Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 28(7): 1145-1150, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38657729

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic cholelithiasis is a common surgical problem, with many patients requiring multiple gallstone-related emergency department (ED) visits before cholecystectomy. The Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) identifies vulnerable patient populations. This study aimed to assess the association between social vulnerability and outpatient management of symptomatic cholelithiasis. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis-related ED visits were identified within our health system from 2016 to 2022. Clinical outcomes data were merged with SVI census track data, which consist of 4 SVI subthemes (socioeconomic status, household characteristics, racial and ethnic minority status, and housing type and transportation). Multivariate analysis was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 47,292 patients presented to the ED with symptomatic cholelithiasis, of which 6103 patients (13.3 %) resided in vulnerable census tract regions. Of these patients, 13,795 (29.2 %) underwent immediate cholecystectomy with a mean time to surgery of 35.1 h, 8250 (17.4 %) underwent elective cholecystectomy at a mean of 40.6 days from the initial ED visit, and 2924 (6.2 %) failed outpatient management and returned 1.26 times (range, 1-11) to the ED with recurrent biliary-related pain. Multivariate analysis found social vulnerability subthemes of socioeconomic status (odds ratio [OR], 1.29; 95 % CI, 1.09-1.52) and racial and ethnic minority status (OR, 2.41; 95 % CI, 2.05-2.83) to be associated with failure of outpatient management of symptomatic cholelithiasis. CONCLUSION: Socially vulnerable patients are more likely to return to the ED with symptomatic cholelithiasis. Policies to support this vulnerable population in the outpatient setting with timely follow-up and elective cholecystectomy can help reduce delays in care and overutilization of ED resources.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia , Colelitíase , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Populações Vulneráveis , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Populações Vulneráveis/estatística & dados numéricos , Colelitíase/cirurgia , Colelitíase/complicações , Adulto , Colecistectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Classe Social , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Hypertension ; 80(9): 1845-1855, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37357771

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Apparent resistant hypertension (aRH) carries excess cardiovascular risk beyond nonresistant forms of hypertension; however, our understanding of this at-risk population, as defined by current US practice guidelines, is limited. Accordingly, we sought to evaluate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and pharmacotherapeutic patterns of patients with aRH using contemporary blood pressure guidance. METHODS: We classified patients at 3 large healthcare systems by hypertensive status using contemporary hypertension guidelines. We subsequently described the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with aRH and compared these factors among hypertensive patients without aRH and between those with controlled and uncontrolled aRH. RESULTS: A total of 2 420 468 patients were analyzed, of whom 1 343 489 (55.6%) were hypertensive according to contemporary guidelines. Among hypertensive patients, 11 992 (8.5%) met criteria for aRH, with nearly all assessed comorbid conditions, particularly diabetes and heart failure, being more common in those with aRH. When compared with patients with uncontrolled aRH, those with controlled aRH were more frequently prescribed a beta-blocker, diuretic, and nitrate, with the largest standardized difference observed for a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (35.4% versus 10.4%, Cohen D 0.62). Consistent findings were noted in sensitivity analyses using the blood pressure threshold of 140/90 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of over 2.4 million individuals, a lower prevalence of aRH was observed than previously reported (12%-15%), but with a high burden of comorbidities. Identification of differences in pharmacotherapy between patients with controlled and uncontrolled aRH, particularly lower rates of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use, help define potential opportunities to improve care and lower cardiovascular risk.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos , Hipertensão , Humanos , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Hipertensivos/farmacologia , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Pressão Sanguínea , Determinação da Pressão Arterial
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA