Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Autism Res ; 2024 Apr 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38682234

RESUMO

Subjective wellbeing (SWB) represents an individual's perception of wellness that is supported by homeostatic mechanisms. These mechanisms are proposed to be maintained by low negative affect and high positive affect, although less is known about these mechanisms and SWB in autism. The current cross-sectional study aimed to compare patterns of positive affect, negative affect (Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale), and SWB (Personal Wellbeing Index-School Children) between autistic (n = 53) and non-autistic (n = 49) individuals aged 10-22 years (Mage = 13.97, SD = 3.13). Between-group t-tests revealed that compared with same-age peers, autistic participants scored lower SWB overall (p < 0.001). In both groups average SWB scores fell into the higher range, however, autistic participants were three-times more likely to fall below this range when compared to non-autistic participants. Negative affect had a higher intercept in the autistic sample, but no difference in slopes were observed. A hierarchical multiple regression revealed that diagnosis, positive affect, and negative affect significantly predicted SWB in our sample. Between-group t-tests found no significant difference in positive affect or negative affect across age between the autistic and non-autistic samples. In autistic participants, positive affect increased across age as SWB decreased, whilst negative affect remained stable, a pattern inconsistent with homeostatic SWB. The current study is overall consistent with the homeostatic explanation for SWB within autism; however, we identified potential differences between autistic and non-autistic participants in the contribution of positive affect and negative affect to homeostatic protect mood across development.

2.
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep ; 22(11): 803-812, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36242715

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide perspectives on the importance of understanding longitudinal profiles of posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) and report results of a scoping review to identify data and knowledge gaps related to PCA survival and longitudinal clinical and biomarker outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Thirteen longitudinal studies were identified; all but two had fewer than 30 participants with PCA. Relatively few longitudinal data exist, particularly for survival. In PCA, posterior cortical dysfunction and atrophy progress at faster rates compared to non-posterior regions, potentially up to a decade after symptom onset. Unlike typical AD, PCA phenotype-defined cognitive dysfunction and atrophy remain relatively more severe compared to other regions throughout the PCA course. Select cognitive tests hold promise as PCA outcome measures and for staging. Further longitudinal investigations are critically needed to enable PCA inclusion in treatment trials and to provide appropriate care to patients and enhance our understanding of the pathophysiology of dementing diseases.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Disfunção Cognitiva , Humanos , Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Atrofia/patologia , Disfunção Cognitiva/patologia , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Córtex Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Córtex Cerebral/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA