Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Gen Pract ; 2024 Jun 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38936883

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) was introduced by NHS England in 2020 alongside Primary Care Networks (PCNs) with aims of increasing the workforce and improving patient outcomes. AIM: Describe the uptake of direct-patient care (DPC)-ARRS roles and its impact on patients' experiences. DESIGN AND SETTING: Ecological study using 2020-2023 PCN and Practice workforce data, registered patient characteristics, the General Practice Patient Survey, and the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). METHODS: Descriptive statistics with associations examined using quantile and linear regression. RESULTS: By March 2023, 17,714 FTE DPC-ARRS roles were commissioned by 1,223 PCNs. PCNs with fewer constituent practices had more DPC-ARRS roles per population (p<0.001) as did PCNs with more FTE GPs per population (p=0.012). DPC-ARRS commissioning did not vary with age, proportion female or deprivation of practice populations. DPC-ARRS roles were associated with small increases in patient satisfaction (0.8 percentage points increase in patients satisfied per one DPC-ARRS FTE) and perceptions of access (0.7 percentage points increase in patients reporting 'good' experience of making an appointment per one DPC-ARRS FTE), but not with overall QOF achievement. CONCLUSIONS: The commissioning of DPC-ARRS roles was associated with small increases in patient satisfaction and perceptions of access, but not with QOF achievement. DPC-ARRS roles were employed in areas with more GPs rather than compensating for a shortage of doctors. Single practice PCNs commissioned more roles per registered population, which may be advantageous to single practice PCNs. Further evaluation of the scheme is warranted.

2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 1(7): e185174, 2018 11 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30646393

RESUMO

Importance: Primary care is an important part of the care pathway for patients with psychosis; therefore, primary care physicians need to be able to accurately identify those at clinical high risk of psychosis. The difficulty of this task is increased because clinical high-risk symptoms are frequently nonspecific to psychosis. Objective: To determine whether the consultation patterns for a prespecified set of symptoms can be used to identify primary care patients who later developed a psychotic illness. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nested case-control study used primary care consultation data collected from 530 primary care practices in 13 UK regions from January 1, 2000, through September 30, 2009. Participants included 11 690 adults with a diagnosis of psychosis and 81 793 control participants who did not have a diagnosis of psychosis individually matched by age group, sex, and primary care practice. Data were analyzed from July 1, 2015, through June 2, 2017. Exposures: Prespecified symptoms selected from literature included attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-like symptoms, bizarre behavior, blunted affect, problems associated with cannabis, depressive symptoms, role functioning problems, social isolation, symptoms of mania, obsessive-compulsive disorder-like symptoms, disordered personal hygiene, sleep disturbance, problems associated with cigarette smoking, and suicidal behavior (including self-harm). Main Outcomes and Measures: Case (diagnosis of psychosis) or control (no diagnosis of psychosis) status. Conditional logistic regression was used to investigate the association between symptoms and case-control status in the 5 years before diagnosis. Positive predictive values (PPVs) were calculated using the Bayes theorem for symptoms stratified by age group and sex. Repeated-measures Poisson regression was used to investigate symptom consultation rate. Results: Of the total sample of 93 483 participants, 57.4% were female and 40.0% were older than 60 years (mean [SD] age, 51.34 [21.75] years). Twelve symptoms were associated with a later psychotic diagnosis (all prespecified symptoms except disordered personal hygiene). The strongest association was with suicidal behavior (odds ratio [OR], 19.06; 95% CI, 16.55-21.95). Positive predictive values were heterogeneous across age and sex. The highest PPVs were for suicidal behavior (33.0% in men 24 years or younger [95% CI, 24.2%-43.2%] and 19.6% in women aged 25-34 years [95% CI, 13.7%-27.2%]). Pairs of symptoms were associated with an increase in PPV. Consultation rates were higher in cases and increased 3 months before diagnosis. Conclusions and Relevance: Most of the preselected nonspecific symptoms were associated with a later psychotic diagnosis, particularly among young men consulting for suicidal behavior, especially if consulting with increasing frequency. These symptoms should alert physicians to patients who may benefit from a further assessment of psychotic symptoms.


Assuntos
Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Psicóticos/epidemiologia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Diagnóstico Precoce , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Psicóticos/fisiopatologia , Reino Unido , Adulto Jovem
3.
Br J Gen Pract ; 63(606): e22-9, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23336454

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Guidelines describing symptoms in children that should alert GPs to consider cancer have been developed, but without any supporting primary-care research. AIM: To identify symptoms and signs in primary care that strongly increase the likelihood of childhood cancer, to assist GPs in selection of children for investigation. DESIGN AND SETTING: A population-based case-control study in UK general practice. METHOD: Using electronic primary care records from the UK General Practice Research Database, 1267 children aged 0-14 years diagnosed with childhood cancer were matched to 15 318 controls. Clinical features associated with subsequent diagnosis of cancer were identified using conditional logistic regression, and likelihood ratios and positive predictive values (PPVs) were estimated for each. RESULTS: Twelve symptoms were associated with PPVs of ≥0.04%, which represents a greater than tenfold increase in prior probability. The six symptoms with the highest PPVs were pallor (odds ratio, OR = 84; PPV = 0.41% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.12% to 1.34%), head and neck masses (OR = 17; PPV = 0.30%; 95% CI = 0.10% to 0.84%), masses elsewhere (OR = 22; PPV = 0.11%; 95% CI = 0.06% to 0.20%), lymphadenopathy (OR = 10; PPV = 0.09%; 95% CI = 0.06% to 0.13%), symptoms/signs of abnormal movement (OR = 16; PPV = 0.08%; 95% CI = 0.04% to 0.14%), and bruising (OR = 12; PPV = 0·08%; 95% CI = 0.05% to 0.13%). When each of these 12 symptoms was combined singly with at least three consultations in a 3-month period, the probability of cancer was between 11 and 76 in 10 000. CONCLUSION: Twelve features of childhood cancers were identified, each of which increased the risk of cancer at least tenfold. These symptoms, particularly when combined with multiple consultations, warrant careful evaluation in general practice.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Medicina Geral , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Adolescente , Idade de Início , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Sistemas Computadorizados de Registros Médicos , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Razão de Chances , Vigilância da População , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA