Quantitative ultrasound measurement of uterine contractility in adenomyotic vs. normal uteri: a multicenter prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate uterine contractility in patients with adenomyosis compared with healthy controls using a quantitative two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) speckle tracking method. DESIGN: A multicenter prospective observational study took place in three European centers between 2014 and 2023. SETTING: One university teaching hospital, 1 teaching hospital and 1 specialised clinic. PATIENTS: A total of 46 women with a sonographic or magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of adenomyosis were included. 106 healthy controls without uterine pathologies were included. INTERVENTION: Four-minute TVUS recordings were performed and four uterine contractility features were extracted using a speckle tracking algorithm. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The extracted features were contraction frequency (contractions/min), amplitude, velocity (mm/s), and coordination. Women with adenomyosis were compared with healthy controls according to the phase of the menstrual cycle. RESULTS: Throughout the different phases of the menstrual cycle, trends of increased amplitude, decreased frequency and velocity, and reduced contraction coordination were seen in patients with adenomyosis compared with healthy controls. These were statistically significant in the late follicular phase, with a higher amplitude (0.087 ± 0.042 vs. 0.050 ± 0.018), lower frequency and velocity (1.49 ± 0.22 vs. 1.68 ± 0.25 contractions/min, and 0.65 ± 0.18 vs. 0.88 ± 0.29 mm/s, respectively), and reduced contraction coordination (0.34 ± 0.08 vs. 0.26 ± 0.17), in the late luteal phase, with higher amplitude (0.050 ± 0.022 vs. 0.035 ± 0.013), lower velocity (0.51 ± 0.11 vs. 0.65 ± 0.13 mm/s), and reduced contraction coordination (0.027 ± 0.06 vs. 0.18 ± 0.07), and in the midfollicular phase, with decreased frequency (1.48 ± 0.21 vs. 1.69 ± 0.16 contractions/min) in patients with adenomyosis compared with healthy controls. During menses, a higher pain score was significantly associated with lower frequency and velocity and higher contraction amplitude. Results remained significant after correcting for age, parity, and body mass index. CONCLUSION: Uterine contractility differs in patients with adenomyosis compared with healthy controls throughout the phases of the menstrual cycle. This suggests an etiologic mechanism for the infertility and dysmenorrhea seen in patients with adenomyosis. Moreover, it presents new potential therapeutic targets and diagnostic markers.

The ADENO study: ADenomyosis and its Effect on Neonatal and Obstetric outcomes: a retrospective population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Adenomyosis is a benign gynecologic condition arising from the uterine junctional zone. Recent studies suggest a relationship between adenomyosis and adverse obstetrical outcomes, but evidence remains conflicting. There is no large-scale study investigating obstetrical outcomes in women with adenomyosis using the gold standard of histopathologic diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in women with histopathologic adenomyosis and that of the general (Dutch) population. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective population-based study used 2 Dutch national databases (Perined, the perinatal registry, and the nationwide pathology databank [Pathologisch Anatomisch Landelijk Geautomiseerd Archief], from 1995 to 2018) to compare obstetrical outcomes in women before histopathologic adenomyosis diagnosis to the general Dutch population without registered histopathologic adenomyosis. The adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) were calculated for adverse obstetrical outcomes. The outcomes were adjusted for maternal age, parity, ethnicity, year of registered birth, induction of labor, hypertensive disorders in previous pregnancies, multiple gestation, and low socioeconomic status. RESULTS: The pregnancy outcomes of 7925 women with histopathologic adenomyosis were compared with that of 4,615,803 women without registered adenomyosis. When adjusted for confounders, women with adenomyosis had adjusted odds ratios of 1.37 (95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.50) for hypertensive disorders, 1.37 (95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.51) for preeclampsia, 1.15 (95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.25) for small-for-gestational-age infants, 1.54 (95% confidence interval, 1.41-1.68) for emergency cesarean delivery, 1.24 (95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.37) for failure to progress, 1.29 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.48) for placental retention, and 1.23 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.38) for postpartum hemorrhage. No increased risk of HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count) syndrome, placental abruption, or operative vaginal delivery or need for oxytocin stimulation was found. CONCLUSION: Women with a histopathologic diagnosis of adenomyosis showed an increased prevalence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and small-for-gestational-age infants, failure to progress in labor, and placental retention compared with the general population in previous pregnancies. This suggests that uterine (contractile) function in labor and during pregnancy is impaired in women with adenomyosis.

Women with combined adenomyosis and endometriosis on MRI have worse IVF/ICSI outcomes compared to adenomyosis and endometriosis alone: A matched retrospective cohort study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of adenomyosis, endometriosis and combined adenomyosis and endometriosis, diagnosed on MRI, on IVF/ICSI outcomes versus male subfertility controls. STUDY DESIGN: This single-centre matched retrospective cohort study was carried out at Catharina Hospital in Eindhoven, The Netherlands. The study group consisted of infertile women undergoing their first, fresh embryo transfer during IVF/ICSI, with adenomyosis only (N = 36), endometriosis only (N = 61), and combined adenomyosis and endometriosis (N = 93) based on MRI. The control group consisted of IVF/ICSI patients undergoing treatment due to male subfertility (N = 889). 1:2 case-control matching based on age during IVF/ICSI, parity and number of embryos transferred was performed. Odds ratios were calculated for biochemical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy and live birth rate versus matched male subfertility controls, and were corrected for embryo quality. RESULTS: Only the combined adenomyosis and endometriosis group showed a significantly reduced OR for biochemical pregnancy (p = 0.004, OR 0.453 (95% CI :(0.284-0.791)), ongoing pregnancy (p = 0.001, OR 0.302 (95% CI: (0.167-0.608)) and live birth (p = 0.001, OR 0.309 (95% CI: (0.168-0.644)) compared to matched male subfertility controls. CONCLUSIONS: The lower (ongoing) pregnancy and live birth rates in the combined adenomyosis and endometriosis women can be attributed to more severe disease in these women, ultimately resulting in increased chances for failed implantation and miscarriage. This highlights the importance of screening for adenomyosis in endometriosis patients, and identifies these women target for additional (hormonal) treatment prior to IVF/ICSI.

Objective measures of adenomyosis on MRI and their diagnostic accuracy-a systematic review & meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnosis of adenomyosis is considered the most accurate non-invasive technique, but remains subjective, with no consensus on which diagnostic parameters are most accurate. We aimed to systematically review the literature on how adenomyosis can be objectively quantified on MRI in a scoping manner, to review the diagnostic performance of these characteristics compared with histopathological diagnosis, and to summarize correlations between measures of adenomyosis on MRI and clinical outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched databases Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane for relevant literature up to April 2020 according to PRISMA guidelines. We included studies that objectively assessed adenomyosis on MRI, and separately assessed studies investigating the diagnostic performance of MRI vs histopathology for inclusion in a meta-analysis. The QUADAS-2 tool was used for risk of bias, with many studies showing an unclear or high risk of bias. RESULTS: Eighty studies were included, of which 14 assessed the diagnostic performance of individual MRI parameters, with four included in the meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. Common MRI parameters were: junctional zone (JZ) characteristics, such as maximum JZ thickness-pooled sensitivity 71.6% (95% CI 46.0%-88.2%), specificity 85.5% (52.3%-97.0%); JZ differential-pooled sensitivity 58.9% (95% CI 44.3%-72.1%), specificity 83.2% (95% CI 71.3%-90.8%); and JZ to myometrial ratio-pooled sensitivity 63.3% (95% CI 51.9%-73.4%), specificity 79.4% (95% CI 42.0%-95.4%); adenomyosis lesion size, uterine morphology (pooled sensitivity 42.9% (95% CI 15.9%-74.9%), specificity 87.7%, (95% CI 37.9-98.8) and changes in signal intensity-eg, presence of myometrium cysts; pooled 59.6% (95% CI 41.6%-75.4%) and specificity of 96.1% (95% CI 80.7%-99.3%). Other MRI parameters have been used for adenomyosis diagnosis, but their diagnostic performance is unknown. Few studies attempted to correlate adenomyosis MRI phenotype to clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of objective parameters for adenomyosis exist on MRI; however, in many cases their individual diagnostic performance remains uncertain. JZ characteristics remain the most widely used and investigated with acceptable diagnostic accuracy. Specific research is needed into how these objective measures of adenomyosis can be correlated to clinical outcomes.

The willingness to participate in biomedical research involving human beings in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review reasons for the willingness to participate in biomedical human subjects research in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: Five databases were systematically searched for articles published between 2000 and 2017 containing the domain of 'human subjects research' in 'LMICs' and determinant 'reasons for (non)participation'. Reasons mentioned were extracted, ranked and results narratively described. RESULTS: Ninety-four articles were included, 44 qualitative and 50 mixed-methods studies. Altruism, personal health benefits, access to health care, monetary benefit, knowledge, social support and trust were the most important reasons for participation. Primary reasons for non-participation were safety concerns, inconvenience, stigmatisation, lack of social support, confidentiality concerns, physical pain, efficacy concerns and distrust. Stigmatisation was a major concern in relation to HIV research. Reasons were similar across different regions, gender, non-patient or patient participants and real or hypothetical study designs. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing factors that affect (non-)participation in the planning process and during the conduct of research may enhance voluntary consent to participation and reduce barriers for potential participants.

OBJECTIFS: Analyser systématiquement les raisons de la volonté de participer à la recherche biomédicale sur les sujets humains dans les PRFI. MÉTHODES: Cinq bases de données ont été systématiquement recherchées pour des articles publiés entre 2000 et 2017 contenant le domaine de la «recherche sur des sujets humains¼ dans les «PRFI¼ et les déterminantes «raisons de la (non) participation¼. Les raisons mentionnées ont été extraites, classées et les résultats décrits de manière narrative. RÉSULTATS: 94 articles ont été inclus, 44 études qualitatives et 51 études à méthodes mixtes. L'altruisme, les avantages pour la santé personnelle, l'accès aux soins de santé, les avantages pécuniaires, les connaissances, le soutien social et la confiance étaient les principales raisons de la participation. Les principales raisons de la non-participation étaient les problèmes de sécurité, les inconvénients, la stigmatisation, le manque de soutien social, les soucis de confidentialité, la douleur physique, les soucis d'efficacité et la méfiance. La stigmatisation était une préoccupation majeure dans le cadre de la recherche sur le VIH. Les raisons étaient similaires dans les différentes régions, le sexe, les participants patients ou non-patients et les modèles d'étude réels ou hypothétiques. CONCLUSIONS: La prise en compte des facteurs qui affectent la (non) participation au processus de planification et au cours de la recherche peut renforcer le consentement volontaire à la participation et réduire les obstacles pour les participants potentiels.