Increased Time to Fixation After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Influenced by Race and Insurance Status.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVES: Although the optimal timing of surgical intervention for traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is controversial, early intervention has been recognized as being beneficial in several studies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the socioeconomic factors that may delay time to surgical fixation in the management of TSCI. METHODS: The present study utilized the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) dataset to identify patients aged greater than 18 undergoing spinal fusion for TSCI from 2007-2016. Patients were divided into subgroups based on race and insurance types. Multivariable linear regression was used to compare time to procedure based on race and payer type while adjusting for demographic and injury-specific factors. Significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Using multivariable analysis, Hispanic and Black patients were associated with significantly increased time to fixation of 12.1 h (95% CI 5.5-18.7, P < .001), and 20.1 h (95% CI 12.1-28.1, P < .001), respectively compared to White patients. Other cohorts based on racial status did not have significantly different times to fixation (P > .05). Medicaid was associated with an increased time to fixation compared to private insurance (11.6 h, 95% CI 3.9-19.2, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Black and Hispanic race and Medicaid were associated with statistically significant increases in time to fixation following TSCI, potentially compromising quality of patient care and resulting in poorer outcomes. More research is needed to elucidate this relationship and ensure equitable care is being delivered.

Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Charcot Neuroarthropathy of the Hip.

BACKGROUND: Historically, Charcot neuroarthropathy hip (CNH) was deemed a contraindication for total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, as implant design and surgical techniques advance, THA for CNH has been performed and documented in literature. Information regarding the outcomes of THA for CNH is limited. The objective of the study was to assess outcomes following THA in patients who have CNH. METHODS: Patients who have CNH underwent primary THA and had at least 2 years of follow-up were identified in a national insurance database. For comparison, a 1:10 matched control cohort of patients who did not have CNH was created based on age, sex, and relevant comorbidities. Eight hundred and ninety-five CNH patients who underwent primary THA were compared to 8,785 controls. Medical outcomes, emergency department visits, hospital readmissions, and surgical outcomes including revisions between cohorts were evaluated using multivariate logistic regressions. RESULTS: The CNH patients were found to have higher risks of 90-day wound complications (P = .014), periprosthetic joint infection (P = .013) (P = .021), dislocation (P < .001) (P < .001), aseptic loosening (P = .040) (P = .002), periprosthetic fracture (P = .003) (P < .001), and revision (P < .001) (P < .001) at 1-year and 2-year follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSION: While patients who have CNH are at a higher risk of wound and implant-related complications, they are comparatively lower than previously reported in literature. Orthopaedic surgeons should be cognizant of the increased risk in this population to provide appropriate preoperative counseling and enhanced perioperative medical management.

Social Determinants of Health Disparities Are Associated With Increased Costs, Revisions, and Infection in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to use a national claims database to assess the impact of pre-existing social determinants of health disparities (SDHD) on postoperative outcomes following rotator cuff repair (RCR). METHODS: A retrospective review of the Mariner Claims Database was used to capture patients undergoing primary RCR with at least 1 year of follow-up. These patients were divided into two cohorts based on the presence of a current or previous history of SDHD, encompassing educational, environmental, social, or economic disparities. Records were queried for 90-day postoperative complications, consisting of minor and major medical complications, emergency department (ED) visits, readmission, stiffness, and 1-year ipsilateral revision surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to assess the impact of SDHD on the assessed postoperative outcomes following RCR. RESULTS: 58,748 patients undergoing primary RCR with a SDHD diagnosis and 58,748 patients in the matched control group were included. A previous diagnosis of SDHD was associated with an increased risk of ED visits (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.18-1.27; P < .001), postoperative stiffness (OR 2.53, 95% CI 2.42-2.64; P < .001), and revision surgery (OR 2.35, 95% CI 2.13-2.59; P < .001) compared to the matched control group. Subgroup analysis revealed educational disparities had the greatest risk for 1-year revision (OR 3.13, 95% CI 2.53-4.05; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a SDHD was associated with an increased risk of revision surgery, postoperative stiffness, emergency room visits, medical complications, and surgical costs following arthroscopic RCR. Overall, economic and educational SDHD were associated with the greatest risk of 1-year revision surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective cohort study.

Effect of Celiac Disease on Outcomes After Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Matched Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze if celiac disease (CD) is associated with increased postoperative complications following single-level posterior lumbar fusion (PLF). METHODS: A retrospective database review was performed using the PearlDiver dataset. The study population included all patients older than 18 years who underwent elective PLF with diagnosis of CD using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Study patients were compared with controls for 90-day medical complications and 2-year surgical complications including 5-year reoperation rates. A multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the independent effect of CD on the postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 909 patients with CD and 4483 patients in the matched control group who underwent primary single-level PLF were included in this study. CD patients had a significantly increased risk of 90-day emergency department (ED) visit (OR 1.28; P = 0.020). CD patients also demonstrated higher rates of 2-year pseudarthrosis and instrument failure, but they were statistically comparable (P > 0.05). There was no difference in 5-year reoperation rate. There were also no significant differences in 90-day medical complication rate and 2-year surgical complication rate between the two groups. In addition, there were no differences in procedure cost and 90-day cost. CONCLUSIONS: For CD patients undergoing PLF, the current study demonstrated increased rate of 90-day ED visit. Our findings may be useful for patient counseling and surgical planning for those with this condition.

Carbon fiber lumbopelvic reconstruction following sacral giant cell tumor resection: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: The use of carbon fiber or polyetheretherketone spine constructs has proven to be a safe and effective alternative to standard metal alloy. The mechanical properties of carbon fiber while unique provide a construct that is comparable in strength to previous titanium-based constructs and have additionally shown greater fatigue resistance. These constructs have been especially useful for the mechanical stabilization of the spine following tumor resection. The subsequent interference seen when imaging a patient with a traditional metallic construct is reduced and allows for improved tumor surveillance after the procedure, and a more accurate delivery of radiotherapy when indicated. OBSERVATIONS: This case report details the treatment of a 25-year-old female diagnosed with a sacral giant cell tumor. The authors discuss the use of a carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone for lumbopelvic reconstruction. LESSONS: Carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone with its radiolucency and rigidity is a reliable option for complex spinal reconstruction after tumor resection.

Orthopedic Surgery Fellowship Directors: Trends in Demographics, Education, Employment, and Institutional Familiarity.

Background: Fellowship directors are assumed to be distinguished in orthopedics, but the traits and training that have enabled them to achieve their leadership positions have not been assessed. Purpose: We sought to identify common demographics, research output, and educational trends of fellowship directors in orthopedics, with an emphasis on racial, ethnic, and gender diversity. Methods: We conducted a literature review to identify published studies on fellowship directors in orthopedic surgery and found 4 cross-sectional studies of fellowship directors in spine, arthroplasty, pediatrics, and sports medicine subspecialties. Another 4 accredited orthopedic subspecialties and their fellowship directors were identified using the American College of Graduate Medical Education Public Accreditation Data System for 2020-2021 and national fellowship directories. Data endpoints included race/ethnicity, age, sex, residency and fellowship training institutions, year of fellowship completion, year of hire at current institution, year of fellowship directors appointment, and h-index. The demographics and educational backgrounds for listed fellowship directors were collected from curricula vitae (CVs). Results: Of the 537 fellowship directors identified among 8 orthopedic subspecialties, the average age was 52.9 ± 2.2 years, 5.6% (N = 30) were women, 79.1% (N = 406) were white, 12.5% (N = 64) were Asian American, 3.7% (N = 19) were African American, 2.9% (N = 15) were Middle Eastern, and 1.7% (N = 9) were Hispanic/Latino. Oncology 20% (N = 4) had the highest percentage of female fellowship directors; 37.6% (N = 202) of fellowship directors were at the same institution they trained at for residency or fellowship. Their average h-index was 18.6 ± 3.7. Conclusion: This study of fellowship directors in orthopedics found that they have a high research output and a high level of institutional familiarity. We identified a need for greater diversity in these leadership positions in both gender and race/ethnicity.

Impaction grafting of lumbar pedicle defects: a biomechanical study of a novel technique for pedicle screw revision.

OBJECTIVE: The two most common revision options available for the management of loose pedicle screws are larger-diameter screws and cement augmentation into the vertebral body for secondary fixation. An alternative revision method is impaction grafting (pedicoplasty) of the failed pedicle screw track. This technique uses the impaction of corticocancellous bone into the pedicle and vertebral body through a series of custom funnels to reconstitute a new pedicle wall and a neomedullary canal. The goal of this study was to compare the biomechanics of screws inserted after pedicoplasty (impaction grafting) of a pedicle defect to those of an upsized screw and a cement-augmented screw. METHODS: For this biomechanical cadaveric study the investigators used 10 vertebral bodies (L1-5) that were free of metastatic disease or primary bone disease. Following initial screw insertion, each screw was subjected to a pullout force that was applied axially along the screw trajectory at 5 mm per minute until failure. Each specimen was instrumented with a pedicoplasty revision using the original screw diameter, and on the contralateral side either a fenestrated screw with cement augmentation or a screw upsized by 1 mm was inserted in a randomized fashion. These revisions were then pulled out using the previously mentioned methods. RESULTS: Initial screw pullout values for the paired upsized screw and pedicoplasty were 717 ± 511 N and 774 ± 414 N, respectively (p = 0.747) (n = 14). Revised pullout values for the paired upsized screw and pedicoplasty were 775 ± 461 N and 762 ± 320 N, respectively (p = 0.932). Initial pullout values for the paired cement augmentation and pedicoplasty were 792 ± 434 N and 880 ± 558 N, respectively (p = 0.649). Revised pullout values for the paired cement augmentation and pedicoplasty were 1159 ± 300 N and 687 ± 213 N, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pedicle defects are difficult to manage. Reconstitution of the pedicle and creation of a neomedullary canal appears to be possible through the use of pedicoplasty. Biomechanically, screws that have been used in pedicoplasty have equivalent pullout strength to an upsized screw, and have greater insertional torques than those with the same diameter that have not been used in pedicoplasty, yet they are not superior to cement augmentation. This study suggests that although cement augmentation appears to have superior pullout force, the novel pedicoplasty technique offers promise as a viable biological revision option for the management of failed pedicle screws compared with the option of standard upsized screws in a cadaveric model. These findings will ultimately need to be further assessed in a clinical setting.

Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Patients With Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. OBJECTIVES: To study postoperative complication rates following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) compared with patients without EDS. METHODS: The Mariner database was utilized to identify patients with EDS undergoing one or two level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Postoperative short-term outcomes assessed included medical complications, readmissions, and ED-visits within 90 days of surgery. Additionally, surgical complications including wound complications, surgical site infection, one- and two-year anterior revision along with posterior revision, pseudarthrosis, and hardware failure within 2 years were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for demographic variables, comorbidities and number of levels operated on. RESULTS: The present study identified 533 patients in the EDS group and 2634 patients in the matched control group. EDS patients undergoing ACDF are at an increased risk for 90-day major medical complications (OR 3.31; P < .001). EDS patients were also found to be associated with surgical complications including wound complications (OR 2.94; P < .001), surgical site infection (OR 8.60; P < .001) within 90 days, pseudarthrosis (OR 2.33; P < .001), instrument failure (OR 4.03; P < .001), anterior revision (OR 22.87; P < .001), and posterior revision (OR 3.17; P < .001) within 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: EDS is associated with higher rates of both medical and surgical complications following ACDF. Spine surgeons should be cognizant of the increased risks in this population to provide appropriate preoperative counseling and enhanced perioperative medical management.

