instrument and an external database. The results were compared with the results of a Vitek® MS system and in case of discrepancies at the species level 16s rRNA sequencing was performed for further verification.