RESUMO
As staff shortage in intensive care medicine increases, sustainable recruitment and retention of qualified professionals becomes increasingly crucial. Current surveys indicate that sufficient onboarding is a key element to success in this context. The recommendations outlined in the position paper "Onboarding in intensive care medicine" aim to address this issue by guiding towards comprehensive, structured onboarding of professionals. The primary goal of providing such structured onboarding is to increase employee satisfaction, ensure the well-being and safety of both care providers and patients, and guarantee long-term supply of intensive care medicine for the population. This paper was developed under the leadership of the Junge DIVI, a multidisciplinary and multiprofessional initiative of young professionals, within the German Interdisciplinary Association of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI). It was based on a systematic literature research and consensus-building among various professional groups and disciplines, offering - for the first time - uniform, standardized, practical guidance for implementing structured onboarding for different professionals in intensive care units in Germany.
Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos , Humanos , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Alemanha , Unidades de Terapia IntensivaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Onboarding of junior staff in the intensive care unit is vital to ensure high-quality critical care treatment. This process depends on beginner's training. AIM: We aimed to determine structure and duration of intensive care onboarding and the job satisfaction of junior professionals in German intensive care units. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an anonymous, interprofessional online survey regarding quality of onboarding and job satisfaction among young professionals. RESULTS: A total of 554 young professionals participated, about two thirds were physicians. A written concept was used in 59% of the nurse's and 27% of physicians' training. Median duration of training before taking full charge of patient treatment was 30 days among nurses and 7 days among physicians. About one third of nurses and 17% of physicians stated that they were sufficiently prepared after the training period, whereby 49% of physicians often felt overwhelmed. More than 42% can imagine working in critical care longer than the next 3 years. CONCLUSION: Fundamental methods for training of critical care professionals starting their intensive care career are underused in Germany and the duration of training blatantly differs from national guideline recommendations. Although there seem to be deficits concerning material and staff resources, participants are satisfied with learning progress and teamwork.