Optimizing the kidney donor pool: transplanting donor kidneys after partial nephrectomy of masses or cysts.

Background: A limiting factor in expanding the kidney donor pool is donor kidneys with renal tumors or cysts. Partial nephrectomy (PN) to remove these lesions prior to transplantation may help optimize organ usage without recurrence of malignancy or increased risk of complications. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all recipients of a living or deceased donor graft between February 2009 and October 2022 in which a PN was performed prior to transplant due to the presence of one or more concerning growths. Donor and recipient demographics, perioperative data, donor allograft pathology, and recipient outcomes were obtained. Results: Thirty-six recipients received a graft in which a PN was performed to remove suspicious masses or cysts prior to transplant. Majority of pathologies turned out to be a simple renal cyst (65%), followed by renal cell carcinoma (15%), benign multilocular cystic renal neoplasm (7.5%), angiomyolipoma (5%), benign renal tissue (5%), and papillary adenoma (2.5%). No renal malignancy recurrences were observed during the study period (median follow-up: 67.2 months). Fourteen complications occurred among 11 patients (30.6% overall) during the first 6mo post-transplant. Mean eGFR (± standard error) at 36 months post-transplant was 51.9 ± 4.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 (N = 23). Three death-censored graft losses and four deaths with a functioning graft and were observed. Conclusion: PN of renal grafts with suspicious looking masses or cysts is a safe option to optimize organ usage and decrease the kidney non-use rate, with no observed recurrence of malignancy or increased risk of complications.

Retroperitoneal kidney transplantation with liver and native kidney mobilization: a safe technique for pediatric recipients.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric kidney transplant (KT) using larger, deceased or living donor adult kidneys can be challenging in the pediatric population due to limited space in the retroperitoneum. Liver and native kidney (L/NK) mobilization techniques can be used in smaller and younger transplant recipients to aid in retroperitoneal placement of the renal allograft. Here, we compare the clinical outcomes of pediatric retroperitoneal KT with and without L/NK mobilization. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed pediatric renal transplant recipients treated between January 2015 and May 2021. Donor and recipient demographics, intraoperative data, and recipient outcomes were included. Recipients were divided into two groups according to the surgical technique utilized: with L/NK mobilization (Group 1) and without L/NK mobilization (Group 2). Baseline variables were described using frequency distributions for categorical variables and means and standard errors for continuous variables. Tests of association with the likelihood of using L/NK mobilization were performed using standard χ2 tests, t tests, and the log-rank test. RESULTS: Forty-six pediatric recipients were evaluated and categorized into Group 1 (n = 26) and Group 2 (n = 20). Recipients in Group 1 were younger (6.7 ± 0.8 years vs. 15. 3 ± 0.7, P < 0.001), shorter (109.5 ± 3.7 vs. 154.2 ± 3.8 cm, P < 0.001) and weighed less (21.4 ± 2.0 vs. 48.6 ± 3.4 kg, P < 0.001) than those in Group 2. Other baseline characteristics did not differ between Groups 1 and 2. One urologic complication was encountered in Group 2; no vascular or surgical complications were observed in either group. Additionally, no stents or drains were used in any of the patients. There were no cases of delayed graft function or graft primary nonfunction. The median follow-up of the study was 24.6 months post-transplant. Two patients developed death-censored graft failure (both in Group 2, P = 0.22), and there was one death with a functioning graft (in Group 2, P = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneal liver/kidney mobilization is a feasible and safe technique that facilitates implantation of adult kidney allografts into pediatric transplant recipients with no increased risk of developing post-operative complications, graft loss, or mortality.

Complex Vascular Reconstruction of an En Bloc Pediatric Kidney Damaged during Organ Procurement.

En bloc pediatric kidney (EBPK) allografts are a potential solution to expand the organ donor pool; however, EBPK transplantation has been traditionally considered suboptimal due to concerns of perioperative vascular and urologic complications. Accidental organ or vasculature injury during harvest is not uncommon; however, this does not necessarily mean that the organ should be discarded. Careful vascular reconstruction can be performed using donor vascular grafts, salvaging the organ without stenosis or thrombosis of the vessels. We report an extensive vascular reconstruction of the right renal artery, aorta, and inferior vena cava of a damaged EBPK allograft using a donor pediatric aorta vascular patch with the goal of avoiding postoperative vascular complications.

Creating a Single Inflow Orifice From Living Donor Kidney Allografts With Multiple Renal Arteries.

Background: Multiple renal arteries (MRA) are often encountered during living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT), requiring surgeons to pursue complex renovascular reconstructions prior to graft implantation. With improvements in reconstruction and anastomosis techniques, allografts with MRA can be successfully transplanted with similar outcomes to allografts with a single renal artery. Here, we describe in detail various surgical techniques for reconstruction of MRA grafts with the intent of creating a single arterial inflow. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all LDKT recipients with laparoscopically procured MRA kidneys between March 2008 and July 2021. Recipient and donor characteristics, operative data, type of reconstruction, and recipient outcomes were analyzed. The primary outcomes were the incidence of developing delayed graft function (DGF) and/or a vascular or urological complication within 12 months post-transplant. Results: Seventy-three LDKT recipients of MRA donor allografts were evaluated. Two renal arteries (RA) were encountered in 62 allografts (84.9%) and three RA in 11 allografts (15.1%). Renal artery reconstruction was performed in 95.8% (70/73) of patients. Eighteen different reconstruction techniques of MRA were utilized, the most common being side-to-side anastomosis in allografts with two RA (N = 44) and side-to-side-to-side anastomosis in allografts with three RA (N = 4). Interposition grafting was performed in seven cases (9.6%). A single ostium was created in 69 cases (94.5%), and the median warm ischemia time was 27 (range 20-42) minutes. None of the patients developed DGF or post-operative vascular or urological complications. Median creatinine at 3, 6, and 12 months post-transplant remained stable at 1.1 mg/dl. With a median follow-up of 30.4 months post-transplant, only one graft failure has been observed-death-censored graft survival was 98.6%. Conclusion: Complex reconstruction techniques to create a single renal artery ostium for graft implantation anastomosis in allografts with MRA show acceptable warm ischemic times, with no increased risk of post-operative vascular or urological complications.

Pediatric kidney transplants with multiple renal arteries show no increased risk of complications compared to single renal artery grafts.

Background: Kidney allografts with multiple renal arteries (MRA) are not infrequent and have been historically associated with a higher risk of developing vascular and urologic complications. Reports of kidney transplantation using MRA allografts in the pediatric population remain scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate if transplantation of allografts with MRA with a surgical intent of creating a single arterial inflow using vascular reconstruction techniques when required, and without the routine use of surgical drains or ureteral stents, is associated with an increased risk of complications when compared to single renal artery (SRA) grafts. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all pediatric renal transplant recipients performed by a single surgeon at our center between January 2015 and June 2022. Donor and recipient demographics, intraoperative data, and recipient outcomes were included. Recipients were divided into two groups based on SRA vs. MRA. Baseline variables were described using frequency distributions for categorical variables and means and standard errors for continuous variables. Comparisons of those distributions between the two groups were performed using standard chi-squared and t-tests. Time-to-event distributions were compared using the log-rank test. Results: Forty-nine pediatric transplant recipients were analyzed. Of these, 9 had donors with MRA (Group 1) and 40 had donors with SRA (Group 2). Native kidney and liver mobilization was performed in 44.4% (4/9) of Group 1 vs. 60.0% (24/40) of Group 2 cases (p = 0.39). There were no cases of delayed graft function or graft primary nonfunction. No surgical drainage or ureteral stents were used in any of the cases. One patient in Group 2 developed a distal ureter stricture. The geometric mean serum creatinine at 6- and 12-months posttransplant was 0.7 */ 1.2 and 0.9 */ 1.2 mg/dl in Group 1 and 0.7 */ 1.1 and 0.7 */ 1.1 mg/dl in Group 2. Two death-censored graft failures were observed in Group 2, with no significant difference observed between the two groups (p = 0.48). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that pediatric renal transplantation with MRA grafts, using a surgical approach to achieve a single renal artery ostium, can be safely performed while achieving similar outcomes as SRA grafts and with a low complication rate.

Perfil genotípico das mutações do HIV-1 relacionadas a terapia antirretroviral / Genotypic profile of HIV1 mutations related to antiretroviral therapy

O teste de genotipagem em pacientes infectados pelo HIV-1 é capaz de selecionar a melhor terapia antirretroviral e auxiliar nos casos de falha terapêutica. O mapeamento das mutações, assim como o perfil de resistência dos antirretrovirais é uma forma de aprimorar e conhecer melhor as utilidades desta técnica. Métodos: Foram avaliados 88 exames de genotipagem, realizados nos anos de 2007 a 2009 em pacientes infectados pelo HIV-1, de exames realizados nos estados de São Paulo, Paraná e Santa Catarina. Entre os 88 exames, 13 destes foram descartados por impossibilidade da amplificação do RNA viral. Resultados: Observamos um predomínio pelo sexo masculino (n=47, 62,7%) e uma maior prevalência do subtipo B (n=53, 70,7%), seguido do C (n=16, 21,3%). Em relação às mutações, 97,4% (n=73) dos pacientes apresentaram-nas na região da protease, sendo a mais prevalente a L63P (n= 43, 43,88%). Entre os Inibidores de Transcriptase reversa, 68 (90,7%) pacientes apresentaram mutação nessa região e dentro das suas classes, os Inibidores de Transcriptase Reversa não Análogos ao Nucleosídeo (ITRNN) apresentaram uma maior prevalência na mutação K103N (n=25, 28,41%) e, entre os Inibidores de Transcriptase Reversa Análogos ao Nucleosídeo (ITRN), encontramos uma maior prevalência no M184V (N=50, 56,82%). Em relação à resistência aos antirretrovirais, 85,4% (n=64) dos pacientes apresentaram resistência a algum Inibidor de Protease e 92% (n=69) dos pacientes apresentaram resistência a algum Inibidor de Transcriptase Reversa. Conclusão: O teste de genotipagem demonstrou-se útil para mapear e identificar as principais mutações, assim como determinar os antirretrovirais mais resistentes.

The genotyping test in patients infected with HIV-1 is able to select the best antiretroviral therapy and assist in cases of therapeutic failure. The mapping of mutations and the resistance profile of antiretroviral drugs is a way to enhance and better understand the utility of this technique. Methods: We evaluated 88 genotyping tests performed from 2007 to 2009 in patients infected with HIV1 in the states of Sao Paulo, Paraná and Santa Catarina. Thirteen of the 88 tests were discarded because of failure of amplification of viral RNA. Results: There was a predominance of males (n = 47, 62.7%) and a higher prevalence of subtype B (n = 53, 70.7%), followed by C (n = 16, 21.3%). Regarding mutations, 97.4% (n = 73) of patients showed them in the protease region, L63P being the most prevalent (n = 43, 43.88%). Among reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 68(90.7%) patients had mutations in this region, and within classes, non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) showed a higher prevalence of mutation K103N (n = 25, 28 , 41%), while among nucleoside analog reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NARTIs) we found a higher prevalence in M184V (N = 50, 56.82%). Regarding resistance to antiretrovirals, 85.4% (n = 64) of patients showed resistance to some protease inhibitor and 92% (n = 69) of patients showed resistance to some reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Conclusion: The genotyping test was shown to be useful to map and identify major mutations, as well as to determine the most effective antiretrovirals.