RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of sustained hypogonadism after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) associated with radiotherapy in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS). METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of 213 consecutive PCa patients referred for radiotherapy plus ADT was carried out. Follow-up times including time to testosterone recovery (TTR) and bRFS were calculated from the end of ADT. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses predicting bRFS were used. The optimal cutoffs for TTR and duration of ADT were determined using the maximally selected rank statistics (MSRS). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 104 months, 18 patients relapsed among those who had recovered testosterone levels and 9 among those who did not. Median ADT duration was 36 months. The optimal cutoff for TTR was determined using MSRS. TTR >48 months was significantly associated with better bRFS (logrank, pâ¯< 0.0027). Five-year bRFS was 100% for >48 months vs. 85% for <48 months. TTR was the only significant variable for bRFS in multivariate Cox analysis. CONCLUSION: Our data show an association between longer TTR and bRFS values among PCa patients treated with ADT.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of single-fraction high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and single-fraction low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy as the sole treatment for primary prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A quasi-randomized study that allocated, from March 2008 to February 2012, 129 low and intermediate risk prostate cancer patients to one single-fraction HDR of 19 Gy (61 patients) or to a 145 Gy 125 I LDR permanent implant (68 patients. Biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 72 months in the HDR group, 26 patients relapsed, and after a median follow-up of 84 months in the LDR group, 7 patients relapsed (p < 0.0001). The 5-year bRFS was significantly better for the LDR group than for the HDR group (93.7% and 61.1%, respectively) (p < 0.0001). The 5-year OS also was significantly better in the LDR group (95.5% vs. 89.9%) (p = 0.0436). CONCLUSIONS: Permanent LDR prostate implant brachytherapy offers better clinical outcomes than single-fraction HDR for prostate cancer.