Evaluation of the Renal Angina Index to Predict the Development of Acute Kidney Injury in Children With Sepsis Who Live in Middle-Income Countries.

OBJECTIVE: The renal angina index (RAI) provides a clinically feasible and applicable tool to identify critically ill children at risk of severe acute kidney injury (AKI) in high-income countries. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of the RAI as a predictor of the development of AKI in children with sepsis in a middle-income country and its association with unfavorable outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study in children with sepsis hospitalized in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) between January 2016 and January 2020. The RAI was calculated 12 hours after admission to predict the development of AKI and at 72 hours to explore its association with mortality, the need for renal support therapy, and PICU stay. RESULTS: We included 209 PICU patients with sepsis with a median age of 23 months (interquartile range, 7-60). We found that 41.1% of the cases (86/209) developed de novo AKI on the third day of admission (KDIGO 1, 24.9%; KDIGO 2, 12.9%; and KDIGO 3, 3.3%).Overall mortality was 8.1% (17/209), higher in patients with AKI (7.7% vs 0.5%, P < 0.01). The RAI on admission was able to predict the presence of AKI on day 3 (area under the curve (AUC), 0.87; sensitivity, 94.2%; specificity, 100%; P < 0.01), with a negative predictive value greater than 95%. An RAI greater than 8 at 72 hours was associated with a greater risk of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-3.2; P < 0.01), a need for renal support therapy (aOR, 2.9; 95% CI, 2.3-3.6; P < 0.01), and a PICU stay of more than 10 days (aOR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The RAI on the day of admission is a reliable and accurate tool for predicting the risk of developing AKI on day 3, in critically ill children with sepsis in a limited resource context. A score greater than eight 72 hours after admission is associated with a higher risk of death, the need for renal support therapy, and PICU stay.

Regional citrate anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in children.

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation of the continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) circuit is an important technical aspect of this medical procedure. Most studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of citrate use have been carried out in adults, and little evidence is available for the pediatric patient population. The aim of this study was to compare regional citrate anticoagulation versus systemic heparin anticoagulation in terms of the lifetime of hemofilters in a pediatric population receiving CRRT at a pediatric center in Bogota, Colombia. METHODS: This was an analytical, observational, retrospective cohort study in which we assessed the survival of 150 hemofilters (citrate group 80 hemofilters, heparin group 70 hemofilters) used in a total of 3442 hours of CCRT (citrate group 2248 h, heparin group 1194 h). Hemofilter survival was estimated beginning at placement and continuing until filter replacement due to clotting or high trans-membrane pressures. RESULTS: Hemofilter survival was higher in the citrate group than in the heparin group (72 vs. 18 h; p <0.0001). Bivariate analysis showed that the hemofilter coagulation risk was significantly increased when heparin was used, regardless of hemofilter size and pump flow (hazard ratio 3.70, standard error 0.82, 95% confidence interval 2.39-5.72; p <0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Regional citrate anticoagulation could be more effective than heparin systemic anticoagulation in terms of prolonging the hemofilter lifetime in patients with acute renal injury who require CRRT.