The incidence of genitourinary and gastrointestinal complications in open and endoscopic gynecologic cancer surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of genitourinary and intestinal tract injuries in an effort to identify which factors might predispose a patient to developing one of these surgical complications. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the charts of gynecologic cancer patients who were treated at a single medical institution from January 2002 to February 2011. The following study variables were noted for evaluation: age, BMI, cancer origin, disease recurrence, a history of pelvic surgery, surgery type, operative approach and injury classification (genitourinary or gastrointestinal). RESULTS: In our group of 1,618 patients, a total of 47 (2.9%) gastrointestinal and 18 (1.1%) genitourinary tract injuries were encountered. There were no intraoperative-related deaths but 2 patients expired 1 month after surgery. Logistic regression indicated that surgery type, undergoing an open procedure, cancerous involvement of the bowel or genitourinary tract and a history of pelvic surgery were significant predictors of operative injury occurrence [χ(2) (28) = 167.22; p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: We ascertained a relatively low incidence of gastrointestinal and genitourinary complications. Nevertheless, undergoing an open procedure, a history of pelvic surgery and surgical involvement of the bowel or genitourinary tract were predictive of an increased risk for these aforementioned injuries.

The utility of routine follow-up procedures in the surveillance of uterine cancer: a 20-year institutional review.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the value of routine follow-up procedures during uterine cancer surveillance and the corresponding cost throughout a 20-year period at a single medical institution. METHODS: We sought to determine which surveillance method (CA-125, imaging, physical examination or vaginal cytology) detected the highest number of patient recurrences and the corresponding cost vis-à-vis the number of identified progressive disease cases. RESULTS: Serial imaging detected the highest number of progressive disease cases but the cost was rather high (USD 17,174 per patient recurrence), whereas CA-125 testing was the least expensive (USD 6,810 per patient recurrence). We also found that those with a variant histology [for example, adenosquamous and uterine papillary serous carcinoma (p < 0.001) and advanced (III/IV) disease stage (p = 0.001)] were associated with an unfavorable progression-free interval. CONCLUSIONS: In the present investigation, serial imaging detected the highest number of progressive disease cases, although no single surveillance method was associated with a sensitive recurrent disease detection rate. Nevertheless, the CA-125 assay appeared to be the most cost-effective method in following patients with epithelial uterine malignancies. Thus, in the context of high-risk disease, a combination of procedures may still be necessary for optimal uterine cancer patient follow-up.