RESUMO
Objective: There has been increasing use of ketamine at subanesthetic doses as an adjunct to opioids in perioperative pain management. There are several known adverse drug effects (ADEs) associated with ketamine. However, the incidence of ADEs with ketamine infusions with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) boluses compared with combined opioid and ketamine PCAs is not well described. The objectives of this study were to compare the incidence and type of ADEs in postoperative spine surgery patients on ketamine infusions with as-needed PCA boluses to patients on combined opioid and ketamine PCAs. Methods: The medical records of patients who underwent spine surgery between March 2016 and March 2020 who were postoperatively treated with a ketamine infusion and as-needed PCA boluses and parenteral opioids or treated with a combined opioid and ketamine PCA were reviewed. Perioperative information including patient characteristics and preoperative morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) were collected. Patient charts were reviewed for ADEs including psychological and neurological side effects, nausea, and new-onset tachycardia. Results: A total of 315 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Of these patients, 121 experienced at least one ADE (38%). Sixteen of the 68 ketamine infusion with PCA bolus patients (24%), 77 of the 203 hydromorphone and ketamine patients (38%), and 28 of the 44 morphine and ketamine patients (64%) experienced an ADE [p<0.01]. In patients with preoperative MEDD ≤ 90, nausea was the only ADE that differed significantly among the three groups. Conclusion: This retrospective analysis suggests that postoperative spine patients treated with a ketamine infusion with as-needed PCA boluses and parenteral opioids were associated with fewer ADEs when compared to an intravenous combined opioid and ketamine PCA. In patients with preoperative MEDD ≤ 90, nausea with and without emesis was the only ADE that showed statistically significant difference amongst the three groups.
RESUMO
Due to the curative potential and improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered the standard of care for several hematologic malignancies, such as multiple myeloma, and lymphomas. ASCT typically involves support with blood product transfusion. Thus, difficulties arise when Jehovah's Witness patients refuse blood transfusions. In order to demonstrate the safety of performing "bloodless" ASCT (BL-ASCT), we performed a retrospective analysis of 66 Jehovah's Witnesses patients who underwent BL-ASCT and 1114 non-Jehovah's Witness patients who underwent transfusion-supported ASCT (TF-ASCT) at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center between January 2000 and September 2018. Survival was compared between the two groups. Transplant-related complications, mortality, engraftment time, length of hospital stay, and number of ICU transfers were characterized for the BL-ASCT group. One year survival was found to be 87.9% for both groups (P = 0.92). In the BL-ASCT group, there was one death prior to the 30 days post transplant due to CNS hemorrhage, and one death prior to 100 days due to sepsis. Based on our data, BL-ASCT can be safely performed with appropriate supportive measures, and we encourage community oncologists to promptly refer JW patients for transplant evaluation when ASCT is indicated.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Testemunhas de Jeová , Transfusão de Sangue , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante AutólogoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection commonly occurs during the immunosuppression associated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Prophylaxis of recurrent infection and management of clinical infection have relied upon acyclovir and congeners. More recently, resistant HSV infection is seen in HSCT and presents new challenges in management. We present a case of HSV following HSCT that provided effective symptomatic management. RESULTS: Oral symptoms and lesions were repeatedly reduced when topical cidofovir was used, strongly supporting the effect of cidofovir used in a host who could not tolerate systemic antiviral medications. CONCLUSIONS: Topical cidofovir can provide effective management of symptomatic oropharyngeal HSV while reducing risk of systemic toxicity and drug interaction and represents an additional approach to management for management in medically compromised patients.
Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Citosina/análogos & derivados , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Herpes Simples/terapia , Organofosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/efeitos adversos , Administração Tópica , Idoso , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Antivirais/farmacologia , Cidofovir , Citosina/administração & dosagem , Citosina/farmacologia , Citosina/uso terapêutico , Herpes Simples/virologia , Humanos , Masculino , Organofosfonatos/administração & dosagem , Organofosfonatos/farmacologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Oral mucormycosis is a rare and high risk of infection in patients following hematopoietic cell transplantation few cases in the literature. We review the literature and present an additional case to emphasize the subtle changes that resulted in positive outcome when diagnosed and managed in a comprehensive transplant team. RESULTS: A patient was diagnosed with gingival mucormycosis on day +25 following a hematopoietic stem cell transplant for lymphoblastic transformation of chronic myeloid leukemia. The patient was diagnosed with minor and nonspecific symptoms and was successfully treated with local dental extraction, a short course of liposomal amphotericin B and 4 months of oral posaconazole. CONCLUSIONS: The good outcome of this case highlights the subtle clinical changes that present early in mucormycosis and the importance of early detection and treatment of post-transplant oral infections by an experienced multidisciplinary team.