Implant-Based Gluteal Augmentation: Comparing Complications Between Single- and Double-Incision Techniques.

BACKGROUND: Gluteal implants are gaining popularity as an alternative to fat grafting for gluteal augmentation. This study aims to compare complication rates between single- and double-incision techniques for implant placement in gluteal augmentation from a single surgeon's experience. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a single surgeon's implant-based gluteal augmentations was conducted between October 2018 and August 2022. Consecutive patient cases were reviewed at the beginning and end of the designated period to compare both incision techniques after switching from the single- to double-incision technique in September 2020. Demographics and postoperative complications were compared. Statistical comparisons were made using the independent sample t-test for quantitative variables and the Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: The study included 134 single-incision patients (247 implants) and 47 double-incision patients (91 implants). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups were similar. Overall complication rate per implant was higher in the single-incision group (16.6% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.02). The most common complication per implant was delayed wound healing (single incision: 9.7%, double incision: 5.5%). The odds ratio of developing at least one complication in the double compared to the single-incision group was 0.44 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: The double incision technique demonstrates a lower complication rate than the single-incision technique for implant-based gluteal augmentation. The most common complication in both groups was delayed wound healing which responded in most patients to conservative wound care. These results support using the double-incision technique for implant-based gluteal augmentation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Play Ball: A 10-Year Comparative Analysis of Craniofacial Safety in Baseball and Softball.

INTRODUCTION: Within the United States, the number of players participating in baseball increased by nearly 21% to 15.9 million between 2014 and 2019. Additionally, batting helmets with face-masks are encouraged yet optional in youth baseball as well as college baseball and softball. in light of inconsistencies in safety equipment enforcement and usage, this study aims to perform a comparative analysis of the number and frequency of baseball and softball-related craniofacial injuries (CFis). METHODS: Data regarding baseball and softball-related injuries were gathered from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database from 2011 to 2020. Craniofacial injuries were isolated and organized into 5-year age groups beginning with 5 to 9 years and ending with 25 to 29 years of age. Data was further stratified by location and type of injury. Injury types specifically reported in this study included concussion, contusion, fracture, and laceration. RESULTS: Distribution of injuries across age groups differed significantly between baseball and softball ( P < 0.001). When comparing the 10 to 14 year old group to the 15 to 19 year old group, we found that concussions and head contusions comprise a significantly greater proportion of all injuries in softball than in baseball. Conversely, facial fractures, facial lacerations, and mouth lacerations comprise a significantly greater proportion ofinjuries in baseball than in softball. CONCLUSION: Future prospective studies aiming to better characterize the within-game nature of these reported CFIs would certainly be beneficial in guiding the baseball and softball communities toward consideration of implementing maximally efficacious updates to current safety equipment standards.

Cadaver Nerve Grafts: Past, Present and Future.

Nerve grafts represent an invaluable tool, when reconstructing nerve defects of more than 1 cm. Historically, the criterion standard use of autografts has relied on the premise of using nonessential sensory nerves to fulfill the principle of replacing "like with like," while simultaneously minimizing the infliction of undue morbidity on the patient. The reconstructive surgeon thus faces a dilemma when extensive nerve damage requires reconstruction, or when donor nerves are not available or limited such as in the pediatric population. Cadaver nerve grafts (CNG) uniquely allow for reconstruction of large nerve lesions without the presence of host morbidity. The following article reviews the use of CNG, its indications, advantages, and disadvantages, as well as provides some case studies of real-world application. In addition, an insight into the future perspectives of CNG is provided.

Cutaneous Histoplasmosis in a Renal Transplant Patient Presenting With Hand and Forearm Necrotizing Myofasciitis.

Histoplasmosis rarely manifests as a primary infection of the extremities, but when it does, the damage inflicted can be severe. We present a case report of cutaneous histoplasmosis of the upper extremity due to direct inoculation in a renal transplant patient, presenting as myofasciitis. The patient initially had a salvaged upper extremity that was functional, but a persistent infection recurred with aggressive myofasciitis requiring a subsequent amputation.

Safe Plastic Surgery of the Breast II: Saving Nipple Sensation.

Background: Since its inception, reduction mammoplasty has matured considerably. Primary evolution in clinical research and practice initially focused on developing techniques to preserve tissue viability; breast parenchyma, skin, and nipple tissue that has expanded to include sensation and erectile function play a large role in the physical intimacy of women. Studies regarding primary innervation to the nipple are few and often contradictory. Our past anatomical study demonstrated that primary innervation to the nipple to come from the lateral branch of the fourth intercostal nerve. We propose an unsafe zone in which dissection during reduction mammoplasty ought to be avoided to preserve nipple sensation. Objective: To identify the trajectory of innervation to the nipple and translate these findings to the clinical setting so as to preserve nipple sensation. Methods: Eighty-six patients underwent reduction mammoplasty using the Wise pattern inferior pedicle (n = 72), vertical Hall-Findlay superomedial pedicle (n = 11), and Drape pattern inferior pedicle (n = 3). Aggressive dissection in the most superficial and deep tissue in the inferolateral quadrant of the breast was avoided. Results: All 86 patients reported having the same normal sensation to the breast at postoperative evaluation. Conclusions: The fourth intercostal nerve provides the major innervation to the nipple-areola complex. Avoiding dissection in inferolateral quadrant "unsafe zone" of the breast during reduction mammoplasty can reliably spare nipple sensation and maximize patient outcomes.

Pseudoptosis Correction With the 270° Pedicle Reduction Mammoplasty: An Anatomic and Clinical Study.

Background: Reduction mammoplasty techniques have evolved considerably. Today, aesthetically pleasing results and preservation of nipple sensation and vascularity are emphasized. Achieving the aforementioned goals for the patient with pseudoptosis remains challenging. Objective: We present 270° pedicle reduction mammoplasty as a safe and direct technique for treatment of pseudoptosis to reduce size and improve breast shape. Methods: Circumareolar subcutaneous dissection of 10 breasts (5 cadavers) was performed to identify the nerves from the chest wall to the nipple. The trajectory of the nerves to the nipple was identified and dissected to their origin of penetration of the chest fascia. This information provides the basis for lateral chest wall tissue preservation for preserved nipple-areolar innervation, which is incorporated into this technique. Retrospective review of a single surgeon's experience with the 270° pedicle technique for reduction mammoplasty over a 1-year period was performed. Results: Anatomic dissection identified 3 to 5 branches of the fourth intercostal nerve to primarily innervate the nipple on 8 of 10 breast dissections. Accessory innervation from the fifth intercostal nerve provided lateral branches to the nipple in 5 of 10 specimens. Five patients underwent reduction mammoplasty with the 270° pedicle technique. No complications were identified. Excellent aesthetic outcomes were achieved on the basis of patient-reported satisfaction and the surgeon's judgment. All patients demonstrated normal nipple sensation at postoperative follow-up. Follow-up at 1 year did not demonstrate recurrence of ptosis/pseudoptosis or change in nipple position. Conclusions: The 270° technique for pedicle reduction mammoplasty yields aesthetically pleasing results and symptomatic relief from macromastia and preserves nipple sensation.

Plastic Surgery of the Breast: Keeping the Nipple Sensitive.

INTRODUCTION: Since its inception, reduction mammaplasty has matured considerably. Primary evolution in clinical research and practice has focused on preserving tissue viability. Surgery involves preserving not only tissue viability but also function and sensation. The nipple serves as the sensate unit of the breast and is a valuable part of women's psychological and sexual health, making preservation of nipple sensation of utmost important. Studies regarding primary innervation to the nipple are few and often contradictory. We propose an unsafe zone in which dissection during reduction mammoplasty ought to be avoided to preserve nipple sensation. METHODS: Circumareolar dissection of 22 cadaveric breasts was performed. Primary nerve branches to the nipple-areola complex were identified and dissected to their origin. RESULTS: Three to 5 branches of the fourth intercostal nerve primarily innervated the nipple on 18 of 22 breast dissections. Two breasts received innervation from the third intercostal nerve and 2 from the fifth intercostal nerve. In half of the specimens, accessory innervation from the third and fifth intercostal nerves provided medial branches to the nipple. CONCLUSIONS: The fourth intercostal nerve provides the major innervation to the nipple-areola complex. Avoiding dissection in inferolateral quadrant "unsafe zone" of the breast during reduction mammaplasty and other breast surgical procedures can reliably spare nipple sensation and maximize patient outcomes.

Review of nipple reconstruction techniques and introduction of v to y technique in a bilateral wise pattern mastectomy or reduction mammaplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Nipple-areola complex reconstruction (NAR) is the final procedure in breast reconstruction after the majority of mastectomies. Many methods of NAR have been described, each with inherent advantages and disadvantages depending on local healthy tissue availability, previous scarring and procedures, and the operative morbidity of the NAR technique. Nipple reconstructions may be complicated by scars or previous nipple reconstruction, making the procedure more challenging. We propose the use of the V-Y advancement flap as a new method that is suitable for both novice and experienced surgeons wishing to broaden their range of techniques for difficult nipple reconstructions. METHODS: A traditional V-Y advancement flap is lifted at the site of the future nipple. Mastectomy scars from prior mastectomy, mammoplasty, or nipple reconstruction can be incorporated into the flap. The flap is folded caudally upon itself and the secondary defect at the apex of the flap is linearly closed. RESULTS: At 6-month postoperative evaluation, adequate nipple projection and patient satisfaction were achieved with this method. CONCLUSION: The V-Y advancement flap is a suitable method for achieving satisfactory results when faced with challenging NAR. The method is easy to perform, reproducible, has low operative morbidity, and incorporates previous wise pattern mastectomy or mammaplasty scars into the newly reconstructed nipple, thereby decreasing new scar formation on the breast and leading to favorable cosmetic results.