COVID-19 Disease in Children With ALL Receiving Maintenance Therapy: Do Not Discount the Risk.

PURPOSE: Unlike most childhood cancers, therapy for ALL includes a prolonged maintenance phase during which children typically resume regular activities. Physicians need data regarding the persistent impact of COVID-19 in this population to help guide families after the pandemic. METHODS: The Pediatric Oncology COVID-19 Case Report (POCC) collects deidentified data (sociodemographics, clinical data [cancer, COVID-19 course]) on children, adolescents, and young adults with cancer and COVID-19 from 104 US pediatric oncology institutions. The analysis presented here compares children (≤21 years) with ALL in maintenance (ALL-MTN) with all other children with cancer and COVID-19. Multivariable analyses adjust for age, race/ethnicity, insurance, absolute neutrophil count at the time of infection, vaccination, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Compared with other children reported to POCC (n = 1,190), those in ALL-MTN (n = 481) were less often hospitalized (23% v 29%, P = .01) or admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU: 3% v 5%, P = .01); these findings persisted in multivariable analysis (hospitalization: odds ratio [OR], 0.7 [95% CI, 0.6 to 0.9]; ICU: OR, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.2 to 0.8]). However, cancer-directed therapy was changed more often for children in ALL-MTN (50% v 33%, P ≤ .01; OR, 2.0 [95% CI, 1.6 to 2.5[). Vaccination was an independent prognostic factor in our multivariable model, decreasing odds of hospitalization (OR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9]). CONCLUSION: Children in ALL-MTN required fewer hospitalizations and ICU admissions but more therapy modifications than other children with cancer. Vaccination against COVID-19 reduced the odds of hospitalization.

Organizational and patient factors associated with positive primary care experiences for veterans with current or recent homelessness.

OBJECTIVE: To identify organizational service features associated with positive patient ratings of primary care within primary care clinics tailored to accommodate persons with ongoing and recent experiences of homelessness (PEH). DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: PEH receiving primary care in 29 United States Veterans Health Administration homeless-tailored clinics were surveyed about their primary care experience using the validated Primary Care Quality-Homeless (PCQ-H) survey. Characteristics of the clinics were assessed through surveys of clinic staff using a new organizational survey developed through literature review, site visits, statistical analysis, and consensus deliberation. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional examination of patients' ratings of care based on surveys of patients, and of clinic characteristics, analyzed with Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis, a form of machine learning. DATA COLLECTION METHODS: Patient surveys (n = 3394) were obtained from a random sample of enrolled patients by both mail and telephone by an external survey contractor. Staff (n = 52 from 29 clinics) were interviewed by telephone. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: This analysis identified service features that impact patient experience favorably, including aspects of patient-centeredness, team identity, strong external leadership support, and service that reach beyond traditional primary care clinic confines. Results varied according to the patient experience scale analyzed. Individual characteristics of PEH, such as degree of social support, general health, and unsheltered status, were also correlated with how they rate care. CONCLUSIONS: Organizational characteristics correlate with ratings of primary care from patients with recent and ongoing homelessness. Primary care programs serving homeless individuals can assure better care based on who they hire, how they foster team identity, what services they provide, and the strength of leadership support to protect a homeless-focused mission.

The methods and baseline characteristics of a multi-site randomized controlled trial evaluating mindfulness-based relapse prevention in conjunction with peer support to improve adherence to medications for opioid use disorders.

