Distinct ER and PR expression patterns significantly affect the clinical outcomes of early HER2-positive breast cancer: A real-world analysis of 871 patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of distinct estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression patterns on tumor behavior and treatment outcomes within HER2-positive breast cancer is not fully explored. This study aimed to comprehensively examine the clinical differences among patients with HER2-positive breast cancer harboring distinct ER and PR expression patterns in the neoadjuvant setting. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 871 HER2-positive breast patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy at our hospital between 2011 and 2022. Comparisons were performed across the three hormone receptor (HR)-specific subtypes, namely the ER-negative/PR-negative/HER2-positive (ER-/PR-/HER2+), the single HR-positive (HR+)/HER2+, and the triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC) subtypes. RESULTS: Of 871 patients, 21.0% had ER-/PR-/HER2+ tumors, 33.6% had single HR+/HER2+ disease, and 45.4% had TPBC. Individuals with single HR+/HER2+ tumors and TPBC cases demonstrated significantly lower pathological complete response (pCR) rates compared to those with ER-/PR-/HER2+ tumors (36.9% vs. 24.3% vs. 49.2%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed TPBC as significantly associated with decreased pCR likelihood (OR = 0.42, 95%CI 0.28-0.63, p < 0.001). Survival outcomes, including disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), showed no significant differences across HR-specific subtypes in the overall patient population. However, within patients without anti-HER2 therapy, TPBC was linked to improved DFS and a trend towards better OS. CONCLUSIONS: HER2-positive breast cancer exhibited three distinct HR-specific subtypes with varying clinical manifestations and treatment responses. These findings suggest personalized treatment strategies considering ER and PR expression patterns, emphasizing the need for further investigations to unravel molecular traits underlying HER2-positive breast cancer with distinct HR expression patterns.

Sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy using pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by taxanes with complete trastuzumab and pertuzumab treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer: A phase II single-arm study.

Objective: Despite cardiotoxicity overlap, the trastuzumab/pertuzumab and anthracycline combination remains crucial due to significant benefits. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), a less cardiotoxic anthracycline, was evaluated for efficacy and cardiac safety when combined with cyclophosphamide and followed by taxanes with trastuzumab/pertuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive early breast cancer (BC). Methods: In this multicenter, phase II study, patients with confirmed HER2-positive early BC received four cycles of PLD (30-35 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2), followed by four cycles of taxanes (docetaxel, 90-100 mg/m2 or nab-paclitaxel, 260 mg/m2), concomitant with eight cycles of trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose, then 6 mg/kg) and pertuzumab (840 mg loading dose, then 420 mg) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was total pathological complete response (tpCR, ypT0/is ypN0). Secondary endpoints included breast pCR (bpCR), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate, rate of breast-conserving surgery (BCS), and safety (with a focus on cardiotoxicity). Results: Between May 27, 2020 and May 11, 2022, 78 patients were treated with surgery, 42 (53.8%) of whom had BCS. After neoadjuvant therapy, 47 [60.3%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 48.5%-71.2%] patients achieved tpCR, and 49 (62.8%) achieved bpCR. ORRs were 76.9% (95% CI, 66.0%-85.7%) and 93.6% (95% CI, 85.7%-97.9%) after 4-cycle and 8-cycle neoadjuvant therapy, respectively. Nine (11.5%) patients experienced asymptomatic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) reductions of ≥10% from baseline, all with a minimum value of >55%. No treatment-related abnormal cardiac function changes were observed in mean N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP), troponin I, or high-sensitivity troponin. Conclusions: This dual HER2-blockade with sequential polychemotherapy showed promising activity with rapid tumor regression in HER2-positive BC. Importantly, this regimen showed an acceptable safety profile, especially a low risk of cardiac events, suggesting it as an attractive treatment approach with a favorable risk-benefit balance.

The learning curve of the MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction by dual-trained breast surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer surgeries involving MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction has traditionally been collaborative efforts between breast surgeons and plastic surgeons. However, in our institution, this procedure is performed by dual-trained breast surgeons who are proficient in both breast surgery and MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction. This study aims to provide insights into the learning curve associated with this surgical approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included eligible breast cancer patients who underwent MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction by dual-trained breast surgeons between 2015 and 2020 at our institution. We present the learning curve of this surgical approach, with a focus on determining factors affecting flap harvesting time, surgery time, and ischemic time. Additionally, we assessed the surgical complication rates. RESULTS: A total of 147 eligible patients were enrolled in this study. Notably, after 30 cases, a statistically significant reduction of 1.7 h in surgery time and 21 min in ischemic time was achieved, signifying the attainment of a plateau in the learning curve. And the major and minor complications were comparable between the early and after 30 cases. CONCLUSION: This study explores the learning curve and feasibility experienced by dual-trained breast surgeons in performing MS-TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05560633.

Neoadjuvant everolimus plus letrozole versus fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: a randomized pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Here we evaluated the feasibility, efficacy, tolerability, and treatment-mediated immune modulation of neoadjuvant everolimus plus letrozole versus chemotherapy in treating postmenopausal patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. METHODS: Postmenopausal women with ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer who had a primary tumor > 2 cm or positive axillary lymph node(s) proofed by biopsy were randomly (1,1) enrolled to receive neoadjuvant everolimus plus letrozole for 18 weeks or fluorouracil, epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (FEC) for 6 cycles before surgery. Primary outcome was feasibility of the trial. Secondary outcome included ultrasound response rate, pathological complete response rate, breast-conserving surgery rate, toxicities, treatment-mediated immune modulation and biomarkers. RESULTS: Forty patients were randomized. Completion rate was 90.0% in the neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) arm but 70.0% in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) arm. The ultrasound response rate was 65.0% in NET arm and 40.0% in FEC arm, respectively. In terms of the adverse events, clearly favored NET arm. Everolimus plus letrozole increased the ratio of peripheral Tregs to CD4+ T cells and tumor PD-L1 expression, and decreased Ki67 index and tumor-infiltrating Tregs, and patients with a greater increase of tumor-specific CTLs showed more sensitive to NET. CONCLUSION: This pilot trial showed that neoadjuvant everolimus plus letrozole might achieve a favorable ultrasound response rate with low toxicities in treating postmenopausal ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients. Everolimus plus letrozole might have positive antitumoral immunity effects. Further large randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings. TRAIL REGISTRATION: A Trial of Neoadjuvant Everolimus Plus Letrozole Versus FEC in Women With ER-positive, HER2-negative Breast Cancer, registered on 07/04/2016 and first posted on 18/04/2016, NCT02742051 .

The Effect of Low and High Vacuum Drainage on the Postoperative Drainage of Breast Cancer: Insights from a Prospective, Non-Inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Vacuum drains have been extensively applied to prevent seroma formation after breast surgery. However, the usage of negative suction drainage is mainly determined by surgeon's experience and preferences. The aim of this study is to prospectively compare the drain effect after breast surgery between the low and high vacuum drains. METHODS: This prospectively randomized trial (from January 2018 to June 2019) involved 188 patients who were subjected to modified radical mastectomy (group A, n=128) or immediate breast reconstruction with implants (group B, n=60). In each group, patients were randomized to receive high vacuum drain (pressure=-98 kPa) or low vacuum drain (pressure=-12 kPa) after surgery. Days of drain permanence, which means the duration of drainage, was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: According to the comparison of days of drain permanence, the effect of a low vacuum drain is not inferior to a high vacuum drain in group A (pectoral drain, P<0.001; axillary drain, P<0.001) or group B (submuscular drain, P=0.002). The complications frequently occurred on patients with high vacuum drain (11.7%), such as seroma formation. The expense of low vacuum drain was significantly lower than high vacuum drain in both groups (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The drain effect of the low vacuum drain is not inferior to a high vacuum drain in both group A and group B. The low vacuum drain was effective, relatively cheap, and did not increase the incidence of complications; it is therefore more recommended after breast surgery.

Adjuvant Capecitabine With Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide Plus Epirubicin for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (CBCSG010): An Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Trial.

