How Prepared Are They? Pediatric Boot Camps and Intern Performance.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether participation in a pediatric boot camp during medical school was associated with higher intern performance. Secondary objectives were to determine whether participation in general boot camps, pediatric subinternships or pediatric electives was associated with higher performance. METHODS: Intern surveys and faculty performance assessments during early internship were collected from a convenience sample of pediatric residency programs. Interns completed a survey regarding participation in medical school boot camps, pediatric subinternships and pediatric electives. Faculty assessed intern performance on selected Milestone-based subcompetencies on a 5-point scale following each intern's initial inpatient rotation and results were compared between groups. RESULTS: Seventeen pediatric residency programs participated. Two hundred eighty-seven interns completed the survey (69%), and faculty completed assessments on 71% of these interns. Of interns with complete faculty assessments (n = 198), 25% participated in 5 or more days of pediatric boot camp, 30% in general boot camp, and 45% in no boot camp. There were no educationally significant associations between participation in 5 or more days of pediatric boot camp, general boot camp, subinternships, or electives and intern performance. Interns completing at least 10 days of pediatric boot camp (n = 25) had slightly higher ratings for incorporating feedback and engaging in help-seeking behavior during June and July only. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in pediatric boot camps, general boot camps, pediatric subinternships or electives was not associated with substantially higher intern performance as measured by selected Milestone subcompetencies. Pediatric educators should carefully consider boot camp curricula and anticipated outcomes associated with boot camp participation.

Going "Fourth" From Medical School: Fourth-Year Medical Students' Perspectives on the Fourth Year of Medical School.

PURPOSE: To learn what graduating medical students considered the primary purposes of the fourth year of medical school, their approach to residency selection, and the challenges they faced in meeting their fourth-year goals. METHOD: A 52-question Web-based survey was administered to fourth-year students from 20 U.S. MD-granting medical schools in spring 2014. Quantitative data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance, chi-square analysis, or paired t tests. Responses to an open-ended question were coded into themes and confirmed. RESULTS: A total of 1,367/2,884 (47.4%) students responded. Students applied to a mean of 36.4 (SD = 22.6) residency programs and interviewed at a mean of 12.3 (SD = 5.6) programs. Surgery applicants applied to more programs (mean = 58.2, SD = 22.3; P < .001); radiology applicants interviewed at more programs (mean = 16.9, SD = 8.5; P < .001). Students took a mean of 1.8 (SD = 0.8) monthlong away electives in their career specialty of choice; surgery and emergency medicine applicants were more likely to complete away electives (P < .001). Students agreed the fourth year has multiple valuable purposes, including maximizing the likelihood of matching into their residency of choice, gaining a broad educational experience, and preparing for residency. The main purpose varied by specialty, but overall students ranked preparing for residency highest. Completing away electives and interviewing were expensive; approximately 35% of students could not complete away electives because of financial constraints. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students view the fourth year as a time for residency selection and preparation.

Getting off to a good start: discussing goals and expectations with medical students.

Medical students highly value a learning environment in which they feel part of the health care team, their views are valued, and they make significant contributions to the care of patients.An orientation that includes an enthusiastic welcome, an opportunity to get to know from where the students have come and where they want to go, and setting mutually agreeable SMART objectives helps create a supportive and effective learning environment.

What makes a great clinical teacher in pediatrics? Lessons learned from the literature.

Great clinical teachers occupy a unique and powerful role in the education of medical students. Their noncognitive and cognitive actions and behaviors influence future student behaviors and career choices and, most importantly, result in a future generation of physicians who are equipped to care for children. Although we continue to have difficulty defining the critical characteristics of a great clinical teacher, identifying such a teacher is easy: they are the ones to whom students and residents flock. If we return to a teacher we each remember as having made the clinical experience memorable and inspired us to work a little harder, it is the person, not necessarily the content, that we remember. Although some have advocated that great teaching is innate, many of the skills and strategies can, in fact, be learned and developed. Over the next several issues we will explore in greater detail the skills and strategies developed by COMSEP that can be quickly and efficiently assimilated into daily practice and help make a good clinical teacher great.

COMSEP: an overview of its history, mission, and relationship to pediatrics.

The reader may wonder, "What is COMSEP, and how does an article from COMSEP affect me?" COMSEP, the Council on Medical Student Education in Pediatrics, is a community of pediatric clerkship directors and other educators whose mission is to improve the health of children and their families by advancing the art and science of medical student education in pediatrics.(1) This is the first in what is envisioned to be a quarterly report from the COMSEP to the readership of Pediatrics. In writing these articles, we hope to accomplish 3 key objectives. First, we want to keep the readership updated on trends that could affect both practice and pediatric education, whether they involve the rise of the pediatric hospitalist service or use of electronic medical records. Second, we hope to share educational techniques or strategies that allow for efficient and effective teaching, particularly in community practice settings. Third, we wish to be a voice for the huge number of pediatric practitioners who are critical not only as role models but also as mentors for the next generation of pediatric care providers. To better understand who and what COMSEP is, this first article is dedicated to the history, structure, and fundamental principles of the organization.

A model for assessing information retrieval and application skills of medical students.

PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a model for assessing information retrieval and application skills, and to compare the performances on the assessment exercises of students who were and were not instructed in these skills. METHOD: The authors developed a set of four examination stations, each with multiple subtasks, and administered the exams to students at two medical schools. Students at one school had intensive instruction in literature searching and filtering skills for information quality (instructed group), and those at the other school had minimal instruction in these areas (uninstructed group). The stations addressed pediatrics content and the skills of searching Medline and the World Wide Web, evaluating research articles, evaluating the accuracy of information from the Web, and using the information to make recommendations to patients. The authors determined the psychometric characteristics of the stations and compared the performances of the two groups of students. RESULTS: Students in the instructed group performed significantly better and with less variability than the uninstructed group on four tasks and no differently on seven tasks. There was no task on which the uninstructed group performed significantly better than the instructed group. CONCLUSION: The prototype stations showed predictable differences across curricula, indicating that they have promise as assessment tools for the essential skills of information retrieval and application.