Introduction: Medications for opioid use disorders (MOUD) remain the gold standard for treating OUD, but treatment initiation and adherence remain challenging. Exclusive utilization of pharmacotherapy as a treatment modality for OUD is sub-optimal, and a combination of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies is recommended. General trends indicate the benefits of peer mentoring and MBRP separately. Therefore, we hypothesize that the combined effect of MBRP and Peer mentoring will produce synergistic improvements in MOUD adherence compared to an enhanced twelve-step facilitation (TSF). Methods: This paper describes the methods and baseline characteristics of a multi-site randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a combination of MBRP and peer support (MiMP) compared to an enhanced TSF in improving adherence to MOUD. Both MiMP and TSF are 12-week manualized protocols that utilize licensed therapists. The interventions are delivered in weekly group sessions that last about 75-90 minutes per session. The primary outcome is MOUD adherence. Secondary and exploratory outcomes include relapse, cravings, depression, anxiety, stress, quality of life, and pain catastrophizing. Results: The participants' ages ranged from 21 years to 77 years, with a mean age of 44.5 (SD ± 11.5 years). There was an almost equal distribution of gender and place of residence. Overall, 51.9% (n=54) of participants identified as female and 48.1% (n=50) were male. Similarly, 51.9% (n=54) of participants resided in urban areas, while 48.1% (n=50) resided in rural areas. Participants identified as either black or white, with over three-quarters identifying as white (77.9%, n= 81) and 22.1% (n= 23) as black. Most participants randomized to the 12-step facilitation group were white (93.1%). Relationships and employment status were well distributed between categories. Over half of the participants reported some college or higher education. Over 90% of the participants made less than $75,000 per year. Some participants indicated that they had both public and private health insurance. Discussion and conclusion: This study is innovative in several ways including combining MBRP and peer support, addressing comorbid mental health issues among individuals with OUD, utilizing manualized protocols, and evaluating of both physiological and self-reported measures in assessing cortisol reactivity as a predictor of relapse and treatment outcomes.

Which individual components of a colorectal surgery enhanced recovery program are associated with improved surgical outcomes?

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery programs improve surgical outcomes. However, the association of adherence to individual components and outcomes in a comprehensive enhanced recovery program remains unclear. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all elective colorectal surgery patients at our institution from 2019 to 2022 (n = 1,175). Data were acquired from our institution's enhanced recovery program dashboard and American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Traditional analyses and machine-learning classification trees were used to identify enhanced recovery program components associated with length of stay, readmissions, and complication rates. RESULTS: The average length of stay was 5.0 days, readmission rate was 12.3%, and complication rate was 32.6%. On linear regression analysis, adherence to preoperative education, regional analgesia, pre- and postoperative multimodal analgesia, no nasogastric tube, early mobilization, early regular diet, early discontinuation of maintenance intravenous fluids, postoperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, and early Foley catheter removal were associated with an decrease in length of stay by 0.7-7.1 days (P < .05). Patients who adhered to no prolonged fasting had a 4.1% decrease in readmission rate (P = .04). Patients who adhered to no nasogastric tube, early mobilization, early regular diet, postoperative multimodal analgesia, and discontinuation of maintenance intravenous fluids had decreases in complication rates ranging from 7.0 to 28.2% (P < .001). Machine learning demonstrated that no nasogastric tube and discontinuation of maintenance intravenous fluids were significant predictors of shorter length of stay and no nasogastric tube and early mobilization were significant predictors of reduced complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Although multiple components were associated outcomes, no nasogastric tube, early mobilization, early regular diet, postoperative multimodal analgesia, and early discontinuation of maintenance intravenous fluids were associated with more than 1 outcome. Focusing on these components may make enhanced recovery program implementation more feasible for resource-limited hospitals.

Predictors of recurrent stroke and subsequent mortality among patients experiencing housing instability.

BACKGROUND: The experience of homelessness has been linked with developing poor health outcomes. Little is known about the risk of recurrent stroke among these individuals. This study investigated the correlates of developing recurrent stroke and subsequent mortality among Veterans with housing instability. METHODS: Using a national sample of Veterans from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs who had an indicator of housing instability between 2014-2018 (n=659,987), we identified 15,566 Veterans who experienced incident stroke. We compared characteristics of Veterans who experienced incident stroke and did and did not experience recurrent stroke and conducted logistic regressions using a discrete-time survival framework to assess two outcomes: recurrent stroke and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Among our cohort, 91.3% did not experience recurrent stroke while 8.7% did during the observation period. The receipt of any level of primary care outpatient visits was associated with a reduction in the odds of recurrent stroke. Several medical diagnoses were also associated with increased odds of recurrent stroke, including hypertension (aOR 1.35, 95% CI 1.15-1.59), diabetes (aOR 1.21, 95% CI 1.07-1.36), and renal disease (aOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.02, 1.35). Veterans who used any level of VA Homeless Programs had reduced odds of all-cause mortality (high level: aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.60-0.71; low level: aOR 0.66, 95% CI 0.60-0.73). CONCLUSION: Our study found several predictors of developing recurrent stroke and subsequent death in a population of Veterans experiencing housing instability. Implications include the need to monitor closely high-risk patients who have experienced incident stroke and have other co-occurring needs.

