RESUMO
Knowledge of tooth anatomy and its variations are essential for the success of endodontic treatment. Dilacerations represent developmental anomalies marked by sudden deviations in a tooth's longitudinal axis. Common causes of treatment failures in such cases are primarily related to procedural errors such as ledging, fractured instruments, canal blockages, zipping, and elbow creations. The current case series presents three such interesting cases of endodontic management of curved root canals in mandibular molars.
RESUMO
Context: To improve efficiency, biomechanical preparation in root canal treatment is shifting from manual SS to nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary devices. While multi-file NiTi systems entail crack and fracture issues, modern single-file systems address these concerns. Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of different torque settings on dentinal crack formation using single-file systems (SFS) (One Curve [OC]) and multi-file systems (ProTaper Next [PTN]) at different levels of the tooth. Subjects and Methods: The study was conducted on 45 freshly extracted human mandibular premolars divided into groups: OC at minimal and maximal torque, PTN at minimal and maximal torque, and a control group. After canal preparation, teeth were horizontally sectioned at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the apex, and then examined for cracks using a stereomicroscope. Statistical Analysis Used: This was analyzed using Chi-square test. Results: PTN group: Highest crack rates at the middle (55.6%) and apical (77.8%) thirds with maximum torque; OC group: Highest rates at the middle (22.2%) with minimal torque and apical (11.1%) with maximum torque. Conclusions: Maximal torque settings had more incidence of cracks compared to minimal torque settings. It can be stated that SFS (OC) produced less cracks compared to multi-file system (PTN) at both minimal and maximal torque settings.