Systemic therapy for treating locoregional recurrence in women with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Between 10% and 35% of women with operable breast cancer will experience an isolated locoregional recurrence following their primary treatment. There is currently no good evidence that adjuvant systemic treatment is effective in this situation and there is no standard treatment for women who have such a recurrence. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether additional systemic treatment will improve the result of local therapy in regard to relapse-free and overall survival in women with potentially curatively resected loco-regional recurrence following breast cancer, who have not had a previous or synchronous distant metastases. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were done, in the first half of 2001, of the specialised register of the Cochrane Breast Cancer Collaborative Review Group, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE. In addition, the records of the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group were checked for any relevant trials. The citations in articles reviewing the treatment of locoregional recurrence of breast cancer were checked. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials or trials in which women were allocated to treatment or observation by a quasi-random process (such as alternation or date of birth) were eligible. Our aim was to consider separately women with a first incidence of isolated loco-regional recurrence in the treated breast, the chest wall or the regional lymphnode areas (except clavicular nodes) which can be resected without (R0) or with (R1) microscopically demonstrable residual disease. Women with previous or synchronous distant metastases were to be excluded from this part of the review. The second part of the review was to consider women with inoperable loco-regional recurrence and / or clavicular lymphnode involvement, regardless of previous or synchronous metastases. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We identified three closed studies in which there were a total of four randomised comparisons of systemic therapy versus observation for women who have received radiotherapy for loco-regional recurrence of breast cancer. One trial assessed Actinomyicin-D and randomised 32 patients in the 1960s and another randomised the same number of women to alpha-interferon versus observation in the early 1980s. The Swiss SAKK trial assessed tamoxifen for "good risk" patients and combination chemotherapy (Vincristine, Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide) for "poor risk" patients. It randomised 178 and 50 women respectively during 1982-1991. Where possible, data on relapse-free and overall survival were extracted for these trials and analysed using RevMan 4.1. No attempt was made to pool the results of the studies because of clinical heterogeneity and the small number of randomised patients. Three ongoing trials of chemotherapy versus observation have been identified. MAIN RESULTS: The trial of 32 women who received either radiotherapy alone or in combination with systemic administration of Actinomycin-D found that chemotherapy improved the local control rate but had no apparent effect on overall survival. The interferon trial, which also included a total of only 32 patients, showed that the addition of alpha-Interferon to local treatment of locoregional recurrent breast cancer had no apparent effect on the further course of the disease. The Swiss SAKK trial of tamoxifen (178 women randomized) found an improvement in disease-free survival but not in overall survival and no results are available for the 50 women randomized into the concurrent trial of chemotherapy. The three ongoing trials of chemotherapy have a total target accrual of nearly 2000 patients. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review of randomised trials provides insufficient evidence to do other than conclude that the most appropriate form of practice for women with loco-regional recurrence of breast cancer is participation in randomised trials of systemic treatment versus observation.

Adjuvant portal-vein infusion of fluorouracil and heparin in colorectal cancer: a randomised trial. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group, the Gruppo Interdisciplinare Valutazione Interventi in Oncologia, and the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research.

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence on the efficacy of regional adjuvant chemotherapy, via portal-vein infusion (PVI), after resection of colorectal cancer. We undertook a randomised controlled multicentre trial to investigate the efficacy of PVI (500 mg/m2 fluorouracil plus 5000 IU heparin daily for 7 days). METHODS: 1235 of about 1500 potentially eligible patients were randomly assigned surgery plus PVI or surgery alone (control). The patients were followed up for a median of 63 months, with yearly screening for recurrent disease. The primary endpoint was survival; analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: 619 patients in the control group and 616 in the PVI group met eligibility criteria. 164 (26%) control-group patients and 173 (28%) PVI-group patients died. 5-year survival did not differ significantly between the groups (73 vs 72%; 95% Cl for difference -6 to 4). The control and PVI groups were also similar in terms of disease-free survival at 5 years (67 vs 65%) and the number of patients with liver metastases (79 vs 77%). INTERPRETATION: PVI of fluorouracil, at a dose of 500 mg/m2 for 7 days, cannot be recommended as the sole adjuvant treatment for high-risk colorectal cancer after complete surgical excision. However, these results cannot eliminate a small benefit when PVI is used at a higher dosage or in combination with mitomycin.

