A LC-MS/MS Method for Quantifying Adenosine, Guanosine and Inosine Nucleotides in Human Cells.

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a method for the simultaneous measurement of adenosine, guanosine, and inosine derived from mono (MP) and triphosphate (TP) forms in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), red blood cells (RBCs) and dried blood spots (DBS). METHODS: Solid phase extraction of cell lysates followed by dephosphorylation to molar equivalent nucleoside and LC-MS/MS quantification. RESULTS: The assay was linear for each of the three quantification ranges: 10-2000, 1.0-200 and 0.25-50 pmol/sample for adenosine, guanosine, and inosine, respectively. Intraassay (n = 6) and interassay (n = 18) precision (%CV) were within 1.7 to 16% while accuracy (%deviation) was within -11.5 to 14.7% for all three analytes. Nucleotide monophosphates were less concentrated than triphosphates (except for inosine) and levels in PBMCs were higher than RBCs for all three nucleotides (10, 55, and 5.6 fold for ATP, GTP and ITP, respectively). DBS samples had an average (SD) of -26% (22.6%) lower TP and 184% (173%) higher MP levels compared to paired RBC lysates, suggesting hydrolysis of the TP in DBS. CONCLUSION: This method was accurate and precise for physiologically relevant concentrations of adenosine, guanosine and inosine nucleotides in mono- and triphosphate forms, providing a bioanalytical tool for quantitation of nucleotides for clinical studies.

Plasma and intracellular ribavirin concentrations are not significantly altered by abacavir in hepatitis C virus-infected patients.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of abacavir on intracellular ribavirin triphosphate and plasma ribavirin trough concentrations. METHODS: Hepatitis C virus-infected subjects who had been cured or failed prior treatment were randomized to 8 weeks of ribavirin alone (N = 14; weight-based dosing) or weight-based ribavirin + abacavir (N = 14; 300 mg orally every 12 h). Ribavirin trough concentrations were measured on days 14, 28, 42 and 56; PBMCs for ribavirin triphosphate determination were sampled on days 28 and 56, pre-dose and at 6 and 12 h post-dose. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01052701. RESULTS: Twenty-six subjects completed the study (24 males, 17 Caucasians, median age 52 years); 2 were excluded for missed pharmacokinetic visits. Fourteen subjects received ribavirin + abacavir and 12 received ribavirin alone. Mean ±â€ŠSD plasma ribavirin trough concentrations (µg/mL) on days 14, 28, 42 and 56, respectively, were not significantly different with coadministration of abacavir (1.54 ±â€Š0.60, 1.93 ±â€Š0.54, 2.14 ±â€Š0.73 and 2.54 ±â€Š1.05) compared with ribavirin alone (1.48 ±â€Š0.32, 2.08 ±â€Š0.41, 2.32 ±â€Š0.47 and 2.60 ±â€Š0.62) (P > 0.40). Mean ribavirin triphosphate intracellular concentrations (pmol/10(6) cells) on days 28 and 56, respectively, did not differ statistically between abacavir users (11.98 ±â€Š9.86 and 15.87 ±â€Š12.52) and non-users (15.91 ±â€Š15.58 and 15.93 ±â€Š12.69) (P > 0.4). Adverse events were mild or moderate, except for three grade 3 occurrences of transaminitis, cholecystitis and low absolute neutrophil count that resolved and were judged not attributable to study medications. CONCLUSIONS: Abacavir did not significantly alter ribavirin or ribavirin triphosphate concentrations.

Measurement of intracellular ribavirin mono-, di- and triphosphate using solid phase extraction and LC-MS/MS quantification.

Ribavirin (RBV) is a nucleoside analog used to treat a variety of DNA and RNA viruses. RBV undergoes intracellular phosphorylation to a mono- (MP), di- (DP), and triphosphate (TP). The phosphorylated forms have been associated with the mechanisms of antiviral effect observed in vitro, but the intracellular pharmacology of the drug has not been well characterized in vivo. A highly sensitive LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for the determination of intracellular RBV MP, DP, and TP in multiple cell matrix types. For this method, the individual MP, DP, and TP fractions were isolated from lysed intracellular matrix using strong anion exchange solid phase extraction, dephosphorylated to parent RBV, desalted and concentrated and quantified using LC-MS/MS. The method utilized a stable labeled internal standard (RBV-(13)C5) which facilitated accuracy (% deviation within ±15%) and precision (coefficient of variation of ≤15%). The quantifiable linear range for the assay was 0.50 to 200 pmol/sample. The method was applied to the measurement of RBV MP, DP, and TP in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), red blood cells (RBC), and dried blood spot (DBS) samples obtained from patients taking RBV for the treatment of chronic Hepatitis C virus infection.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between boceprevir and etravirine in HIV/HCV seronegative volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to determine the bioequivalence of boceprevir, an HCV protease inhibitor and etravirine, an HIV non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; area under the concentration time curve (AUC(0,τ)); maximum concentration (C(max)); and trough concentration (C(8) or C(min)) when administered in combination versus alone. DESIGN: Open-label crossover study in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Boceprevir, etravirine, and the combination were administered for 11-14 days with intensive sampling between days 11 and 14 of each sequence. Boceprevir and etravirine were quantified using validated liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography/ultraviolet assays, respectively and pharmacokinetics determined using noncompartmental methods. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence interval (CI) for the combination versus each drug alone were evaluated using 2 one-sided t tests. The hypothesis of equivalence was rejected if 90% GMR CI was not contained in the interval (0.8-1.25). RESULTS: Twenty subjects completed study. GMRs (90% CI) for etravirine AUC(o,τ), C(max), and C(min) were 0.77 (0.66 to 0.91), 0.76 (0.68 to 0.85), and 0.71 (0.54 to 0.95), respectively, in combination versus alone. Boceprevir GMRs (90% CI) for AUC(o,τ), C(max), and C(8) were 1.10 (0.94 to 1.28), 1.10 (0.94 to 1.29), and 0.88 (0.66 to 1.17), respectively, in combination versus alone. All adverse events (n = 112) were mild or moderate. Six subjects discontinued: 4 due to rash, 1 due to central nervous system effects, and 1 for a presumed viral illness. CONCLUSIONS: Etravirine AUC(o,τ), C(max), and C(min)decreased 23%, 24%, and 29%, respectively, with boceprevir. Boceprevir AUC(0,τ) and C(max) increased 10% and C(8) decreased 12% by etravirine. Additional research is needed to elucidate the mechanism(s) and therapeutic implications of the observed interaction.

Determination of nucleoside analog mono-, di-, and tri-phosphates in cellular matrix by solid phase extraction and ultra-sensitive LC-MS/MS detection.

An ultra-sensitive liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay was developed and validated to facilitate the assessment of clinical pharmacokinetics of nucleotide analogs from lysed intracellular matrix. The method utilized a strong anion exchange isolation of mono-(MP), di-(DP), and tri-phosphates (TP) from intracellular matrix. Each fraction was then dephosphorylated to the parent moiety yielding a molar equivalent to the original nucleotide analog intracellular concentration. The analytical portion of the methodology was optimized in specific nucleoside analog centric modes (i.e. tenofovir (TFV) centric, zidovudine (ZDV) centric), which included desalting/concentration by solid phase extraction and detection by LC-MS/MS. Nucleotide analog MP-, DP-, and TP-determined on the TFV centric mode of analysis include TFV, lamivudine (3TC), and emtricitibine (FTC). The quantifiable linear range for TFV was 2.5-2000 fmol/sample, and that for 3TC/FTC was 0.1 200 pmol/sample. Nucleoside analog MP-, DP-, and TP-determined on the ZDV centric mode of analysis included 3TC and ZDV. The quantifiable linear range for 3TC was 0.1 100 pmol/sample, and 5-2000 fmol/sample for ZDV. Stable labeled isotopic internal standards facilitated accuracy and precision in alternative cell matrices, which supported the intended use of the method for MP, DP, and TP determinations in various cell types. The method was successfully applied to clinical research samples generating novel intracellular information for TFV, FTC, ZDV, and 3TC nucleotides. This document outlines method development, validation, and application to clinical research.