High risk populations for unplanned healthcare utilization following ostomy construction.

BACKGROUND: Patients with a new ostomy have high rates of unplanned healthcare utilization (UPHU). We used machine learning to assess which factors contributed the most to UPHU after ostomy construction. METHODS: We retrospectively studied new ostomy patients between 2018 and 2021 â€‹at a single institution. The primary outcome was UPHU within 60 days of discharge. Factors that contributed the most to UPHU were assessed using a classification tree machine learning method. RESULTS: Among 318 patients, 30.8 â€‹% of patients had an UPHU event. The classification tree identified diabetes mellitus as the most important factor associated with UPHU: 56 â€‹% of diabetics had UPHU. Smoking history was the next most important factor: 77 â€‹% of diabetics who smoked had UPHU. Patients who had diabetes, smoked, and had chronic kidney disease had the highest UPHU rate at 86 â€‹%. DISCUSSION: Unplanned healthcare utilization after ostomy construction is highest among patients with diabetes, smoking history, and chronic kidney disease.

Predictors of Incident Stroke and Subsequent Mortality Among a Sample of Veterans with Experience of Housing Instability.

Homelessness is associated with poor health outcomes and early development of cardiovascular disease. This study investigated the correlates of incident stroke and its association with mortality among Veterans experiencing housing instability. Using a national sample of Veterans (n=565,608) with incident housing instability between 2014-2018, we compared characteristics of Veterans who did and did not experience incident stroke and conducted logistic regressions to assess two outcomes: incident stroke and mortality. Almost four percent experienced a first stroke and were more frequently male, older than 55 years, Black, and non-Hispanic. A higher rate of mortality was observed among those with a first stroke compared with those with no stroke (17.6% vs. 10.8%), although the difference was not statistically significant. Incident stroke was associated with triple the odds of death among unstably-housed Veterans compared with those who did not have an incident stroke. Implications include the need to screen and monitor for stroke risk among Veterans with experience of housing instability, particularly for those who are older.

Preoperative Education is Associated with Adherence to Downstream Components and Outcomes in a Colorectal Surgery Enhanced Recovery Program.

Objective: This study evaluated the association between preoperative education and adherence to downstream components of enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) and surgical outcomes among patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Background: ERPs improve outcomes for surgical patients. While preoperative education is an essential component of ERPs, its relationship with other components is unclear. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all ERP patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery from 2019 to 2022. Our institutional ERP database was linked with American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data and stratified by adherence to preoperative education. Primary outcomes included adherence to individual ERP components and secondary outcomes included high-level ERP adherence (>70% of components), length of stay (LOS), readmissions, and 30-day complications. Results: A total of 997 patients were included. The mean (SD) age was 56.5 (15.8) years, 686 (57.3%) were female, and 717 (71.9%) were white. On adjusted analysis, patients who received preoperative education (n = 877, 88%) had higher adherence rates for the following ERP components: no prolonged fasting (estimate = +19.6%; P < 0.001), preoperative blocks (+8.0%; P = 0.02), preoperative multimodal analgesia (+18.0%; P < 0.001), early regular diet (+15.9%; P < 0.001), and postoperative multimodal analgesia (+6.4%; P < 0.001). High-level ERP adherence was 13.4% higher (P < 0.01) and LOS was 2.0 days shorter (P < 0.001) for those who received preoperative education. Classification and regression tree analysis identified preoperative education as the first-level predictor for adherence to early regular diet, the second-level predictor for LOS, and the third-level predictor for ERP high-level adherence. Conclusion: Preoperative education is associated with adherence to ERP components and improved surgical outcomes.

Adolescents and young adults with cancer: the clinical course of COVID-19 infections.

