Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38511806

RESUMO

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are at -increased risk for severe COVID-19. The aim of this study was to evaluate the burden of COVID-19 in a cohort of HSCT recipients. This retrospective study evaluated a cohort of adult hospitalized HSCT recipients diagnosed with COVID-19 in two large hospitals in São Paulo, Brazil post-HSCT, from January 2020 to June 2022. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Of 49 cases, 63.2% were male with a median age of 47 years. Allogeneic-HSCT (51.2%) and autologous-HSCT (48.9%) patients were included. The median time from HSCT to COVID-19 diagnosis was 398 days (IQR: 1211-134), with 22 (44.8%) cases occurring within 12 months of transplantation. Most cases occurred during the first year of the pandemic, in non-vaccinated patients (n=35; 71.4%). Most patients developed severe (24.4%) or critical (40.8%) disease; 67.3% received some medication for COVID-19, primarily corticosteroids (53.0%). The probable invasive aspergillosis prevalence was 10.2%. All-cause mortality was 40.8%, 51.4% in non-vaccinated patients and 14.2% in patients who received at least one dose of the vaccine. In the multiple regression analyses, the variables mechanical ventilation (OR: 101.01; 95% CI: 8.205 - 1,242.93; p = 0.003) and chest CT involvement at diagnosis ≥50% (OR: 26.61; 95% CI: 1.06 - 664.26; p = 0.04) remained associated with all-cause mortality. Thus, HSCT recipients with COVID-19 experienced high mortality, highlighting the need for full vaccination and infection prevention measures.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pandemias , Brasil/epidemiologia , Teste para COVID-19 , Fatores de Risco , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos
2.
Mycoses ; 67(2): e13697, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38374494

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The clinical features of central nervous system (CNS) sporotrichosis are derived from case reports and a limited series of cases. Our objective was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of CNS sporotrichosis. METHODS: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and LILACS on 9 September 2023. Our inclusion criteria were documentation of Sporothrix and demonstrated CNS involvement. A metaproportion or metamean analysis was performed to estimate a summary proportion with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: We included 52 cases of CNS sporotrichosis published from 1966 to 2023. Forty-six patients were male (88%, 95% CI: 77-95), and the mean age was 39 years (95% CI: 36-43). Close contact with cats was reported in 55% of cases (95% CI: 37-72). Thirty-two (61.5%) patients were from Brazil, 18 patients from the United State of America (34.6%). Only two Sporothrix species were reported: S. schenckii (26/41, 63%), and S. brasiliensis (15/41, 37%). The most common neurological symptom was headache. Meningitis was chronic in approximately 80% of cases. A significant majority of the patients were immunocompromised. HIV infection was the primary cause of immunosuppression (85%, 95% CI: 61-95). Overall mortality was 56% (22/39). The comparison of Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed a higher mortality with a statistically significant difference in immunosuppressed patients (p = .019). CONCLUSION: CNS sporotrichosis represents a notable cause of chronic meningitis, especially in individuals living in the Americas with HIV infection and concurrent skin lesions.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Meningite , Sporothrix , Esporotricose , Humanos , Animais , Masculino , Gatos , Adulto , Feminino , Esporotricose/diagnóstico , Esporotricose/tratamento farmacológico , Esporotricose/patologia , Brasil , Sistema Nervoso Central/patologia
3.
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1550673

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are at -increased risk for severe COVID-19. The aim of this study was to evaluate the burden of COVID-19 in a cohort of HSCT recipients. This retrospective study evaluated a cohort of adult hospitalized HSCT recipients diagnosed with COVID-19 in two large hospitals in São Paulo, Brazil post-HSCT, from January 2020 to June 2022. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Of 49 cases, 63.2% were male with a median age of 47 years. Allogeneic-HSCT (51.2%) and autologous-HSCT (48.9%) patients were included. The median time from HSCT to COVID-19 diagnosis was 398 days (IQR: 1211-134), with 22 (44.8%) cases occurring within 12 months of transplantation. Most cases occurred during the first year of the pandemic, in non-vaccinated patients (n=35; 71.4%). Most patients developed severe (24.4%) or critical (40.8%) disease; 67.3% received some medication for COVID-19, primarily corticosteroids (53.0%). The probable invasive aspergillosis prevalence was 10.2%. All-cause mortality was 40.8%, 51.4% in non-vaccinated patients and 14.2% in patients who received at least one dose of the vaccine. In the multiple regression analyses, the variables mechanical ventilation (OR: 101.01; 95% CI: 8.205 - 1,242.93; p = 0.003) and chest CT involvement at diagnosis ≥50% (OR: 26.61; 95% CI: 1.06 - 664.26; p = 0.04) remained associated with all-cause mortality. Thus, HSCT recipients with COVID-19 experienced high mortality, highlighting the need for full vaccination and infection prevention measures.

4.
Rev Med Virol ; 33(6): e2483, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37794598

RESUMO

Patients who undergo hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) are more susceptible to developing severe forms of COVID-19 with an increased risk of mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze, by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis, all studies that evaluated COVID-19 in HSCT adult recipients and present clinical characteristics and outcomes. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they: (I) described the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in adult (aged 18 years old or above) HSCT recipients; (II) described outcomes of COVID-19 in this population, mainly lethality; (III) were full-text articles. We searched MedLine, Embase, SCOPUS, LILACS and Web of Science for full-text studies that evaluated COVID-19 in adult HSCT patients until 26 Apr 2023. Two independent reviewers screened the articles and extracted the data. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data was used to assess quality of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed and the pooled prevalence of severe/critical disease and of death with a 95% CI was calculated with the random-effects model. Sixteen studies were included; seven (43.7%) were multicenter. Most of the studies were from Europe (37.5%). All of them had a low risk of bias using the JBI Checklist. A total of 1186 patients were included. Allogeneic HSCT patients were the majority in most studies, with a total of 861 patients (72.5%). The symptomatic rate was 79.4%. The pooled prevalence of severe/critical COVID-19 was 24.0% (95% CI 0.13-0.36; I2  = 94%; n = 334/990). The pooled prevalence of death for the entire population was 17% (95% CI 0.13-0.22; I2  = 76%; n = 221/1117), 17% (95% CI 0.12-0.23; I2  = 67%; n = 152/822) for allogeneic-HSCT and 14% (95% CI 0.08-0.22; I4  = 65%; n = 48/293) for autologous-HSCT. In conclusion, frequently the infection of SARS-CoV-2 in HSCT was symptomatic and lethality is higher than in general population. Thus, it is essential to focus on the implementation of measures to mitigate the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in this population, as well as to carefully assess HSCT recipients who develop COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Adulto , Humanos , Adolescente , Transplantados , COVID-19/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Europa (Continente) , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto
5.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36946817

RESUMO

The measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine is usually recommended from 24 months after a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Some authors have demonstrated that the MMR vaccination can be safe from 12 months post-HSCT in non-immunosuppressed patients, as recommended by the Brazilian National Immunization Program/Ministry of Health, since 2006. The objectives of this study were to evaluate when patients received MMR vaccine after an HSCT in our care service and if there were reports of any side effects. We retrospectively reviewed the records of HSCT recipients who received at least one MMR dose in our care service, a quaternary teaching hospital in Sao Paulo city, Brazil, from 2017 to 2021. We identified 82 patients: 75.6% (90.1% in the autologous group and 45.1% in the allogeneic group) were vaccinated before 23 months post-transplantation. None reported side effects following the vaccination. Our data support that the MMR vaccination is safe from 12 to 23 months after HSCT.


Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola , Sarampo , Caxumba , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão) , Humanos , Lactente , Anticorpos Antivirais , Brasil , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Sarampo/induzido quimicamente , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Caxumba/induzido quimicamente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Vacinação
6.
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1431357

RESUMO

ABSTRACT The measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine is usually recommended from 24 months after a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Some authors have demonstrated that the MMR vaccination can be safe from 12 months post-HSCT in non-immunosuppressed patients, as recommended by the Brazilian National Immunization Program/Ministry of Health, since 2006. The objectives of this study were to evaluate when patients received MMR vaccine after an HSCT in our care service and if there were reports of any side effects. We retrospectively reviewed the records of HSCT recipients who received at least one MMR dose in our care service, a quaternary teaching hospital in Sao Paulo city, Brazil, from 2017 to 2021. We identified 82 patients: 75.6% (90.1% in the autologous group and 45.1% in the allogeneic group) were vaccinated before 23 months post-transplantation. None reported side effects following the vaccination. Our data support that the MMR vaccination is safe from 12 to 23 months after HSCT.

7.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 23(4): 231-236, July-Aug. 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1039230

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction: Vaccination with tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) has been recommended for healthcare workers (HCWs) by Brazilian Ministry of Health since November 2014. Objective: To describe the strategies implemented to improve Tdap uptake, cumulative vaccine coverage after each intervention, variables associated to Tdap vaccination, and reasons for non-vaccination among HCWs of the main building of a quaternary hospital attached to the Sao Paulo University Medical School. Methods: A list of HCWs eligible for pertussis vaccination was generated. From April to December 2015, the following interventions were implemented: note on intern journal reminding the importance of pertussis vaccination; email to the head nurses strengthening vaccine recommendations; lectures on pertussis and Tdap for physicians of Obstetrics and Neonatology Clinics; on-site vaccination by mobile teams at the Obstetrics, Neonatology, and Anesthesiology Clinics. Vaccine coverage was accessed at the end of each month. Multivariate Poisson regression model with a robust error variance was used to evaluate variables associated with Tdap vaccination. Reasons for non-vaccination were evaluated from January to May 2017 through phone calls for HCWs who had not received Tdap. Results: The study included 456 HCWs. After the interventions, Tdap coverage raised from 2.8% to 41.2%. In the multivariate analysis, occupation (physician), working place (obstetrics or anesthesiology) and influenza vaccination in 2015 were independently associated to Tdap vaccination. The main reason for non-vaccination was unawareness of Tdap recommendations. Conclusions: Tdap uptake among HCWs was low in our hospital. Providing vaccination at convenient places/times for HCW seems to be the most efficient strategy to increase vaccine uptake.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular , Cobertura Vacinal/métodos , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Brasil , Distribuição de Poisson , Vigilância da População , Análise Multivariada , Local de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Imunização/métodos
8.
Braz J Infect Dis ; 23(4): 231-236, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31351815

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Vaccination with tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) has been recommended for healthcare workers (HCWs) by Brazilian Ministry of Health since November 2014. OBJECTIVE: To describe the strategies implemented to improve Tdap uptake, cumulative vaccine coverage after each intervention, variables associated to Tdap vaccination, and reasons for non-vaccination among HCWs of the main building of a quaternary hospital attached to the Sao Paulo University Medical School. METHODS: A list of HCWs eligible for pertussis vaccination was generated. From April to December 2015, the following interventions were implemented: note on intern journal reminding the importance of pertussis vaccination; email to the head nurses strengthening vaccine recommendations; lectures on pertussis and Tdap for physicians of Obstetrics and Neonatology Clinics; on-site vaccination by mobile teams at the Obstetrics, Neonatology, and Anesthesiology Clinics. Vaccine coverage was accessed at the end of each month. Multivariate Poisson regression model with a robust error variance was used to evaluate variables associated with Tdap vaccination. Reasons for non-vaccination were evaluated from January to May 2017 through phone calls for HCWs who had not received Tdap. RESULTS: The study included 456 HCWs. After the interventions, Tdap coverage raised from 2.8% to 41.2%. In the multivariate analysis, occupation (physician), working place (obstetrics or anesthesiology) and influenza vaccination in 2015 were independently associated to Tdap vaccination. The main reason for non-vaccination was unawareness of Tdap recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Tdap uptake among HCWs was low in our hospital. Providing vaccination at convenient places/times for HCW seems to be the most efficient strategy to increase vaccine uptake.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura Vacinal/métodos , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Brasil , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/métodos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Distribuição de Poisson , Vigilância da População , Fatores de Tempo , Local de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos
9.
Vaccine ; 37(17): 2298-2310, 2019 04 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30910406

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To review the literature on economic evaluation of dengue vaccination to produce evidence to support a local cost-effectiveness study and to subsidize the decision to introduce a dengue vaccine in the Brazilian National Immunization Program. METHODS: We systematically searched multiple databases (MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, SCOPUS, NHS Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), HTA Database (via Centre for Reviews and Dissemination - CRD) and LILACS), selecting full HEEs of dengue vaccine. Two independent reviewers screened articles for relevance and extracted the data. The methodology for the quality reporting was assessed using CHEERS checklist. We performed a qualitative narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Thirteen studies conducted in Asian and Latin America countries were reviewed. All studies were favorable to the incorporation of the vaccine. However, the assumptions and values assumed for vaccine efficacy, safety and duration of protection, as well as the choice of the study population and the type of model used in the analyses, associated to an insufficient reporting of the methodological steps, affect the validity of the studies' results. The quality reporting appraisal showed that the majority (8/13) of the studies reported less than 55% of the CHEERS checklists' items. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review shows that the economic evaluation of dengue vaccination did not adhere to key recommended general methods for economic evaluation. The presented cost-effectiveness results should not be transferred to other countries. It is recommended to conduct studies with local epidemiological and cost data, as well as assumptions about vaccination that reflect the results observed in clinical trials.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Vacinas contra Dengue/economia , Dengue/epidemiologia , Dengue/prevenção & controle , Brasil/epidemiologia , Vacinas contra Dengue/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Dengue/imunologia , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/economia , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Vacinação , Cobertura Vacinal
10.
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo ; 60: e37, 2018 07 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30066805

RESUMO

Annual vaccination is the most effective way to prevent seasonal influenza illness. Instituto Butantan (IB) performed clinical studies with its 2013, 2014 and 2015 seasonal trivalent influenza vaccines (inactivated split-virion). Prospective cohort studies were carried out to describe the safety and immunogenicity of Instituto Butantan influenza vaccines, in healthy adults and elderly, from 2013 to 2015. Immediately after the informed consent was signed, participants underwent blood collection followed by vaccination. On study days 1, 2 and 3 post-vaccination participants were contacted by the staff to evaluate the occurrence of solicited (local and systemic) and non-solicited adverse reactions. On study day 21 (+7) subjects returned to the clinical site for final safety assessments and blood collection to evaluate post-vaccination immunogenicity. The immunogenicity analyses were performed by means of hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay. The immunogenicity endpoints were: seroprotection (SPR) and seroconversion (SCR) rates and the geometric mean HI antibody titer ratio (GMTR). The 2013 study was conducted at the Centro de Referência para Imunobiológicos Especiais (CRIE) and at the Centro de Pesquisa Clínica do Instituto da Criança, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo while the 2014 and 2015 studies were conducted at CRIE. The vaccine composition followed the WHO recommendation for the Southern hemisphere seasonal influenza vaccine. Forty-seven healthy adults and 13 elderly participated in the 2013 study, 60 healthy adults and 60 elderly in the 2014 study, and 62 healthy adults and 57 elderly in the 2015 study. In the 2013, 2014 and 2015 studies, pain was the most frequent local adverse reaction and headache the most frequent systemic adverse reaction. All observed adverse reactions were classified as mild or moderate and none as severe. SPR >70% and SPR >60% were observed in adults and elderly, respectively, for the three vaccine viruses, in the 2013, 2014 and 2015 studies. SCR >40% was observed in adults, for the three vaccine viruses, only in the 2014 study and SCR >30% was observed in the elderly, for the three vaccine viruses, only in the 2013 and 2014 studies. GMTR >2.5 among adults, for the three vaccine viruses was only observed in the 2013 study and GMTR >2.0 was observed among elderly, for the three vaccine viruses, in the 2013, 2014 and 2015 studies. The 2013, 2014 and 2015 seasonal influenza vaccines produced by Instituto Butantan were safe and immunogenic according to the immunogenicity criteria defined by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Testes de Inibição da Hemaglutinação , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estações do Ano , Adulto Jovem
11.
Int J Infect Dis ; 67: 3-6, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28935245

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the annual incidence of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) and to evaluate its current classification based on the epidemiological distribution of agents identified and their sensitivity profiles. METHODS: Consecutive cases of PVE occurring within the first year of valve surgery during the period 1997-2014 were included in this prospective cohort study. Incidence, demographic, clinical, microbiological, and in-hospital mortality data of these PVE patients were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-two cases of PVE were included, and the global annual incidence of PVE was 1.7%. Most PVE cases occurred within 120days after surgery (76.7%). After this period, there was a reduction in resistant microorganisms (64.4% vs. 32.3%, respectively; p=0.007) and an increase in the incidence of Streptococcus spp (1.9% vs. 23.5%; p=0.007). A literature review revealed 646 cases of PVE with an identified etiology, of which 264 (41%) were caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci and 43 (7%) by Streptococcus spp. This is in agreement with the current study findings. CONCLUSIONS: Most PVE cases occurred within 120days after valve surgery, and the same etiological agents were identified in this period. The current cut-off level of 365days for the classification of early-onset PVE should be revisited.


Assuntos
Endocardite Bacteriana/epidemiologia , Endocardite Bacteriana/etiologia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Endocardite Bacteriana/microbiologia , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/etiologia , Adulto Jovem
12.
Brain Inj ; 28(9): 1223-5, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24910931

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A 36-year-old immunocompetent woman with a posterior fossa arteriovenous malformation (PF-AVM) and hydrocephalus presented with low fever and mental confusion 4 days after ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS). METHODS: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and ventricular catheter tip cultures isolated Corynebacterium sp. Similar to previous cases in the literature, species determination was not possible. However, the antibiotic sensitivity profile of this isolate suggested Corynebacterium jeikeium. Conversion to external ventricular drainage (EVD) was done and intravenous vancomycin was administered for 21 days. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The patient showed progressive improvement. Since the first CSF shunt infection caused by Corynebacterium sp., 16 other cases in the literatures have been reported. Additionally, this study reports the difficulties in recognizing CSF shunt infection caused by this agent and the possible clinical or laboratory patterns as observed in the literature.


Assuntos
Confusão/microbiologia , Infecções por Corynebacterium/diagnóstico , Corynebacterium/isolamento & purificação , Febre/microbiologia , Hidrocefalia/microbiologia , Derivação Ventriculoperitoneal/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Cateterismo/efeitos adversos , Confusão/tratamento farmacológico , Confusão/etiologia , Infecções por Corynebacterium/tratamento farmacológico , Drenagem , Feminino , Febre/tratamento farmacológico , Febre/etiologia , Humanos , Hidrocefalia/tratamento farmacológico , Hidrocefalia/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Vancomicina/administração & dosagem
13.
Pak J Pharm Sci ; 25(3): 493-9, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22713933

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to evaluate the salivary glands in diabetic mice, analyzing alterations in the secretory epithelium and interactions with the stromal compartment acquired during a prolonged period of treatment with Bauhinia forficata extract. Female mice were divided into two groups: Nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice treated with Bauhinia forficata (I), and NOD mice not treated with the hypoglycemic agent (II). After treatment, the salivary glands were collected for analysis by transmitted and polarized light microscopy, complemented by three-dimensional analysis of these tissues. The results showed weight loss in animals of group II and weight recovery in treated animals. Glucose levels were elevated in group II, but declined in group I. In the two groups, the salivary glands were characterized by involution of the secretory epithelium, presence of an inflammatory infiltrate and an increase of extracellular fibrillar components. It can be concluded that treatment with Bauhinia forficata reduced glucose levels and contributed to weight recovery in treated animals. However, the observation of tissue destructuring and compromised epithelial-stromal interactions, with consequent impairment of glandular function, demonstrates that Bauhinia forficata exerts an effect on the recovery of body metabolism but this improvement does not influence in the tissue recovery.


Assuntos
Bauhinia , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes/farmacologia , Extratos Vegetais/farmacologia , Glândulas Salivares/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Glicemia/análise , Feminino , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos NOD , Fitoterapia , Glândulas Salivares/patologia , Redução de Peso/efeitos dos fármacos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA