RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Facilitating primary triage and care at pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) can improve outcomes for children after trauma. However, scene location and regional emergency medical services regulations may result in initial evaluation occurring at nonpediatric facilities with later transportation to PTCs for definitive care. In this study, we assessed the results of a change in transport time cutoff from 30 to 45 minutes on pediatric patient outcomes. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, the Pediatric Trauma Database at a level 1 PTC was queried for patients seen before (January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017) and after (January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020) the implementation of a policy increasing transport cutoff time from 30 to 45 minutes. Patient outcomes were compared by transport status and Injury Severity Score (ISS) using generalized linear regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 505 patients were seen before policy changes, and 413 patients, after policy changes. Both groups had similar numbers of severely injured patients (ISS, ≥15; pre, 64 [13%]; post, 61 [15%]). Average transport time increased after change (pre, 20 minutes [95% confidence interval, 18-22 minutes]; post, 29 minutes [95% confidence interval, 26-33 minutes]; p = 0.0252), consistent with policy compliance. The proportion of transferred patients did not change after policy implementation ( p = 0.5856), and the complications among all patients with an ISS of ≥15 did not significantly decrease (pre, 75%; post, 65.6%). However, those patients with an ISS of ≥15 admitted directly from the scene had a lower frequency of complications after the policy changes (pre, 76%; post, 59%; p = 0.0319), and in the postperiod, transferred patients with an ISS of ≥15 had a higher complication rate than those admitted directly from the scene ( p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Direct scene admission to a PTC is associated with a lower complication profile for patients with higher ISS. Methods to ensure adherence to cutoff thresholds for emergency medical services transport may have a positive benefit on patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.
Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Transporte de Pacientes , Centros de Traumatologia , Triagem , Ferimentos e Lesões , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Criança , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Traumatologia/normas , Transporte de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Transporte de Pacientes/normas , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/normas , Triagem/normas , Fatores de Tempo , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Estudos Retrospectivos , LactenteRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The incidence of ulcerative colitis (UC) is increasing. Roughly 20% of all patients with UC are diagnosed in childhood, and children typically present with more severe disease. Approximately 40% will undergo total colectomy within ten years of diagnosis. The objective of this study is to assess the available evidence regarding the surgical management of pediatric UC as determined by the consensus agreement of the American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice Committee (APSA OEBP). METHODS: Through an iterative process, the membership of the APSA OEBP developed five a priori questions focused on surgical decision-making for children with UC. Questions focused on surgical timing, reconstruction, use of minimally invasive techniques, need for diversion, and risks to fertility and sexual function. A systematic review was conducted, and articles were selected for review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Risk of Bias was assessed using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. The Oxford Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation were utilized. RESULTS: A total of 69 studies were included for analysis. Most manuscripts contain level 3 or 4 evidence from single-center retrospective reports, leading to a grade D recommendation. MINORS assessment revealed a high risk of bias in most studies. J-pouch reconstruction may result in fewer daily stools than straight ileoanal anastomosis. There are no differences in complications based on the type of reconstruction. The timing of surgery should be individualized to patients and does not affect complications. Immunosuppressants do not appear to increase surgical site infection rates. Laparoscopic approaches result in longer operative times but shorter lengths of stay and fewer small bowel obstructions. Overall, complications are not different using an open or minimally invasive approach. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently low-level evidence related to certain aspects of surgical management for UC, including timing, reconstruction type, use of minimally invasive techniques, need for diversion, and risks to fertility and sexual function. Multicenter, prospective studies are recommended to better answer these questions and ensure the best evidence-based care for our patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level of evidence III. STUDY TYPE: Systematic review.
Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Humanos , Criança , Adolescente , Colite Ulcerativa/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Colectomia/métodos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Estudos Multicêntricos como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gastrostomy tubes (GTs) provide life-saving enteral access for children. Although upper gastrointestinal (UGI) series and impedance studies (ISs) detect gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or malrotation, their benefit for preoperative evaluation of asymptomatic patients requiring GT placement is controversial. This study investigated the value of routine preoperative testing and whether specific patient characteristics could guide the selective use of these studies. METHODS: The charts of children who underwent GT placement from 2003 to 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Demographics, preoperative evaluation, and postoperative course were evaluated. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-three patients underwent GT placement, 61% with preoperative testing. Seven of 190 UGI (4%) series demonstrated malrotation, and 39 of 141 (28%) ISs revealed severe GERD. Although all malrotations were surgically addressed, only 59% (23/39) of IS-proven GERD cases prompted simultaneous fundoplication. Age <1 year was associated with a positive UGI series (6.7% positive vs 1.0%; P < 0.05), but no other patient characteristics were associated with either positive UGI series or IS. Elimination of the 96% of UGI series that did not alter care represented a cost savings of $89,487-$229,665 and avoided the radiation exposure from testing; elimination of the 84% of ISs that did not alter eventual treatment would have saved $127,776-$266,563. CONCLUSION: Routine preoperative evaluation with UGI series and IS can increase healthcare costs without substantially altering care. The only patients potentially benefiting from routine UGI series were <1 year old. Instead, a targeted, symptom-based preoperative evaluation may streamline the process by decreasing preoperative testing and minimizing cost and radiation exposure.
Assuntos
Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Gastrostomia , Lactente , Humanos , Criança , Estudos Retrospectivos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Fundoplicatura , Nutrição EnteralRESUMO
PURPOSE: Management of undescended testes (UDT) has evolved over the last decade. While urologic societies in the United States and Europe have established some guidelines for care, management by North American pediatric surgeons remains variable. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the published evidence regarding the treatment of (UDT) in children. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were utilized to identify, review, and report salient articles. Five principal questions were asked regarding imaging standards, medical treatment, surgical technique, timing of operation, and outcomes. A literature search was performed from 2005 to 2020. RESULTS: A total of 825 articles were identified in the initial search, and 260 were included in the final review. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative imaging and hormonal therapy are generally not recommended except in specific circumstances. Testicular growth and potential for fertility improves when orchiopexy is performed before one year of age. For a palpable testis, a single incision approach is preferred over a two-incision orchiopexy. Laparoscopic orchiopexy is associated with a slightly lower testicular atrophy rate but a higher rate of long-term testicular retraction. One and two-stage Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy have similar rates of testicular atrophy and retraction. There is a higher relative risk of testicular cancer in UDT which may be lessened by pre-pubertal orchiopexy.
Assuntos
Criptorquidismo , Neoplasias Testiculares , Atrofia , Criança , Criptorquidismo/cirurgia , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Orquidopexia/métodos , Neoplasias Testiculares/cirurgia , Testículo/cirurgia , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Diverse perspectives are critical components of effective teams in every industry. Underrepresentation of minorities in medicine leads to worse outcomes for minority patients, and efforts to increase diversity in the health care workforce are critical. Presently, about 70% of the pediatric surgery workforce is white, and pediatric surgeons at large do not reflect the racial or ethnic diversity of the populations they serve. Pediatric surgery fellowship training programs are the gateway to the field, and fellow selection processes should be optimized to support diversity and inclusion. The Association of Pediatric Surgery Training Program Directors (APSTPD) Diversity Equity and Inclusion subcommittee compiled best practices for bias mitigation during fellow selection, drawing from published literature and personal experiences in our own programs. A list of concrete recommendations was compiled, which can be implemented in every phase from applicant screening to rank list creation. We present these as a position statement that has been endorsed by the executive committee of the APSTPD. Pediatric surgery fellowship programs can utilize this focused review of best practices to mitigate bias and support diverse applicants.
Assuntos
Bolsas de Estudo , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Criança , Etnicidade , Humanos , Grupos Minoritários , Recursos HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Long-Segment Hirschsprung Disease (LSHD) differs clinically from short-segment disease. This review article critically appraises current literature on the definition, management, outcomes, and novel therapies for patients with LSHD. METHODS: Four questions regarding the definition, management, and outcomes of patients with LSHD were generated. English-language articles published between 1990 and 2018 were compiled by searching PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. A qualitative synthesis was performed. RESULTS: 66 manuscripts were included in this systematic review. Standardized nomenclature and preoperative evaluation for LSHD are recommended. Insufficient evidence exists to recommend a single method for the surgical repair of LSHD. Patients with LSHD may have increased long-term gastrointestinal symptoms, including Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis (HAEC), but have a quality of life similar to matched controls. There are few surgical technical innovations focused on this disorder. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized definition of LSHD is recommended that emphasizes the precise anatomic location of aganglionosis. Prospective studies comparing operative options and long-term outcomes are needed. Translational approaches, such as stem cell therapy, may be promising in the future for the treatment of long-segment Hirschsprung disease.
Assuntos
Enterocolite , Doença de Hirschsprung , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Doença de Hirschsprung/cirurgia , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
Effective tocolysis is essential after fetal myelomeningocele repair and is associated with the development of pulmonary edema. The increased uterine activity in the immediate postoperative period is commonly treated with magnesium sulfate. However, other tocolytic agents such as nitroglycerine, nifedipine, indomethacin, terbutaline, and atosiban (outside the US) have also been used to combat uterine contractility. The ideal tocolytic regimen which balances the risks and benefits of in-utero surgery has yet to be determined. In this case report, we describe a unique case of fetal myelomeningocele repair complicated by maternal pulmonary edema and increased uterine activity resistant to magnesium sulfate therapy.
RESUMO
This is a commentary on the manuscript by Sarosi A, Coakley B, Berman L, et al., titled "A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Compassion, Fatigue, Burnout, and Compassion Satisfaction in Pediatric Surgeons in the U.S."
Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional , Fadiga de Compaixão , Cirurgiões , Esgotamento Profissional/epidemiologia , Criança , Fadiga de Compaixão/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Empatia , Humanos , Satisfação no Emprego , Satisfação Pessoal , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is growing concern regarding the impact of general anesthesia on neurodevelopment in children. Pre-clinical animal studies have linked anesthetic exposure to abnormal central nervous system development, but it is unclear whether these results translate into humans. The purpose of this systematic review from the American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice (OEBP) Committee was to review, summarize, and evaluate the evidence regarding the neurodevelopmental impact of general anesthesia on children and identify factors that may affect the risk of neurotoxicity. METHODS: Medline, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were queried for articles published up to and including December 2017 using the search terms "general anesthesia and neurodevelopment" as well as specific anesthetic agents. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to screen manuscripts for inclusion in the review. A consensus statement of recommendations in response to each study question was synthesized based upon the best available evidence. RESULTS: In total, 493 titles were initially identified, with 56 articles selected for full analysis and 44 included for review. Based on currently available developmental assessment tools, a single exposure to general anesthesia does not appear to have a significant effect on general neurodevelopment, although prolonged or multiple anesthetic exposures may have some adverse effects. Exposure to general anesthesia may affect different domains of development at different ages. Regional anesthetic techniques with the addition of dexmedetomidine and/or some intravenous agents may mitigate the risks of neurotoxicity. This approach may be performed safely in some patients and can be considered as an option in selected short procedures. CONCLUSION: There is no conclusive evidence that a single short anesthetic in infancy has a detectable neurodevelopmental effect. Data do not support waiting until later in childhood to perform general anesthesia for single short procedures. With the complexities and nuances of different anesthetic methods, patients and procedures, the planning and execution of anesthesia for the pediatric patient is generally best accomplished by an anesthesiologist, ideally a pediatric anesthesiologist. TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review of level 1-4 studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1-4 (mainly level 3-4).
Assuntos
Anestesia Geral , Anestésicos , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos/efeitos adversos , Animais , Criança , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this systematic review by the American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice Committee was to develop recommendations for the management of ileocolic intussusception in children. METHODS: The ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases were queried for literature from January 1988 through December 2018. Search terms were designed to address the following topics in intussusception: prophylactic antibiotic use, repeated enema reductions, outpatient management, and use of minimally invasive techniques for children with intussusception. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Consensus recommendations were derived based on the best available evidence. RESULTS: A total of 83 articles were analyzed and included for review. Prophylactic antibiotic use does not decrease complications after radiologic reduction. Repeated enema reductions may be attempted when clinically appropriate. Patients can be safely observed in the emergency department following enema reduction of ileocolic intussusception, avoiding hospital admission. Laparoscopic reduction is often successful. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding intussusception in hemodynamically stable children without critical illness, pre-reduction antibiotics are unnecessary, non-operative outpatient management should be maximized, and minimally invasive techniques may be used to avoid laparotomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3-5 (mainly level 3-4) TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic Review of level 1-4 studies.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Intussuscepção , Criança , Enema , Hospitalização , Humanos , Lactente , Intussuscepção/cirurgia , Laparotomia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome affects monochorionic twin pregnancies and can result in fetal death. Endoscopic laser treatment remains a relatively infrequent procedure for this condition. This presents difficulties for maintaining proficiency and for training new personnel. OBJECTIVE: The dual mentoring program at our institution allows for continuous mentoring of new providers. We hypothesize that this approach stabilizes program proficiency despite the addition of new practitioners. METHODS: Query of the fetal treatment program database returned 146 cases of laser ablation between 2000 and 2019. Patient and pregnancy characteristics as well as operative time and outcomes were recorded. The learning curve-cumulative summation method and rolling averages were used to analyze outcomes. RESULTS: Overall survival was 69%, and survival of at least 1 twin was 89%. Mean operative time was 53.6 ± 20.9 min. Overall twin survival stabilized after the first 40 cases. Rolling averages for operative time decreased from 71 to 49 min for the most recent cases. These results were not affected by the introduction of new surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Creative mentoring can maintain stable overall program outcomes despite changes in team composition. This training approach may be applicable to other rare procedures in fetal surgery.
Assuntos
Transfusão Feto-Fetal , Curva de Aprendizado , Feminino , Morte Fetal , Transfusão Feto-Fetal/cirurgia , Fetoscopia , Feto , Humanos , Gravidez , Resultado da GravidezRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Myelomeningocele (MMC) is the most frequent congenital abnormality of the central nervous system that leads to significant physical disabilities. Historically, treatment involved postnatal repair with management of the hydrocephalus with ventricular shunting. Animal and early human studies demonstrated the feasibility of fetal closure. The benefit of in-utero closure was debated until the results of the prospective randomized multicenter Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS trial) were published, demonstrating a decreased need for shunting, reversal of hindbrain herniation, and better neurologic function in the prenatal repair group compared to postnatal repair. Fetal MMC closure has become a standard of care option for prenatally diagnosed spina bifida. The size of the spinal defect may require modification of the classic surgical technique requiring patching. CASE: This report describes a case of open fetal myelomeningocele repair, which required incorporation of a skin allograft. CONCLUSION: Large myelomeningocele defects may be successfully repaired with utilization of a skin allograft.
Assuntos
Meningomielocele/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal , Adulto , Aloenxertos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Doenças Fetais/diagnóstico , Doenças Fetais/cirurgia , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Meningomielocele/diagnóstico por imagem , Meningomielocele/cirurgia , Gravidez , Resultado da GravidezRESUMO
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The optimal method to repair gastroschisis defects continues to be debated. The two primary methods are immediate closure (IC) or silo placement (SP). The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between each approach using a multicenter retrospective analysis. We hypothesized that patients undergoing SP for ≤5â¯days would have largely equivalent outcomes compared to IC patients. METHODS: Gastroschisis patient data were collected over a 7-year period. The cohort was separated into IC and SP groups. The SP group was further stratified based on time to closure (≤5â¯days, 6-10â¯days, >10â¯days). Characteristics and outcomes were compared between groups. Multivariate logistic regression was also performed. RESULTS: 566 neonates with gastroschisis were identified including 224 patients in the IC group and 337 patients in the SP group. Among SP patients, 130 were closed within 5â¯days, 140 in 6-10â¯days, and 57 in >10â¯days. There were no significant differences in mortality, sepsis, readmission, or days to full enteral feeds between IC patients and SP patients who had a silo ≤5â¯days. IC patients had a significantly higher incidence of ventral hernias. Multivariate analysis revealed time to closure as a significant independent predictor of length of stay, ventilator duration, time to full enteral feeds, and TPN duration. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show largely equivalent outcomes between patients who undergo immediate closure and those who have silos ≤5â¯days. We propose that closure within 5â¯days avoids many of the risks commonly attributed to delay in closure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II retrospective study.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Gastrosquise/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Gastrosquise/mortalidade , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gastroschisis is an increasingly common congenital abdominal wall defect. Due to advances in neonatal critical care and early surgical management, mortality from gastroschisis and associated complications has decreased to less than 10% in most series. However, it has been recognized that the outcome of gastroschisis has a spectrum and that the disorder affects a heterogeneous cohort of neonates. The goal of this study is to predict morbidity and mortality in neonates with gastroschisis using clinically relevant variables. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective observational study of neonates born with gastroschisis was conducted. Neonatal characteristics and outcomes were collected and compared. Prediction of morbidity and mortality was performed using multivariate clinical models. RESULTS: Five hundred and sixty-six neonates with gastroschisis were identified. Overall survival was 95%. Median hospital length of stay was 37 d. Sepsis was diagnosed in 107 neonates. Days on parenteral nutrition and mechanical ventilation were considerable with a median of 27 and 5 d, respectively. Complex gastroschisis (atresia, perforation, volvulus), preterm delivery (<37 wk), and very low birth weight (<1500 g) were associated with worse clinical outcomes including increased sepsis, short bowel syndrome, parenteral nutrition days, and length of stay. The composite metric of birth weight, Apgar score at 5 min, and complex gastroschisis was able to successfully predict mortality (area under the curve, 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical variables can be used in gastroschisis to distinguish those who will survive from nonsurvivors. Although these findings need to be validated in other large multicenter data sets, this prognostic score may aid practitioners in the identification and management of at-risk neonates.
Assuntos
Gastrosquise/mortalidade , Sepse/epidemiologia , Síndrome do Intestino Curto/epidemiologia , Índice de Apgar , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Gastrosquise/complicações , Gastrosquise/terapia , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido de Baixo Peso , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Nutrição Parenteral/estatística & dados numéricos , Prognóstico , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Sepse/etiologia , Síndrome do Intestino Curto/etiologia , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Peer-review endeavors represent the continual learning environment critical for a culture of patient safety. Morbidity and mortality (M&M) conferences are designed to review adverse events to prevent future similar events. The extent to which pediatric surgeons participate in M&M, and believe M&M improves patient safety, is unknown. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of the American Pediatric Surgical Association membership was conducted to evaluate participation in and perception of M&M conferences. Closed and open-ended questions were provided to gauge participation and perceptions of M&M effectiveness. Standard frequency analyses and tests of associations between M&M program attributes and surgeons' perceptions of effectiveness were performed. RESULTS: The response rate was 38% (353/928). Most surgeons (85%) reported that they always participate in M&M, but only 64% believe M&M is effective in changing practice or prevention of future adverse events. Effective M&Ms were more likely to emphasize loop closure, multidisciplinary participation, standardized assessment of events, and connection to quality improvement efforts. CONCLUSIONS: Most pediatric surgeons participate in M&M, but many doubt its effectiveness. We identified attributes of M&M conferences that are perceived to be effective. Further investigation is needed to identify how to optimally utilize peer-review programs to prevent adverse events and improve patient safety. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.
Assuntos
Dano ao Paciente/prevenção & controle , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Pediatras , Cirurgiões , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Morbidade , Pediatras/organização & administração , Pediatras/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Cirurgiões/organização & administração , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The treatment of ovarian masses in pediatric patients should balance appropriate surgical management with the preservation of future reproductive capability. Preoperative estimation of malignant potential is essential to planning an optimal surgical strategy. METHODS: The American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice Committee drafted three consensus-based questions regarding the evaluation and treatment of ovarian masses in pediatric patients. A search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was performed and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to identify articles for review. RESULTS: Preoperative tumor markers, ultrasound malignancy indices, and the presence or absence of the ovarian crescent sign on imaging can help estimate malignant potential prior to surgical resection. Frozen section also plays a role in operative strategy. Surgical staging is useful for directing chemotherapy and for prognostication. Both unilateral oophorectomy and cystectomy have been used successfully for germ cell and borderline ovarian tumors, although cystectomy may be associated with higher rates of local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Malignant potential of ovarian masses can be estimated preoperatively, and fertility-sparing techniques may be appropriate depending on the type of tumor. This review provides recommendations based on a critical evaluation of recent literature. TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review of level 1-4 studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1-4 (mainly 3-4).
Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Preservação da Fertilidade/métodos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Ovariectomia/métodos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Adolescente , American Medical Association , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Ovário/patologia , Ovário/cirurgia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Omphaloceles can be some of the more challenging cases managed by pediatric surgeons. Single center studies have not been meaningful in delineating outcomes due to the length of time required to accumulate a large enough series with historical changes in management negating the results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors impacting the morbidity and mortality of neonates with omphaloceles. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective observational study was performed for live born neonates with omphalocele between 2005 and 2013 at nine centers in the United States. Maternal and neonatal data were collected for each case. In-hospital management and outcomes were also reported and compared between neonates with small and large omphaloceles. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-four neonates with omphalocele were identified. The majority were delivered by cesarean section with a median gestational age of 37â¯weeks. Overall survival to hospital discharge was 81%. The presence of an associated anomaly was common, with cardiac abnormalities being the most frequent. Large omphaloceles had a significantly longer hospital and ICU length of stay, time on ventilator, number of tracheostomies, time on total parenteral nutrition, and time to full feeds, compared to small omphaloceles. Birth weight and defect size were independent predictors of survival. CONCLUSION: This is the largest contemporary study of neonates with omphalocele. Increased defect size is an independent predictor of neonatal morbidity and mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
Assuntos
Hérnia Umbilical , Doenças do Recém-Nascido , Peso ao Nascer , Hérnia Umbilical/epidemiologia , Hérnia Umbilical/mortalidade , Hérnia Umbilical/patologia , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Doenças do Recém-Nascido/epidemiologia , Doenças do Recém-Nascido/mortalidade , Doenças do Recém-Nascido/patologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Early initiation of feedings after gastrostomy tube (GT) placement may reduce associated hospital costs, but many surgeons fear complications could result from earlier feeds. We hypothesized that, irrespective of placement method, starting feedings within the first 6h following GT placement would not result in a greater number of post-operative complications. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective review of all GTs placed between January 2012 and December 2014 at three academic institutions was undertaken. Data was stratified by placement method and whether the patient was initiated on feeds at less than 6h or after. Baseline demographics, operative variables, post-operative management and complications were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used and P-values <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: One thousand and forty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. GTs were inserted endoscopically (48.9%), laparoscopically (44.9%), or via an open approach (6.2%). Demographics were similar in early and late fed groups. When controlling for method of placement, those patients who were fed within the first 6h after gastrostomy placement had shorter lengths of stay compared to those fed greater than 6h after placement (P<0.05). Total post-operative outcomes were equivalent between feeding groups for all methods of placement (laparoscopic (P=0.87), PEG (P=0.94), open (P=0.81)). CONCLUSIONS: Early initiation of feedings following GT placement was not associated with an increase in complications. Feeds initiated earlier may shorten hospital stays and decrease overall hospital costs. TYPE OF STUDY: Multi-institutional retrospective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Assuntos
Nutrição Enteral/métodos , Gastrostomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Nutrição Enteral/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Ovarian torsion in pediatric patients is a rare event and is primarily managed by pediatric general surgeons. Torsion can be treated with detorsion of the ovary or oopherectomy. Oopherectomy is the most common procedure performed by pediatric general surgeons for ovarian torsion. The purpose of this systematic review by the American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee was to examine evidence from the medical literature and provide recommendations regarding the optimal treatment of ovarian torsion. METHODS: Using PRISMA guidelines, six questions were addressed by searching Medline, Cochrane, Embase Central and National clearing house databases using relevant search terms. Risks of ovarian detorsion including thromboembolism and malignancy, indications for oophoropexy, benefits of detorsion including recovery of function and subsequent fertility, and recommended surveillance after detorsion were evaluated. Consensus recommendations were derived for each question based on the best available evidence. RESULTS: Ninety-six studies were included. Risks of ovarian detorsion such as thromboembolism and malignancy were reviewed, demonstrating minimal evidence for unknowingly leaving a malignancy behind in the salvaged ovary and no evidence in the literature of thromboembolic events after detorsion of a torsed ovary. There is no clear evidence supporting the benefit of oophoropexy after a single episode of ovarian torsion. The gross appearance of the ovary does not correlate with long-term ovarian viability or function. Pregnancies have occurred in patients after detorsion of an ovary both spontaneously and with harvested oocytes from previously torsed ovaries. The consensus recommendation for imaging surveillance following ovarian detorsion is an ultrasound at 3months postprocedure but sooner if there is a concern for malignancy. CONCLUSION: There appears to be overwhelming evidence supporting ovarian detorsion rather than oopherectomy for the management of ovarian torsion in pediatric patients. Ovarian salvage is safe and is the preferred treatment for ovarian torsion. Most salvaged ovaries will maintain viability after detorsion. TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review of level 3-4 studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3-4.
Assuntos
Cistos Ovarianos/cirurgia , Doenças Ovarianas/cirurgia , Anormalidade Torcional/cirurgia , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Fertilidade , Humanos , Ovário/patologia , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Variation in management characterizes treatment of infants with a congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM). This review addresses six clinically applicable questions using available evidence to provide recommendations for the treatment of these patients. METHODS: Questions regarding the management of a pediatric patient with a CPAM were generated. English language articles published between 1960 and 2014 were compiled after searching Medline and OvidSP. The articles were divided by subject area and by the question asked, then reviewed and included if they specifically addressed the proposed question. RESULTS: 1040 articles were identified on initial search. After screening abstracts per eligibility criteria, 130 articles were used to answer the proposed questions. Based on the available literature, resection of an asymptomatic CPAM is controversial, and when performed is usually completed within the first six months of life. Lobectomy remains the standard resection method for CPAM, and can be performed thoracoscopically or via thoracotomy. There is no consensus regarding a monitoring protocol for observing asymptomatic lesions, although at least one chest computerized tomogram (CT) should be performed postnatally for lesion characterization. An antenatally identified CPAM can be evaluated with MRI if fetal intervention is being considered, but is not required for the fetus with a lesion not at risk for hydrops. Prenatal consultation should be offered for infants with CPAM and encouraged for those infants in whom characteristics indicate risk of hydrops. CONCLUSIONS: Very few articles provided definitive recommendations for care of the patient with a CPAM and none reported Level I or II evidence. Based on available information, CPAMs are usually resected early in life if at all. A prenatally diagnosed congenital lung lesion should be evaluated postnatally with CT, and prenatal counseling should be undertaken in patients at risk for hydrops.