Long-term outcomes in patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis receiving adalimumab with or without methotrexate.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term safety and efficacy of adalimumab among patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) was evaluated through 6 years of treatment. METHODS: Children aged 4-17 years with polyarticular JIA were enrolled in a phase III, randomised-withdrawal, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial consisting of a 16-week open-label lead-in period, 32-week randomised double-blind period and 360-week long-term extension. Patients were stratified by baseline methotrexate use. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored, and efficacy assessments included JIA American College of Rheumatology (JIA ACR) 30%, 50%, 70% or 90% responses and the proportions of patients achieving 27-joint Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS27) low disease activity (LDA, ≤3.8) and inactive disease (ID, ≤1). RESULTS: Of 171 patients enrolled, 62 (36%) completed the long-term extension. Twelve serious infections in 11 patients were reported through 592.8 patient-years of exposure. No cases of congestive heart failure-related AEs, demyelinating disease, lupus-like syndrome, malignancies, tuberculosis or deaths were reported. JIA ACR 30/50/70/90 responses and JADAS27 LDA were achieved in 66% to 96% of patients at week 104, and 63 (37%) patients achieved clinical remission (JADAS27 ID sustained for ≥6 continuous months) during the study. Attainment of JIA ACR 50 or higher and JADAS27 LDA or ID in the initial weeks were the best predictors of clinical remission. Mean JADAS27 decreased from baseline, 22.5 (n=170), to 2.5 (n=30) at week 312 (observed analysis). CONCLUSIONS: Through 6 years of exposure, adalimumab was well tolerated with significant clinical response (up to clinical remission) and a relatively low retention rate.

Translation and validation of the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ) / Tradução e validação do Questionário de Avaliação do Preparo para a Transição (TRAQ)

Abstract Objective: To translate and validate the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire in a population of adolescents and young adults with chronic rheumatologic disorders. This questionnaire evaluates the patient's readiness for making the transition from the pediatric health service to adult care. Methods: The four-phase methodology for the translation and validation of generic questionnaires was followed, including translation, back-translation, pilot testing and clinical validation of the final tool. The confirmatory factor analysis was used for clinical validation and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to assess the overall internal consistency of the final tool. Results: A total of 150 patients with a mean age of 17.0 years (SD = 2.2 years, range 14-21 years) were enrolled for the final tool validation. Of those, 71 patients had juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (47.3%), 64 had juvenile idiopathic arthritis (42.7%), and 15 had juvenile dermatomyositis (10%). During the confirmatory factor analysis, the dimension "Talking with providers" consisting of two questions, was considered as not fitting the translated questionnaire due to a very high ceiling effect and was therefore excluded. All other translated items favorably contributed to the overall consistency of the final tool; removing that dimension did not result in a substantial increase in Cronbach's alpha, which was 0.776. Conclusions: The Brazilian Portuguese version of the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire was validated in a population of transitional patients with chronic rheumatologic disorders, after one dimension from the original questionnaire was excluded. It is a non-specific disease questionnaire; thus, it can be used to evaluate the transition readiness of Brazilian patients with other chronic diseases.

Resumo Objetivo: Traduzir para o português brasileiro e validar o Questionário de Avaliação do Preparo para a Transição em uma população de adolescentes e adultos jovens com doenças reumáticas crônicas. Este questionário avalia o preparo do paciente para realizar a transição do serviço de saúde pediátrico para a assistência ao adulto. Métodos: Seguimos a metodologia de quatro etapas para a tradução e validação de questionários genéricos que inclui tradução, retrotradução, teste piloto e validação clínica do instrumento final. Utilizamos Análise Fatorial Confirmatória e Coeficiente Alfa de Cronbach para testar a validade do instrumento e sua consistência interna. Resultados: Responderam ao questionário traduzido e adaptado 150 pacientes. A média de idade foi de 17,0 anos (DP = 2,2 anos, variação 14-21 anos). Tinham o diagnóstico de lúpus eritematoso sistêmico juvenil 71 pacientes (47,3%), 64 (42,7%) artrite idiopática juvenil e 15 (10%) dermatomiosite juvenil. Durante a análise fatorial confirmatória, a dimensão "Falando com a Equipe Médica" contendo duas questões teve que ser removida devido à presença de expressivo efeito teto. Todas as outras questões restantes contribuíram favoravelmente para aumentar a consistência interna do questionário, obteve-se um Coeficiente Alfa de Cronbach de 0,776. Conclusões: O Questionário de Avaliação do Preparo para a Transição na sua versão em português brasileiro pode ser validado em uma população de pacientes com doenças reumáticas crônicas em transição, com a exclusão de uma dimensão do questionário original. Por ser um questionário não específico para doenças reumáticas, poderá ser utilizado para avaliar o preparo para a transição de outros pacientes brasileiros com doenças crônicas.

Translation and validation of the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ).

OBJECTIVE: To translate and validate the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire in a population of adolescents and young adults with chronic rheumatologic disorders. This questionnaire evaluates the patient's readiness for making the transition from the pediatric health service to adult care. METHODS: The four-phase methodology for the translation and validation of generic questionnaires was followed, including translation, back-translation, pilot testing and clinical validation of the final tool. The confirmatory factor analysis was used for clinical validation and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to assess the overall internal consistency of the final tool. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients with a mean age of 17.0 years (SD=2.2 years, range 14-21 years) were enrolled for the final tool validation. Of those, 71 patients had juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (47.3%), 64 had juvenile idiopathic arthritis (42.7%), and 15 had juvenile dermatomyositis (10%). During the confirmatory factor analysis, the dimension "Talking with providers" consisting of two questions, was considered as not fitting the translated questionnaire due to a very high ceiling effect and was therefore excluded. All other translated items favorably contributed to the overall consistency of the final tool; removing that dimension did not result in a substantial increase in Cronbach's alpha, which was 0.776. CONCLUSIONS: The Brazilian Portuguese version of the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire was validated in a population of transitional patients with chronic rheumatologic disorders, after one dimension from the original questionnaire was excluded. It is a non-specific disease questionnaire; thus, it can be used to evaluate the transition readiness of Brazilian patients with other chronic diseases.

Transition of Care and Health-Related Outcomes in Pediatric-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: Transition from pediatric to adult care is a complex process and can negatively impact patients with chronic disease. We describe the transition experience of patients with pediatric-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and its associated outcomes in adulthood. METHODS: A telephone survey of 41 pediatric-onset SLE patients was conducted following their transition to adult care. Data on medical and social outcomes during and after the transition were collected. Health status was compared to retrospectively collected baseline data at pediatric discharge. RESULTS: The mean ± SD followup interval was 5 ± 3.7 years; the mean ± SD age at followup was 24 ± 4.2 years. More than half of patients (22 of 41) experienced transition difficulties, primarily due to loss of insurance and emotional readjustment, which were associated with poor symptom control (P = 0.03) and multiple organ system involvement (P = 0.05) at followup. After the transition, most patients (35 of 41) were followed by an adult-care rheumatologist, and the majority (37 of 41) reported recent symptoms of active disease; 41% (13 of 29) had developed symptoms suggestive of new renal manifestations following transition. One-third (15 of 41) reported new or ongoing neuropsychiatric symptoms. Both renal and neuropsychiatric manifestations were associated with unemployment (P < 0.05). Direct referral by a pediatric rheumatologist was associated with fewer hospitalizations following transition (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients transitioned successfully to adult rheumatologic care. Major challenges were loss of insurance and attachment to pediatric providers, highlighting the importance of a structured transition process that focuses on providing emotional and financial guidance. Disease activity in pediatric-onset SLE remains high throughout adulthood, with morbidity primarily related to renal and neuropsychiatric manifestations.

Impact of medication withdrawal method on flare-free survival in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis on combination therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether order of medication withdrawal in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) taking methotrexate (MTX) and tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) combination therapy (CBT) affects flare-free survival (FFS). METHODS: This retrospective observational study of 335 patients with polyarticular JIA or enthesitis-related arthritis analyzed FFS off medications in 4 withdrawal arms: 1) TNFi plus MTX, off MTX first, 2) TNFi plus MTX, off TNFi first, 3) MTX monotherapy, or 4) TNFi monotherapy. Outcomes were evaluated based on order of medication withdrawal, clinical presentation, serologic parameters, and duration of clinically inactive disease (CID) while taking medications. RESULTS: Sixty-four percent of all patients achieved CID. However, 89% of patients on CBT who withdrew TNFi first flared within 12 months despite continuing MTX, compared to 12% of those who withdrew MTX and continued TNFi (P < 0.0005). Twenty-seven percent of patients discontinued all medications, but 63% flared within 12 months, and only 49% of these regained CID within 12 months of restarting therapy. Patients on MTX monotherapy had the best FFS after medication withdrawal. FFS was independent of disease subtype, rheumatoid factor status, initial erythrocyte sedimentation rate, initial joint count, corticosteroid exposure, time in CID, and method of medication discontinuation. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that flare rates in JIA are high, and discontinuing medications is challenging. Withdrawal of TNFi from CBT first carries a significantly higher risk of disease flare than withdrawing MTX first. The high relapse rate after discontinuation of TNFi suggests that these medications may not modify the underlying disease process.

The effect of rilonacept versus placebo on health-related quality of life in patients with poorly controlled familial Mediterranean fever.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of rilonacept on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with poorly controlled familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). METHODS: As part of a randomized, double-blinded trial comparing rilonacept and placebo for the treatment of FMF, patients/parents completed the modified Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) at baseline, and at the start and end of each of 4 treatment courses, 2 each with rilonacept and placebo. RESULTS: Fourteen subjects were randomized; mean age was 24.4 ± 11.8 years. At baseline the physical HRQoL score was significantly less (24.2 ± 49.5) but the psychosocial score was similar to the population norm (49.5 ± 10.0). There were significant improvements in most HRQoL concepts after rilonacept but not placebo. Significant differences between rilonacept and placebo were found in the physical (33.7 ± 16.4 versus 23.7 ± 14.5, P = 0.021) but not psychosocial scores (51.4 ± 10.3 versus 49.8 ± 12.4, P = 0.42). The physical HRQoL was significantly impacted by the treatment effect and patient global assessment. CONCLUSION: Treatment with rilonacept had a beneficial effect on the physical HRQoL in patients with poorly controlled FMF and was also significantly related to the patient global assessment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00582907.

Long-term safety and efficacy of rilonacept in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term safety and efficacy of rilonacept, an anti-interleukin-1 fusion protein, in patients with active systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: In patients with systemic JIA, ages 4-20 years, the efficacy of rilonacept was evaluated using 30%, 50%, and 70% levels of improvement according to the adapted American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30, 50, and 70 response criteria, respectively. Efficacy and safety were evaluated during 23 months of open-label treatment (3 phases) after a 4-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase. Following double-blind treatment with 2.2 mg/kg or 4.4 mg/kg of rilonacept, patients were eligible to receive open-label treatment at their prior dose, with adjustments. Reductions in the median daily dose of oral prednisone and improvements in laboratory parameters of disease activity (i.e., decreased levels of D-dimer and myeloid-related proteins [MRPs]) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients entered the double-blind study and 23 entered the open-label period. Patients were predominantly white and female, and had a median age of 14.0 years at baseline. No significant differences in efficacy were observed between the rilonacept- and placebo-treated patients during the double-blind phase, but fever and rash completely resolved by month 3 in all patients during the open-label treatment period and did not recur. Adapted ACR Pediatric 30, 50, and 70 response rates at 3 months from the start of the study were 78.3%, 60.9%, and 34.8%, respectively; these responses were generally maintained over the study duration. Levels of D-dimer and MRP-8/MRP-14 dramatically improved during the study, and in 22 of 23 patients, the prednisone dose was decreased or prednisone therapy was discontinued. No serious treatment-related adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: Sustained improvements in clinical and laboratory measures of the articular and systemic manifestations of systemic JIA were achieved in >50% of rilonacept-treated patients over 2 years. Treatment with rilonacept had a substantial steroid-sparing effect and was generally well-tolerated.

Rilonacept for colchicine-resistant or -intolerant familial Mediterranean fever: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no proven alternative therapy for patients with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) that is resistant to or intolerant of colchicine. Interleukin-1 is a key proinflammatory cytokine in FMF. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of rilonacept, an interleukin-1 decoy receptor, in treating patients with colchicine-resistant or -intolerant FMF. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, single-participant alternating treatment study. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00582907). SETTING: 6 U.S. sites. PATIENTS: Patients with FMF aged 4 years or older with 1 or more attacks per month. INTERVENTION: One of 4 treatment sequences that each included two 3-month courses of rilonacept, 2.2 mg/kg (maximum, 160 mg) by weekly subcutaneous injection, and two 3-month courses of placebo. MEASUREMENTS: Differences in the frequency of FMF attacks and adverse events between rilonacept and placebo. RESULTS: 8 males and 6 females with a mean age of 24.4 years (SD, 11.8) were randomly assigned. Among 12 participants who completed 2 or more treatment courses, the rilonacept-placebo attack risk ratio was 0.59 (SD, 0.12) (equal-tail 95% credible interval, 0.39 to 0.85). The median number of attacks per month was 0.77 (0.18 and 1.20 attacks in the first and third quartiles, respectively) with rilonacept versus 2.00 (0.90 and 2.40, respectively) with placebo (median difference, -1.74 [95% CI, -3.4 to -0.1]; P = 0.027). There were more treatment courses of rilonacept without attacks (29% vs. 0%; P = 0.004) and with a decrease in attacks of greater than 50% compared with the baseline rate during screening (75% vs. 35%; P = 0.006) than with placebo. However, the duration of attacks did not differ between placebo and rilonacept (median difference, 1.2 days [-0.5 and 2.4 days in the first and third quartiles, respectively]; P = 0.32). Injection site reactions were more frequent with rilonacept (median difference, 0 events per patient treatment month [medians of -4 and 0 in the first and third quartiles, respectively]; P = 0.047), but no differences were seen in other adverse events. LIMITATION: Small sample size, heterogeneity of FMF mutations, age, and participant indication (colchicine resistance or intolerance) were study limitations. CONCLUSION: Rilonacept reduces the frequency of FMF attacks and seems to be a treatment option for patients with colchicine-resistant or -intolerant FMF. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Office of Orphan Products Development.

Pediatric rheumatic disease in the intensive care unit: lessons learned from 15 years of experience in a tertiary care pediatric hospital.

OBJECTIVE: This study describes the 15-yr experience of a large urban tertiary care children's hospital in treating critically ill patients with pediatric rheumatic diseases. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Children's Hospital Los Angeles, a large urban tertiary care children's hospital. PATIENTS: All patients with pediatric rheumatic diseases admitted to the Children's Hospital Los Angeles pediatric intensive care unit from January 1995 to July 2009. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: An internal database and medical records were reviewed for demographics, diagnoses, treatments, organ dysfunction, interventions, infections, and outcomes. Standardized mortality ratio was calculated based on Pediatric Risk of Mortality III estimated mortality. Factors associated with mortality were identified by univariate analyses.Ninety patients with 122 total admissions were identified. The majority of patients were Hispanic (63%), female (73%), and had systemic lupus erythematosus (62%). Pediatric rheumatic disease-related complications (50%) were the most common reason for admission; 32% of admissions involved multiorgan dysfunction. Eighteen admissions (15%) resulted in mortality. Deaths were most commonly attributed to combined infection and active rheumatic disease (50%), infection only (22%), rheumatic disease only (11%), or other causes (17%). In 30 (25%) admissions, a new rheumatologic diagnosis was established. Standardized mortality ratio was 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.38-1.25) for pediatric rheumatic disease patients compared to 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.79-0.96) for all pediatric intensive care unit patients. Factors associated with mortality included use of mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, and renal replacement (continuous venovenous hemodialysis) (all p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric rheumatic disease-related complications were the principal cause of pediatric intensive care unit admission. Deaths occurred most often from severe infections in patients with active rheumatic disease. Pediatric rheumatology patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit had outcomes similar to the global pediatric intensive care unit population when adjusted for severity of illness.

Acanthamoeba meningoencephalitis presenting as neuropsychiatric lupus in a pediatric patient.

We present the case of a 16-year-old patient with systemic lupus erythematosus who presented with altered mental status and regressive behaviour. She was worked up and empirically treated for common and opportunistic infectious agents. All work-up was negative and after an extensive course of antibiotics she was treated for neuropsychiatric lupus with cytoxan. She initially responded, but this was short-lived and she eventually became comatose and passed away. On brain biopsy she was found to have numerous trophozoites with round nucleus, prominent nucleolus and thin nuclear membrane. Methenamine silver stain showed encysted amoeba, corresponding with a diagnosis of acanthamoeba meningoencephalitis. Making the diagnosis of acanthamoeba meningoencephalitis requires a high degree of suspicion. Specific serum antibodies may not be a reliable measure in immunocompromised patients and trophozoites in CSF can be confused with monocytes. Brain biopsy may be required to make a definitive diagnosis. It is important for clinicians treating immunocompromised patients to keep this agent in mind in an immunocompromised patient with neurological manifestations. Acanthamoeba infections have only been reported in a small handful of patients and, to our knowledge, this is the first reported case in the United States.