Early silent coronary bypass graft occlusion following coronary bypass surgery, implication of routine coronary computed tomography angiography.

Objective: To evaluate incidence and predictors of early silent bypass occlusion following coronary bypass surgery using cardiac computed tomography angiography. Methods: A total of 439 consecutive patients with mean age of 66 ± 10 years comprising 17% (n = 75) females underwent isolated coronary bypass surgery followed by CT scan before discharge. Graft patency was evaluated in 1,319 anastomoses where 44% (n = 580) arterial and 56% (n = 739) vein graft anastomosis were performed. Cardiovascular risk factors, demographics, and intraoperative variables were analyzed. We conducted univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to analyze variables potentially associated with graft occlusion following CABG. Variables included gender, surgery duration, graft flow, pulsatility index, vein vs. artery graft, and recent MI. Results: Overall incidence of graft occlusion was 2.4% (31/1,319), and it was diagnosed in 6.6% (29/439) of patients. The difference in occlusion between arterial (2.1%) and vein (2.6%) grafts was not significant, p = 0.68. The duration of intervention p = 0.034, cross clamp time p = 0.024 as well the number of distal anastomosis p = 0.034 were significantly higher in occlusion group. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression indicated duration of surgery being predictive for bypass graft occlusion with OR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.01-1.38; p = 0.035. Conclusions: Early graft occlusion was associated with surgical factors. The number of distant anastamoses, along duration of surgical intervention were, significantly influenced the risk of EGO. Prolonged procedural time reflecting complex coronary pathology and time-consuming revascularization procedure was as well associated to the elevated risk of occlusion.

Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Versus Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Agents After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing long-term outcomes between non-vitamin K antagonist (VKA) oral anticoagulant agents (direct oral anticoagulant agents [DOACs]) and VKA anticoagulant agents after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are scarce, with conflicting results. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the periprocedural, short-term, and long-term safety and effectiveness of DOACs vs VKAs in patients undergoing TAVR via femoral access with concomitant indications for oral anticoagulation. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR in the prospective national SwissTAVI Registry between February 2011 and June 2021 were analyzed. Net clinical benefit (a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and life-threatening or major bleeding) and the primary safety endpoint (a composite of life-threatening and major bleeding) were compared between the VKA and DOAC groups at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years after TAVR. RESULTS: After 1:1 propensity score matching, 1,454 patients were available for analysis in each group. There was no significant difference in the rate of the net clinical benefit and the safety endpoints between the groups as assessed at 30 days and 1 and 5 years post-TAVR between VKAs and DOACs. VKAs were associated with significantly higher rates of 1- year (HR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.01-1.62) and 5-year (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.11-1.40) all-cause mortality. Long-term risk for disabling stroke was significantly lower in the VKA group after excluding periprocedural events (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: At 5 years after TAVR, VKAs are associated with a higher risk for all-cause mortality, a lower risk for disabling stroke, and a similar rate of life-threatening or major bleeding compared with DOACs. (SwissTAVI Registry; NCT01368250).

Aortic root rotation: morphological analysis of the aortic root with three-dimensional computed tomography.

OBJECTIVES: The aortic root (AoR) rotation and its spatial morphology at the base of the heart were postulated but not described in every detail. AoR rotation modalities may play an important role in decision-making during AoR surgery and its outcome. The aim was to provide a detailed spatial anatomy of the AoR rotation and its relation to the vital surrounding structure. METHODS: The AoR rotation and its relation to the surrounding structure were assessed in 104 patients with tricuspid aortic valve. The interatrial septum was chosen as a reference to describe AoR rotation that marked the midline of the heart base as a landmark for the AoR rotation direction. Intermediate, clockwise and counterclockwise AoR rotations were defined based on the mentioned reference structures. RESULTS: The AoR rotation was successfully assessed in 104 patients undergoing ascending aorta and or AoR intervention by multidetector row computed tomography. AoR was positioned normally in 53.8% of cases (n = 56) and rotated counterclockwise in 5.8% (n = 6) and clockwise in 40.4% (n = 42) of cases. In clockwise AoR rotation, the right coronary sinus was positioned in proximity to the right atrium and of the tricuspid valve, whereas in a counterclockwise rotation, the noncoronary sinus was placed over the tricuspid valve just over the membranous septum. CONCLUSIONS: The AoR's rotation can be diagnosed using multidetector row computed tomography. Understanding the anatomy of the aortic valve related to rotational position helps guide surgical decision-making in performing AoR reconstruction.

Long-Term Risk of Stroke After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the SwissTAVI Registry.

BACKGROUND: Stroke after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Predictors of stroke and the long-term risk after TAVR remain incompletely understood. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to investigate the short- and long-term incidence and predictors of stroke after TAVR in the SwissTAVI Registry. METHODS: Between February 2011 and June 2021, consecutive patients undergoing TAVR were included. Standardized stroke ratios (SSRs) were calculated to compare trends in stroke of TAVR patients with an age- and sex-matched general population in Switzerland derived from the 2019 Global Burden of Disease study. RESULTS: A total of 11,957 patients (81.8 ± 6.5 years of age, 48.0% female) were included. One-third of the patients (32.3%) had a history of atrial fibrillation, and 11.8% had a history of cerebrovascular accident. The cumulative 30-day incidence rate of stroke was 3.0%, with 69% of stroke events occurring within the first 48 hours after TAVR. The incidence of stroke was 4.3% at 1 year, and 7.8% at 5 years. Compared with an age- and sex-adjusted general population, the risk of stroke was significantly higher in the TAVR population during the first 2 years after TAVR: first year: SSR 7.26 (95% CI: 6.3-8.36) and 6.82 (95% CI: 5.97-7.79) for males and females, respectively; second year: SSR 1.98 (95% CI: 1.47-2.67) and 1.48 (95% CI: 1.09-2.02) for males and females, respectively; but returned to a comparable level to that observed in the matched population thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with an age- and sex-matched population, TAVR patients experienced a higher risk of stroke for up to 2 years after the procedure, and a comparable risk thereafter. (SwissTAVI Registry; NCT01368250).

Combining Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Transapical Aortic Valve Implantation-The Next Level Heart Team Approach.

We present the results of a combined approach for transapical aortic valve replacement and minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (taTAVI-MIDCAB) in patients with combined aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND: For patients presenting with aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease, a simultaneous procedure addressing both diseases is recommended to reduce operative risk. In high-risk patients with hostile femoral or coronary axis, taTAVI-MIDCAB can be an alternative minimally invasive approach, offering the benefits of left interior mammary artery to left anterior descending coronary artery (LIMA-LAD) grafting. METHODS: From 2014 to 2022, 10 patients underwent taTAVI-MIDCAB for combined coronary and severe aortic stenosis in the hybrid operation theater at our institution. We assessed perioperative outcomes and follow-up outcomes. RESULTS: The median age was 83 years (81 to 86). The procedure was successfully performed in all patients without conversion to sternotomy. The median length of hospital and intensive care unit stay was 9 days (7 to 16) and 2.5 days (1 to 5), respectively. The median flow over the coronary artery bypass was 31 (22 to 44) mL/min, with a pulsatility index (PI) of 2.4 (2.1 to 3.2). Mild paravalvular leak occurred in 2 patients (10%). There were no neurological events nor acute kidney injury. Pacemaker implantation was required in 1 patient (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous surgical coronary revascularization and interventional valve implantation in the setting of a hostile femoral and coronary axis appears to be safe and beneficial.

Sex differences in readmission rate after cardiac surgery.

Introduction: The impact of sex on hospital readmission rate after cardiac surgery is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to analyse sex-specific differences and underlying factors in 30-day readmission rate after cardiac surgery. Methods: We conducted a single center study including all patients after major cardiac surgery (excluding aortic dissection and left ventricular assist device implantation) from January 2012 to September 2020. Reasons for readmission were adjudicated according to all available medical records. We calculated incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for female sex with re-admission crude and adjusted for plausible confounding factors using negative binomial regression. Results: 4,868 patients were included in the analysis. The median [Interquartile range] age was 68 [60 to 74] years and 24% (n = 1,149) of the patients were female. Female patients were significantly older (median [IQR] age 70 (63 to 76) vs. 67 (59 to 74), p < 0.001) and had lower body mass index and fewer cardiovascular risk factors compared to men. Isolated valve surgery was more frequent in female while coronary artery bypass grafting was more often in men. 30-day readmission was comparable between both sexes (7.0% [n = 81] in female vs. 8.7% [n = 322] in men; p = 0.078). Cardiac related readmissions and infections were the most common reasons for readmission in both groups. The overall incidence rate ratios of female sex with readmission (0.80, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.03, p = 0.078) remained robust after adjustment for EuroSCORE 2 (0.78, CI 0.61 to 1.0, p = 0.051). Conclusion: Readmission rate and reasons for 30-day readmission after major cardiac surgery were similar between men and women.

Incidence and Outcomes of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Failed Bioprosthetic Valves.

INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a widely used, comparably efficient and safe alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Its utilization continues to grow, especially among younger patients. Despite improvements in durability, degeneration and subsequent re-interventions of failed prosthetic valves are still common. Even though valve-in-valve procedures have become more frequent, little is known about the trends over time or about clinical and echocardiographic long-term outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent a valve-in-valve procedure between December 2011 and December 2022 in a large tertiary university hospital were analyzed. Primary outcomes were defined as procedural and device successes as well as event-free survival. Secondary analyses between subsets of patients divided by index valve and date of procedure were performed. RESULTS: Among 1407 procedures, 58 (4%) were valve-in-valve interventions, with an increased frequency observed over time. Overall, technical success was achieved in 88% and device success in 85% of patients. Complications were predominantly minor, with similar success rates among TAVR-in-SAVR (TiSAVR) and TAVR-in-TAVR (TiTAVR). Notably, there were significant and lasting improvements in mean echocardiographic gradients at 1 year. Event-free survival was 76% at one month and 69% at one year. CONCLUSIONS: Over the last decade, a rising trend of valve-in-valve procedures was observed. Despite an increase in procedures, complications show a contrasting decline with improved technical and device success over time. TiSAVR and TiTAVR showed comparable rates of procedural and device success as well as similar outcomes, highlighting the utility of valve-in-valve procedures in an aging population.

Combined Band and Plate Fixation as a New Individual Option for Patients at Risk of Sternal Complications after Cardiac Surgery: A Single-Center Experience.

Due to the advent of interventional therapies for low- and intermediate-risk patients, case complexity has increased in cardiac surgery over the last decades. Despite the surgical progress achieved to keep up with the increase in the number of high-risk patients, the prevention of sternal complications remains a challenge requiring new, individualized sternal closure techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility, as well as the in-hospital and long-term outcomes, of enhanced sternal closure with combined band and plate fixation using the new SternaLock® 360 (SL360) system as an alternative to sternal wiring. From 2020 to 2022, 17 patients underwent enhanced sternal closure using the SL360 at our institution. We analyzed perioperative data, as well as clinical and radiologic follow-up data. The results were as follows: In total, 82% of the patients were treated with the SL360 based on perioperative risk factors, while in 18% of cases, the SL360 was used for secondary closure due to sternal instability. No perioperative complications were observed. We obtained the follow-up data of 82% of the patients (median follow-up time: 141 (47.8 to 511.5) days), showing no surgical revision, no sternal instability, no deep wound infections, and no sternal pain at the follow-up. In one case, a superficial wound infection was treated with antibiotics. In conclusion, enhanced sternal closure with the SL360 is easy to perform, effective, and safe. This system might be considered for both primary and secondary sternal closure in patients at risk of sternal complications.

Severe structural valve deterioration after TAVR with ACURATE Neo: report of two cases.

