Australian surveys on incidence and control of blowfly strike in sheep between 2003 and 2019 reveal increased use of breeding for resistance, treatment with preventative chemicals and pain relief around mulesing.

Blowfly strike or cutaneous myiasis, caused principally by the Australian sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina is endemic to Australian sheep producing areas and is a major cause of suffering and economic loss. This article reports incidence and control practices as determined by three cross-sectional surveys of Australian sheep farmers covering the years 2003 (n = 1365), 2011 (n = 575) and 2018 (n = 354) with more questions relating to blowfly strike in the latter two surveys. Breech strike was reported at a higher rate than body strike in all survey years. Reported annual incidence of breech strike ranged from 2.2 to 4.7% of sheep nationally with minor differences between ewes and lambs. The incidence of body strike ranged from 1.0 to 7.1% with higher incidence in younger sheep in all years. The use of fixed time routine preventative chemical treatments increased during the survey period (43%, 46% and 66%, in 2003, 2011 and 2018 respectively) with dicyclanil (54%-58%) and cyromazine (23-36%) the main insecticides used for control since 2011. The use of the Mules operation (mulesing) to remove skin wrinkles from the breech area as a preventative modification did not change between 2011 and 2018 (47% in both), however, the use of pain relief at mulesing of replacement ewe lambs increased substantially between 2011 (59%) and 2018 (87%). The most commonly used methods to assist with flystrike control were timing of crutching (clipping of wool from susceptible areas) and shearing, with few respondents destroying maggots from treated sheep (21-26%) and very low use of fly traps (5-8%). Phenotypic selection of ewes for reduced susceptibility to flystrike based on visual traits was practiced by 61% of respondents in 2011 and 56% in 2018. Selection of rams for reduced susceptibility using estimated breeding values increased from 10% in 2011 to 17% in 2018. Breeding for resistance was the most commonly nominated (21%) most important change made to flystrike management in 2018. The results indicate that concern for sheep welfare has increased with almost universal use of pain relief at mulesing. Increased use of selection for blowfly resistance indicates farmer commitment to planning for a future without mulesing, although the practice remains prevalent. An increase in the reliance on preventative chemical treatments increases the risk of insecticide resistance.

Prevalence of sheep lice and trends in control practices across Australia - Australian sheep parasite control surveys from 2003 to 2019.

The sheep body louse (Bovicola ovis) is a parasite of major economic concern in Australia. This article reports lice incidence and control practices on Australian sheep farms as determined by three cross-sectional surveys of the years 2003, 2011 and 2018. The incidence of live lice detected within a flock was similar across the survey years with a slight decline in 2018 (2003: 20%, 2011: 18.6% and 2018: 13.9%). In an average year, most farmers did not see any direct or indirect evidence of lice infestation (2011: 59.3% and 2018: 69.5%), however, over a five-year period 38.9% (2003), 66.3% (in 2011) and 55.8% (in 2018) reported seeing evidence of lice infestation at least once with significant variation between sheep producing regions in 2011. In an average year, nearly three quarters of respondents treated for lice (2011:73.5% and 2018: 73.3%) with the majority treating immediately following shearing and very few treating sheep with long wool. Even higher percentages treated for lice at least once in the preceding five-year period (2011: 86.2% and 2018: 87.5%). Backliner was the most popular method of chemical application for lice control in sheep off-shears or with short wool (2003: 77%, 2011: 73% and 2018: 74.3%). For long wool treatments, hand jetting declined in popularity from 2003 (64%) to 2011 (54%) and 2018 (8.6%) as backliners became more popular (2003: 36%, 2011: 51% and 2018: 60%). The use of benzoylphenyl urea insect growth regulators (IGR) for off-shears/short wool treatment declined from 2003 (92.8%) to 2011 (51%) and 2018 (2.9%) and were largely replaced by neonicotinoids and spinosad for backliner/spray-on products. The use of organophosphates declined for plunge dipping (2003: 83.8%, 2011: 83% and 2018: 7.7%). Spinosad use for plunge dipping off-shears/short wool increased over the survey years (2003, 0%, 2011: 9% and 2018:46.2%). The use of IGRs declined for backliner application on long wool and were mainly replaced by spinosad in 2011 and 2018. Fewer respondents reported suspected resistance to lice control products in 2018 (8%) compared with 2003 (26%) and 2011 (13%) with most reporting suspected resistance to IGR and synthetic pyrethroids and emerging suspicions of resistance to neonicotinoids in 2018. Resistance to lice control products also reduced in importance as a reason for recurring lice infestations between 2011 (ranked 2nd) and 2018 (ranked 6th). Biosecurity was important to sheep producers with the highest ranked reason for recurring lice infestations being from stray or purchased sheep.

Benchmarking Australian sheep parasite control: Changes in gastrointestinal nematode control practices reported from surveys between 2003 and 2019.

Cross-sectional surveys of sheep parasite control practices in Australia were conducted in 2004, 2012 and 2019 to document parasite problems, control practices and measure change over time. This article reports the results pertaining to gastrointestinal nematode infection; comparisons between years are mostly descriptive and not based on statistical inference. There was a general increase in the use of grazing management to prepare clean pastures for sheep to control gastrointestinal nematode infections with the largest increases in the use of: cropping, long acting anthelmintics to prepare clean pastures, feeding strategies, selecting rams for resistance to nematodes, and leaving some sheep untreated. The proportion of respondents using faecal worm egg count monitoring (WEC) and the number of WEC monitors per year were similar in 2003 (weaners: 3.0 WEC/year, adult ewes: 2.6 WEC/year) and 2018 (lambs and weaners and adult ewes both 3.1 WEC/year) but lower in 2011(lambs and weaners: 2.0 WEC/year, adult ewes: 2.9 WEC/year), whilst there was a higher number of anthelmintic treatments given in 2011 than 2003 and 2018 which were similar. There was an increase in the proportion of respondents carrying out WEC monitors themselves from 2011 (21%) to 2018 (30%) and a corresponding reduction in the use of private laboratories, government laboratories and veterinarians with regional differences in who carried out WECs. The top three anthelmintic groups used did not differ between the three survey years with macrocyclic lactones the most used followed by benzimidazoles (BZ) and levamisole (LEV) although the percentage of MLs used in 2011 and 2018 was lower than in 2003 with higher proportions of respondents using BZ and LEV groups in the latter two survey years. Moxidectin was in the most commonly used active in all survey years. There was an increase in the use of combination of anthelmintics from different groups, especially for a combination of three anthelmintics (2003: 4.4%, 2011: 19.1%, 2018: 21.5%), with lower use of single anthelmintics in 2011 (57.0%) and 2018 (55.4%) compared with 2003 (74.5%). The use of testing for anthelmintic resistance was generally low across the survey years with a lower proportion of respondents using tests in 2011 and 2018 than in 2003 (2003:48%, 2011: 29%, 2018: 37%). Time of year, results from WEC and seasonal weather condition were the most important factors when deciding when to apply anthelmintic treatment.