Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Drug Saf ; 18(1): 116-120, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36748234

RESUMO

Orthopaedic implant removal is considered a sterile procedure, but the current literature suggests it is associated with around a 20% Surgical Site Infection (SSI) rate. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis is still ambiguous and contentious. Taking into consideration this issue we conducted a meta-analysis for the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopaedic implant removal surgery. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether or not antibiotic prophylaxis benefits orthopaedic implant removal surgeries. METHODS: Electronic and printed sources were searched up to February 2021 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using antibiotic prophylaxis and a control group. Data from eligible studies were pooled for the following outcomes: overall, superficial, and deep surgical site infection (SSI). Pooled odds ratios with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using Mantel Haenszel fixed-effect model preferentially. RESULTS: Two studies, including 766 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was not statistically significant between the studies. There was no significant difference in the incidence of overall SSI in cefazolin and normal saline (NS) groups (Pooled OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.53- 1.17). In subgroup analysis, antibiotic prophylaxis showed statistically significant improvement for deep SSI (Pooled OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06-0.70). CONCLUSION: Overall incidence of SSI is not reduced after the administration of antibiotic prophylaxis one hour before removal of orthopaedic implants.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Ortopedia , Humanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Antibioticoprofilaxia/efeitos adversos , Cefazolina
2.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 29(12): 17417-17424, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34665416

RESUMO

The RhoA gene showed an important genotypic association with nicotine dependence and smoking initiation. The current study aims to investigate the effect of the Rho GTPase inhibitor ML141 in the progression of nicotine dependence in a mice model of precipitated nicotine withdrawal syndrome by mecamylamine.The experimental procedure involved administration of 2.5 mg/kg nicotine dissolved in normal saline subcutaneously (s.c) four times a day consecutively for 7 days and last single dose in the morning on 8th day. ML-141 was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and was administered daily with nicotine as corrective treatment at a dose of 1,5 and 10 mg/kg (p < 0.05). An injection of 3 mg/kg of mecamylamine intraperitoneal (ip) was given an hour later than the last nicotine dose on the day 8 to precipitate withdrawal of nicotine and withdrawal severity was assessed by measuring hyperalgesia, piloerection, jumping frequency, tremors, and withdrawal severity score (WSS). Various behavioural changes such as hyperalgesia, piloerection, jumping frequency, and tremors were monitored and WSS was calculated. ML-141 a selective Rho GTPase inhibitor was found to show dose-dependent effect on all these parameters. Inhibition of Rho GTPase was found to reduce the severity of withdrawal syndrome; therefore, it can be concluded that Rho GTPase would serve as a suitable biological target by regulating the reward system in brain and could be used as new target for drug discovery.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Abstinência a Substâncias , Tabagismo , Animais , Mecamilamina/farmacologia , Mecamilamina/uso terapêutico , Camundongos , Nicotina , Síndrome de Abstinência a Substâncias/tratamento farmacológico , Proteínas rho de Ligação ao GTP/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA