Reconstruction of 3D knee MRI using deep learning and compressed sensing: a validation study on healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the potential of combining compressed sensing (CS) and artificial intelligence (AI), in particular deep learning (DL), for accelerating three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences of the knee. METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers were examined using a 3-T scanner with a fat-saturated 3D proton density sequence with four different acceleration levels (10, 13, 15, and 17). All sequences were accelerated with CS and reconstructed using the conventional and a new DL-based algorithm (CS-AI). Subjective image quality was evaluated by two blinded readers using seven criteria on a 5-point-Likert-scale (overall impression, artifacts, delineation of the anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, menisci, cartilage, and bone). Using mixed models, all CS-AI sequences were compared to the clinical standard (sense sequence with an acceleration factor of 2) and CS sequences with the same acceleration factor. RESULTS: 3D sequences reconstructed with CS-AI achieved significantly better values for subjective image quality compared to sequences reconstructed with CS with the same acceleration factor (p ≤ 0.001). The images reconstructed with CS-AI showed that tenfold acceleration may be feasible without significant loss of quality when compared to the reference sequence (p ≥ 0.999). CONCLUSIONS: For 3-T 3D-MRI of the knee, a DL-based algorithm allowed for additional acceleration of acquisition times compared to the conventional approach. This study, however, is limited by its small sample size and inclusion of only healthy volunteers, indicating the need for further research with a more diverse and larger sample. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00024156. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Using a DL-based algorithm, 54% faster image acquisition (178 s versus 384 s) for 3D-sequences may be possible for 3-T MRI of the knee. KEY POINTS: • Combination of compressed sensing and DL improved image quality and allows for significant acceleration of 3D knee MRI. • DL-based algorithm achieved better subjective image quality than conventional compressed sensing. • For 3D knee MRI at 3 T, 54% faster image acquisition may be possible.

Five-minute knee MRI: An AI-based super resolution reconstruction approach for compressed sensing. A validation study on healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: To investigate the potential of combining Compressed Sensing (CS) and a newly developed AI-based super resolution reconstruction prototype consisting of a series of convolutional neural networks (CNN) for a complete five-minute 2D knee MRI protocol. METHODS: In this prospective study, 20 volunteers were examined using a 3T-MRI-scanner (Ingenia Elition X, Philips). Similar to clinical practice, the protocol consists of a fat-saturated 2D-proton-density-sequence in coronal, sagittal and transversal orientation as well as a sagittal T1-weighted sequence. The sequences were acquired with two different resolutions (standard and low resolution) and the raw data reconstructed with two different reconstruction algorithms: a conventional Compressed SENSE (CS) and a new CNN-based algorithm for denoising and subsequently to interpolate and therewith increase the sharpness of the image (CS-SuperRes). Subjective image quality was evaluated by two blinded radiologists reviewing 8 criteria on a 5-point Likert scale and signal-to-noise ratio calculated as an objective parameter. RESULTS: The protocol reconstructed with CS-SuperRes received higher ratings than the time-equivalent CS reconstructions, statistically significant especially for low resolution acquisitions (e.g., overall image impression: 4.3 ±â€¯0.4 vs. 3.4 ±â€¯0.4, p < 0.05). CS-SuperRes reconstructions for the low resolution acquisition were comparable to traditional CS reconstructions with standard resolution for all parameters, achieving a scan time reduction from 11:01 min to 4:46 min (57 %) for the complete protocol (e.g. overall image impression: 4.3 ±â€¯0.4 vs. 4.0 ±â€¯0.5, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The newly-developed AI-based reconstruction algorithm CS-SuperRes allows to reduce scan time by 57% while maintaining unchanged image quality compared to the conventional CS reconstruction.

Reconstruction of shoulder MRI using deep learning and compressed sensing: a validation study on healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the potential of combining compressed sensing (CS) and deep learning (DL) for accelerated two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the shoulder. METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers were examined using at 3-T scanner with a fat-saturated, coronal, 2D proton density-weighted sequence with four acceleration levels (2.3, 4, 6, and 8) and a 3D sequence with three acceleration levels (8, 10, and 13), all accelerated with CS and reconstructed using the conventional algorithm and a new DL-based algorithm (CS-AI). Subjective image quality was evaluated by two blinded readers using 6 criteria on a 5-point Likert scale (overall impression, artifacts, and delineation of the subscapularis tendon, bone, acromioclavicular joint, and glenoid labrum). Objective image quality was measured by calculating signal-to-noise-ratio, contrast-to-noise-ratio, and a structural similarity index measure. All reconstructions were compared to the clinical standard (CS 2D acceleration factor 2.3; CS 3D acceleration factor 8). Additionally, subjective and objective image quality were compared between CS and CS-AI with the same acceleration levels. RESULTS: Both 2D and 3D sequences reconstructed with CS-AI achieved on average significantly better subjective and objective image quality compared to sequences reconstructed with CS with the same acceleration factor (p ≤ 0.011). Comparing CS-AI to the reference sequences showed that 4-fold acceleration for 2D sequences and 13-fold acceleration for 3D sequences without significant loss of quality (p ≥ 0.058). CONCLUSIONS: For MRI of the shoulder at 3 T, a DL-based algorithm allowed additional acceleration of acquisition times compared to the conventional approach. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The combination of deep-learning and compressed sensing hold the potential for further scan time reduction in 2D and 3D imaging of the shoulder while providing overall better objective and subjective image quality compared to the conventional approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00024156. KEY POINTS: • Combination of compressed sensing and deep learning improved image quality and allows for significant acceleration of shoulder MRI. • Deep learning-based algorithm achieved better subjective and objective image quality than conventional compressed sensing. • For shoulder MRI at 3 T, 40% faster image acquisition for 2D sequences and 38% faster image acquisition for 3D sequences may be possible.

A deep learning-based reconstruction approach for accelerated magnetic resonance image of the knee with compressed sense: evaluation in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of combining compressed sense (CS) with a newly developed deep learning-based algorithm (CS-AI) using convolutional neural networks to accelerate 2D MRI of the knee. METHODS: In this prospective study, 20 healthy volunteers were scanned with a 3T MRI scanner. All subjects received a fat-saturated sagittal 2D proton density reference sequence without acceleration and four additional acquisitions with different acceleration levels: 2, 3, 4 and 6. All sequences were reconstructed with the conventional CS and a new CS-AI algorithm. Two independent, blinded readers rated all images by seven criteria (overall image impression, visible artifacts, delineation of anterior ligament, posterior ligament, menisci, cartilage, and bone) using a 5-point Likert scale. Signal- and contrast-to-noise ratios were calculated. Subjective ratings and quantitative metrics were compared between CS and CS-AI with similar acceleration levels and between all CS/CS-AI images and the non-accelerated reference sequence. Friedman and Dunn´s multiple comparison tests were used for subjective, ANOVA and the Tukey Kramer test for quantitative metrics. RESULTS: Conventional CS images at the lowest acceleration level (CS2) were already rated significantly lower than reference for 6/7 criteria. CS-AI images maintained similar image quality to the reference up to CS-AI three for all criteria, which would allow for a reduction in scan time of 64% with unchanged image quality compared to the unaccelerated sequence. SNR and CNR were significantly higher for all CS-AI reconstructions compared to CS (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: AI-based image reconstruction showed higher image quality than CS for 2D knee imaging. Its implementation in the clinical routine yields the potential for faster MRI acquisition but needs further validation in non-healthy study subjects. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Combining compressed SENSE with a newly developed deep learning-based algorithm using convolutional neural networks allows a 64% reduction in scan time for 2D imaging of the knee. Implementation of the new deep learning-based algorithm in clinical routine in near future should enable better image quality/resolution with constant scan time, or reduced acquisition times while maintaining diagnostic quality.

Conventional and Deep-Learning-Based Image Reconstructions of Undersampled K-Space Data of the Lumbar Spine Using Compressed Sensing in MRI: A Comparative Study on 20 Subjects.

Compressed sensing accelerates magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition by undersampling of the k-space. Yet, excessive undersampling impairs image quality when using conventional reconstruction techniques. Deep-learning-based reconstruction methods might allow for stronger undersampling and thus faster MRI scans without loss of crucial image quality. We compared imaging approaches using parallel imaging (SENSE), a combination of parallel imaging and compressed sensing (COMPRESSED SENSE, CS), and a combination of CS and a deep-learning-based reconstruction (CS AI) on raw k-space data acquired at different undersampling factors. 3D T2-weighted images of the lumbar spine were obtained from 20 volunteers, including a 3D sequence (standard SENSE), as provided by the manufacturer, as well as accelerated 3D sequences (undersampling factors 4.5, 8, and 11) reconstructed with CS and CS AI. Subjective rating was performed using a 5-point Likert scale to evaluate anatomical structures and overall image impression. Objective rating was performed using apparent signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (aSNR and aCNR) as well as root mean square error (RMSE) and structural-similarity index (SSIM). The CS AI 4.5 sequence was subjectively rated better than the standard in several categories and deep-learning-based reconstructions were subjectively rated better than conventional reconstructions in several categories for acceleration factors 8 and 11. In the objective rating, only aSNR of the bone showed a significant tendency towards better results of the deep-learning-based reconstructions. We conclude that CS in combination with deep-learning-based image reconstruction allows for stronger undersampling of k-space data without loss of image quality, and thus has potential for further scan time reduction.

Does Drug-Eluting Bead TACE Enhance the Local Effect of IRE? Imaging and Histopathological Evaluation in a Porcine Model.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted an in vivo trial on swine to compare the ablation volumes of irreversible electroporation (IRE) followed by drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) versus IRE only. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine swine underwent CT-guided IRE in one liver lobe and IRE immediately followed by DEB-TACE in a different liver lobe. For DEB-TACE, 100-300 µm beads (DC-Beads®) were loaded with 50 mg doxorubicin. For IRE, the NanoKnife® was used employing two electrodes according to the vendor's protocol. Imaging follow-up was performed including CT-based lesion volume assessment using contrast-enhanced CT (venous phase) on days 1, 3, and 7 after the procedure. Three animals were killed for histopathological analysis after each follow-up. RESULTS: Ablation volumes in CT in the IRE + DEB-TACE group were 15.4 ± 10.5 ml on day 1, 8.7 ± 5.6 ml on day 3, and 1.6 ± 0.7 ml on day 7. In the IRE group, the corresponding values were 5.2 ± 5.2 ml on day 1, 1.0 ± 1.2 ml on day 3, and 0.1 ± 0.1 ml on day 7. On day 1 and day 3, ablation volumes of IRE + TACE group were significantly larger than in the IRE group (p < 0.05). 96% of beads were depicted in or around ablative lesions. 69% of these beads were found in the surrounding hemorrhagic infiltration and 31% within the ablative lesion itself. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of IRE immediately followed by DEB-TACE resulted in larger ablation volumes compared to IRE alone, suggesting that local efficacy of IRE can be enhanced by post-IRE DEB-TACE.