Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Elife ; 102021 09 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34553686

RESUMO

The gut is the primary interface between an animal and food, but how it adapts to qualitative dietary variation is poorly defined. We find that the Drosophila midgut plastically resizes following changes in dietary composition. A panel of nutrients collectively promote gut growth, which sugar opposes. Diet influences absolute and relative levels of enterocyte loss and stem cell proliferation, which together determine cell numbers. Diet also influences enterocyte size. A high sugar diet inhibits translation and uncouples intestinal stem cell proliferation from expression of niche-derived signals, but, surprisingly, rescuing these effects genetically was not sufficient to modify diet's impact on midgut size. However, when stem cell proliferation was deficient, diet's impact on enterocyte size was enhanced, and reducing enterocyte-autonomous TOR signaling was sufficient to attenuate diet-dependent midgut resizing. These data clarify the complex relationships between nutrition, epithelial dynamics, and cell size, and reveal a new mode of plastic, diet-dependent organ resizing.


Assuntos
Dieta , Drosophila melanogaster/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Trato Gastrointestinal/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Animais , Animais Geneticamente Modificados , Proliferação de Células , Drosophila melanogaster/fisiologia , Enterócitos/citologia , Feminino , Trato Gastrointestinal/citologia , Trato Gastrointestinal/fisiologia , Masculino , Nicho de Células-Tronco
2.
G3 (Bethesda) ; 8(11): 3469-3480, 2018 11 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30190420

RESUMO

Resistance to insecticides has evolved in multiple insect species, leading to increased application rates and even control failures. Understanding the genetic basis of insecticide resistance is fundamental for mitigating its impact on crop production and disease control. We performed a GWAS approach with the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) to identify the mutations involved in resistance to two widely used classes of insecticides: organophosphates (OPs, parathion) and pyrethroids (deltamethrin). Most variation in parathion resistance was associated with mutations in the target gene Ace, while most variation in deltamethrin resistance was associated with mutations in Cyp6a23, a gene encoding a detoxification enzyme never previously associated with resistance. A "nested GWAS" further revealed the contribution of other loci: Dscam1 and trpl were implicated in resistance to parathion, but only in lines lacking WolbachiaCyp6a17, the paralogous gene of Cyp6a23, and CG7627, an ATP-binding cassette transporter, were implicated in deltamethrin resistance. We observed signatures of recent selective sweeps at all of these resistance loci and confirmed that the soft sweep at Ace is indeed driven by the identified resistance mutations. Analysis of allele frequencies in additional population samples revealed that most resistance mutations are segregating across the globe, but that frequencies can vary substantially among populations. Altogether, our data reveal that the widely used OP and pyrethroid insecticides imposed a strong selection pressure on natural insect populations. However, it remains unclear why, in Drosophila, resistance evolved due to changes in the target site for OPs, but due to a detoxification enzyme for pyrethroids.


Assuntos
Drosophila melanogaster/genética , Genoma de Inseto , Resistência a Inseticidas/genética , Animais , Drosophila melanogaster/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Variação Genética , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Inseticidas/toxicidade , Masculino , Organofosfatos/toxicidade , Piretrinas/toxicidade , Seleção Genética
3.
PLoS Pathog ; 14(2): e1006847, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29394281

RESUMO

Host responses to infection encompass many processes in addition to activation of the immune system, including metabolic adaptations, stress responses, tissue repair, and other reactions. The response to bacterial infection in Drosophila melanogaster has been classically described in studies that focused on the immune response elicited by a small set of largely avirulent microbes. Thus, we have surprisingly limited knowledge of responses to infection that are outside the canonical immune response, of how the response to pathogenic infection differs from that to avirulent bacteria, or even of how generic the response to various microbes is and what regulates that core response. In this study, we addressed these questions by profiling the D. melanogaster transcriptomic response to 10 bacteria that span the spectrum of virulence. We found that each bacterium triggers a unique transcriptional response, with distinct genes making up to one third of the response elicited by highly virulent bacteria. We also identified a core set of 252 genes that are differentially expressed in response to the majority of bacteria tested. Among these, we determined that the transcription factor CrebA is a novel regulator of infection tolerance. Knock-down of CrebA significantly increased mortality from microbial infection without any concomitant change in bacterial number. Upon infection, CrebA is upregulated by both the Toll and Imd pathways in the fat body, where it is required to induce the expression of secretory pathway genes. Loss of CrebA during infection triggered endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and activated the unfolded protein response (UPR), which contributed to infection-induced mortality. Altogether, our study reveals essential features of the response to bacterial infection and elucidates the function of a novel regulator of infection tolerance.


Assuntos
Proteína A de Ligação a Elemento de Resposta do AMP Cíclico/metabolismo , Proteínas de Drosophila/metabolismo , Drosophila melanogaster/imunologia , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolismo , Regulação da Expressão Gênica no Desenvolvimento , Interações Hospedeiro-Patógeno , Tolerância Imunológica , Imunidade Inata , Imunidade Adaptativa , Animais , Animais Geneticamente Modificados , Carga Bacteriana , Vacinas Bacterianas/administração & dosagem , Proteína A de Ligação a Elemento de Resposta do AMP Cíclico/antagonistas & inibidores , Proteína A de Ligação a Elemento de Resposta do AMP Cíclico/genética , Proteínas de Drosophila/antagonistas & inibidores , Proteínas de Drosophila/genética , Drosophila melanogaster/genética , Drosophila melanogaster/microbiologia , Estresse do Retículo Endoplasmático , Corpo Adiposo/imunologia , Corpo Adiposo/metabolismo , Corpo Adiposo/microbiologia , Corpo Adiposo/patologia , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Biblioteca Gênica , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/imunologia , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/patogenicidade , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/fisiologia , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/imunologia , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/patogenicidade , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/fisiologia , Masculino , Interferência de RNA , Análise de Sobrevida , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/administração & dosagem , Virulência
4.
PLoS Genet ; 13(11): e1007091, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29108021

RESUMO

Cytokine signaling is responsible for coordinating conserved epithelial regeneration and immune responses in the digestive tract. In the Drosophila midgut, Upd3 is a major cytokine, which is induced in enterocytes (EC) and enteroblasts (EB) upon oral infection, and initiates intestinal stem cell (ISC) dependent tissue repair. To date, the genetic network directing upd3 transcription remains largely uncharacterized. Here, we have identified the key infection-responsive enhancers of the upd3 gene and show that distinct enhancers respond to various stresses. Furthermore, through functional genetic screening, bioinformatic analyses and yeast one-hybrid screening, we determined that the transcription factors Scalloped (Sd), Mothers against dpp (Mad), and D-Fos are principal regulators of upd3 expression. Our study demonstrates that upd3 transcription in the gut is regulated by the activation of multiple pathways, including the Hippo, TGF-ß/Dpp, and Src, as well as p38-dependent MAPK pathways. Thus, these essential pathways, which are known to control ISC proliferation cell-autonomously, are also activated in ECs to promote tissue turnover the regulation of upd3 transcription.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/metabolismo , Drosophila/genética , Drosophila/microbiologia , Transdução de Sinais , Animais , Infecções Bacterianas/genética , Proliferação de Células , Proteínas de Drosophila/genética , Proteínas de Drosophila/metabolismo , Enterócitos/metabolismo , Feminino , Regulação da Expressão Gênica , Redes Reguladoras de Genes , Intestinos/citologia , Intestinos/microbiologia , Peptídeos e Proteínas de Sinalização Intracelular/genética , Peptídeos e Proteínas de Sinalização Intracelular/metabolismo , Sistema de Sinalização das MAP Quinases , Masculino , Pectobacterium carotovorum/metabolismo , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinases/genética , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinases/metabolismo , Pseudomonas/metabolismo , Células-Tronco/microbiologia , Fatores de Transcrição/genética , Fatores de Transcrição/metabolismo , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta/genética , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta/metabolismo
5.
Elife ; 62017 10 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29022878

RESUMO

A central problem in infection biology is understanding why two individuals exposed to identical infections have different outcomes. We have developed an experimental model where genetically identical, co-housed Drosophila given identical systemic infections experience different outcomes, with some individuals succumbing to acute infection while others control the pathogen as an asymptomatic persistent infection. We found that differences in bacterial burden at the time of death did not explain the two outcomes of infection. Inter-individual variation in survival stems from variation in within-host bacterial growth, which is determined by the immune response. We developed a model that captures bacterial growth dynamics and identifies key factors that predict the infection outcome: the rate of bacterial proliferation and the time required for the host to establish an effective immunological control. Our results provide a framework for studying the individual host-pathogen parameters governing the progression of infection and lead ultimately to life or death.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/imunologia , Infecções Bacterianas/patologia , Drosophila melanogaster/fisiologia , Interações Hospedeiro-Patógeno , Animais , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Drosophila melanogaster/imunologia , Drosophila melanogaster/microbiologia , Análise de Sobrevida
6.
Cell Rep ; 12(2): 346-58, 2015 Jul 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26146076

RESUMO

Deciphering contributions of specific cell types to organ function is experimentally challenging. The Drosophila midgut is a dynamic organ with five morphologically and functionally distinct regions (R1-R5), each composed of multipotent intestinal stem cells (ISCs), progenitor enteroblasts (EBs), enteroendocrine cells (EEs), enterocytes (ECs), and visceral muscle (VM). To characterize cellular specialization and regional function in this organ, we generated RNA-sequencing transcriptomes of all five cell types isolated by FACS from each of the five regions, R1-R5. In doing so, we identify transcriptional diversities among cell types and document regional differences within each cell type that define further specialization. We validate cell-specific and regional Gal4 drivers; demonstrate roles for transporter Smvt and transcription factors GATAe, Sna, and Ptx1 in global and regional ISC regulation, and study the transcriptional response of midgut cells upon infection. The resulting transcriptome database (http://flygutseq.buchonlab.com) will foster studies of regionalization, homeostasis, immunity, and cell-cell interactions.


Assuntos
Drosophila/metabolismo , Intestinos/citologia , Transcriptoma , Músculos Abdominais/citologia , Músculos Abdominais/metabolismo , Animais , Diferenciação Celular , Proliferação de Células , Sobrevivência Celular , Drosophila/genética , Proteínas de Drosophila/antagonistas & inibidores , Proteínas de Drosophila/genética , Proteínas de Drosophila/metabolismo , Enterócitos/citologia , Enterócitos/metabolismo , Células Enteroendócrinas/citologia , Células Enteroendócrinas/metabolismo , Fatores de Transcrição GATA/antagonistas & inibidores , Fatores de Transcrição GATA/genética , Fatores de Transcrição GATA/metabolismo , Mucosa Intestinal/metabolismo , Análise de Componente Principal , Interferência de RNA , RNA Interferente Pequeno/metabolismo , Fatores de Transcrição da Família Snail , Células-Tronco/citologia , Células-Tronco/metabolismo , Simportadores/metabolismo , Fatores de Transcrição/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA