An overview of the safety and efficacy of LX-9211 in treating neuropathic pain conditions.

INTRODUCTION: LX-9211 is a drug designed to treat neuropathic pain conditions. It functions by inhibiting the adaptor-associated kinase 1 (AAK1) enzyme which promotes clathrin-dependent endocytosis. Preclinical studies have shown that LX-9211 does produce a reduction in nociceptive related behaviors and produces no major adverse effects in rats. Thus, LX-9211 has advanced to clinical trials to assess its safety and efficacy in humans. So far, phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials involving patients with postherpetic neuralgia and diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain have been conducted with phase 3 trials planned in the future. AREAS COVERED: This paper highlights preclinical studies involving LX-9211 in rodents. Additionally, phase 1 clinical trials examining the safety of LX-9211 in healthy subjects as well as phase 2 studies looking at the safety and efficacy of LX-9211 compared to placebo in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain and postherpetic neuralgia are also discussed. EXPERT OPINION: In phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials conducted so far, LX-9211 has been shown to produce few adverse effects as well as cause a significantly greater reduction in pain compared to placebo. However, more clinical studies are needed to further assess its effects in humans to ensure its safety.

IPACK Block Efficacy for Acute Pain Management after Total Knee Replacement: A Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients often experience a significant degree of knee pain following total knee replacement (TKR). To alleviate this pain, nerve blocks may be performed such as the adductor canal block (ACB). However, ACBs are unable to relieve pain originating from the posterior region of the knee. A new type of nerve block known as the IPACK block may be used in conjunction with ACBs as it is designed to inhibit nerve branches innervating this area. In this article, we examine the rationale behind the IPACK procedure, how it is performed, and clinical trials examining its efficacy. RECENT FINDINGS: 5 of the 7 clinical trials examined in this article showed the IPACK + ACB block to show superior efficacy in treating pain following TKR compared to other blocks. These blocks included PMDI+ACB, SPANK+ACB, PAI+ACB, ACB alone, and SCAB. 2 of the 7 clinical trials showed the IPACK + ACB to be less effective in managing patients pain following TKR compared to other blocks which included the CACB and 4 in 1 block. In most instances, the IPACK + ACB showed superior efficacy in managing patients' pain following TKR when compared to other types of nerve blocks. This was determined by measuring usage of opioids, reported postoperative pain, and length of hospital stays following TKR. Thus, we suppose the IPACK block may be used in conjunction with the ACB to effectively reduce patient's pain following TKR.