PURPOSE: Standard adjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) includes a taxane and an anthracycline. Concomitant capecitabine may be beneficial, but robust data to support this are lacking. The efficacy and safety of the addition of capecitabine into the TNBC adjuvant treatment regimen was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized, open-label, phase III trial was conducted in China. Eligible female patients with early TNBC after definitive surgery were randomly assigned (1:1) to either capecitabine (3 cycles of capecitabine and docetaxel followed by 3 cycles of capecitabine, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide) or control treatment (3 cycles of docetaxel followed by 3 cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide). Randomization was centralized without stratification. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Between June 2012 and December 2013, 636 patients with TNBC were screened, and 585 were randomly assigned to treatment (control, 288; capecitabine, 297). Median follow-up was 67 months. The 5-year DFS rate was higher for capecitabine than for control treatment (86.3% v 80.4%; hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.99; P = .044). Five-year overall survival rates were numerically higher but not significantly improved (capecitabine, 93.3%; control, 90.7%). Overall, 39.1% of patients had capecitabine dose reductions, and 8.4% reported grade ≥ 3 hand-foot syndrome. The most common grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (capecitabine, 136 [45.8%]; control, 118 [41.0%]) and febrile neutropenia (capecitabine, 50 [16.8%]; control, 46 [16.0%]). Safety data were similar to the known capecitabine safety profile and generally comparable between arms. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine when added to 3 cycles of docetaxel followed by 3 cycles of a 3-drug anthracycline combination containing capecitabine instead of fluorouracil significantly improved DFS in TNBC without new safety concerns.

Risk factors of catheter-related thrombosis in early-stage breast cancer patients: a single-center retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs) are widely used in cancer patients. The main purpose of our study is to observe the incidence and identified risk factors of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in breast cancer patients with TIVAD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive breast cancer patients who received the ultrasound-guided TIVAD implantation for the administration of chemotherapy from 2013 to 2016. The primary outcome was CRT (both symptomatic and asymptomatic detected by ultrasound). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify the risk factors for breast cancer TIVAD-related CRT. RESULTS: A total of 209 breast cancer patients with a newly implanted TIVAD for chemotherapy were included in this study. The average time of port duration was 7 months. Of the enrolled 209 patients, 33 patients (15.8%) had CRT, 2 of the 33 cases were symptomatic (1 pulmonary embolism, 1 deep-venous thrombosis [DVT]), the other 31 cases were asymptomatic detected by routine ultrasound examination of the catheter-associated vein before TIVAD removal with all cycles of chemotherapy completed. In total, 19 (57.6%) of CRT patients underwent directly TIVAD removal without any further treatments, 14 patients received anticoagulation treatments for 3-30 days followed by TIVAD removal. No DVT event was observed within at least 1.5 years of follow-up. In the multiple-variable analysis, tumor size >2 cm (OR 2.735, 95% CI 1.042-7.177; P=0.032), positive HbsAg (OR 2.803 95% CI 1.027-7.856; P=0.047) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) >3.6 mmol/L (OR 2.360, 95% CI 1.059-5.351; P=0.040) were the significant independent risk factors of breast cancer TIVAD-related CRT. CONCLUSION: CRT is a common complication in breast cancer patients with TIVAD for chemotherapy. Tumor size, HbsAg status and LDL level were independent predictors of breast cancer for TIVAD-related CRT. Removal of the port without anticoagulation treatments might be a feasible choice for asymptomatic TIVAD-related CRT.

Proof-of-Concept Study of 3-D-Printed Mold-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients.

PURPOSE: In this proof-of-concept study, we proposed 3-D-printed mold-guided breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pathologically confirmed and eligible breast cancer patients received magnetic resonance imaging examinations before BCS. The information on the shape, size, and location of the tumor relative to the nipple was extracted and analyzed. We used a 3-D printing technique to produce a mold to guide BCS for breast cancer patients. RESULTS: We performed 3-D-printed mold-guided BCS in 8 breast cancer patients. All of the patients had negative surgical margins, confirmed by intraoperative and postoperative pathologic examinations. CONCLUSION: The 3-D-printed mold-guided BCS approach is a feasible way to achieve negative surgical margins. A prospective designed cohort study, with more patients included and a longer follow-up, is needed to further confirm its long-term oncologic safety.

Neoadjuvant everolimus plus letrozole versus fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: study protocol for a randomized pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: The response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) varies by estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) statuses, with responses being lower in ER-positive, HER2-negative tumors as compared with ER-negative, HER2-positive or triple-negative tumors. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is an attractive alternative to NAC for ER-positive, HER2-negative cancer. However, a prior trial comparing NET with standard NAC in ER-positive tumor showed that the difference of response was not significant. Studies demonstrated that the mTOR inhibitor everolimus could sensitize breast tumors to endocrine therapy. A pilot open-label, randomized trial has been designed to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and tolerability of neoadjuvant everolimus plus letrozole versus NAC in treating postmenopausal women with ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. METHODS: Forty postmenopausal women with non-metastatic ER-positive, HER2-negative invasive breast cancer with a primary tumor > 2 cm or positive axillary lymph node(s) proved by biopsy will be randomly (1:1) enrolled from Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital to receive neoadjuvant everolimus plus letrozole for 18 weeks or fluorouracil, epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (FEC) for six cycles before surgery. Primary outcome is the feasibility of the trial. Secondary outcome measures include ultrasound response rate, pathological complete response rate, breast-conserving surgery rate, toxicities, and changes in the percentages of peripheral blood CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, T helper cells, regulatory T cells, and NK cells. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to determine the feasibility, efficacy and tolerability of head-to-head neoadjuvant everolimus plus letrozole versus neoadjuvant FEC in treating postmenopausal women with ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. The trial will provide evidence to assess the feasibility of a future multicenter, randomized controlled trial, and will provide valuable clinical data of the immunoregulatory effect of everolimus in breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registry, ID: NCT02742051 . Registered on 7 April 2016.

Impact of a 21-Gene Recurrence Score Test on the Choice of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Hormone Receptor-positive Early-stage Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Studies have recommended a 21-gene recurrence score (RS) to optimize adjuvant treatment for patients with early-stage breast cancer (EBC) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) tumors. This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the impact of this RS in Chinese patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected 227 patients with EBC with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and HER2- tumors. We used one-way analysis of variance to compare the distribution of different risk groups based on a 21-gene RS assay. A Kruskal-Wallis test and either a chi-square or Fisher's exact test were used as appropriate to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 227 eligible women enrolled, 61.2%, 30%, and 8.8% of patients were in the low (≤17), intermediate (18-30) and high (≥31) RS groups, respectively. Of the patients with a low RS, 74.8% were overestimated into the intermediate-risk group by St. Gallen risk. The overall impact of the 21-gene RS was reduced use of chemotherapy (78/227, 34.4%). In addition, Ki67 expression was positively associated with the 21-gene RS (R=0.68). CONCLUSION: Among patients with ER+/HER2- EBC, the 21-gene RS was an effective method for making a chemotherapy decision. Ki67 was associated with 21-gene RS.

Significance of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and the Expression of Topoisomerase IIα in the Prediction of the Clinical Outcome of Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer after Taxane-Anthracycline-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine factors able to predict chemotherapeutic responses and clinical outcomes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS: Fifty-two TNBC patients on taxane-anthracycline-based NAC were included. The expression of Ki67, topoisomerase IIα (TOPOIIα), and p53, as well as the presence of CD4+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and CD8+ TILs were evaluated in biopsy specimens by immunohistochemistry. The expression of Ki67, TOPOIIα, and p53, as well as CD4 and CD8 in TILs was calculated according to the pathological response to NAC, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Fourteen (26.9%) TNBC patients demonstrated a pathological complete response (pCR). According to univariate analyses, significant factors associated with pCR were high infiltration of CD4+ TILs (p = 0.004), high infiltration of CD8+ TILs (p = 0.010), and high expression of topoisomerase IIα (TOPOIIα) (p = 0.006). CD4+ TILs and TOPOIIα were significantly positively correlated with CD8+ TILs. Multivariate analyses indicated that TOPOIIα was an independent predictor of pCR. Although TNBC patients with high infiltration of CD4+ TILs, CD8+ TILs, or with high expression of TOPOIIα exhibited a significantly good 5-year DFS, only TNBC patients with a high infiltration of CD8+ TILs exhibited significantly positive 5-year OS probabilities. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that CD4+ TILs and TOPOIIα in pretreated cancer tissues were significantly correlated with CD8+ TILs. CD4+ TILs, CD8+ TILs, and TOPOIIα expression were predictors of pCR and 5-year DFS of TNBC patients who were treated with NAC, and TOPOIIα was an independent predictor of pCR. CD8+ TILs were a key factor in the prediction of good 5-year OS rates of TNBC patients after taxane-anthracycline-based NAC.

Granulomatous Lobular Mastitis Associated with Mycobacterium abscessus in South China: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Mycobacteria, which are known as rapidly growing bacteria, are pathogens that are responsible for cutaneous or subcutaneous infections that especially occur after injection, trauma, or surgery. In this report, we describe a species of Mycobacterium abscessus that was isolated from a breast abscess in a patient who was previously diagnosed with granulomatous lobular mastitis (GLM). This current case is the first ever presented case of GLM associated with M. abscessus documented in South China. The case presentation highlights the role of M. abscessus in GLM. The association of M. abscessus and GLM is discussed and a summary of breast infection due to Mycobacteria is given.

Comparison of the Therapeutic Efficacy of the Early and the Delayed Use of Vinorelbine-Based Regimens for Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of vinorelbine-based regimens as first-, second- and more-line therapies in advanced breast cancer (ABC) and to analyze the best timing of vinorelbine treatment. METHODS: A total of 71 ABC patients were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 35 patients were treated with vinorelbine-based regimens as first-line chemotherapy, and 36 patients were treated with vinorelbine-based regimens as second-line or more-line therapy. The primary end point of the study was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: No difference was found in baseline characteristics between the two groups (p > 0.1 for all comparisons). There was a significant difference in the objective response rate (ORR; p = 0.006) and clinical benefit rate (CBR; p = 0.013) between the first-line group and the second- or more-line groups. In the vinorelbine first-line group, the ORR was 68.6% (24 patients), and in the second-line or more-line groups the ORR was 36.1% (13 patients). A significant difference in PFS between the first-line group and the second-line or more-line groups was also observed (p = 0.030). The median PFS in the overall population was 6.3 ± 1.32 months (95% CI 3.69-8.90). The median PFS was 11.1 ± 3.76 months (95% CI 3.73-18.47) in the first-line group compared with 5.2 ± 1.35 months (95% CI 2.54-7.85) in the second-line or more-line groups. In patients treated with vinorelbine-trastuzumab combination as the first-line therapy, a complete response was observed in 1 patient (12.5%) and partial response in 5 patients (62.5%), giving an ORR of 75.0%. Progressive disease was observed in 1 patient (12.5%), and stable disease in 1 patient (12.5%), leading to a CBR of 87.5%. The median PFS was 13.8 ± 2.75 months (95% CI 8.42-19.18), and median OS was 37.0 ± 11.6 months (95% CI 14.18-59.82). No significant difference was found in overall survival (OS) between the groups (p = 0.612). CONCLUSION: For ABC patients, no significant difference in median OS was found between the early use and delayed use of vinorelbine-based regimens, but the short-term efficacy and PFS of vinorelbine-based regimens were significantly better in the early use group than in the delayed use group.

The Extent of Axillary Surgery Is Associated With Breast Cancer-specific Survival in T1-2 Breast Cancer Patients With 1 or 2 Positive Lymph Nodes: A SEER-Population Study.

This study aimed to compare the breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) of a nonclinical trial population of T1-2 breast cancer patients with 1 to 2 positive lymph nodes who received breast-conserving surgery and either sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to identify 17,028 patients with a median follow-up of 7.1 years. We assigned the patients into a SLNB-cohort (≤5 nodes) and an ALND-cohort (>5 nodes) based on the number of removed lymph nodes. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to estimate the cumulative BCSS and used Cox-regression analysis to study the risk factors. We also performed subgroup analysis by the patients' age and hormonal receptor (HR) status.The cumulative BCSS and Overall Survival (OS) of the entire population were 94.4% and 91.4% at 5 years and 88.2% and 79.9% at 10 years, respectively. Axillary surgery (ALND vs SLNB) had no association with BCSS when adjusted for stage, HR status, tumor grade, or other factors. In subgroup analysis by age and HR status, ALND was associated with a significantly improved BCSS relative to SNLB (HR = 0.70, HR = 0.026, 95% confidence interval 0.51-0.96) only in patients younger than 50 years with HR- disease (N = 1281), but not in other subgroup of patients.In early-stage breast cancer patients with limited lymph node metastasis, ALND had better BCSS than SLNB only in patients younger than 50 years and with HR- disease. More studies are needed to confirm our findings.

HER-2 positive breast cancer is associated with an increased risk of positive cavity margins after initial lumpectomy.

BACKGROUND: The effect of breast cancer subtype on margin status after lumpectomy remains unclear. This study aims to determine whether approximated breast cancer subtype is associated with positive margins after lumpectomy, which could be used to determine if there is an increased risk of developing local recurrence (LR) following breast-conserving surgery. METHODS: We studied 1,032 consecutive patients with invasive cancer who received lumpectomies and cavity margin (CM) assessments from January 2003 to November 2012. The following data were collected: patient age, cT stage, pT stage, grade, status of CM, lymph node status, menopausal status, ER, PR, HER-2, and Ki67, as well as the presence of extensive intraductal component (EIC) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). A χ2 test was used to compare categorical baseline characteristics. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate associations between pathologic features of CM status. Kaplan-Meier actuarial cumulative rates of LR (ipsilateral in-breast) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 7,884 pieces of marginal tissue were collected from 1,032 patients, and 209 patients had positive CMs. Of the patients tested, 52.3% had luminal A subtype, 14.9% were luminal B, 12.8% were luminal-HER-2, 8.1% were HER-2 enriched, and 11.8% were triple negative. Univariate analysis showed that EIC (P < 0.001), LVI (P = 0.026), pN stage (N1 vs. N0: P = 0.018; N3 vs. N0: P < 0.001), and luminal B (P = 0.001) and HER-2 (P < 0.001) subtypes were associated with positive CMs. Multivariable analysis indicated that only EIC (P < 0.001), pN stage (P = 0.003), and HER-2 subtype (P < 0.001) were significantly correlated with positive CMs. On multivariable analysis, HER-2 subtype was an independent prognostic factor in LR (P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: The HER-2 subtype was the predictive factor most associated with positive CMs and an independent prognostic factor for LR. This result suggests that the increased risk of LR in HER-2 breast cancer is due to an increased microscopic invasive tumor burden, which is indicated by margin status after lumpectomy.

What lies behind chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea for breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

To evaluate the incidence of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea (CIA) and its therapeutic impact in premenopausal breast cancer patients. A systematic search was performed to identify clinical studies that compared the incidence of CIA with different chemotherapy regimens and oncological outcomes with and without CIA. The fixed-effects and random-effects models were used to assess the pooled estimates. Heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity among studies and to assess the effects of study quality. A total of 15,916 premenopausal breast cancer patients from 46 studies were included. The cyclophosphamide-based regimens, taxane-based regimens, and anthracycline/epirubicin-based regimens all increased the incidence of CIA with pooled odds ratios of 2.25 (95 % CI 1.26-4.03, P = 0.006), 1.26 (95 % CI 1.11-1.43, P = 0.0003) and 1.39 (95 % CI 1.15-1.70, P = 0.0008), respectively. The three-drug combination regimens of cyclophosphamide,anthracycline/epirubicin, and taxanes (CAT/CET) caused the highest rate of CIA compared with the other three drug combinations (OR 1.41, 95 % CI 1.16-1.73, P = 0.0008). Tamoxifen therapy was also correlated with a higher incidence of CIA, with an OR of 1.48. Patients with CIA were found to exhibit better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with patients without CIA. With respect to molecular subtype, this DFS advantage remained significant in hormone-sensitive patients (HR 0.61, 95 % CI 0.52-0.72, P < 0.00001). The current meta-analysis has demonstrated that anthracycline/epirubicin, taxanes, cyclophosphamide, and tamoxifen all contributed to elevated rates of CIA, and CIA was not merely a side effect of chemotherapy but was a better prognostic marker, particularly for ER-positive premenopausal early-stage breast cancer patients. However, this topic merits further randomized control studies to detect the associations between CIA and patient prognosis after adjusting for age, ER status, and other influential factors.