Improvement of postural stability and gait velocity after cervical decompression surgery in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a progressive degenerative condition that can lead to significant neurological deficits, including gait instability. Biomechanical alterations of gait and its various components are poorly understood. The goal of the current study was to determine how spatiotemporal gait parameters, as well as postural and dynamic stability, change after surgery in CSM patients. METHODS: A total of 47 subjects were included, with 23 test subjects and 24 controls. Baseline measurements were made for both cohorts. In the CSM cohort, repeat measurements were made at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. To record spatiotemporal and dynamic stability parameters, subjects performed walking trials over force plates on a 15-m runway. To assess postural stability, standing balance trials were conducted on a floor-mounted force plate. Three-dimensional motion analysis cameras and gait modeling software were used to quantify and visually represent results. Statistical analysis was completed using repeated-measures ANOVA and paired t-tests. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: CSM patients had significantly increased gait velocity at the 6-month follow-up (mean 0.948 ± 0.248 m/sec/leg length) versus baseline (mean 0.852 ± 0.257 m/sec/leg length) (p = 0.039). The tilted ellipse area was significantly decreased at the 6-month follow-up compared with baseline (mean 979.8 ± 856.7 mm2 vs 598.0 ± 391.1 mm2, p = 0.018). Angular momentum excursion was not significantly different between baseline and the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: CSM patients displayed significant improvement in gait velocity and postural stability parameters after decompressive surgery. Dynamic stability parameters did not change significantly during the study period.

Preoperative Substance Use Disorder Is Associated With an Increase in 90-Day Postoperative Complications, 1-Year Revisions and Conversion to Arthroplasty Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Substance Use Disorder on the Rise.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study was to use a nationwide administrative-claims database to characterize the substance use disorder trends of patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). Additionally, we sought to evaluate the influence of preoperative substance use disorder on postoperative outcomes following arthroscopic RCR. METHODS: The Mariner database was used to identify patients undergoing RCR using CPT codes, ages 18-84 years old, from 2010 to 2019. Patients were stratified by substance use, including cannabis, cocaine, nicotine, alcohol, opioids, stimulants, or sedative, as defined by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Substance use disorders trends were reported. Postoperative outcomes assessed consisted of major complications, minor complications, infections, readmissions, and Emergency Department visits within 90 days of surgery. Additionally, postoperative stiffness, revision surgery, and conversion to arthroplasty within 1 year were evaluated. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to control for demographic and comorbid factors. RESULTS: Substance use trends from 2010 to 2019 show an increase in documentation of substance use in patients undergoing RCR. Individuals with a history of substance use disorder had an increased risk of adverse outcomes, most notably major medical complications (odds ratio [OR]: 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.44-1.86; P < .001), revision surgery (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.30-1.56; P < .001), and conversion to arthroplasty (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.08-1.80; P = .009). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that cannabis users were at higher risk for major medical complications (OR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.15-2.56; P < .001), conversion to arthroplasty (OR: 3.54; 95% CI: 1.77-6.4; P < .001), and revision (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.12-2.04; P < .05) compared to controls. Additionally, substance use was associated with higher medical costs in terms of procedural cost (ß; $3634: $3,490-3,777) and 90-day postoperative costs (ß: $436; $375-$498). CONCLUSION: Documentation of substance use disorder is increasing in individuals undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Substance use is associated with higher rates of postoperative complications, overall costs, and revision surgery following arthroscopic RCR. Nicotine and cannabis use were most commonly associated with increased rates of postoperative complications and treatment failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective therapeutic case series.

Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Prior to Posterior Lumbar Fusion: No Difference in Medical Outcomes or Reoperation.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: To analyze and confirm the rates of postoperative complications of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) undergoing primary posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) and assess whether treatment of HCV before surgery reduces complications. BACKGROUND CONTEXT: HCV causes chronic disease, leading to increased risk of cirrhosis and chronic illness. Currently, there is a lack of research regarding whether the patient's HCV is a modifiable risk factor for postoperative complications after spinal procedures. METHODS: The Mariner database was utilized to find patients from 2010 to 2018 undergoing PLF with active follow-up for a year. Cases involving same-day revision procedures and patients with a history of spine, infection, trauma, human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B, or neoplasm were excluded. Patients with a history of HCV diagnosis were identified and further stratified whether they had prior treatment using the national drug codes for antiviral, interferons, or ribavirin. Patients with HCV were matched with those without respect to age, sex, and comorbidity of burden. Outcome measured included 90-day medical complications, infection, readmission, and 1-year reoperation. RESULTS: There were 2,129 patients with HCV and 10,544 patients in the matched control group who underwent primary PLF. Out of the 2,129 patients, 469 (22.0.%) were treated with HCV medications before surgery. Patients with prior history of HCV had a significantly increased risk of wound complications (4.4% vs. 3.2%, odds ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.24-1.96, P =0.009), and infection (7.7% vs. 5.7%, odds ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.53, P =0.009) within 90 days of surgery. Patients treated before surgery did not have a difference in major ( P =0.205) or minor medical complications ( P =0.681) after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with prior history of HCV are at increased risk for many complications after surgery; however, this risk factor does not seem to be modifiable as the treatment group did not experience any improvement in postoperative outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Economic and educational disparities are associated with an increased risk of revision surgery following shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There is limited literature exploring how nonmedical factors such as social determinants of health (SDOHs) are associated with postoperative outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective cohort review of the Pearl Diver Database was used to capture patients undergoing either primary anatomic total or reverse shoulder arthroplasty from the fourth quarter of 2015 to the third quarter of 2019 with at least 1 year of active longitudinal follow-up. Patients with proximal humeral fractures, stress fractures, or septic arthritis were excluded. The included patients were then divided into 2 cohorts based on the presence of current SDOHs or a history of SDOHs. The SDOH cohort comprised 4 non-mutually exclusive categories: economic, educational, social, and environmental disparities. Subsequently, a control cohort was matched at a 1:1 ratio to the SDOH cohort. Primary outcome measures were assessed using a logistic regression and consisted of the following 90-day postoperative complications: minor and major medical complications and infection. Emergency department (ED) visits and readmissions for any cause were also assessed. Additionally, the following 1-year outcomes were assessed: aseptic loosening, instability, and revision arthroplasty. Surgical costs and 90-day postoperative costs were collected using averaged insurance reimbursements for both the control and SDOH cohorts. RESULTS: There were 5190 patients in each cohort. Economic disparities made up the largest portion of the SDOH cohort (n = 4631, 89.2%), followed by social (n = 741, 14.3%), environmental (n = 417, 8.0%), and educational (n = 99, 1.9%) disparities. Compared with the control cohort, SDOHs were associated with an increased risk of major complications (2.3% vs. 1.4%; odds ratio [OR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-1.87; P < .001), minor complications (5.7% vs. 3.8%; OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.21-1.95; P = .001), readmissions (4.3% vs. 2.8%; OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.26-1.84; P < .001), and ED visits (15.2% vs. 11.0%; OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.29-1.63; P < .001) within 90 days following surgery. Additionally, SDOHs were associated with an increased risk of aseptic loosening (1.1% vs. 0.6%; OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.20-2.65; P = .006), instability (4.0% vs. 2.2%; OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.43-2.28; P < .001), and ipsilateral revision (9.2% vs. 7.6%; OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08-1.43; P < .001) at 1 year postoperatively compared with the control cohort. CONCLUSION: SDOHs are associated with increased rates of adverse outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty including revision surgery, ED visits, length of stay, and overall cost compared with matched controls without SDOHs. Specifically, economic and educational disparities are associated with increased rates of adverse outcomes following surgery including revision surgery, ED visits, length of stay, and overall cost.

No Difference in Two-Year Revisions Between Hybrid Fusion and Two-Level Anterior Discectomy and Fusion: A National Database Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort. OBJECTIVE: This study utilized a large national database to compare two-year revision rates, in addition to complications and costs, of hybrid surgery (HS) compared to two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: This study used the PearlDiver Mariner dataset selecting for patients aged 18 and older who had at least 90-day active longitudinal follow-up who underwent two-level ACDF or two-level Hybrid surgery (single level ACDF and single level CDA). Patients with prior spinal trauma, infection, cancer, or posterior fusion were excluded. Primary outcomes measures were 90-day major and minor medical complications, ED visits, readmissions, as well as two-year revisions. Patients were also assessed for postoperative dysphagia, incidental durotomy, vascular injury, 90-day surgical site, and implant complications. Additionally, hospitalization and postoperative costs were evaluated. RESULTS: There were 4570 two-level ACDF surgeries and 888 hybrid surgeries. After matching the cohorts, no statistical differences in demographics were found. There were no differences in reoperation rates at all measured time points nor 2-year complications. HS had a lower incidence of major (1.6% vs 3.1%, P = .003) and minor complications (3.0% vs 4.6%, P = .009) than ACDF. 90-day readmission was lower in the HS cohort (2.8% vs 4.2%), P = .024. HS was associated with reduced hospitalization costs -$2614 (-$3916 to -$904, P < .001). 3516 patients had ACDF, and 699 had HS with at least 2 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Hybrid surgery is a safe and effective surgical treatment for cervical disease in appropriately selected patients.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients with preexisting dementia: Increased medical complications, costs, and 90-day readmissions.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective-Cohort INTRODUCTION: Dementia is among the most common health concerns for the aging population, characterized by steep cognitive decline and subsequent loss of independence. Limited orthopedic literature examines the influence that dementia has on patients undergoing elective spinal surgeries. METHODS: Employing the PearlDriver Database, a study population consisting of patients who underwent primary elective ACDF with a prior diagnosis of dementia were selected using Internal Classification Disease-9 (ICD) and ICD-10 codes. Patients with a history of trauma, infection, or malignancy were excluded. Patients with dementia were compared to matched controls via logistical regression accounting for patient demographics, medical comorbidities and levels operated on. Patients were assessed for 90-day outcomes including medical complications, emergency department visits, readmissions, one-year reoperation, hospital length of stay (LOS) and total operative hospitalization costs, and 90-day postoperative cost. RESULTS: There were 4104 patients in the dementia group and 20,269 patients in the matched control group who underwent primary ACDF. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with dementia undergoing ACDF were associated with increased 90-day major and minor medical complications (p < 0.001). Patients with dementia were also associated with an increased risk of dysphagia (p < 0.001), 90-day ER visits(p < 0.001), 90-day readmissions(p < 0.001), and increased LOS(p < 0.001) following ACDF compared to the control group. Additionally, both total hospitalization costs and 90-day postoperative costs were higher in the dementia cohort(p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative dementia diagnosis in patients undergoing ACDF is associated with increased number of readmissions, hospitalization and 90-day costs, and postoperative medical complications.

Penicillin Allergy in Spine Surgery: Increased Rates of Sepsis, Emergency Room Visits, and Readmission.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a penicillin allergy is an independent risk factor for poor outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior lumbar fusion (PLF). METHODS: A retrospective database review was performed using the PearlDiver data set. The study population included all patients younger than 85 years who underwent elective PLF or ACDF with diagnosis of penicillin allergy using International Classification of Diseases codes. Study patients were compared with controls for 90-day complications and 1-year reoperation rates. A multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the independent effect of penicillin allergy on the postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: PLF cohort multivariate analysis showed that patients with a penicillin allergy had a significantly increased risk of sepsis (2.6% vs. 2.0%; P = 0.020), urinary tract infection (10.8% vs. 8.4%; P < 0.001), emergency room visits (27.3% vs. 20.2%; P < 0.001), and readmissions (9.6% vs. 6.4%; P < 0.001) within 90 days index of surgery. Similarly, the ACDF cohort multivariate analysis showed that a penicillin allergy was associated with an increased risk of sepsis (1.8% vs. 1.1%; P < 0.001), emergency room visits (27.2% vs. 20.7%; P < 0.001), and readmissions (6.8% vs. 5.6%; P = 0.003) within 90 days index of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The present study found that a reported penicillin allergy is associated with an increase in sepsis, urinary tract infection, emergency room visit, and readmission postoperatively within 90 days after PLF and ACDF. The findings can help physicians provide patients with more comprehensive preoperative counseling in the setting of patient-reported penicillin allergy.

Propensity Scored Analysis of Outpatient Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: No Increased Complications.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim were to (1) evaluate differences in postoperative outcomes and cost associated with outpatient anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) compared with inpatient ALIF, and to (2) identify independent factors contributing to complications after outpatient ALIF. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: While lumbar fusion is traditionally performed inpatient, outpatient spinal surgery is becoming more commonplace as surgical techniques improve. METHODS: The study population included all patients below 85 years of age who underwent elective ALIF (CPT-22558). Patients were then divided into those who underwent single-level fusion and multilevel fusion using the corresponding additional level fusion codes (CPT-22585). These resulting populations were then split into outpatient and inpatient cohorts by using a service location modifier. To account for selection bias, propensity score matching was performed; the inpatient cohorts were matched with respect to the outpatient cohorts based on age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05 and the Bonferroni correction was used for each multiple comparison (P<0.004). RESULTS: Patients undergoing outpatient procedure had decreased rates of medical complications following both single-level and multilevel ALIF. In addition, age above 60, female sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index>3, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, hypertension, and tobacco use were all identified as independent risk factors for increased complications. Finally, the cost of outpatient ALIF was $12,013 while the cost of inpatient ALIF was $27,271 (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The findings add to the growing body of literature advocating for the utilization of ALIF in the outpatient setting for a properly selected group of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

How old is too old?: Matched analysis of geriatric patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Review INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to utilize a national database to identify how age affects patient outcomes following anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). There are no established age guidelines for the geriatric population within the spine specialty, which makes patient selection challenging. Furthermore, there are conflicting studies for the risks of performing spine surgeries in the elderly. METHODS: A retrospective review of the Mariner Claims Database was conducted on patients who underwent a single level ALIF (CPT 22558) between 2010 and 2018. Patients were separated into three groups by age: 50-64, 65-74, and 75-84 and matched with respect to gender, smoking, and comorbidity burden. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the independent effect of outpatient surgery on the postoperative outcomes after adjusting for demographic factors and pertinent comorbidities. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The study identified 8459 matched patients (3350 50-64; 3350 65-74; and 1759 75-84). Compared with patients aged 50-64, patients aged 65-74 and 75-84 had significantly increased risks of pneumonia (65-74: OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.06-2.24, p = 0.025; 75-84: OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.07-2.42, p = 0.022), sepsis (65-74: OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.36-3.76, p = 0.002; 75-84: OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.43-4.13, p = 0.001), and major complications (65-74: OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.05-1.74, p = 0.021; 75-84: OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.11-1.95, p = 0.006) (Table 2). There were no significant differences between patients aged 65-74 and 75-84 for risks of postoperative pneumonia, sepsis, and major complications (p > 0.05). There were no differences between any groups in terms of long-term outcomes such as pseudoarthrosis, implant related complications, or reoperation (p > 0.05) (Table 3). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The study showed that those older than 65 had a significant increase in risk of pneumonia, sepsis, and major complications following ALIF. In the two cohorts above the age of 65 (65-74 and 75-84) there was no significant differences in postoperative outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.