Structural valve deterioration (SVD) of transcatheter implanted aortic valve (TAVR) prostheses leading to prosthesis dysfunction is an uncommon yet increasingly described complication. Literature is scarce on specific mechanisms and clinical presentation of SVD after TAVR, notably on self-expanding valve ACURATE Neo. We report on two cases with severe bioprosthetic failure after ACURATE Neo implantation due to leaflet disruption, and we treated them with surgical aortic valve replacement. Based on the literature, we further discuss the incidence of SVD after TAVR, the durability of ACURATE NEO, and the modes of failure of biological valve prostheses.

Transapical Transcatheter Mitral Valve Implantation with the Tendyne Valve: The Swiss Experience.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to report outcomes of all patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve implantation with the Tendyne Mitral Valve System (Tendyne) in Switzerland. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed preoperative echocardiographic and computed tomography (CT) data, procedural findings, and 30-day and 1-year follow-up echocardiographic and clinical data of patients who underwent transcatheter mitral valve implantation with Tendyne in Switzerland. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients (age, 74.8 ± 7.8 years; 67% male) underwent transapical transcatheter mitral valve implantation with Tendyne between June 2020 and October 2022. Technical success rate was 96%. In five patients, concomitant interventions in the form of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (one patient), minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (one patient), and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (three patients) were performed prior to or after the index procedure. There was one device embolization, and two patients required valve retrieval. In-hospital outcomes included one stroke and three major bleeding events. None of the patients died within 30 days. Two patients were rehospitalized for decompensated heart failure. At 1-year follow-up, there were three noncardiovascular-related deaths. CONCLUSION: Transcatheter mitral valve implantation with Tendyne is feasible to treat polymorbid patients suffering from complex mitral valve disease as well as patients with previous mitral interventions. Perioperative risk was acceptable and procedural success high.

Clinical Outcomes in High-Gradient, Classical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient, and Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Report From the SwissTAVI Registry.

Background In view of the rising global burden of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, its early recognition and treatment is key. Although patients with classical low-flow, low-gradient (C-LFLG) aortic stenosis have higher rates of death after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) when compared with patients with high-gradient (HG) aortic stenosis, there is conflicting evidence on the death rate in patients with severe paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient (P-LFLG) aortic stenosis. Therefore, we aimed to compare outcomes in real-world patients with severe HG, C-LFLG, and P-LFLG aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. Methods and Results Clinical outcomes up to 5 years were addressed in the 3 groups of patients enrolled in the prospective, national, multicenter SwissTAVI registry. A total of 8914 patients undergoing TAVI at 15 heart valve centers in Switzerland were analyzed for the purpose of this study. We observed a significant difference in time to death at 1 year after TAVI, with the lowest observed in HG (8.8%) aortic stenosis, followed by P-LFLG (11.5%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.35 [95% CI, 1.16-1.56]; P<0.001) and C-LFLG (19.8%; HR, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.64-2.26]; P<0.001) aortic stenosis. Cardiovascular death showed similar differences between the groups. At 5 years, the all-cause death rate was 44.4% in HG, 52.1% in P-LFLG (HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.23-1.48]; P<0.001), and 62.8% in C-LFLG aortic stenosis (HR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.54-1.88]; P<0.001). Conclusions Up to 5 years after TAVI, patients with P-LFLG have higher death rates than patients with HG aortic stenosis but lower death rates than patients with C-LFLG aortic stenosis.

Five-Year Survival of Patients Treated with Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass (MIDCAB) Compared with the General Swiss Population.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the midterm follow-up and 5-year survival outcome of the minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) procedure compared with the survival of the general Swiss population. METHODS: Retrospective study on preoperative data, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcome of patients who underwent MIDCAB surgery between June 2010 and February 2019. To assess validity of this surgical therapy, outcomes were compared with survival data of a gender- and age-matched cohort of the general Swiss population taken from the database of the Swiss Federal Statistical Office. RESULTS: A total of 88 patients were included. Median (interquartile range [IQR[) age was 66 (56-75) years, and 27% (n = 24) were female. The median (IQR) length of the in-hospital stay was 7 (6-8) days. No postoperative stroke occurred. The 30-day mortality was 1.1% (n = 1). Reintervention for failed left internal mammary artery was needed in 1.1% (n = 1). The median (IQR) ejection fraction was 58% (47-60) preoperatively and remained stable during follow-up. The median (IQR) follow-up period was 3 (1.1-5.2) years. Five years postoperatively, 83% (confidence interval, 69-91) of the patients were alive, showing an overlap with the range of survival of the matched subcohort of the general Swiss population (range, 84-100%). CONCLUSION: Though suffering from coronary heart disease, patients after MIDCAB show almost equal survival rates as an equivalent subcohort corresponding to the general Swiss population matched on age and gender. Thus, our data show this treatment to be safe and beneficial.

Minimally Invasive Nonresectional Mitral Valve Repair Long-term Results.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the outcomes of the minimally invasive nonresectional technique over 10 years in patients with severe mitral valve insufficiency. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 365 patients undergoing a minimally invasive complete endoscopic mitral valve repair for mitral valve insufficiency was conducted between May 2009 and September 2021. All patients underwent the nonresectional repair approach using artificial neochordae implantation or ring annuloplasty. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-ups were performed. RESULTS: The minimal invasive procedure was successfully performed in all patients. The mean age was 61 ± 11, and 36% were female patients. The surgical success was 99.7%, with no conversion to sternotomy or to mitral valve replacement at 30 days. In 1 case (0.27%), mitral valve related reoperation was performed during the hospital stay. The procedural safety was 92%, with in-hospital mortality in 0.55% (n = 2), stroke in 0.55% (n = 2), and perioperative myocardial infarction in 0.82% (n = 3) patients. The mean follow up was 5.3 ± 2.9 years. Survival at 5 and 10 years was 96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94%-98%) and 83% (95% CI, 72%-90%). Freedom of myocardial infarction, stroke, and congestive heart failure at 10 years was 95% (95% CI, 88%-98%), 86% (95% CI, 75%-92%), and 93% (95% CI, 89%-96%), respectively. Recurrent mitral valve insufficiency ≥ + 2 was diagnosed in 4.9% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive nonresectional mitral valve repair technique can be performed for severe mitral valve regurgitation with excellent long-term results. The procedure is safe, with minimal risk of reoperation and recurrent mitral valve insufficiency at long term.

Long-Term Follow-Up after Mycobacterium Chimaera Infection Following Cardiac Surgery: Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Disseminated Mycobacterium chimaera (M. chimaera) infection following cardiac surgery has been associated with a high mortality. The long-term impact of surgery and the appropriate surgical approach are still matters of debate. METHODS: From 2015 to 2019, seven patients with M. chimaera infection following cardiac surgery were isolated. RESULTS: The median incubation time was 30 months (IQR 18-38). Echocardiography was unremarkable in three patients (43%). We decided to redo cardiac surgery in all patients and explanted all previously implanted prosthetic material. All explant cultures yielded M. chimaera. One patient (14%) died in-hospital seven months after the redo surgery. After a median follow-up of 59.6 months (IQR 39.1-69.6), we observed three infection relapses among the survivors (43%), presumably due to concomitant extracardiac infection and recurrent cardiac implant infection. CONCLUSIONS: M. chimaera infection following cardiac surgery is associated with a delayed and unspecific clinical presentation. Echocardiogaphy has a limited sensitivity for prosthetic valve infection with M. chimaera, and negative findings should not preclude the surgical decision. The extraction of all previously implanted material is crucial to achieving the source control, as the re-implantation of prosthetic material as well as uncontrolled extracardiac infection at the time of the redo cardiac surgery appear to be key factors for persisting/relapsing infection.

Hyperacute T Wave in the Early Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The diagnostic performance of T-wave amplitudes for the detection of myocardial infarction is largely unknown. We aimed to address this knowledge gap. METHODS: T-wave amplitudes were automatically measured in 12-lead ECGs of patients presenting with acute chest discomfort to the emergency department within a prospective diagnostic multicenter study. The final diagnosis was centrally adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists. Patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, complete left bundle branch block, or paced ventricular depolarization were excluded. The performance for lead-specific 95th-percentile thresholds were reported as likelihood ratios (lr), specificity, and sensitivity. RESULTS: Myocardial infarction was the final diagnosis in 445 (18%) of 2457 patients. In most leads, T-wave amplitudes tended to be greater in patients without myocardial infarction than those with myocardial infarction, and T-wave amplitude exceeding the 95th percentile had positive and negative lr close to 1 or with confidence intervals (CIs) crossing 1. The exceptions were leads III, aVR, and V1, which had positive lrs of 3.8 (95% CI, 2.7 to 5.3), 4.3 (95% CI, 3.1 to 6.0) and 2.0 (95% CI, 1.4 to 2.9), respectively. These leads normally have inverted T waves, so T-wave amplitude exceeding the 95th percentile reflects upright rather than increased-amplitude hyperacute T waves. CONCLUSION: Hyperacute T waves, when defined as increased T-wave amplitude exceeding the 95th percentile, did not provide useful information in diagnosing myocardial infarction in this sample.

Similar 5-Year Survival in Transfemoral and Transapical TAVI Patients: A Single-Center Experience.

Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TA-TAVI) is generally considered to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality compared with transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation TAVI (TF-TAVI). We aimed to compare different patient risk profiles, access-related complications, and long-term survival using inverse probability treatment weighting. This is a retrospective, single-center analysis of 925 consecutive patients with aortic valve stenosis undergoing TF-TAVI (n = 802) or TA-TAVI (n = 123) at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, as a single procedure between September 2011 and August 2020. Baseline characteristics revealed a higher perioperative risk as reflected in the EuroSCORE II (geometric mean 2.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 2.4) vs. 3.7 (CI 3.1 to 4.5); before inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) p < 0.001) in the transfemoral than in the transapical group, respectively. After 30 days, TF-TAVI patients had a higher incidence of any bleeding than TA-TAVI patients (TF-TAVI n = 146 vs. TA-TAVI n = 15; weighted hazard ratio (HR) 0.52 (0.29 to 0.95); p = 0.032). After 5 years, all-cause mortality did not differ between the two groups (TF-TAVI n = 162 vs. TA-TAVI n = 45; weighted HR 1.31, (0.92 to 1.88); p = 0.138). With regard to our data, we could demonstrate, despite a higher perioperative risk, the short- and long-term safety and efficacy of the transapical approach for TAVI therapies. Though at higher perioperative risk, transapically treated patients suffered from less bleeding or vascular complications than transfemorally treated patients. It is of utmost interest that 5-year mortality did not differ between the groups.

Detrimental consequences after intimal disruption of subclavian artery during transcathether aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: TAVI via the left subclavian artery is considered a bail-out strategy in cases where a transfemoral approach is not feasible. However, since this route is only scarcely used, major complications can arise. We describe such an adverse course and present our proceeding. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old man with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) was referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) via left subclavian artery. After uneventful deployment of the TAVI prosthesis, consequent valve assessment with transeosophageal echocardiography and angiography showed a highly mobile and tubular structure shifting within the valve. We went for a surgical extraction via sternotomy on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). A 6 cm longish intimal cylinder was hassle-free extracted. 4 days postoperatively the left sided radial pulse was missing. In a subsequent computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan a proximal dissection as well as an intimal flap, causing a subtotal stenosis of the left subclavian artery, was detected. Consecutively the intimal cylinder was removed using a Fogarty-balloon. Pre-discharge control revealed recurrence of peripheral radial pulse and an unimpeded function of the TAVI prosthesis. The patient presented no sequela at discharge. CONCLUSION: Though TAVI is a well-advanced technique complications are not completely avertable. It is thus advisable to have patients discussed in the heart team encompassing all potentially involved specialties.

Minimal Extracorporeal Circulation and Microplegia in the Setting of Urgent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Background: We aimed to analyse the performance of minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) concomitantly with Microplegia, in patients with recent myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing urgent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. Methods: We included patients with a recent MI (≤7 days) undergoing isolated CABG surgery using MiECC. The primary endpoint was a major cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event (MACCE). In a secondary analysis, we compared our institutional Microplegia concept with the use of a crystalloid single-shot cardioplegic solution. Results: In total, 139 patients (mean ± standard deviation (SD) age 66 ± 10 years) underwent urgent CABG surgery using Microplegia; 55% (n = 77) of the patients had an acute MI within 1−7 days preoperatively; 20% (n = 28) had an acute MI within 6−24 h; and 24% (n = 34) had an acute MI within <6 h preoperatively. The number of distal anastomoses was a geometric mean of 4 (95% confidence interval 3−4). The MACCE and in-hospital mortality were 7% (n = 10) and 1% (n = 2), respectively. The results were confirmed in a secondary analysis comparing Microplegia with crystalloid cardioplegic solution (n = 271). Conclusion: The use of MiECC with Microplegia in urgent CABG surgery is feasible and safe and provides a straight-forward intraoperative setting. Therefore, it can also be considered to retain the benefits of MiECC in urgent CABG surgery.

First-in-man concomitant mitral valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting using a single minimally invasive access.

We present the case of a 78-year-old woman suffering from coronary artery disease and secondary severe mitral valve regurgitation due to left ventricular and annular distention. The interdisciplinary heart team recommended a simultaneous hybrid procedure consisting of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting with subsequent transapical mitral valve replacement using the Tendyne prosthesis via the same small anterolateral thoracotomy. The operation was performed using a heart-team approach with close collaboration between heart surgeons and cardiologists in the hybrid operating theatre. The intra- and postoperative courses were uneventful. Predischarge transthoracic echocardiography on postoperative day 8 revealed the immaculate functioning of the implanted valve without para- or transvalvular insufficiency, a mean gradient of 2 mmHg, no left ventricular outflow tract obstruction and a stable ejection fraction of 50%. The combination of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting revascularization with concomitant transapical mitral valve replacement is feasible and enables a further step towards minimally invasive therapy, even in complex situations. It shows that the modern heart-team approach exceeds mere decision making and expands towards a hybrid treatment for patients.

Outcome of patients with double valve surgery between 2009 and 2018 at University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.

BACKGROUND: In isolated mitral valve regurgitation general consensus on surgery is to favor repair over replacement excluding rheumatic etiology or endocarditis. If concomitant aortic valve replacement is performed however, clinical evidence is more ambiguous and no explicit guidelines exist on the choice of mitral valve treatment. Both, double valve replacement (DVR) and aortic valve replacement in combination with concomitant mitral valve repair (AVR + MVP) have been proven to be feasible procedures. In our single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study, we compared the outcome of these two surgical techniques focusing on mortality and morbidity. METHODS: 89 patients underwent DVR (n = 41) or AVR + MVP (n = 48) in our institution between 2009 and 2018. Follow-up data was collected using electronic patient records, by contacting treating physicians and by telephone interviews. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to analyze mortality during follow-up and Cox regression to investigate potential predictors of mortality. RESULTS: During a median follow-up duration of 4.5 [IQR 2.9 to 6.1] years, there was no significant difference in mortality between both cohorts. Thirty days mortality was 6.3% in the DVR and 7% in the AVR + MVP cohort. Overall mortality amounted to 17% for DVR and 23% for AVR + MVP. DVR was the preferred procedure for valve disease of rheumatic etiology and for endocarditis, while in degenerative valves AVR + MVP was predominant. More biological valves were used in the AVR + MVP cohort (p < 0.001) and more mechanical valves were implanted in the DVR cohort. The rate of rehospitalization, deterioration of left ventricular ejection fraction and postoperative complications were equally distributed among the two cohorts. CONCLUSION: Our data analysis showed that both DVR and AVR + MVP are safe and feasible options for double valve surgery. Based on our findings we could not prove superiority of one surgical technique over the other. Choosing the appropriate procedure for the patient should be influenced by valve etiology, patients' comorbidities and the surgeons' experience. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This was a retrospectively registered trial, registered on April 1st 2018, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03667274.