Adolescents and young adults (ie, individuals aged 15-39 years, known as AYAs) with cancer face unique vulnerabilities yet remain underrepresented in clinical trials, including adult registries of COVID-19 in cancer (AYAs: 8%-12%). We used the Pediatric Oncology COVID-19 Case Report to examine the clinical course of COVID-19 among AYAs with cancer. The Pediatric Oncology COVID-19 Case Report collects deidentified clinical and sociodemographic data regarding individuals aged from birth to 39 years with cancer (37%) and COVID-19 from more than 100 institutions. Between April 1, 2020, and November 28, 2023, 191 older AYAs (individuals 22-39 years of age) and 640 younger AYAs (individuals 15-21 years of age) were captured. Older AYAs were less often hospitalized (P < .001), admitted to the intensive care unit (P = .02), and required respiratory support (P = .057). In multivariable analyses, older AYAs faced 80% lower odds of intensive care unit admission but 2.3-times greater odds of changes to cancer-directed therapy. Unvaccinated patients had 5.4-times higher odds of intensive care unit admission. Among AYAs with cancer, the COVID-19 course varies by age. These findings can inform oncology teams directing COVID-19 management and prevention in AYA patients with cancer.

Pre-frailty after blood or marrow transplantation and the risk of subsequent mortality.

We examined the prevalence, risk factors, and association between pre-frailty and subsequent mortality after blood or marrow transplantation (BMT). Study participants were drawn from the BMT Survivor Study (BMTSS) and included 3346 individuals who underwent BMT between 1974 and 2014 at one of three transplant centers and survived ≥2 years post-BMT. Participants completed the BMTSS survey at a median of 9 years from BMT and were followed for subsequent mortality for a median of 5 years after survey completion. Closest-age and same-sex biological siblings also completed the survey. Previously published self-reported indices (exhaustion, weakness, low energy expenditure, slowness, unintentional weight loss) classified participants as non-frail (0-1 indices) or pre-frail (2 indices). National Death Index was used to determine vital status and cause of death. Overall, 626 (18.7%) BMT survivors were pre-frail. BMT survivors had a 3.2-fold higher odds of being pre-frail (95% CI = 1.9-5.3) compared to siblings. Compared to non-frail survivors, pre-frail survivors had higher hazards of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.4-2.0). Female sex, pre-BMT radiation, smoking, lack of exercise, anxiety, and severe/life-threatening chronic health conditions were associated with pre-frailty. The novel association between pre-frailty and subsequent mortality provides evidence for interventions as pre-frail individuals may transition back to their robust state.

Association of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Race on Readmissions After Stroke.

BACKGROUND: There is limited research on outcomes of patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) who also develop stroke, particularly regarding racial disparities. Our goal was to determine whether PTSD is associated with the risk of hospital readmission after stroke and whether racial disparities existed. METHODS: The analytical sample consisted of all veterans receiving care in the Veterans Health Administration who were identified as having a new stroke requiring inpatient admission based on the International Classification of Diseases codes. PTSD and comorbidities were identified using the International Classification of Diseases codes and given the date of first occurrence. The retrospective cohort data were obtained from the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse. The main outcome was any readmission to Veterans Health Administration with a stroke diagnosis. The hypothesis that PTSD is associated with readmission after stroke was tested using Cox regression adjusted for patient characteristics including age, sex, race, PTSD, smoking status, alcohol use, and comorbidities treated as time-varying covariates. RESULTS: Our final cohort consisted of 93 651 patients with inpatient stroke diagnosis and no prior Veterans Health Administration codes for stroke starting from 1999 with follow-up through August 6, 2022. Of these patients, 12 916 (13.8%) had comorbid PTSD. Of the final cohort, 16 896 patients (18.0%) with stroke were readmitted. Our fully adjusted model for readmission found an interaction between African American veterans and PTSD with a hazard ratio of 1.09 ([95% CI, 1.00-1.20] P=0.047). In stratified models, PTSD has a significant hazard ratio of 1.10 ([95% CI, 1.02-1.18] P=0.01) for African American but not White veterans (1.05 [95% CI, 0.99-1.11]; P=0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Among African American veterans who experienced stroke, preexisting PTSD was associated with increased risk of readmission, which was not significant among White veterans. This study highlights the need to focus on high-risk groups to reduce readmissions after stroke.

Practice Facilitation and Peer Coaching for Uncontrolled Hypertension Among Black Individuals: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Rural Black participants need effective intervention to achieve better blood pressure (BP) control. Objective: Among Black rural adults with persistently uncontrolled hypertension attending primary care clinics, to determine whether peer coaching (PC), practice facilitation (PF), or both (PCPF) are superior to enhanced usual care (EUC) in improving BP control. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted in 69 rural primary care practices across Alabama and North Carolina between September 23, 2016, and September 26, 2019. The participating practices were randomized to 4 groups: PC plus EUC, PF plus EUC, PCPF plus EUC, and EUC alone. The baseline EUC approach included a laptop for each participating practice with hyperlinks to participant education on hypertension, a binder of practice tips, a poster showing an algorithm for stepped care to improve BP, and 25 home BP monitors. The trial was stopped on February 28, 2021, after final data collection. The study included Black participants with persistently uncontrolled hypertension. Data were analyzed from February 28, 2021, to December 13, 2022. Interventions: Practice facilitators helped practices implement at least 4 quality improvement projects designed to improve BP control throughout 1 year. Peer coaches delivered a structured program via telephone on hypertension self-management throughout 1 year. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of participants in each trial group with BP values of less than 140/90 mm Hg at 6 months and 12 months. The secondary outcome was a change in the systolic BP of participants at 6 months and 12 months. Results: A total of 69 practices were randomized, and 1209 participants' data were included in the analysis. The mean (SD) age of participants was 58 (12) years, and 748 (62%) were women. In the intention-to-treat analyses, neither intervention alone nor in combination improved BP control or BP levels more than EUC (at 12 months, PF vs EUC odds ratio [OR], 0.94 [95% CI, 0.58-1.52]; PC vs EUC OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 0.83-2.04]; PCPF vs EUC OR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.64-1.64]). In preplanned subgroup analyses, participants younger than 60 years in the PC and PCPF groups experienced a significant 5 mm Hg greater reduction in systolic BP than participants younger than 60 years in the EUC group at 12 months. Practicewide BP control estimates in PF groups suggested that BP control improved from 54% to 61%, a finding that was not observed in the trial's participants. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cluster randomized clinical trial demonstrated that neither PC nor PF demonstrated a superior improvement in overall BP control compared with EUC. However, PC led to a significant reduction in systolic BP among younger adults. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02866669.

Time Kills: Impact of Socioeconomic Deprivation on Timely Access to Guideline-Concordant Treatment in Foregut Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Receipt of guideline-concordant treatment (GCT) is associated with improved prognosis in foregut cancers. Studies show that patients living in areas of high neighborhood deprivation have worse healthcare outcomes; however, its effect on GCT in foregut cancers has not been evaluated. We studied the impact of the area deprivation index (ADI) as a barrier to GCT. STUDY DESIGN: A single-institution retrospective review of 498 foregut cancer patients (gastric, pancreatic, and hepatobiliary adenocarcinoma) from 2018 to 2022 was performed. GCT was defined based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. ADI, a validated measure of neighborhood disadvantage was divided into terciles (low, medium, and high) with high ADI indicating the most disadvantage. RESULTS: Of 498 patients, 328 (66%) received GCT: 66%, 72%, and 59% in pancreatic, gastric, and hepatobiliary cancers, respectively. Median (interquartile range) time from symptoms to workup was 6 (3 to 13) weeks, from diagnosis to oncology appointment was 4 (1 to 10) weeks, and from oncology appointment to treatment was 4 (2 to 10) weeks. Forty-six percent were diagnosed in the emergency department. On multivariable analyses, age 75 years or older (odds ratio [OR] 0.39 [95% CI 0.18 to 0.87]), Black race (OR 0.52 [95% CI 0.31 to 0.86]), high ADI (OR 0.25 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.48]), 6 weeks or more from symptoms to workup (OR 0.44 [95% CI 0.27 to 0.73]), 4 weeks or more from diagnosis to oncology appointment (OR 0.76 [95% CI 0.46 to 0.93]), and 4 weeks or more from oncology appointment to treatment (OR 0.63 [95% CI 0.36 to 0.98]) were independently associated with nonreceipt of GCT. CONCLUSIONS: Residence in an area of high deprivation predicts nonreceipt of GCT. This is due to multiple individual- and system-level barriers. Identifying these barriers and developing effective interventions, including community outreach and collaboration, leveraging telehealth, and increasing oncologic expertise in underserved areas, may improve access to GCT.