A comparison of survival outcomes and side effects of toremifene or tamoxifen therapy in premenopausal estrogen and progesterone receptor positive breast cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In premenopausal women, endocrine adjuvant therapy for breast cancer primarily consists of tamoxifen alone or with ovarian suppressive strategies. Toremifene is a chlorinated derivative of tamoxifen, but with a superior risk-benefit profile. In this retrospective study, we sought to establish the role of toremifene as an endocrine therapy for premenopausal patients with estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive breast cancer besides tamoxifen. METHODS: Patients with early invasive breast cancer were selected from the breast tumor registries at the Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital (China). Premenopausal patients with endocrine responsive breast cancer who underwent standard therapy and adjuvant therapy with toremifene or tamoxifen were considered eligible. Patients with breast sarcoma, carcinosarcoma, concurrent contralateral primary breast cancer, or with distant metastases at diagnosis, or those who had not undergone surgery and endocrine therapy were ineligible. Overall survival and recurrence-free survival were the primary outcomes measured. Toxicity data was also collected and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Of the 810 patients reviewed, 452 patients were analyzed in the study: 240 received tamoxifen and 212 received toremifene. The median and mean follow up times were 50.8 and 57.3 months, respectively. Toremifene and tamoxifen yielded similar overall survival values, with 5-year overall survival rates of 100% and 98.4%, respectively (p = 0.087). However, recurrence-free survival was significantly better in the toremifene group than in the tamoxifen group (p = 0.022). Multivariate analysis showed that recurrence-free survival improved independently with toremifene (HR = 0.385, 95% CI = 0.154-0.961; p = 0.041). Toxicity was similar in the two treatment groups with no women experiencing severe complications, other than hot flashes, which was more frequent in the toremifene patients (p = 0.049). No patients developed endometrial cancer. CONCLUSION: Toremifene may be a valid and safe alternative to tamoxifen in premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer.

Clinical outcomes of breast-conserving surgery in patients using a modified method for cavity margin assessment.

BACKGROUND: This study describes a modified intraoperative method for cavity margin (CM) assessment in place of lumpectomy margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS). METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 422 breast cancer patients undergoing BCS with intraoperative CM assessment. After an initial lumpectomy with intent to obtain ≥1-cm margins, separate specimens 1 × 1 cm, 0.5-cm thick were taken from the cavity margin circumferentially. These were frozen without reference to the side of the new margin as a time-saving measure, and parallel sections of the resected surface were evaluated. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 55.5 months, a cumulative 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival rate of 95.3%, metastasis-free survival rate of 97.8%, disease-free survival rate of 88.3%, and overall survival rate of 96.0%, was achieved. The CM positivity rates were of no statistical difference when <7, 7-8, and >8 CMs were assessed. The second operation rate was 3.5% because of the false-negative results of the frozen section analysis on CMs. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that a higher pN stage and cT stage as well as a lack of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation demonstrated significantly worse clinical outcomes. Locoregional recurrences and metastasis are both correlated with worse overall survival. The number of the CMs assessed was not associated with clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The modified CM assessment presented here is a rapid, accurate, and oncologically safe approach for margin evaluation in BCS patients. Lumpectomy margin assessment might be spared when this method is used.