A multicenter randomized trial to compare automatic versus as-needed follow-up for children hospitalized with common infections: The FAAN-C trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Physicians commonly recommend automatic primary care follow-up visits to children being discharged from the hospital. While automatic follow-up provides an opportunity to address postdischarge needs, the alternative is as-needed follow-up. With this strategy, families monitor their child's symptoms and decide if they need a follow-up visit in the days after discharge. In addition to being family centered, as-needed follow-up has the potential to reduce time and financial burdens on both families and the healthcare system. As-needed follow-up has been shown to be safe and effective for children hospitalized with bronchiolitis, but the extent to which hospitalized children with other common conditions might benefit from as-needed follow-up is unclear. METHODS: The Follow-up Automatically versus As-Needed Comparison (FAAN-C, or "fancy") trial is a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Children who are hospitalized for pneumonia, urinary tract infection, skin and soft tissue infection, or acute gastroenteritis are eligible to participate. Participants are randomized to an as-needed versus automatic posthospitalization follow-up recommendation. The sample size estimate is 2674 participants and the primary outcome is all-cause hospital readmission within 14 days of discharge. Secondary outcomes are medical interventions and child health-related quality of life. Analyses will be conducted in an intention-to-treat manner, testing noninferiority of as-needed follow-up compared with automatic follow-up. DISCUSSION: FAAN-C will elucidate the relative benefits of an as-needed versus automatic follow-up recommendation, informing one of the most common decisions faced by families of hospitalized children and their medical providers. Findings from FAAN-C will also have implications for national quality metrics and guidelines.

Moving eConsults Into Mainstream Pediatric Care.

This Viewpoint discusses strategies and considerations for moving electronic consultations (eConsults) into mainstream pediatric practice.

Primary Care Enhanced Access Services and the Association With Nonurgent Pediatric Emergency Department Utilization and Child Opportunity Index.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine the association between primary care practice characteristics (enhanced access services) and practice-level rates of nonurgent emergency department (ED) visits using ED and practice-level data. Survey data suggest that enhanced access services within a child's primary care practice may be associated with reduced nonurgent ED visits. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of nonurgent ED visits to a tertiary pediatric hospital in Western Pennsylvania with nearly 85,000 annual ED visits. We obtained patient encounter data of all nonurgent pediatric ED (PED) visits between January 2018 and December 2019. We identified the primary care provider at the time of the study period. For each of the 42 included offices, we determined the number of unique children in the office with a nonurgent PED visit, allowing us to determine the percentage of children in the practice with such a visit during the study period. We then stratified the 42 offices into low, intermediate, and high tertiles of nonurgent PED use. Using Kruskal-Wallis tests, logistic regression, and Pearson χ2 tests, we compared practice characteristics, enhanced access services, practice location Child Opportunity Index 2.0, and PED visit diagnoses across tertiles. RESULTS: We examined 52,459 nonurgent PED encounters by 33,209 unique patients across 42 outpatient offices. Primary care practices in the lowest ED visit tertile were more likely to have 4 or more evenings with office hours (36% vs 14%, P = 0.04), 4 or more evenings of weekday extended hours (43% vs 14%, P = 0.05), and at least 1 day of any weekend hours (86% vs 29%, P = 0.01), compared with practices in other tertiles. High PED use tertile offices were also associated with lower Child Opportunity Index scores. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care offices with higher nonurgent PED utilization had fewer enhanced access services and were located in neighborhood with fewer child-focused resources.

Pediatric Primary Care Clinicians' Perspectives on Telemedicine Use, 2020 Versus 2021.

Objective: We examined the change in pediatric primary care clinician attitudes and perceptions about telemedicine after one year of telemedicine use. Methods: We administered a survey to pediatric primary care clinicians across 50 primary care practices in Pennsylvania in 2020 and 2021. Surveys were linked using a combination of deterministic and probabilistic matching. We used McNemar's test to compare change in responses from 2020 to 2021. Results: Among pediatric primary care clinicians surveyed in 2020 and 2021 (n = 101), clinicians agreed that telemedicine could always or usually deliver high-quality care for mental health (80% in 2020 and 78% in 2021), care coordination (77% in 2020 and 70% in 2021), acute care (33% in 2020 and 34% in 2021), or preventive care (25% in 2020 and 18% in 2021) and this did not significantly change. Clinician perceptions of usability, while high, declined over time with fewer endorsing ease of use (93% in 2020 and 80% in 2021) and reliability (14% in 2020 and 0% in 2021) over time. Despite this, 62% of clinicians agreed that they were satisfied with their use of telemedicine at both time points. Respondents anticipated positive impact on equity and timeliness of care from telemedicine use but did not anticipate positive impact across child health, health care delivery, or clinician experience. Perceptions across these domains did not change over time. Conclusions: With one year of telemedicine experience, primary care clinicians maintained beliefs that telemedicine could deliver high-quality care for specific clinical needs but had worsening perceptions of usability over time.

Antibiotic Receipt for Pediatric Telemedicine Visits With Primary Care vs Direct-to-Consumer Vendors.

Importance: Prior research found that pediatric direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine visits are associated with more antibiotic prescribing than in-person primary care visits. It is unclear whether this difference is associated with modality of care (telemedicine vs in-person) or with the context of telemedicine care (primary care vs not primary care). Objective: To compare antibiotic management during telemedicine visits with primary care practitioners (PCPs) vs commercial direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine companies for pediatric acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs). Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, cross-sectional study of visits for ARTIs by commercially insured children 17 years of age or younger analyzed deidentified medical and pharmacy claims in OptumLabs Data Warehouse data, a national sample of commercial enrollees, between January 1 and December 31, 2022. Exposure: Setting of telemedicine visit as PCP vs DTC. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was percentage of visits with antibiotic receipt. Secondary outcomes were the percentages of visits with diagnoses for which prescription of an antibiotic was potentially appropriate, guideline-concordant antibiotic management, and follow-up ARTI visits within the ensuing 1 to 2 days and 3 to 14 days. The ARTI telemedicine visits with PCP vs DTC telemedicine companies were matched on child demographic characteristics. Generalized estimated equation log-binomial regression models were used to compute marginal outcomes. Results: In total, data from 27 686 children (mean [SD] age, 8.9 [5.0] years; 13 893 [50.2%] male) were included in this study. There were 14 202 PCP telemedicine index visits matched to 14 627 DTC telemedicine index visits. The percentage of visits involving receipt of an antibiotic was lower for PCP (28.9% [95% CI, 28.1%-29.7%]) than for DTC (37.2% [95% CI, 36.0%-38.5%]) telemedicine visits. Additionally, fewer PCP telemedicine visits involved receipt of a diagnosis in which the use of antibiotics may be appropriate (19.0% [95% CI, 18.4%-19.7%] vs 28.4% [95% CI, 27.3%-29.6%]), but no differences were observed in receipt of nonguideline-concordant antibiotic management based on a given diagnosis between PCP (20.2% [95% CI, 19.5%-20.9%]) and DTC (20.1% [95% CI, 19.1%-21.0%]) telemedicine visits. Fewer PCP telemedicine visits involved a follow-up visit within the ensuing 1 to 2 days (5.0% [95% CI, 4.7%-5.4%] vs 8.0% [95% CI, 7.3%-8.7%]) and 3 to 14 days (8.2% [95% CI, 7.8%-8.7%] vs 9.6% [95% CI, 8.8%-10.3%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with virtual-only DTC telemedicine companies, telemedicine integrated within primary care was associated with lower rates of antibiotic receipt and follow-up care. Supporting use of telemedicine integrated within pediatric primary care may be one strategy to reduce antibiotic receipt through telemedicine visits.

Parent Perceptions of Telemedicine for Acute Pediatric Respiratory Tract Infections: Sequential Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Since 2020, parents have had increasing opportunities to use telemedicine for their children, but how parents decide whether to use telemedicine for acute pediatric care relative to alternative sites of care is not clear. One of the most common reasons parents seek acute care for their children is for acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine parental expectations of care via telemedicine for pediatric ARTIs, contrasting expectations of care delivered via primary care telemedicine and direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine. METHODS: We performed a sequential mixed methods analysis to examine how parents assess telemedicine for their children's acute care. We used ARTIs as a case study for examining parent perceptions of telemedicine. First, we analyzed semistructured interviews focused on parent responses about the use of telemedicine. Each factor discussed by parents was coded to reflect whether parents indicated it incentivized or disincentivized their preferences for telemedicine versus in-person care. Results were organized by a 7-dimension framework of parental health care seeking that was generated previously, which included dimensions related to care sites (expected access, affordability, clinical quality, and site quality) and dimensions related to child or family factors (perceived illness severity, perceived child susceptibility, and parent self-efficacy). Second, we analyzed responses to a national survey, which inquired about parental expectations of primary care telemedicine, commercial DTC telemedicine, and 3 in-person sites of care (primary care, urgent care, and emergency department) across 21 factors identified through prior qualitative work. To assess whether parents had different expectations of different telemedicine models, we compared survey responses for primary care telemedicine and commercial DTC telemedicine using weighted logistic regression. RESULTS: Interview participants (n=40) described factors affecting their perceptions of telemedicine as a care modality for pediatric ARTIs. Generally, factors aligned with access and affordability (eg, decreased wait time and lower out-of-pocket cost) were discussed as potential incentives for telemedicine use, while factors aligned with perceived illness severity, child susceptibility, and clinician quality (eg, trustworthiness) were discussed as potential disincentives for telemedicine use. In survey responses (n=1206), primary care and commercial DTC telemedicine were rated similarly on items related to expected accessibility and affordability. In contrast, on items related to expected quality of care, primary care telemedicine was viewed similarly to in-person primary care, while commercial DTC telemedicine was rated lower. For example, 69.7% (weighted; 842/1197) of respondents anticipated their children would be comfortable and cooperative with primary care telemedicine versus 49.7% (weighted; 584/1193) with commercial DTC telemedicine (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a mixed methods analysis focused on telemedicine for ARTIs, parents expressed more concerns about telemedicine quality in commercial DTC models compared with primary care-based telemedicine. These results could help health systems better design telemedicine initiatives to support family-centered care.

Accuracy of a Single Financial Security Question to Screen for Social Needs.

OBJECTIVES: Screening for social needs is recommended during clinical encounters but multi-item questionnaires can be burdensome. We evaluate if a single question about financial stress can be used to prescreen for food insecurity, housing instability, or transportation needs. METHODS: We use retrospective medical record data from children (<11 years) seen at 45 primary pediatric care offices in 2022. Social needs screening was automated at well child visits and could be completed by the parent/guardian via the patient portal, tablet in the waiting room, or verbally with staff. We report the area under the receiver operating curve for the 5 response options of the financial stress question as well as sensitivity and specificity of the financial stress question ("not hard at all" vs any other response) to detect other reported social needs. RESULTS: Of 137 261 eligible children, 130 414 (95.0%) had social needs data collected. Seventeen percent of respondents reported a housing, food, or transportation need. The sensitivity of the financial stress question was 0.788 for any one or more of the 3 other needs, 0.763 for food insecurity, 0.743 for housing instability, and 0.712 for transportation needs. Using the financial stress question as the first-step of a screening process would miss 9.7% of the families who reported food insecurity, 22.6% who reported housing instability, and 33.0% who reported transportation needs. CONCLUSIONS: A single question screener about financial stress does not function well as a prescreen because of low sensitivity to reports of food insecurity, housing instability, and transportation needs.

Family Caregivers of Children With Medical Complexity: Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life and Experiences of Care Coordination.

OBJECTIVE: Examine the longitudinal association between family experiences of care coordination (FECC) and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) for family caregivers of children with medical complexity (CMC). METHODS: A Longitudinal survey of family caregivers of CMC was completed between July 2018 and June 2020. Baseline data were collected at initial contact with a regional complex care center; follow-up data were collected 12 to 16 months later. Assessed receipt of care coordination and caregiver HR-QOL via FECC questionnaire and Center for Disease Control's HR-QOL-14 measure, respectively. Baseline and follow-up results were compared via McNemar's and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Relationships between changes in FECC and changes in HR-QOL were examined using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 185 eligible, 136 caregivers enrolled and completed baseline surveys (74%) and 103 (76% initial sample) follow-up surveys. Caregivers reported significant improvements in 8 of 9 FECC measures after 1 year of care within a complex care center (all P < .05). In contrast, caregiver HR-QOL (general health status, unhealthy days, symptom days) remained stable over the study period (all P > .05) except for monthly days of poor sleep (baseline vs follow-up median; 16 vs 15 [P = .05]). At both timepoints, >20% participants rated their general health status as fair-to-poor, and >50% reported frequent poor sleep and fatigue. No significant associations were observed between changes in FECC and changes in HR-QOL. CONCLUSIONS: After receiving 1 year of care through a complex care center, CMC family caregivers report improvement in care coordination but not in HR-QOL. Caregivers' continued mentally unhealthy days and negative mental symptom days highlight the need for a directed intervention.

General and subspecialist pediatrician perspectives on barriers and strategies for referral: a latent profile analysis.

BACKGROUND: Children in need of pediatric subspecialty care may encounter multiple barriers, and multiple strategies have been suggested to improve access. The purpose of this study was to describe the perceptions of general and subspecialty pediatric physicians regarding barriers to subspecialty care and the value of strategies to improve subspecialty access. METHODS: We surveyed a national sample of 1680 general pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists in May and June 2020 regarding 11 barriers to subspecialty care and 9 strategies to improve access to subspecialty care, selected from recent literature. Using latent profile analysis, respondents were grouped according to the degree to which they believed each of the barriers impacted access to subspecialty care. Using chi-squared tests, we compared the profiles based on respondent characteristics and perspectives on strategies to improve access. RESULTS: The response rate was 17%. In 263 responses completed and eligible for inclusion, the barriers most frequently described as "major problems" were wait times (57%), lack of subspecialists (45%) and difficulty scheduling (41%). Respondents were classified into 4 profiles: "Broad concerns," "Subspecialist availability concerns," "Clinician communication concerns," and "Few concerns." These profiles varied significantly by respondent specialty (p < .001, with medical subspecialists overrepresented in the "Clinician communication" profile, psychiatrists in the "subspecialist availability" profile, and surgeons in the "few concerns" profile); and by respondents' typical wait time for appointments (p < .001, with physicians with the longest wait times overrepresented in the "subspecialist availability" profile). CONCLUSIONS: We found specific profiles in clinician views regarding barriers to subspecialty care which were associated with perspectives on strategies aimed at overcoming these barriers. These results suggest that health systems aiming to improve subspecialty access should first identify the barriers and preferences specific to local clinicians.

Adolescent Perspectives on the Use of Telemedicine for Confidential Health Care: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study.

PURPOSE: Telemedicine can improve access to adolescent health care, but adolescents may experience barriers to accessing this care confidentially. Gender-diverse youth (GDY) may especially benefit from telemedicine through increased access to geographically limited adolescent medicine subspecialty care but may have unique confidentiality needs. In an exploratory analysis, we examined adolescents' perceived acceptability, preferences, and self-efficacy related to using telemedicine for confidential care. METHODS: We surveyed 12- to 17-year-olds following a telemedicine visit with an adolescent medicine subspecialist. Open-ended questions assessing acceptability of telemedicine for confidential care and opportunities to enhance confidentiality were qualitatively analyzed. Likert-type questions assessing preference for future use of telemedicine for confidential care and self-efficacy to complete components of telemedicine visits confidentially were summarized and compared across cisgender versus GDY. RESULTS: Participants (n = 88) included 57 GDY and 28 cisgender females. Factors affecting the acceptability of telemedicine for confidential care related to patient location, telehealth technology, adolescent-clinician relationships, and quality or experience of care. Perceived opportunities to protect confidentiality included using headphones, secure messaging, and prompting from clinicians. Most participants (53/88) were likely or very likely to use telemedicine for future confidential care, but self-efficacy for completing components of telemedicine visits confidentially varied by component. DISCUSSION: Adolescents in our sample were interested in using telemedicine for confidential care, but cisgender and GDY recognized threats to confidentiality that may reduce acceptability of telemedicine for these services. Clinicians and health systems should carefully consider youth's preferences and unique confidentiality needs to ensure equitable access, uptake, and outcomes of telemedicine.

Parent Care-Seeking Decisions for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Tract Infections in the United States: A Mental Models Approach.

OBJECTIVE: To understand US parent health care-seeking decisions in the context of multiple in-person and telehealth care options. As the health care landscape evolves, new research is needed to explain how parents now decide when and where to seek acute pediatric health care. METHODS: We applied a mental models approach, focusing on the archetypal example of care-seeking for pediatric acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs), by first reviewing pediatric ARTI guidelines with 16 health care professionals to inform 40 subsequent semi-structured interviews with parents of young children in 2021. Interviews were qualitatively coded using thematic analysis, with code frequency and co-occurrence informing the final influence model of parent health care-seeking decisions. RESULTS: Parent interviewees identified 33 decisional factors which were synthesized into seven dimensions influencing care-seeking decisions: perceived illness severity, perceived child susceptibility, parental self-efficacy, expected accessibility of care, expected affordability of care, expected quality of clinician, and expected quality of site. The first three dimensions (perceived severity, perceived susceptibility, parental self-efficacy) influenced an initial decision about whether to seek care, while all seven factors influenced a subsequent decision about where to seek care (eg, in-person primary care, primary care-based telehealth, urgent care, direct-to-consumer telehealth). Uncertainty was present within many dimensions (eg, severity, access, quality) indicating potential targets to support parent decision-making processes and optimize care-seeking behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: A mental models approach identified dimensions influencing parent choice to seek care and choice of care site for children with ARTIs, suggesting targets to advance family-centered practice and policy.

Healthcare Utilization Among Children Receiving Permanent Supportive Housing.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Permanent supportive housing (PSH) integrates long-term housing and supports for families and individuals experiencing homelessness. Although PSH is frequently provided to families with children, little is known about the impacts of PSH among children. We examined changes in health care visits among children receiving PSH compared with similar children who did not receive PSH. METHODS: We analyzed Pennsylvania Medicaid administrative data for children entering PSH between 2011 and 2016, matching to a comparison cohort with similar demographic and clinical characteristics who received non-PSH housing services. We conducted propensity score-weighted difference-in-differences (DID) analyses to compare changes in health care visits 3 years before and after children entered PSH versus changes in the comparison cohort. RESULTS: We matched 705 children receiving PSH to 3141 in the comparison cohort. Over 3 years following PSH entry, dental visits among children entering PSH increased differentially relative to the comparison cohort (DID: 12.70 visits per 1000 person-months, 95% confidence interval: 3.72 to 21.67). We did not find differential changes in preventive medicine visits, hospitalizations, or emergency department (ED) visits overall. When stratified by age, children ≤5 years old at PSH entry experienced a greater decrease in ED visits relative to the comparison cohort (DID: -13.16 visits per 1000 person-months, 95% confidence interval: -26.23 to -0.10). However, emergency visit trends before PSH entry differed between the cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Children in PSH had relatively greater increases in dental visits, and younger children entering PSH may have experienced relative reductions in ED visits. Policymakers should consider benefits to children when evaluating the overall value of PSH.

School Nurse Perspectives on Collaboration With Primary Care Providers.

BACKGROUND: School nurses are rarely integrated into primary care teams to their full potential. We aimed to characterize school nurses' perceptions related to current and optimal collaboration with primary care providers (PCPs) and identify actionable solutions to improve efficiency, quality, and coordination of pediatric care. METHODS: We conducted and qualitatively analyzed interviews with school nurses to characterize structures, processes, and perceived benefits of optimized school nurse-PCP collaboration. RESULTS: School nurse interviewees (n = 23) identified factors important to school nurse-PCP collaboration within 2 domains: information sharing and relationship building. Information sharing themes included health information sharing laws, data sharing systems, and technology-based communication systems. Relationship building themes included health care sector understanding of the school nurse role, PCP knowledge of school health requirements, shared professional development opportunities, and time and personnel. Perceived benefits of optimized PCP-school nurse collaboration were identified for children, PCPs, school nurses, and parents. IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL HEALTH POLICY, PRACTICE, AND EQUITY: Needs assessments and action plans guided by the domains of information sharing and relationship building can inform local improvements to optimize school nurse-PCP collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: School nurses highlighted cross-sector solutions to enhance school nurse-PCP collaboration including integrated information sharing systems and intentional relationship building.