Grading system for breast cancer.

As recurrence rates in breast cancer depend significantly on degree of malignancy (6-9) and mitotic rates as part of the grading system are difficult to assess in exact manner, we widened the grading system by evaluation of the proliferative compartment to get more information about proliferation activity as an important factor for tumor-progression (15, 16). This additional analysis can be used as a control factor for the correctness of the evaluation of mitotic activity. We practice this procedure at present as a "working formulation". New antibodies are in preparation which allow to exclude the highly variable G1-Phase. Further precision and control of degree of malignancy can be achieved by photometric analysis of S-Phase, 5c exceeding rate and state of ploidy according to Auer scheme.

Eight-year results of a prospective non-randomised study on therapy of small breast cancer. The German Breast Cancer Study Group (GBSG).

In this report, the results of the first controlled clinical trial on breast cancer in Germany, begun in 1983, are presented after a median follow-up of 8 years. Four-year results have been previously published. In pT1 N0 M0 breast cancer, mastectomy as the standard treatment was to be compared with tumorectomy plus radiotherapy to the remaining breast tissue. The study design, originally planned as a comprehensive cohort study including randomised and non-randomised patients, had to be changed into a prospective observation study due to the low randomisation rate. 1036 out of 1119 recruited patients were evaluable. After a median follow-up of 97 months, 237 events (local recurrence, regional recurrence, distant metastases, contralateral breast cancer or death of the patient without previous recurrence) occurred. With the exception of death without recurrence, the events were evenly distributed among the two treatment groups. The 8-year local recurrence rate of the whole patient population is 8.8%. Out of all prognostic factors examined, only tumour size and grade had a significant influence on recurrent disease. Event-free survival decreased in cases with 'uncertain' tumour margins, whereas the width of the margin has no influence on disease recurrence. Based on 151 deaths observed so far, there was no significant difference in overall survival between the two treatment groups. The 8-year results of this study are in accordance with the 4-year results reported previously and with those of other breast-conserving treatment trials. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups with regard to event-free and overall survival. Incomplete tumorectomy had a negative influence on recurrence.

[Introduction of studies by the German Breast Center Study Group (GBSG)]. / Vorstellung der Studien der German Breast Center Study Group (GBSG).

The GBSG is actually running two studies on breast cancer therapy: GBSG-5 addresses the necessity of radiotherapy following tumor removal, in breast preserving treatment of pT1N0M0 G1 breast cancer. The other question to be answered in a randomised 2- by 2-design is related to the replacement of radiotherapy by a 5-year treatment with tamoxifen. Up till now, 341 patients have been randomised. 200 more patients are needed for a valid study evaluation. GBSG-6 will be activated in fall of this year. It should answer the question whether the addition of systemic therapy to the local treatment of isolated locoregional recurrence will prolong time to further relapse as well as overall survival. According to a prognostic profile derived drom previous studies patients will be randomly allocated to more or less intensive treatment with chemo- and/or hormone therapy.

[Detection of disseminated carcinoma cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood in primary breast cancer with RT/PCR of parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP)]. / Nachweis disseminierter Karzinomzellen im Knochenmark und peripheren Blut beim primären Mammakarzinom mittels RT/PCR des Parathyroid Hormone-related Proteins (PTHrP).

The analysis of tissue specific gene expression by reverse transcription based RT/PCR methods is currently evaluated as a method for the detection of tumor cell dissemination in patients with cancer. Breast cancer tissues express PTHrP and the level of PTHrP expression in the primary tumor correlates with the incidence of metastases in the bone. We applied a RT/PCR assay of PTHrP to detect tumor cells in the mononuclear cell fraction of peripheral blood (pb) and bone marrow (bm) of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. PTHrP positivity was found in 18/67 pb and 20/71 bm samples. In a median follow up of 23 months there were 7 metastatic relapses (4 osseous, 2 hepatic, 1 pulmonary) and 9 local relapses in patients with primary lymph node positive breast cancer. The hepatic and pulmonary relapses had been both PTHrP-PCR negative in pb and in bm. Of the 4 patients with metastatic relapses to the bone the samples of bm had been initially negative in all cases, the pb had been positive in 2 cases. Of the 9 patients with local recurrences the pb alone had been positive in 4 patients, 5 patients had been negative in both the pb and the bm. During the period of observation there was no local and metastatic relapse detectable in the group of patients with primary lymph node negative breast cancer. In summary the increased risk for local or systemic relapse would have been predictable by RT/PCR of PTHrP alone in pb in 4 of the 9 local and in 2 of the 7 early metastatic relapses. Further follow-up of the patient cohort analysed is needed to assess the value of the RT/PCR of PTHrP as a prognostic and predictive marker in patients with breast cancer.

Final results of a phase III clinical trial on adjuvant intraportal infusion with heparin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in resectable colon cancer (EORTC GITCCG 1983-1987). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group.

In this phase III clinical trial conducted by the Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (GITCCG-EORTC), we evaluated the effect of adjuvant intraportal infusion of heparin (HEP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on overall survival, disease-free survival and time to progression in patients with resectable colon cancer. From January 1983 to June 1987, 235 patients were randomised from 14 institutions in seven European countries: 79 patients made up the control group (control): 72 the portal vein infusion group given heparin alone (5000 IU daily x 7 consecutive days) (HEP); 84 the portal vein infusion group given heparin (5000 IU daily x 7 consecutive days) and 5-FU (500 mg/m2 daily x 7 consecutive days) (HEP/5-FU); 34 patients were considered ineligible. The 199 patients considered eligible were well balanced for age, sex, Karnofsky index, tumour location, surgery, surgical procedure and Dukes' stage. Four patients (2 control, 1 HEP, 1 HEP/5-FU) died of surgical complications. No differences were observed between control group and treatment groups (HEP, HEP/5-FU) for postoperative complications and number of hospitalisation days. Severe toxicity (grade 3-4, WHO) was found in 12% of patients in the HEP group and 8% in the HEP/5-FU group. After a median follow-up of 9 years, disease progression was reported in 40% of patients in the control group, 40% in the HEP group and 29% in the HEP/5-FU group. Five-year survival, time to progression and disease-free survival were 69%, 58% and 56%, respectively, in the control arm, 61%, 58% and 56% in the HEP arm, and 71%, 69% and 65% in the HEP/5-FU arm. Based on all randomised patients, the effect of treatment was not statistically significant with respect to any of the endpoints. It is confirmed that intraportal 5-FU infusion is safe and has a tolerable toxicity, but cannot be considered standard treatment for patients with resectable colon cancer.

Phase II evaluation of 5-fluourouracil plus folinic acid and alpha 2b-interferon in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by folinic acid (FA) increases the response rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer compared to 5-FU alone. Phase II trials also demonstrated increased efficacy when interferon was added to 5-FU. In two consecutive trials, 76 patients were treated on days 1-5 with FA 200 mg/m2 plus interferon 5 x 10(6) U/m2 and 5-FU 350 mg/m2 as intravenous bolus injection (n = 33, regimen A) or 5-FU 500 mg/m2 as 2-hour infusion (n = 43, regimen B), repeated every 3 weeks with individual 5-FU dose escalation in steps of 50 (regimen A) or 100 mg/m2 (regimen B). In regimen A 5-FU dose reduction to 300 mg/m2 due to toxicity was necessary in 49% of the patients; in regimen B a 5-FU dose of 600 mg/m2 or above was tolerated by 70% of the patients. Dose-limiting toxicity was severe mucositis and/or diarrhea. Objective responses were observed in 5 of 33 patients (15%) in regimen A (3-28%, 95% confidence interval) and 7 of 41 patients (17%) in regimen B (5-29%, 95% confidence interval). Median time to progression was 4.7 and 4.8 months, and median survival 9.9 and 11.4 months for regimens A and B, respectively. Prolonged 5-FU administration over 2 h allows the administration of a higher 5-FU dose compared to bolus injection with no apparent improvement in antineoplastic efficacy. The addition of interferon to the combination of 5-FU plus FA in this dose and schedule does not seem to improve the response rate but appears to increase treatment toxicity.

Reverse transcriptase/polymerase chain reaction analysis of parathyroid hormone-related protein for the detection of tumor cell dissemination in the peripheral blood and bone marrow of patients with breast cancer.

Tumor cell dissemination in the bone marrow is an independent prognostic marker for relapse and survival for patients with primary breast cancer. Parathyroid-hormone-related protein (PTHrP) is expressed in most primary tumors and bone metastases of patients with breast cancer. PTHrP acts as an autocrine growth factor for breast cancer cells in vitro and there is evidence that it is especially important for osseous metastasis. For a sensitive detection of PTHrP-positive disseminated tumor cells a reverse transcriptase/polymerase chain reaction (RT/PCR) assay for PTHrP transcripts in the peripheral blood (PB) and in the bone marrow (BM) has been established. In mixing studies, the sensitivity of the reverse transcriptase/polymerase chain reaction (RT/PCR) for PTHrP was one tumor cell in 1 x 10(6) mononuclear cells. At this level of sensitivity, transcripts of PTHrP were detected in none of 30 PB samples and in 3 of 25 BM samples of healthy volunteers; there were also no transcripts of PTHrP in the PB and BM of 6 patients with benign breast lesions. The PB samples of 31 patients and the BM samples of 34 patients with predominantly early-stage breast cancer were tested for PTHrP expression along with immunocytology against cytokeratin 18 (CK18) as a standard immunological detection technique. PTHrP expression was shown in 9 of 31 patients in the PB and in 9 of 34 patients in the BM. In 30 patients, PB and BM samples were available simultaneously. There were cases of combined positive findings in the PB and the BM (4/30) and of isolated positivity in the PB (5/30) or in the BM (4/30). Compared to immunocytology, RT/PCR assay of PTHrP assay was significantly more sensitive in the peripheral blood (8/30 by RT/PCR compared to 1/30 by immunocytology). In the bone marrow there were cases of positivity for both markers (2/34), cases of isolated positivity by immunocytology for CK18 (3/34) and cases of isolated positivity for PTHrP transcripts (7/34). In conclusion the RT/PCR assay for PTHrP transcripts is a feasible and very sensitive technique for the detection of tumor cell dissemination in the PB, even in patients with early-stage breast cancer. The specificity of detection of PTHrP transcripts in the bone marrow is limited, possibly because of autochthonous expression of PTHrP in osteoblastic cells. The clinical follow-up of the subgroups of patients at risk, as defined by this assay, will show its prognostic significance for patients with breast cancer.

[Brief interdisciplinary oncology: a model for ambulatory, multimodal treatment of tumor patients]. / Interdisziplinäre Kurzzeit-Onkologie (IKO): Ein Modell zur ambulanten, multimodalen Behandlung von Tumorpatienten.

Since 10/1994 the Interdisziplinäre Kurzzeit-Onkologie (IKO) is an outpatient department for the treatment of patients with cancer used by the departments of hematology/oncology and surgery. Between 09/1995 and 02/1997, 818 patients received 2024 cytotoxic therapies with neoadjuvant (15%), adjuvant (65%) or palliative (20%) intention-mostly within multicenter clinical studies. Ambulatory operations like removal of lymph nodes for diagnosis or the implantation of venous catheter systems prepared the way for specialized modalities of cancer therapy. The high compliance and consent of patients, combined with better understanding of cancer therapy, resulted in an enhanced quality of life and optimized therapy. Standardization in diagnostics and fast realisation of interdisciplinary treatment schedules lead to reduction of costs and to enhancement of quality and security in cancer therapy.

[Therapy of the small breast carcinoma--generalized conversion to breast-saving treatment in Germany. 8 years results]. / Therapie des Kleinen Mammakarzinoms--flächendeckende Umsetzung der brusterhaltenden Behandlung in der BRD. 8-Jahres-Ergebnisse.

In the prospective nonrandomized observation study "Therapy of Small Breast Cancer", which was the first multicenter trial on breast cancer ever conducted in Germany, mastectomy (303 cases) was compared with breast-preservation therapy (733 cases) in patients with stage pT1N0M0 breast cancer. After a median follow-up of 8 years, there is no difference between the treatment modalities with regard to disease-free and overall survival which compares well with the results of international randomized studies. There is no difference in treatment outcome between centers specialized in the therapy of breast diseases in comparison to less experienced institutions as long as a high standard of treatment performance is guaranteed by reference centers.

Leakage measurement during selective limb perfusion using a gamma probe.

The objective of this study was to establish a probe system for intraoperative quantitative leakage measurement during selective limb perfusion for adjuvant high-dose chemotherapy in patients with malignant melanomas. We used a portable gamma probe with digital display and investigated the physical properties in a phantom study simulating blood pool activity at different angles of the probe to the surface and different distances. In 20 patients the limb circulation was surgically separated from the systemic blood circulation, and the limb was then selectively perfused (cytostatics added) for 60 min. Initially, 15 MBq technetium-99m labelled autologous red blood cells was injected into the limb circulation, and an equal amount was kept as a standard. Every 10 min, blood samples were drawn from the body circulation and count rates were simultaneously measured by the probe system at the lower end of the sternal body. At the end of perfusion, the circulation of the limb was reconnected, the standard injected into the systemic circulation, and a blood sample drawn after 10 min. All blood samples were counted for calculation of leakage in terms of percent of the injected dose, and the results compared with the intraoperative count rates of the probe system. In the range of leakage observed in this study (0%-86%), the count rate of the probe system (corrected for blood volume, i.e. for body surface) correlated with the results of conventional measurement (r=0.92) according to the equation: %leakage=counts per sx[1.2xbody surface (m2)-1.19]. In conclusion, the use of the described probe system is a feasible approach for leakage quantification which continuously yields data during selective limb perfusion.

Interferon-alpha does not improve the antineoplastic efficacy of high-dose infusional 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid in advanced colorectal cancer. First results of a randomized multicenter study by the Association of Medical Oncology of the German Cancer Society (AIO).

BACKGROUND: High-dose 5-FU given weekly as a 24-h infusion in combination with folinic acid (FA) has been associated with low toxicity and a high response rate. Interferon-alpha (IFN) either alone or in combination with FA has also improved treatment results by modulating 5-FU activity. We therefore initiated a randomized multicenter trial comparing the ability of FA or IFN to modulate infusional 5-FU. The statistical design using a sequential analysis allows us to report on the comparison of 5-FU/FA vs. 5-FU/FA/IFN while randomization of patients into 5-FU/FA vs. 5 FU/IFN continues. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced progressive colorectal cancer and measurable metastatic lesions were randomized to receive 5-FU 2600 mg/m2 i.v. as a 24-h infusion, combined with either FA 500 mg/m2 as a 2-h infusion (A), or IFN 3 x 10(6) U s.c. 3 x/week (B), or the combination of FA plus IFN as in arms A and B (C). Treatment arms were repeated weekly for 6 weeks followed by a 2-week rest period. These 8-week cycles were administered until tumor progression. Because of the occurrence of 2 toxic deaths among the first 17 patients treated in arm C, 5-FU was reduced to 2000 mg/m2 for all patients in arm C. Sequential analysis according to Whitehead for objective response was planned with alpha = 0.05/3 and a power of 80% (beta = 0.2) to detect a difference of > or = 25% (delta = 0.25) or equivalence of response rates. For pairwise comparison of treatment arms a minimum of 30 patients per arm and a maximum of 90 patients per arm were expected in case of equivalence or difference. RESULTS: An interim analysis was performed after the first 93 of 149 randomized patients were evaluable for response and toxicity (A 31 pts, B 33 pts, C 29 pts). Despite the 5-FU dose reduction in arm C, 28% of patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicity (CTC) including diarrhea, mucositis and handfoot syndrome compared to 16% in arm A and 12% in arm B (not significant). No treatment related toxic death occurred in arms A or B, but 3 patients (10%) in arm C died of diarrhea and septicemia. Among patients treated with 5-FU/FA objective tumor response occurred in 12/31 patients (39%) (21%-56%, 95% confidence interval) (3 CR, 9 PR), no change in 13/31 (42%) and PD in 6/31 (19%) patients. Eleven of 29 patients (38%) (20%-56%, 95% confidence interval) receiving 5-FU/FA/IFN achieved complete (3 patients) or partial (8 patients) remissions, 10/29 patients (34%) had stable disease and 8/29 patients (28%) tumor progression. According to the sequential analysis the rates of objective responses observed in patients treated with 5-FU/FA or 5-FU/FA/IFN were equivalent. CONCLUSION: This interim analysis allows the conclusion that infusional 5-FU plus FA/IFN is no more active than infusional 5-FU plus FA alone. However, 5-FU/FA/IFN despite 5-FU dose reduction was associated with unacceptably high toxicity, including 10% deaths. Therefore, further investigation of this regimen is not justified. The study is continued with the comparison of 5-FU/FA vs. 5-FU/IFN.

Randomized 2 x 2 trial evaluating hormonal treatment and the duration of chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer patients. German Breast Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: In 1984, the German Breast Cancer Study Group (GBSG) started a multicenter randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of three versus six cycles of 500 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, 40 mg/m2 methotrexate, and 600 mg/m2 fluorouracil (CMF) on day 1 and 8 starting perioperatively with or without tamoxifen (TAM) (3 x 10 mg/d for 2 years). The aim of the trial was to compare recurrence-free and overall survival between the different treatment modalities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During 5 years, 41 institutions randomized 473 patients (3 x CMF: 145; 3 x CMF + TAM: 93; 6 x CMF 144; 6 x CMF + TAM: 91). Until March 31, 1992, median follow-up time was 56 months with 197 events for disease-free survival and 116 deaths observed. This provides a power of approximately 80% to detect a potential treatment difference corresponding to a relative risk (RR) of 0.67 for recurrence-free survival. Treatment modalities and various patient characteristics were evaluated by means of a multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: No significant difference in recurrence-free survival was observed with respect to hormonal therapy (RR = 0.75 TAM v no TAM; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 1.04; P = .08) as well as duration of chemotherapy (RR = 0.90 of 6 x CMF v 3 x CMF; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.19; P = .45). Similar results were obtained for overall survival. The multivariate analysis revealed a significant prognostic impact of the number of positive lymph nodes and the progesterone receptor level on recurrence-free survival. Compliance with chemotherapy within the range of 85% to 115% of the target dose was achieved in 94% and 78% of the patients randomized to 3 x CMF and 6 x CMF, respectively. Sufficient compliance with TAM was reported for 141 patients (93%). CONCLUSION: At this stage of follow-up, six courses of CMF are not superior to three courses with respect to recurrence-free survival.

Randomised trial of epirubicin versus fluorouracil in advanced gastric cancer. An International Collaborative Cancer Group (ICCG) study.

BACKGROUND: It is not yet established whether doses of epirubicin equitoxic to adriamycin are more effective in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy patients with advanced gastric cancer were randomised to receive fluorouracil (500 mg/m2 days 1-5 every three weeks) or epirubicin (100 mg/m2 every three weeks), with doses escalating to a maximum dose of 700 mg/m2 of fluorouracil or 140 mg/m2 of epirubicin. RESULTS: No patients attained complete response. Partial response was seen in 3 patients in the epirubicin arm (8%) compared with 2 patients in the fluorouracil arm (6%). No statistically significant difference between the two treatments was seen in either response or survival. Severe side effects, particularly alopecia, and nausea and vomiting were more common in the epirubicin arm (45% and 37%, respectively) compared with the fluorouracil arm (12% and 8%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our trial demonstrates that fluorouracil and epirubicin as single agents have comparable but insufficient activity in advanced gastric cancer.

Quality control review for radiotherapy of small breast cancer: analysis of 708 patients in the GBSG I trial. German Breast Study Group (GBSG).

Within six years between November 1983 and December 1989 the German Breast Cancer Study Group (GBSG) conducted a prospective multicenter trial on the treatment of pT1 pN0 M0 breast carcinoma. Out of 1036 eligible patients from 69 hospitals, a total of 733 underwent breast preservation surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. A detailed quality control (QC) screening of 708 available radiotherapy records was performed by the radiotherapy reference center. The following quality control scoring system was used for all radiotherapy variables: Radiotherapy treatment "completely according to study protocol" (QC score = 0); "acceptable protocol deviations" (QC score = 1); "unacceptable protocol violations" (QC score = 2); the "overall QC score" was the worst judgement for any single quality control criterion, while the "total QC score" was the summation of all single quality control scores (range: 0 to 14). 292 (41.2%) patients were treated per protocol; 290 (41.0%) had acceptable protocol deviations; and 126 (17.8%) had unacceptable protocol violations. 107 (84.9%) single violations, 15 (11.9%) combinations of two, three (2.4%) combinations of three, and one (0.8%) combination of four unacceptable violations were observed. 564 (79.4%) patients achieved a total QC score of < or = 2, 124 (17.5%) of 3 to 5, and 20 (2.8%) of > or = 6. The criterion "radiotherapy treatment duration" had the highest rate of protocol violations, 67/708 (9.5%); other quality control criteria with protocol violations were "radiotherapy reference dose" (27 = 3.8%), "radiotherapy treatment initiation" (15 = 2.1%) and "other protocol violations" (33 = 4.7%). No protocol violations were observed for the criterion "target volume coverage". The protocol compliance improved slightly during the conduct of the study. Institutional differences in protocol compliance were observed depending upon the accrual rate, the institutional treatment preference and between academic and non-academic hospitals. After a short median follow-up of 48 months, differences in protocol compliance, i.e. protocol violations, have not resulted in a reduced disease-free survival; however, the final prognostic evaluation of the quality control review may require longer follow-up and eventually different treatment endpoints to be analyzed.

The prognostic effect of histological tumor grade in node-negative breast cancer patients.

The prognostic effect of histological tumor grade was evaluated in 1036 patients with early breast cancer (pT1 pN0 M0) entered into a trial comparing mastectomy and breast preserving treatment. All analyses were adjusted for the factors treatment, patients' age, and tumor size. Tumor grade was defined according to Bloom and Richardson based on the sum of scores assigned to each of three histological features: 1) degree of differentiation, 2) pleomorphism, and 3) mitotic index. The relative importance of these factors with regard to disease-free survival was evaluated. In univariate as well as in multivariate analyses the pleomorphism was the only factor showing a significant effect (univariate: p = 0.0024, multivariate: p = 0.015). It was investigated how the factors should be combined to define a histological grading score which yields the best possible classification of the patients with respect to prognosis. A new grading system was defined splitting the patients into three groups: 1) pleomorphism 1; 2) pleomorphism 2 or pleomorphism 3 and mitotic index 1; 3) pleomorphism 3 and mitotic index 2 or 3. This yields a good classification of the patients with respect to prognosis (p = 0.0004). The prognostic effect of this score was compared with the effects of the grading systems proposed in the literature. According to Bloom and Richardson and in the modified version by Schauer and Weiss, grading is based on the sum of scores of the various histological factors. Therefore, the strong effect of the pleomorphism was diluted in these grading definitions (Bloom and Richardson: p = 0.03, Schauer and Weiss: p = 0.028). The grading system proposed by Le Doussal et al. consists only of the scores of pleomorphism and mitotic index (p = 0.014). In summary, the factor pleomorphism showed a stronger effect on disease-free survival by itself than the grading systems proposed in the literature.