Myoepithelial Carcinoma of Soft Tissue: Report of Two Cases.

CASE: A 40-year-old man was evaluated for a painful mass on his right calf, and a 36-year-old woman presented with a painless mass on her right foot. Final pathology revealed marked nuclear atypia and positivity for S100/SOX10 and AE1/AE3 confirming diagnoses of myoepithelial carcinoma. Both patients underwent surgical resection and are without evidence of local recurrence or metastatic disease at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Soft-tissue tumors presenting in the extremities warrant careful evaluation and timely histopathologic diagnosis. Myoepithelial carcinomas are rare, aggressive tumors with a propensity for local recurrence and metastasis. Treatment of these tumors should be discussed by a multidisciplinary tumor team.

Measuring Value in Elective Spine Surgery.

Objective: To summarize the main findings from research on measuring the value in spine surgery. Summary of Background Data: Determining the value of surgical interventions, which is defined by the quality and efficacy of care received divided by the cost to deliver healthcare, is inherently complex. The two most fundamental components of value-quality and total cost-are multifactorial and difficult to quantify. Methods: A narrative review of all the relevant papers known to the author was conducted. Results: It is straightforward to calculate the aggregate hospital cost following a surgical procedure, but it is not simple to estimate the total cost of a procedure-including the direct and indirect costs. These individual metrics can help providers make more educated decisions with regards to improving patient quality of life and minimizing unnecessary costs. A consensus of the appropriate cost-per-quality-adjusted life-year threshold of different spine surgeries needs to be established. As these metrics become more commonplace in spine surgery, the potential for personalized health care will continue to be developed. Conclusions: As the healthcare system shifts toward value-based care, there is a substantial need for research assessing the value as defined by the quality and efficacy of care received divided by the cost to deliver healthcare of specific spine surgery procedures. Studies on different predictors-both patient-specific and surgical-that may influence outcomes, cost, and value are required.

High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma of the Sciatic Nerve That Mimicked a Schwannoma: A Case Report.

CASE: A 41-year-old woman with a history of high-grade B-cell lymphoma status-post chemotherapy was evaluated for a painful left posterior thigh mass and significant weakness with sensory changes. Imaging revealed a benign-appearing mass consistent with schwannoma; however, intraoperative frozen section suggested high-grade B-cell lymphoma. Subsequent restaging studies revealed metastatic disease. CONCLUSION: A history of lymphoma warrants careful investigation of a posterior thigh mass, despite imaging findings consistent with nerve sheath tumor. Surgical removal of lymphomas of the nerve often proves futile, so these lesions are usually managed with medical treatment or radiation.

Behavioral Economics and Ambulatory Antibiotic Stewardship: A Narrative Review.

PURPOSE: Behavioral economics recognizes that contextual, psychological, social, and emotional factors powerfully influence decision-making. Behavioral economics has the potential to provide a better understanding of, and, through subtle environmental changes, or "nudges," improve persistent quality-of-care challenges, like ambulatory antibiotic overprescribing. Despite decades of admonitions and educational initiatives, in the United States, up to 50% of ambulatory antibiotic prescriptions remain inappropriate or not associated with a diagnosis. METHODS: We conducted a Medline search and performed a narrative review that examined the use of behavioral economics to understand the rationale for, and improvement of, ambulatory antibiotic prescribing. FINDINGS: Clinicians prescribe antibiotics inappropriately because of perceived patient demand, to maintain patient satisfaction, diagnostic uncertainty, or time pressure, among other reasons. Behavioral economics-informed approaches offer additional improvements in antibiotic prescribing beyond clinician education and communication training. Precommitment, in which clinicians publicize their intent to prescribe antibiotics "only when they are absolutely necessary," leverages clinicians' self-conception and a desire to act in a manner consistent with public statements. Precommitment was associated with a 20% absolute reduction in the inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections. Justification alerts, in which clinicians must provide a brief written rationale for prescribing antibiotics, leverages social accountability, redefines the status quo as an active choice, and helps clinicians to shift from fast to slow, careful thinking. With justification alerts, the absolute rate of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing decreased from 23% to 5%. Peer comparison, in which clinicians receive feedback comparing their performance to their top-performing peers, provides evidence of improved performance and leverages peoples' desire to conform to social norms. Peer comparison decreased absolute inappropriate antibiotic prescribing rates from 20% to 4%, a decrease that persisted for 12 months after the end of the intervention. Also, a one-time peer-comparison letter from a high-profile messenger to primary care practices with high rates of prescribing antibiotics, there was a 6-month, 3% decrease inantibiotic prescribing. Future directions in applying behavioral economics to the inappropriate antibiotic prescribing include paying careful attention to design details; improving intervention effectiveness and durability; making harms salient; participants' involvement in the development of interventions (the "Ikea effect"); factoring in patient satisfaction; and patient-facing nudges about antibiotic use and care-seeking. In addition, the COVID pandemic could aid in ambulatory antibiotic prescribing improvements due to changing cognitive frames around respiratory symptom evaluation and antibiotic prescribing. IMPLICATIONS: To improve ambulatory antibiotic prescribing, several behavioral economics-informed approaches-especially precommitment, justification alerts, and peer comparison-have reduced the rates of inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics to low levels.