Antibiotic Receipt During Outpatient Visits for COVID-19 in the US, From 2020 to 2022.

This cross-sectional study examines prescribed and filled antibiotics for outpatient COVID-19 treatment among children, adolescents, and adults with commercial insurance.

Parent-Reported Use of Pediatric Primary Care Telemedicine: Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine delivered from primary care practices became widely available for children during the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: Focusing on children with a usual source of care, we aimed to examine factors associated with use of primary care telemedicine. METHODS: In February 2022, we surveyed parents of children aged ≤17 years on the AmeriSpeak panel, a probability-based panel of representative US households, about their children's telemedicine use. We first compared sociodemographic factors among respondents who did and did not report a usual source of care for their children. Among those reporting a usual source of care, we used Rao-Scott F tests to examine factors associated with parent-reported use versus nonuse of primary care telemedicine for their children. RESULTS: Of 1206 respondents, 1054 reported a usual source of care for their children. Of these respondents, 301 of 1054 (weighted percentage 28%) reported primary care telemedicine visits for their children. Factors associated with primary care telemedicine use versus nonuse included having a child with a chronic medical condition (87/301, weighted percentage 27% vs 113/753, 15%, respectively; P=.002), metropolitan residence (262/301, weighted percentage 88% vs 598/753, 78%, respectively; P=.004), greater internet connectivity concerns (60/301, weighted percentage 24% vs 116/753, 16%, respectively; P=.05), and greater health literacy (285/301, weighted percentage 96% vs 693/753, 91%, respectively; P=.005). CONCLUSIONS: In a national sample of respondents with a usual source of care for their children, approximately one-quarter reported use of primary care telemedicine for their children as of 2022. Equitable access to primary care telemedicine may be enhanced by promoting access to primary care, sustaining payment for primary care telemedicine, addressing barriers in nonmetropolitan practices, and designing for lower health-literacy populations.

Access to What for Whom? How Care Delivery Innovations Impact Health Equity.

Achieving health equity (where every person has the opportunity to attain their full health potential) requires the removal of obstacles to health, including barriers to high-quality medical care. Innovations in service delivery can inadvertently maintain, worsen, or introduce inequities. As such, implementation of innovations must be accompanied by a dual commitment to evaluate impact on marginalized groups and to restructure systems that obstruct people from health and healthcare. Understanding the impact innovations have on access to high-quality care is central to this effort. In this Perspective, we join conceptual models of healthcare access and quality with health equity frameworks to conceptualize healthcare receipt as a series of interactions between people and systems unfolding over time. This synthesized model is applied to illustrate the effects of telemedicine on patient, population, and system outcomes. Telemedicine may improve or worsen health equity by altering access to care and by altering quality of care once it is accessed. Teasing out these varied effects is complex and requires considering multilevel influences on the outcome of a care-seeking episode. This synthesized model can be used to inform research, practice, and policy surrounding the equity implications of care delivery innovations more broadly.

Scheduled and attended pediatric primary care telemedicine appointments during COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine pediatric primary care telemedicine visit scheduling and attendance during the first year of telemedicine. METHODS: Using electronic health record data from two academic pediatric primary care practices between April 2020-March 2021, we used Pearson χ2 tests and logistic regression models to identify child-, family-, and appointment-level characteristics associated with scheduled and attended telemedicine appointments. RESULTS: Among 5178 primary care telemedicine appointments scheduled during the 12-month period, the proportion of appointments scheduled differed over time for children in families with a language preference other than English or Spanish (4% quarter 1 vs. 6% in quarter 4, p = 0.01) and residing in ZIP codes with the lowest household technology access (24% in quarter 1 vs. 19% in quarter 3 (p = 0.01). Four thousand one hundred and forty-eight of 5178 scheduled telemedicine appointments were attended. Likelihood of attending a telemedicine appointment was highest for children in families with a language preference other than English or Spanish (90%, 95% CI 86-94% compared to Spanish 74%, 95% CI 65-84%), and same-day appointments (86%, 95% CI 85-87%). Attendance among families preferring Spanish language was higher in later months compared to earlier months. CONCLUSIONS: We found disparities in scheduling and attending telemedicine appointments, but signs of greater language equity over time.

