Eprenetapopt Plus Azacitidine in TP53-Mutated Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Phase II Study by the Groupe Francophone des Myélodysplasies (GFM).

PURPOSE: TP53-mutated (TP53m) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have very poor outcome irrespective of the treatment received, including 40% responses (20% complete remission [CR]) with azacitidine (AZA) alone, short response duration, and a median overall survival (OS) of approximately 6 months. Eprenetapopt (APR-246), a novel first-in-class drug, leads to p53 protein reconformation and reactivates its proapoptotic and cell-cycle arrest functions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase II study assessed the safety and efficacy of eprenetapopt in combination with AZA in untreated high or very high International Prognostic Scoring System-R TP53m MDS and AML patients. RESULTS: Fifty-two TP53m patients (34 MDS, 18 AML [including seven with more than 30% blasts]) were enrolled. In MDS, we observed an overall response rate (ORR) of 62%, including 47% CR, with a median duration of response at 10.4 months. In AML, the ORR was 33% including 17% CR (27% and 0% CR in AML with less than and more than 30% marrow blasts, respectively). Seventy-three percent of responders achieved TP53 next-generation sequencing negativity (ie, variant allele frequency < 5%). The main treatment-related adverse events were febrile neutropenia (36%) and neurologic adverse events (40%), the latter correlating with a lower glomerular filtration rate at treatment onset (P < .01) and higher age (P = .05), and resolving with temporary drug interruption without recurrence after adequate eprenetapopt dose reduction. With a median follow-up of 9.7 months, median OS was 12.1 months in MDS, and 13.9 and 3.0 months in AML with less than and more than 30% marrow blasts, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this very high-risk population of TP53m MDS and AML patients, eprenetapopt combined with AZA was safe and showed potentially higher ORR and CR rate, and longer OS than reported with AZA alone.

Biologics in myelodysplastic syndrome-related systemic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases: French multicenter retrospective study of 29 patients.

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases (SIADs) associated with myelodysplastic syndromes are often difficult to treat. Corticosteroids are efficient but only usually at high doses. The use of biologics needs to be specified. METHODS: In a French multicenter retrospective study, we analyzed the efficacy and safety of biologics (tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α] antagonists, tocilizumab, rituximab and anakinra) for SIADs associated with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs). Clinical, biological and overall treatment responses were evaluated. When several lines of treatment were used, data were analyzed before and at the end of each treatment line and were pooled to compare overall response among steroids, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologics. RESULTS: We included 29 patients (median age 67years [interquartile range 62-76], 83% males) with MDS-related SIADs treated with at least one biologic. The MDSs were predominantly refractory anemia with excess blasts 1 (38%) and refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (21%). The SIADs were mainly arthritis (n=6; 20%), relapsing polychondritis (n=8; 30%) and vasculitis (n=10; 34%). During a 3-year median follow-up (IQR 1.3-4.5), a total of 114 lines of treatments were used for all patients: steroids alone (22%), DMARDs (23%), TNF-α antagonists (14%), anakinra (10%), rituximab (10%), tocilizumab (7%) and azacytidine (9%). Considering all 114 lines, overall response (complete and partial) was shown in 54% cases. Overall response was more frequent with steroids (78%) and rituximab (66%) than DMARDs (45%) and other biologics (33%) (p<0.05). Rituximab had better response in vasculitis and TNF-α antagonists in arthritis. During follow-up, 20 patients (71%) presented at least one severe infection. CONCLUSION: This nationwide study demonstrates the efficacy of steroids for SIAD-associated MDSs but a high frequency of steroid dependence. The response to biologics seems low, but rituximab and azacytidine seem promising.

Characteristics and outcome of immune thrombocytopenia in elderly: results from a single center case-controlled study.

The management of ITP in elderly raises several questions that have not been fully addressed in the literature. To assess the impact of ITP in elderly, a case-control study was performed. The main characteristics at onset and the outcome of ITP in 55 patients aged of 70 years and above (cases) were compared with those of 97 younger adults (controls) seen at the same tertiary referral institution. The mean age at diagnosis was respectively 77.8±6.1 years (cases) and 40.3±14.9 years (controls). While the median platelet count at time of diagnosis was not significantly different in cases and controls (6×10(9) /L, range: 2-26 versus 12×10(9) /L: 5-21.5), bleeding symptoms were more frequent in cases (82%) than in the controls (68%, p=0.07), and the median bleeding score was significantly higher in elderly (p=0.001). The rate of treatment-related adverse events was more than twofold higher in elderly patients and the mean cumulative duration of hospital stay for ITP during the follow-up period was much longer when compared to the controls (p<0.0001). Three ITP-related deaths (5.4%) including 1 from intracranial hemorrhage occurred in the cases but none in the controls. In conclusion, this study confirms that at equivalent platelet count, ITP has a greater impact in elderly.

Outcome of high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome after azacitidine treatment failure.

PURPOSE: Azacitidine (AZA) is the current standard of care for high-risk (ie, International Prognostic Scoring System high or intermediate 2) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), but most patients will experience primary or secondary treatment failure. The outcome of these patients has not yet been described. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, 435 patients with high-risk MDS and former refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation (RAEB-T) were evaluated for outcome after AZA failure. The cohort of patients included four data sets (ie, AZA001, J9950, and J0443 trials and the French compassionate use program). RESULTS: The median follow-up after AZA failure was 15 months. The median overall survival was 5.6 months, and the 2-year survival probability was 15%. Increasing age, male sex, high-risk cytogenetics, higher bone marrow blast count, and the absence of prior hematologic response to AZA were associated with significantly worse survival in multivariate analysis. Data on treatment administered after AZA failure were available for 270 patients. Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation and investigational agents were associated with a better outcome when compared with conventional clinical care. CONCLUSION: Outcome after AZA failure is poor. Our results should serve as a basis for designing second-line clinical trials in this population.