School Nurse Perspectives on Addressing Chronic Absenteeism.

Chronic absenteeism is associated with poor health and educational outcomes. School nurses have great potential to address the health and educational needs that contribute to absenteeism. Through qualitative analysis of interviews with school nurses, we characterize their current role in reducing absenteeism and identify barriers 3 that limit their capacity to meet this goal, organized by the Framework for 21st Century School Nursing Practice. Interviewees (n = 23) identified actions perceived to reduce absenteeism aligned with domains of care coordination, leadership, quality improvement, and community and public health. Barriers perceived to limit the capacity of school nurses to address absenteeism were identified within these domains and ranged from student- and family-level to federal-level barriers. Specific healthcare system-level barriers included insufficient communication with community-based healthcare teams and the need for coordinated approaches across health and education sectors to address absenteeism. Strategic opportunities exist to address barriers to comprehensive school nursing practice and reduce absenteeism.

Patient and Family Factors Associated with Use of Telemedicine Visits for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Tract Infections, 2018-2019.

Background: Pediatric acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) were a common reason for commercial direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine use before the COVID-19 pandemic, but the factors associated with this use are unknown. Objective: To identify child and family factors associated with use of commercial DTC telemedicine for ARTIs in 2018-2019. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of claims data from the Optum Clinformatics® Data Mart Database. Among children with ARTI visits, we fitted logit models to examine child and family characteristics associated with DTC telemedicine use. Results: Of 660,725 children with ARTI visits, 12,944 (2.0%) had ≥1 commercial DTC telemedicine encounter. The odds of DTC telemedicine use were higher for children with age ≥12 years, lower parent educational attainment, higher household income, white non-Hispanic race/ethnicity, and residency in the West South Central census division. Conclusion: In 2018-2019, commercial DTC telemedicine use varied with child age, child race/ethnicity parent educational attainment, household income, and geography.

Telemedicine Visits to Children During the Pandemic: Practice-Based Telemedicine Versus Telemedicine-Only Providers.

OBJECTIVE: In March 2020, regulatory and payment changes allowed "brick and mortar" pediatric practices to offer practice-based telemedicine for the first time, joining direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine vendors in the ability to offer visits for common acute pediatric concerns via telemedicine. We sought to characterize the relative contribution of practice-based telemedicine versus commercial DTC telemedicine models in provision of children's telemedicine from 2018 through 2021. METHODS: Using January 2018 to September 2021 data from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database, we identified telemedicine visits by children ≤17, excluding preventive visits and visits to specialists, emergency departments, and urgent care. Among included visits, we defined "telemedicine-only" providers as those with ≥80% of visits via telemedicine and practice-based telemedicine providers as those with ≤50% of visits via telemedicine. We then described the telemedicine visit volume and diagnoses for these categories overall and per 1000 children per month. RESULTS: From January 2018 to February 2020, telemedicine-only providers accounted for 57,815 telemedicine visits (90.8%), while practice-based telemedicine accounted for 4192 telemedicine visits (6.6%). From March 2020 to September 2021, telemedicine-only providers accounted for 38,282 telemedicine visits (6.1%), while practice-based telemedicine accounted for 555,125 telemedicine visits (88.2%). Per month, telemedicine visits to practice-based telemedicine providers increased from pre-pandemic to pandemic periods (0.1 vs 12.9 visits per 1000 children/month), while telemedicine visits to telemedicine-only providers occurred at a similar rate from pre-pandemic to pandemic periods (0.92 vs 0.96 visits per 1000 children/month). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a large increase in telemedicine visits during the pandemic, with the growth in visits exclusively occurring among visits to practice-based telemedicine providers as opposed to telemedicine-only providers.